Satoshi's supposed reappearance, but why now?

[smartbitcoininvestor]

Litecoin has a Charlie Lee, and Bitcoin has a Satoshi Nakamoto. The identity of Satoshi does not need to be known for Bitcoin to succeed. I wouldn't even want to know.

[1715078977]

1715078977

[1715078977]

1715078977

[1715078977]

1715078977

[1715078977]

1715078977

[1715078977]

1715078977

[1715078977]

1715078977

[Bountyhonter]

I don't believe anything in what you just posted, it's obvious that Satoshi's account was hacked. There is nothing special about his account, his account is the same with that of other users using the platform and if their accounts can get hacked then why won't Satoshi's account be able to get hacked

[gentlemand]

Since his original email address has been hacked for several years all of his other accounts will fair game too. There's zero question this is a load of bilge, as was the Dorian Nakamoto post.

Why would you break several years of silence over that?

[btyco]

His account was probably hacked by the US secret service and now that the bitcoin market has crashed, they are going to crash it even more by bringing satoshi to life and hinting he will sell his coins

[Bitfling]

His account was probably hacked by the US secret service and now that the bitcoin market has crashed, they are going to crash it even more by bringing satoshi to life and hinting he will sell his coins

Many people speculate that its satoshi nakamoto but many people think his account hacked. I am better not speculating anything, i am just hoping market recovery soon

[overthetop2011]

I dont think it was The Satoshi. Maybe anyone who got control of the account.

[pooya87]

~
He won't shows up. But I think we need an improvments on Bitcoin network. And he may not shows up, but he/she still can help in somehow to BTC. We and BTC need a help.

bitcoin is decentralized and because of that it doesn't need some authority figure to "help" with its improvement. in fact one of the main reasons why Satoshi left must be this, he didn't want to be that authority figure whom everyone looks up to instead of using their own judgement and making bitcoin more decentralized.

[bbc.reporter]

The Second Coming of Satoshi Nakamoto has finally occurred...
Several long-term hodlers pointed out that the poster was unlikely to be the “real” Satoshi Nakamoto....

this is the dumbest article that they could have written! started with saying it is satoshi when it obviously is not! and then saying "long term holders" pointed out he is not! what does that even mean? why do you need a long term holder to know whether some random comment posted on the internet doesn't belong to Satoshi? doesn't matter what account it comes from and where it is posted. if Satoshi wanted to come out, he wouldn't come out on a centralized platform that has been hacked. he would come out using decentralized methods which people can easily verify eg. signing a message from one of his keys.

I hope that day does not come hehehe. Visualize someone signing a message from a private key that holds the billions in bitcoin that can destroy the whole market. He would become a threat.

[nutildah]

Since his original email address has been hacked for several years all of his other accounts will fair game too. There's zero question this is a load of bilge, as was the Dorian Nakamoto post.

Why would you break several years of silence over that?

Perhaps Craig Wright bought the account (and the Satoshi Twitter account that likes to delete its tweets) to coordinate a publicity stunt for SV...

I wonder what the significance of adding that Brazilian dude as a P2P Foundation friend was... In any case, the whole things reeks of shenanigans and of course none of it has anything to do with Real Satoshi.

Nobody can actually sign a message from an address known (or almost certainly known) to be owned by Satoshi (private keys stored as metadata in the blockchain don't coint). Until this happens, Satoshi isn't back.

[electronicash]

why would satoshi come out this time?

if i were him i would just enjoy the life after all he introduced everything to the crypto users already, developers began exploring and have come up other crypto innovations thru his initial works. it would only create more trouble if he comes out this time and he understood this.

[nebiki]

I dont think it was The Satoshi. Maybe anyone who got control of the account.

satoshi only creates bitcoin and so on has been left to his team. but right now I don't know whether the satoshi team controls all this or not. yes maybe the satoshi disappeared from the crypto world because satoshi didn't want to be searched for and asked by many people.

[Soots]

I dont think it was The Satoshi. Maybe anyone who got control of the account.

satoshi only creates bitcoin and so on has been left to his team. but right now I don't know whether the satoshi team controls all this or not. yes maybe the satoshi disappeared from the crypto world because satoshi didn't want to be searched for and asked by many people.

For many years we've been longing to see the founder of Bitcoin, who have brought this extraordinary technology that creates a different approach into bringing quality of living. This identity of this person has been very puzzling. However, if Satoshi prefers not to reveal himself, we must respect his decision and value his privacy. We should thank him instead of this innovation that he offered, and do our part to continually support it inorder for it to prosper and survive despite issues and controversies.

[tahozor]

It is worth noting that in the years that have passed since the appearance of Bitcoin, several people have already claimed that they are Satoshi Nakamoto. There are even more versions in the press.

[bitfocus]

Please don't take it otherwise, but I think we should stop this hype and let him/her/them stay as he/she/they want to.