Crypto exchanges comparison [trade fee + listing fee + age + mobile app + more!]

[wavessurfing]

Poloniex exchange just announced that they now have NO KYC for basic Level up to $10,000.
This is good news, and lets hope other exchanges will follow them.
https://cryptopotato.com/cryptocurrency-exchange-poloniex-enables-no-kyc-for-level-one-accounts/

Wow, this is some big news from Poloniex after a long long time. I'll be logging in to my old account at Polo and try out this new stuff (including a withdrawal).

Changes coming soon to the Polo's data in OP!

would be an important step, did you try ?

[Raja_MBZ]

some updates for crex24:

-fees: maker rebate 0.01% vs taker fee 0.10% https://crex24.com/fees

-headquarters: either estonia or cyprus. it's highly likely they operate from russia or the eastern bloc considering their payment methods and that their CS speaks russian.

Raja_MBZ, you've been trading there? what's the deal with KYC? i can't tell from this page whether it's required or if they "reserve the right" to request it.

Thanks, I'll update it right away.

I've used Crex24 with only about 0.1 BTC of balance, and it worked great. No KYC or anything like that was required. Not sure if it'll be the case with big balances too.

evolution of "old exchange"

waves dex replaced by waves.exchange, combining centralized structure with dex wallet for users.

is it a new species among the beasts?

-

Interesting. So am I supposed to categorize it as DEX or CEX?

~snip~

would be an important step, did you try ?

Not yet.

BTW, Poloniex is being way too much affiliated with Tron/Justin these days, and I don't like this affiliation at all.

[wavessurfing]

evolution of "old exchange"

waves dex replaced by waves.exchange, combining centralized structure with dex wallet for users.

is it a new species among the beasts?

-

Interesting. So am I supposed to categorize it as DEX or CEX ?

I don't know.
IMHO they made that,to increase traffic, and be acceptable for regulation (my opinion)
but they seem presently attached to keep a DEX character for users.

[Raja_MBZ]

~snip~
I don't know.
IMHO they made that,to increase traffic, and be acceptable for regulation (my opinion)
but they seem presently attached to keep a DEX character for users.

With the high number of nodes, public Github code, and Keeper wallet, I guess it'd be better if it is categorized as a DEX.

[Raja_MBZ]

Crex24 has been updated.

[Raja_MBZ]

BitPanda has been updated.

[Raja_MBZ]

STEX updated. Just logged in and found out that their verification system is now live and I can no longer withdraw without getting myself verified from one of the following available options:

[countryfree]

The launch date on the second column may be misleading, as it doesn't tell anything about the history of the company.

If you consider Poloniex, it was the greatest exchange up to 2017, when its creator sold it to Circle. It changed owner again in 2019, and moved its HQ from Massachusetts to the Carribean, then to the Seychelles.

So the 2014 launch date is correct, but today's Poloniex is totally different from what it was 6 years ago.

Maybe it would be better to state the date when the company last changed hands? Great initiative, though.

[Raja_MBZ]

The launch date on the second column may be misleading, as it doesn't tell anything about the history of the company.

If you consider Poloniex, it was the greatest exchange up to 2017, when its creator sold it to Circle. It changed owner again in 2019, and moved its HQ from Massachusetts to the Carribean, then to the Seychelles.

So the 2014 launch date is correct, but today's Poloniex is totally different from what it was 6 years ago.

Maybe it would be better to state the date when the company last changed hands? Great initiative, though.

This is a very good suggestion. I guess I should rename the current column to "initial launch date" and right next to it, add another column labeled as "changed ownership?". Under this new column, the link to the details/date of the change in ownership may be added.

What do you think about this solution?

[logfiles]

This is a very good suggestion. I guess I should rename the current column to "initial launch date" and right next to it, add another column labeled as "changed ownership?". Under this new column, the link to the details/date of the change in ownership may be added.

What do you think about this solution?

It's a good suggestion but my worry is whether it's possible to gather all that information about all the exchanges in the list 

Maybe, You could just make additional notes below with links of details of exchanges that have changed ownership (i believe it's just a few of them that are very old and have changed owners) otherwise the table is going to be super large with more columns and it will be hard to follow up a row while scrolling across when one is trying to read through info about a specific exchange.

