✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆

[Maasdamer]

I've seen half-million-dollar games.

Half a million chips maybe but not $ .
SWC is very dead at the moment.

[1713544846]

1713544846

[xGoodfella]

no, I've definitely seen half a million dollar games.

[iv4n]

I've seen half-million-dollar games.

Half a million chips maybe but not $ .
SWC is very dead at the moment.

Sad but true! In recent months I wanted to play some tournaments and in moments I wanted there wasn't any with players! There are some people on the cash tables, but nothing special, in some moments even that is dead!

And SwC still owes me two SwC flexi hats... I won two tournaments more than a year ago, I sent them my address and all that two times... and still nothing!

[Steamtyme]

Sad but true! In recent months I wanted to play some tournaments and in moments I wanted there wasn't any with players! There are some people on the cash tables, but nothing special, in some moments even that is dead!

And SwC still owes me two SwC flexi hats... I won two tournaments more than a year ago, I sent them my address and all that two times... and still nothing!

Yeah I pulled out of the site. It was fun when it was fun, but that all seemed to change last year. I welcomed the chat moderation policy, actually think they should have just done away with it completely. Would have really helped with all the begging for stakes.

While I don't know of anyone who multi accounted at the same table, there were rumours and we did see a user with 2 accountsn from our series in the end; not that they ever played the same tournament.

Yeah the hats not showing up was just salt in the wound.

[SwC Frank #1 Fan]

Can you please fix the leaderboard, https://swcpoker.club/krill-leaderboard? I believe this hasn't updated since Monday Sept 13th.  It kind of defeats the purpose of a leaderboard if you can't check it and see where you are at on it.

Also can you please get SWC Frank to make more regular appearances in the troll box.

[JoanL226]

Dear SWC,

I would really appreciate it you would restore BertBert's chat.  I find him very funny and he has the most beautiful penis I have ever seen.

Thanks,
JoanL226

[tokeweed]

Sad but true! In recent months I wanted to play some tournaments and in moments I wanted there wasn't any with players! There are some people on the cash tables, but nothing special, in some moments even that is dead!

And SwC still owes me two SwC flexi hats... I won two tournaments more than a year ago, I sent them my address and all that two times... and still nothing!

Yeah I pulled out of the site. It was fun when it was fun, but that all seemed to change last year. I welcomed the chat moderation policy, actually think they should have just done away with it completely. Would have really helped with all the begging for stakes.

While I don't know of anyone who multi accounted at the same table, there were rumours and we did see a user with 2 accountsn from our series in the end; not that they ever played the same tournament.

Yeah the hats not showing up was just salt in the wound.

There’s high chance there is multi accounting going on at SWC.  It’s just one of those things in online poker that sites have to look out for.  It happens all the time.  And think about it..  Players can make how ever much accounts they want, there’s no KYC and the site doesn’t look like it’s being run at the highest standards in the online poker industry.  I mean sorry but that’s how I see it rn.

[iv4n]

Sad but true! In recent months I wanted to play some tournaments and in moments I wanted there wasn't any with players! There are some people on the cash tables, but nothing special, in some moments even that is dead!

And SwC still owes me two SwC flexi hats... I won two tournaments more than a year ago, I sent them my address and all that two times... and still nothing!

Yeah I pulled out of the site. It was fun when it was fun, but that all seemed to change last year. I welcomed the chat moderation policy, actually think they should have just done away with it completely. Would have really helped with all the begging for stakes.

While I don't know of anyone who multi accounted at the same table, there were rumours and we did see a user with 2 accountsn from our series in the end; not that they ever played the same tournament.

Yeah the hats not showing up was just salt in the wound.

There’s high chance there is multi accounting going on at SWC.  It’s just one of those things in online poker that sites have to look out for.  It happens all the time.  And think about it..  Players can make how ever much accounts they want, there’s no KYC and the site doesn’t look like it’s being run at the highest standards in the online poker industry.  I mean sorry but that’s how I see it rn.

