bitcointalk should make their own coin

[EcuaMobi]

Good news is BitcoinTalkCoinTalk.org is available!

[1713980873]

1713980873

[1713980873]

1713980873

[1713980873]

1713980873

[1713980873]

1713980873

[1713980873]

1713980873

[NeuroticFish]

C'mon guys and girls, you don't know that BitcoinTalk already has a coin? There's an ICO too. theymos himself has posted [ANN][ICO]HoweyCoins: the only BitcoinTalk-endorsed ICO - GUARANTEED PROFIT

Joke aside what iasenko has written here is the best answer, really...

[stompix]

Good news is BitcoinTalkCoinTalk.org is available!

The bad news is that Bitcointalkcoin(.)org is taken and the com was also registered for a brief period.
Was there some ICO with that domain involved? 

I guess I don't see much of a problem with adding just 1more shitcoin to pile.

So....you think that all the bright minds here on this forum wouldn't be capable of creating anything else than a shitcoin? 

[Jet Cash]

The only useful function I can think of would be some sort of escrow coin, or asset deposit. However, that functin can just as easily be performed by trusted members.

[manfredmann]

Well it could be possible for bitcontalk.org to have coin. The utility of the coin could be integrated to escrowing services for the better service to be arranged in the market place. This is just my opininion because I do not like some of the escrow service of some users who provided it because some of them are scam so we have to secure the transactions using bitcointalk.org coin as an escrow service provider.

[acarli]

IMO, no. Unless a blockchain would solve a problem. I think a lot of business created their own crypto for no reason other than to make one. The database will handle merit better. Also, we wouldn't want to create a secondary market for it. Also, these coins are the "sh%t coins" we should shun as a community. This pretty much sums up my views:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7kaoqb/i_am_having_a_hard_time_understanding_why_nearly/

Oddly enough, when researching useless coins I found very little info. Most of the info is on ICO evaluations and ICO related topics. Most likely, this is due to the fact that that is where the money is in 2017. People generating large funding for ideas with lots of keywords and promises.

[The Cryptovator]

There is two Bitcointalk coin    BTALK and BTT But its only for fun.

Disclaim: Bitcointalk Token was created for fun and not affiliated with Bitcointalk Forum.

However I think topic has discussed previously. I don't think Bitcointalk should create new coin. Its is already base on bitcoin so there is no question about new coin. If create in case, it will be shitcoin because this is Bitcoin community. This forum was build for spread the word about bitcoin. But in future I don't know if someone make fork from bitcoin by using Bitcointalk ticker. But for fork there should be miner community and should be allow by admin.

[bitmover]

Merit coin?
Spammers could buy merit coins so they could rank up while shitposting. Lol

Bitcointalk doesn't need a coin. It's a forum to discuss a technology

[TheBeardedBaby]

Merit coin?
Spammers could buy merit coins so they could rank up while shitposting. Lol

Bitcointalk doesn't need a coin. It's a forum to discuss a technology

But they are already buying it. Well it's another thing that we catch them and they get banned or get painted in red but they still do it. So merit has most of the characteristics of the other tokens/coins and it's much more successful than 99% of the shitcoins listed in the Ann section every day.
So theymos when merit on exchanges??? When moon?? I'm so successful, I'll buy me a lamboo... /jk

[bitart]

C'mon guys and girls, you don't know that BitcoinTalk already has a coin? There's an ICO too. theymos himself has posted [ANN][ICO]HoweyCoins: the only BitcoinTalk-endorsed ICO - GUARANTEED PROFIT
...

Wow what an idea, and it's 63 pages now and still counting
I was just about to post a 'Good project' into that topic but I was afraid that someone would report me because of low quality posting
unbelievable that people can write but they can't read (or they just don't like to read )

[TheBeardedBaby]

C'mon guys and girls, you don't know that BitcoinTalk already has a coin? There's an ICO too. theymos himself has posted [ANN][ICO]HoweyCoins: the only BitcoinTalk-endorsed ICO - GUARANTEED PROFIT
...

Wow what an idea, and it's 63 pages now and still counting
I was just about to post a 'Good project' into that topic but I was afraid that someone would report me because of low quality posting
unbelievable that people can write but they can't read (or they just don't like to read )

I was surprised too but for Good project some users got merit in the very beginning i don't think you gonna get in trouble for hype-ing it.I actually thought that theymos' account was hacked and I open a thread in meta, but I got confirmation from themos_away that it was a "real deal" only for to give a lesson to the newbies.