[Raja_MBZ]

This is a very good suggestion. I guess I should rename the current column to "initial launch date" and right next to it, add another column labeled as "changed ownership?". Under this new column, the link to the details/date of the change in ownership may be added.

What do you think about this solution?

It's a good suggestion but my worry is whether it's possible to gather all that information about all the exchanges in the list 

Maybe, You could just make additional notes below with links of details of exchanges that have changed ownership (i believe it's just a few of them that are very old and have changed owners) otherwise the table is going to be super large with more columns and it will be hard to follow up a row while scrolling across when one is trying to read through info about a specific exchange.

Hehe, well, if I put all the details in a single column, it'll obviously ruin the alignment of the whole table. However, what I meant was a "link" to the details of the ownership change. That link may lead to a post/thread/web-article/etc.

Under this new column, the link to the details/date of the change in ownership may be added.

I guess I should've been clearer with my words.

[Raja_MBZ]

Binance updated. They've changed the withdrawal fee of many cryptocurrencies.

Moreover, I'll soon add the Binance DEX to the comparison; I've never used it, so it'll be great if someone who has used Binance's DEX can share some views related to the comparison.

[Raja_MBZ]

Yobit and Coinbene have been updated.

[examplens]

OP you can update Tradesatoshi exchange status. They are closing down
Here is my thread about that with proper links to his official Twitter account and his blog
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227332.0

[Raja_MBZ]

OP you can update Tradesatoshi exchange status. They are closing down
Here is my thread about that with proper links to his official Twitter account and his blog
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227332.0

That's bad to know. I'll remove them right away!

[Raja_MBZ]

It seems like Binance is outta this world; they claim to be registered at several places, but it seems like they're registered no-where.

Binance Is Not Under Our Jurisdiction, Says Malta Regulator

https://www.coindesk.com/binance-is-not-under-our-jurisdiction-says-malta-regulator

[rdbase]

It seems like Binance is outta this world; they claim to be registered at several places, but it seems like they're registered no-where.

Binance Is Not Under Our Jurisdiction, Says Malta Regulator

https://www.coindesk.com/binance-is-not-under-our-jurisdiction-says-malta-regulator

Yeah I heard they are actually registered in the Cayman islands or some place like this.
Where they just have an empty office and a sign hanging up sort of like "Look we have occupied this space!"

[Raja_MBZ]

It seems like Binance is outta this world; they claim to be registered at several places, but it seems like they're registered no-where.

Binance Is Not Under Our Jurisdiction, Says Malta Regulator

https://www.coindesk.com/binance-is-not-under-our-jurisdiction-says-malta-regulator

Yeah I heard they are actually registered in the Cayman islands or some place like this.
Where they just have an empty office and a sign hanging up sort of like "Look we have occupied this space!"

This is actually horrifying; Binance controls a hell lot of volume and if Binance gets shut or if CZ (somehow) gets jailed, crypto might temporarily face a big decline.

Opening post updated with Binance's reported headquarters location.

[OmegaStarScream]

Crex24: According to this tweet[1], KYC is only mandatory for EU citizens.
The pit: If your trading volume exceeds 1999$ per year (ridiculous), you'll have to verify your account:



Also, I'm not sure who suggested Tradence, but I think you should remove it. Aside from the (empty) announcement thread[2] on the forum, there is no mention of them online and if you try to make an account and use the platform, you will notice that the site is totally broken. I doubt anyone is using that site.

[1] https://twitter.com/crex_24/status/1201822589771026432?lang=en
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207358.0

[Raja_MBZ]

Crex24: According to this tweet[1], KYC is only mandatory for EU citizens.
The pit: If your trading volume exceeds 1999$ per year (ridiculous), you'll have to verify your account:

~snip~

[1] https://twitter.com/crex_24/status/1201822589771026432?lang=en
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207358.0

Thanks for this information! I'll update it right away. Sorry for the delay.

Also, I'm not sure who suggested Tradence, but I think you should remove it. Aside from the (empty) announcement thread[2] on the forum, there is no mention of them online and if you try to make an account and use the platform, you will notice that the site is totally broken. I doubt anyone is using that site.

Hmmm, well, I'm not so sure about removing an exchange that is currently online and working. Even though they may have a very low volume, but that's not supposed to be a reason for disclusion of it.