Should ICOs be regulated

[Leah38]

In will willingly agree for SEC regulations on ICOs. That will limit, if not stop scam ICOs. There's a of of shit ICOs everywhere. So it would be a big help once ICO is regulated.

[1713973582]

1713973582

[1713973582]

1713973582

[powerman24]

I think that ICOs should be regulated as now it is a wild western on the ICO market.  If that happens then more people will be investing as their investment will be more secure of scam.

[SlimShadyMmp]

Less scam and more investment I think regulation if not in a harm way should be tolerated Atleast investors funds are secured and am sure market dip will not be bad as this with better regulation because it will be taken care of and more ico will reach their target accurately

[Ozero]

ICO projects and their founders had to undergo a certain inspection and registration several years ago. Now it would not be such a deplorable situation with fraud in the ICO. Moderate regulation of ICO activities is very necessary, because this process has become too unmanageable and subject to abuse. If the rights of investors are protected, this will give popularity to the activities of ICO, and cryptocurrency in general.

[Cat Coin]

Now there are no strict rules in the crypto investment market and because of the simple creation of the project, it is difficult to track and find out why it was brought to the market. There must be criteria and responsibility.

[santouao]

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the  founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

Some wanted it to be regulated to avoid investment fraud scheme that is lurking on thr crypto market. They have the basis to do this since most ico are being flagged as scammed and investors cant do anything about it due no regulation about its business aspect. Maybe more wull adopt to security tokens on the next few years.

[PanGiMoon]

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the  founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

Then we will not create topics about fraudsters and think what is really bad and what is not. Their effectiveness will improve, and as a result, only promising coins with further development will enter the market, and not various trash.

[alexsoul]

I think that everyone understands the need to create regulatory bodies in the field of ICO. But this should be done by the state within the country or by the Alliance of States. So far, we only see news that such laws are planned, but I am sure that it is necessary as soon as possible to protect investors from fraud.

[honghe99]

I think that when the ICO market is regulated, everything will change. For example, the profits we receive may decrease, but the scam will decrease!

[cpoer2011]

Yes, ICOs should be regulated especially for the developers or team that made the ICOs since there are many scammers doing it. They must do their KYC and gives some proves such legalize documents about their project. But, who will be the right regulator for this?

[terrific]

If everyone agrees for these ICOs to be regulated.
The effect would also take place with bounty hunters.
They will require KYC in that case if the regulation starts.

[Ria Sakurai]

It must be, ICO under regulations can help us to avoid scam ICO and request refund if we want. Regulations for ICO can help us to verify ICO team are real members and they take their responsibility of law for their project, so  we won't see scam ICO anymore.

[castiloros]

at least it is indeed necessary for organizing the ICO policy. This will work well for a long period in which investors will be even more secure in choosing the ICO they will log in to invest without fear or hesitate because of the scam. The SEC should at least start can provide a good solution to this problem is related.

[Krismanto]

The form of the agency assigned to audit ICO projects and this method, in my opinion, is a very good idea. So with the agency responsible for auditing the ICO project, many people will find it helpful and easier to get a good ICO project.

[Enzos]

The regulated ICO is more in line with the long-term development of the cryptocurrency market. This way can save the price of Ethereum. At present, Ethereum has been hit hard by ICO abuse, so I think that ICO is regulated more favorably and investors will flood in.

[mullzerwar]

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the  founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

Indeed, with the amount of those scam project that keep on appearing without any sign of stopping.
A regulation is so much needed to filter all those scam project. And it should be available in any country, so that everyone could get protected from those scam project.

[brixbounty]

Of course, I believe that there should be organizations engaged in auditing, which will check ICO projects for compliance with the requirements. This will make everyone responsible to investors and significantly reduce risks. This approach will give impetus to the development of the crypto market.

[Keyboard PC]

I think maybe the ICO seems to have clear regulations but for cryptocurrency like Bitcoin it doesn't really need regulation.

[vanya.pronin.1983]

It is the only possible method of how to keep a lot of investors in out industry, because if the ICOs are not going to be regulated, we will lose a huge amount of people, because nowadays there are too much fraud projects.

[tosmartak]

I strongly agree, investors should be protected, because without the crypto investor not going to live, investor trust in crypto must continue to be maintained, where when the system can be used, it looks like investors will feel happy and relieved, not afraid of being exposed to fraud again

I feel Ico's should be regulated for the safety of it's investors as many Ico's have turned scam, I feel this has severely dented investors confidence in the crypto market. I would like to see a separate body formed for the regulations of Ico's, and one whose rules apply to all countries otherwise it would be difficult to prosecute an Ico's owner. It'll be interesting going ahead to see who's the regulator, and under which regulations can the Ico's owners be prosecuted.

At least, most investors have shown that they are not even capable enough to handle themselves in this space, and the only thing that will help everyone equally to be able to have peace of mind investing in the market is regulation as that would limit scams, and in a way will limit smaller investors as well which is one thing that could be a disadvantage. However, let's see what time ends up coming up with.