Never clicked any of the links, as I thought that his account was compromised.

[bluefirecorp_]

Good news is BitcoinTalkCoinTalk.org is available!

Also, bitcointalkcointalkcointalk.org is available.

I wonder how meta we can go. 63 characters. 3 characters for "bit", so 60 left for "cointalk"

I guess only like 7 layers, unless we start using subdomains, which could be an option.

bitcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalk.cointalkcointalkcoi ntalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalk.cointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkc ointalkcointalkcointalk.cointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointalkcointal k.org ?

[OgNasty]

Bitcointalk launching it's own coin would be stupid.  This site is here to promote Bitcoin!  You wouldn't even be able to discuss the "bitcointalkcoin" on a majority of the forum if it were it's own coin.  That being said, the possibility of launching a token on the Liquid network would be more in line with promoting Bitcoin.  However, it would be a bit pointless, except maybe to create a pump and dump that would enrich a few members who time it correctly.

[bluefirecorp_]

However, it would be a bit pointless, except maybe to create a pump and dump that would enrich a few members who time it correctly.

Way to describe literally every single shitcoin ever.

[jackg]

Isn't howeycoins our bitcointalk coin by public demand we got our bitcointlak coin?

But, in all seriousness, the name of bitcointalkcoin is a bit rediculous. And since bitcointak was made by satoshi, we do have our own coin, it's called bitcoin and it's the best coin out there.

Way to describe literally every single shitcoin ever.

EVERY altcoin behaves in that way.
Tether got pumped-dumped. I can imagine something going wrong with that new "stablecoin" and that getting pumped dumped for no reason too...

[cizatext]

Bitcointalk already have an existing coin which is the bitcoin it self, if you have not taken the time to read the brain behind bitcointalk forum well according to the information the forum was created by Santoshi Nakamoto him self and about the same time or period with the creation of bitcoin. Asking bitcointalk to created another coin of it own has no relevance instead we as a community will keep developing on the existing foundation which is bitcoin.

[bluefirecorp_]

EVERY altcoin behaves in that way.
Tether got pumped-dumped. I can imagine something going wrong with that new "stablecoin" and that getting pumped dumped for no reason too...

I shall continue hodling my eth and ltc. tbf, ltc might as well be any of the other altcoins.

At least eth added something to the blockchain with smart contracts.

I guess XMR would add some more value with private ledger shit, but fuck that noise; aint nobody want a private ledger for legit purposes.


Yall remember namecoin? That shit was pretty awesome with whole new tld, shame ICANN never recognized their authority. I'm willing to bet cloudflare would with their 1.1.1.1 service.

[jackg]

I shall continue hodling my eth and ltc. tbf, ltc might as well be any of the other altcoins.

At least eth added something to the blockchain with smart contracts.

LTC has an infinite amount that can be credited to users who mine doesn't it? I mean it'll still halve but it can go down to 1 litoshi as far as I am aware. It also uses the scrypt algorithm like dogecoin (just makes it harder to mine with an asic for bitcoin)...

And ltc and eth follow the same sort of pattern so I don't think there's much point in hodling it unless it's part of a bigger strategy.

[bitmover]

Bitcointalk launching it's own coin would be stupid.  This site is here to promote Bitcoin!  You wouldn't even be able to discuss the "bitcointalkcoin" on a majority of the forum if it were it's own coin.  That being said, the possibility of launching a token on the Liquid network would be more in line with promoting Bitcoin.  However, it would be a bit pointless, except maybe to create a pump and dump that would enrich a few members who time it correctly.

I agree that bitcointalk launching a coin Would be stupid.

However, it's possible to launch a coin that supports BTC.

For example, Omni allow coins to be created over  the Bitcoin blockchain. That's a way to support Bitcoin. You don't need to create erc20 or any other blockchain

[Quickseller]

I've heard rumors that people who have recently been banned for plagiarism are planning to fork Bitcoin and get their own chain called:

Carry a Signature SV (SV stands for 'shitposting violator')

users should

spam.

Satoshi's Vision!

I think the first person to use this argument to have their ban lifted should automatically get unbanned.

I think this actually would be a good idea, perhaps for things like captcha bypasses, and the ability to rank up and/or the ability to wear (better) signatures. The purpose of using it instead of using Bitcoin would be so that micropayments can be used without bloating the blockchain.