Just God knows what happens on SwC! I guess there are ways to fight against multi-accounting and collusion, but I didn't notice that SwC is doing anything about that! When you think about it they are not doing anything at all!

Hets are not showing up... I have two tickets for the Big game at 1 am (for me), but that game got canceled so many times, so I am not sure is it worth waiting for it at all...

Looks like they don't care much about this place!

[xGoodfella]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

[Maasdamer]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Thats why you complain about the game being rigged in the swc chat box?
Everyday claiming that you quit swc as well.

Makes sense.

[Kittygalore]

no, I've definitely seen half a million dollar games.

If you count the fiat ones, they're on the million dollar category, but they are pooled from a dozen professional poker players. I haven't heard of a million dollar game that's cryptocurrency dependent though.

[AlexTrebbert]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe the discussion was about collusion.  How on earth are you backing up this claim here with regards to game integrity/security?  Are you claiming that SWC has a security/game integrity team?  I have never once been refunded for cheating scandals on SWC and I have played a significant amount of hands on this site.  I'm not saying cheating exists on SWC. I'm just saying that sites often give refunds when players have been found to be cheating.  So either: 1) no one has ever cheated/colluded on SWC, 2) SWC has never caught anyone colluding because there is no one monitoring the games, or 3) SWC keeps completely silent with regards to all security measures. Most sites don't reveal their security measures in detail, but they do reveal enough to make players feel comfortable playing there.  SWC to my knowledge has shown the community absolutely nothing with regards to their game integrity team.

There is absolutely no way SWC's game integrity team is anywhere near as advanced as some of the industry leaders like Poker Stars or America's Cardroom. So your claim that SWC has "some of the highest standards in the industry" is probably completely false.

[zanezane]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Well, it's for the sake of their website and company too that they're achieving the highest standard if possible because they know that they're going to make more money if their standards high and their clients and users happy.

[Victorycoin]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Well, it's for the sake of their website and company too that they're achieving the highest standard if possible because they know that they're going to make more money if their standards high and their clients and users happy.

One thing we all agree on before saying anything about casinos is that no one can deny that the quality and safety of casinos is paramount in online gaming your personal information and money should always be protected. Major gaming operators through their own platform players can also adjust their budget for a certain period of time.

[iv4n]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Well, it's for the sake of their website and company too that they're achieving the highest standard if possible because they know that they're going to make more money if their standards high and their clients and users happy.

Zenezane looks like you paid attention to some of the posts above! Like this one, for example:

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe the discussion was about collusion.  How on earth are you backing up this claim here with regards to game integrity/security?  Are you claiming that SWC has a security/game integrity team?  I have never once been refunded for cheating scandals on SWC and I have played a significant amount of hands on this site.  I'm not saying cheating exists on SWC. I'm just saying that sites often give refunds when players have been found to be cheating.  So either: 1) no one has ever cheated/colluded on SWC, 2) SWC has never caught anyone colluding because there is no one monitoring the games, or 3) SWC keeps completely silent with regards to all security measures. Most sites don't reveal their security measures in detail, but they do reveal enough to make players feel comfortable playing there.  SWC to my knowledge has shown the community absolutely nothing with regards to their game integrity team.

There is absolutely no way SWC's game integrity team is anywhere near as advanced as some of the industry leaders like Poker Stars or America's Cardroom. So your claim that SWC has "some of the highest standards in the industry" is probably completely false.

Nice comment Alex, discussion about collusion is not new, and those who follow this thread could see some very suspicious situations happening on the tables! And SwC didn't do anything about that...

PS: Still waiting for my hats! I guess this is a funny part, I won two of them, and both times I gave them my info... after that once again when they said they lost it. I don't think they will send them, but it's interesting for me to poke them here and there about that!

