Crypto.com - The Pioneering Payments & Cryptocurrency Platform

[velociti]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

And look how well that worked out in the last thread. At least now if certain people tried spreading spam here.. it can be removed and stopped.

If its valid and contributing then it most likely wont be removed. The main reason a new thread was pushed for was so certain people couldnt troll and dig up the past which has no relevance

[1714077531]

1714077531

[1714077531]

1714077531

[1714077531]

1714077531

[1714077531]

1714077531

[BiteMyShinyMetalAss]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

They are turning on the cenzorship machine again so killing the voice of unhappy people so they could shill their mco token.

[codemanX]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

It just didn't work in the unmoderated thread, thanks to people like Jollygood or PistonHonda. So I can understand the decision and I think they will also answer critical questions if they are asked in a polite way.

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

Hi there, we like to keep things civil and besides, we are now Crypto.com
Opinions and feedback are welcome but we do not tolerate profanity, trolling or harassment of any kind.
Comments containing the above mentioned will be moderated.

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Crypto.com announces the appointment of Tyson Hackwood to the leadership team as SVP, Head of Global Merchant Acquisition to expand the adoption of Crypto.com Pay, a cryptocurrency payment solution powered by the Crypto.com Chain. Read more here - https://goo.gl/t6vYH2

[TheHas]

Anyone use crypto invest? I saw on reddit that a few people have tried it and lost money so far.

I'm interested in if there is verifiable way to check this, or if crypto.com has charts or other info to show what the returns have been like to date.

Alternatively, I could just drop $20 on it and let people know what the returns are like in percentages.

[Wekkel]

Alternatively, I could just drop $20 on it and let people know what the returns are like in percentages.

I believe the minimum is $100, payable in BTC.

[peterlustig]

@cryptocom has officially joined Binance Info’s transparency initiative. By sharing project-related information such as news and progress reports on Binance Info, http://Crypto.com  (MCO) is contributing to keeping the community informed

[TheHas]

Alternatively, I could just drop $20 on it and let people know what the returns are like in percentages.

I believe the minimum is $100, payable in BTC.

I read it was $20 usd, but once I've logged in etc I'll have a look. Really just need enough to see if it generates any returns over, say a month.

[peterlustig]

I received my CRO airdrop today.
Log in to your mobile app or look for an email from crypto.com to check if you received the token or not.

[scolary23]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

Hi there, we like to keep things civil and besides, we are now Crypto.com
Opinions and feedback are welcome but we do not tolerate profanity, trolling or harassment of any kind.
Comments containing the above mentioned will be moderated.

This is the usual dictatorship.
Censorship is not acceptable here, this is a place where everyone can have their point of view in any form. People are able to independently assess the accusations, the excuses and the evidence. Without your intervention. Who are you to tell me or anyone else what to write to us or how to do it.
I see, that you just ranaway. And hid here. And in vain, there was nothing scary.

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Our Co-Founder Bobby Bao demonstrated his MCO Visa Card in a coffee shop with Miss Bitcoin Mai (https://twitter.com/missbitcoin_mai) in Seoul! Catch the video here - https://youtu.be/f3pH34qxzFs

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Crypto.com announced the appointment of Tyson Hackwood to the leadership team as SVP, Head of Global Merchant Acquisition to expand the adoption of Crypto.com Pay, a cryptocurrency payment solution powered by Crypto.com Chain - https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/crypto-com-hires-former-paypal-and-braintree-leader-tyson-hackwood-853510469.html

His appointment has also been featured on Cointelegraph - https://cointelegraph.com/news/cryptocom-nets-ex-paypal-exec-to-increase-merchant-cryptocurrency-adoption

[velociti]

Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.

And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com.

So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better.  Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it.

If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there.

Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator.

Hi there, we like to keep things civil and besides, we are now Crypto.com
Opinions and feedback are welcome but we do not tolerate profanity, trolling or harassment of any kind.
Comments containing the above mentioned will be moderated.

This is the usual dictatorship.
Censorship is not acceptable here, this is a place where everyone can have their point of view in any form. People are able to independently assess the accusations, the excuses and the evidence. Without your intervention. Who are you to tell me or anyone else what to write to us or how to do it.
I see, that you just ranaway. And hid here. And in vain, there was nothing scary.

These are crypto.com rules. If you dont like it.. then leave. Simple.

The team shouldnt have to waste time arguing or dictating. Rules are pretty simple to follow.

[peterlustig]

Any words about when they are planning to release the cards for the European citizens?  Asking this because they said after Asia cards will be available for Europe.

[TheHas]

I received my CRO airdrop today.
Log in to your mobile app or look for an email from crypto.com to check if you received the token or not.

I think most people have 'received' their CRO token airdrops.

But it is kind of meaningless - they are locked for 12 months so whether your app says you have CRO or not doesn't really matter.

I also don't like that they put the 'value' of CRO as part of the airdrop notification. Like obviously when a bunch of tokens become unlocked in one years time, that will dilute the existing supply and more people might start selling - so today's price is almost irrelevant.

[honolulumark]

I received my CRO airdrop today.
Log in to your mobile app or look for an email from crypto.com to check if you received the token or not.

I think most people have 'received' their CRO token airdrops.

But it is kind of meaningless - they are locked for 12 months so whether your app says you have CRO or not doesn't really matter.

I also don't like that they put the 'value' of CRO as part of the airdrop notification. Like obviously when a bunch of tokens become unlocked in one years time, that will dilute the existing supply and more people might start selling - so today's price is almost irrelevant.

One years time? hahaha, 2019? oh man, while they trade their tokens making free money for themselves you're stuck holding the tokens waiting? hahahah
they really gave it to you good this time.

[TheHas]

One years time? hahaha, 2019? oh man, while they trade their tokens making free money for themselves you're stuck holding the tokens waiting? hahahah
they really gave it to you good this time.

Yea if they want to make you hold tokens for 12 months, it's like, whatever.

But to show you how much your CRO airdrop is 'worth' in USD based on today's price is totally about optics. In one year crypto changes so much.

Plus they say they are only interested in long term holders for CRO who believe in etc. If that is the case, why promote today's price as though that is the important factor when it is irrelevant?

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Crypto.com Chain’s CRO Token will be listed on GOPAX Exchange, a leading South Korean exchange. Trading starts 19 Dec! Full details here - https://www.gopax.com/notice/304

[Yvonne_Crypto]

Crypto.com Updates: We have UP'ed our Wallet Trading and Credit Card Purchase Limits, UP'ed our Cryptos with Automated Withdrawals, and are adding the Card UPgrade Path. Read the full details here: https://goo.gl/R6m1sm