[AlexTrebbert]

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe the discussion was about collusion.  How on earth are you backing up this claim here with regards to game integrity/security?  Are you claiming that SWC has a security/game integrity team?  I have never once been refunded for cheating scandals on SWC and I have played a significant amount of hands on this site.  I'm not saying cheating exists on SWC. I'm just saying that sites often give refunds when players have been found to be cheating.  So either: 1) no one has ever cheated/colluded on SWC, 2) SWC has never caught anyone colluding because there is no one monitoring the games, or 3) SWC keeps completely silent with regards to all security measures. Most sites don't reveal their security measures in detail, but they do reveal enough to make players feel comfortable playing there.  SWC to my knowledge has shown the community absolutely nothing with regards to their game integrity team.

There is absolutely no way SWC's game integrity team is anywhere near as advanced as some of the industry leaders like Poker Stars or America's Cardroom. So your claim that SWC has "some of the highest standards in the industry" is probably completely false.

Nice comment Alex, discussion about collusion is not new, and those who follow this thread could see some very suspicious situations happening on the tables! And SwC didn't do anything about that...

PS: Still waiting for my hats! I guess this is a funny part, I won two of them, and both times I gave them my info... after that once again when they said they lost it. I don't think they will send them, but it's interesting for me to poke them here and there about that!

I was just trying to be objective. You can not say that collusion is happening on SWC.  You just don't have enough data to confirm this.  Only SWC can.  SWC can see the hole cards and can analyze all the hand histories of suspect players.  Players don't even get hard copies of the hand histories to save locally.  SWC has done very little, possibly nothing, with regards to communicating with their user base to make them feel safe.  I would be amazed if collusion wasn't happening or hadn't happened in the past.  Most poker sites will admit and post about cheating incidents on their site.  The poker community isn't dumb.  We know cheating exists.  There are basic flaws in the platforms and the game itself that make it virtually impossible to stop collusion before it happens.  I believe most poker sites have realized this and out of respect for their user base and to show that they are actually doing something, they inform the community about cheating incidents on their site. Often this information sites provide is very limited with regards to cheating incidents because they don't want to reveal information about their security tactics.

[xGoodfella]

I'm not here to argue. SwC is a good room, it's time to look at rake again though.

[AlexTrebbert]

I'm not here to argue. SwC is a good room, it's time to look at rake again though.

Please remember that the current SWC is not the SWC of old.   In August 2020, SWC introduced a new rake schedule and the rake percent and caps were all drastically increased.  SWC was some of the lowest rake in the industry prior to August 2020.  Granted there were times pre 2020 when the rake wasn't adjusted in a timely manner during a spike up in the BTC price, but the rake targeted on the date of change was substantially lower than it is now.  The last rake adjustment was on March 2, 2021 (https://swcpoker.club/old-rake) when the BTC price was $50,000.  If you check the rake changes historically we are at about the rake that I believe SWC wants.  50 cents HU caps at mid stakes limit, $1.00 HU caps at high stakes limit and mid and high stakes no limit/pot limit, $3 and $4 caps at games with 4+ players at no limit and pot limit games, and $1 drops for the Bad Beat Jackpot.  These are around or slightly above the industry standard. Not super high, but definitely not low rake.  Lower heads up caps at 6 handed plus tables would help incentivize regs to start games and battle.  Something SWC desperately needs.

I can't imagine SWC will lower the rake again until the BTC price goes over $65,000.

[xGoodfella]

the rake cap across the board at acr is 3 dollars. It is 4 to 6 dollars here.

[famososMuertos]

Well!! It is almost impossible to get something that will make you come back ... they seem to have entered a period where someone buys them (!?) and / or a new generation can renew this project .

Since for some there seems to be no return and this casino sounds to be in walking dead mode, you should take advantage of the month of Halloween for a tournament that relives how dead it is, an invitation tournament with a good GTD can at least bring old souls. .But if the comments are true, we would play to survive ...

^{Do not read me literally in this post, you might not understand me.}