Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 10:02:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Scaling of bitcoin.  (Read 375 times)
Kolikalex55 (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 1

simply getting the job done


View Profile
December 13, 2018, 07:37:58 PM
 #1

Hi guys, I would like to consult and find out if bitcoin scaling is possible ? I heard that bitcoin is in free swimming. Is that so ?)
THANKS FOR THE REPLY.

Mycro Jobs
〈 SIMPLY GETTING THE JOB DONE ⟩
1711706560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711706560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711706560
Reply with quote  #2

1711706560
Report to moderator
1711706560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711706560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711706560
Reply with quote  #2

1711706560
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711706560
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711706560

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711706560
Reply with quote  #2

1711706560
Report to moderator
OmegaStarScream
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 6083



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 07:14:24 AM
 #2

If people had the least doubt that scaling is impossible, everyone would've switched to something else. Aside from the lightning network: https://medium.com/@ianedws/roadmap-to-bitcoin-developments-f7af59b6d122

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 09:46:47 AM
 #3

If people had the least doubt that scaling is impossible, everyone would've switched to something else. Aside from the lightning network: https://medium.com/@ianedws/roadmap-to-bitcoin-developments-f7af59b6d122

the link mentions lightning network.. so lets explain ALL the proposals
[tl:dr;
none of these help increase the tx/s ONCHAIN. all they do is add new features but reduce the impact of the new features to try to prevent a drop in tx/s]


1. lightning network
this is a SEPARATE NETWORK for ANY compatible coin to use. it works by locking up any compatible coin as a unspendable UTXO for a time period on the coins network and requires co-signing by someone else.
LN is not a bitcoin feature. bitcoin had to become LN compatible. not LN had to become bitcoin compatible

on the separate network it will require masternodes to be online and monitor multiple chains to ensure channels that allow atomic swaps to have 'trust' that funds from different chains are remained locked while channels play with 12 decimal values that are unconfirmed/unaudited.
LN is not about scaling bitcoin. its about taking utility away from the bitcoin network to cough give relief cough to bitcoin by having less users using the bitcoin(other coins too) network(s)
LN does not help the transactions per second scaling in bitcoin, it take transactions out of the bitcoin network

2. mast. this is where certain utxo get locked unless certain conditions are met.
usually involves bloating up a transaction with alot of script. thus reducing the tx/s but mast uses secondary transactions to spend the first transaction when condition is met. there is still a bit more bloat than average per tx and still if you add up the child and parent transaction together still end up being alot of bytes used combined to make value spendable... but does not help the tx/s scale up
merkelised syntax tree's are just buzzwords which means it simply tries to avoid making the tx size average for the last ~10 years become a bloated higher number. by requiring a child transaction
but does not help the transactions per second scaling in bitcoin, its to try to avoid less tx/s when people use smart contracts

3. schnorr. similar thing to mast. it doesnt help increase tx/s it simply tries to avoid the average transaction size becoming more bloated transactions of new formats, by cutting down the signature bloat. again not helping to increase tx/s but does avoid a reduction of tx/s when new smart contracts are added

4. sidechains. again like LN involves locking up funds on bitcoin network to then make transactions on another chain. again it will require masternodes to monitor both chains. but does not help increase tx/s throughput of bitcoins mainnt. it simply pushes utility off the mainnet.

5. bulletproofs tries to hide how much is being spend. though this ends up opening possible bugs of fungibility and requiring trust of fund origins rather than a transparent audited ledger. it also does increase the computational processing of such transactions which is not helpful if suddenly everyone used it. as the propogation times of rlaying a block would increase even if the tx count is the same

6. confidential transactions is another way to hide how much value is spent but does require large scripts bloated to a tx. the core devs simply think that segwit done its job right by not having to count the scripts. yet to a CPU and a hard drive that do actual processing they do actually see and process the bloat.

summary
none of these help increase the tx/s ONCHAIN. all they do is add new features but reduce the impact of the new features to try to prevent a drop in tx/s although we have already seen that transaction bytes have increased and average tx/s has decreased (satoshi said in 2009 if we stick with lean 1in 2out tx we can have 4200 tx a block (7tx/s)
with new features SO FAR we are averaging only 1750 tx a block (3tx/s)
these features want to avoid bloating the network to not become under 3tx/s or take transactions off the network completely so that those that want to stay transacting onchain can continue with the 3tx/s average

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
mk4
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3817


🪸 NotYourKeys.org 🪸


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 10:12:05 AM
 #4

If people had the least doubt that scaling is impossible, everyone would've switched to something else. Aside from the lightning network: https://medium.com/@ianedws/roadmap-to-bitcoin-developments-f7af59b6d122

Oh you'd be surprised. Check out Reddit r/cryptocurrency; where a lot of people think that bitcoin is centralized compared to their favorite altcoins, and where people think bitcoin is "outdated" or "old tech" and that their favorite altcoin is the best invention since the dawn of mankind.

Take a look at this: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/a5w4ew/serious_people_here_that_own_no_btc_why_not/

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 11:25:47 AM
 #5

If people had the least doubt that scaling is impossible, everyone would've switched to something else. Aside from the lightning network: https://medium.com/@ianedws/roadmap-to-bitcoin-developments-f7af59b6d122

Oh you'd be surprised. Check out Reddit r/cryptocurrency; where a lot of people think that bitcoin is centralized compared to their favorite altcoins, and where people think bitcoin is "outdated" or "old tech" and that their favorite altcoin is the best invention since the dawn of mankind.

Take a look at this: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/a5w4ew/serious_people_here_that_own_no_btc_why_not/
altcoins are created because teams that are not core are not being allowed to add their proposals for upgrades to bitcoins network because they dont fit cores roadmap

what should have happened was teams allowed to run their nodes on the bitcoin network, make their proposals and if a consensus is formed, then the network upgrades to the new features..
if there is no consensus. then so be it, back to the drawing board and find a new community acceptable feature

 but no, any non-core proposals end up in rekt campaigns or get challenged to f**k off so that core can remain the dominant power where by core even get to have their devs and friends make mandated rules that coerce and bypass consensus to ensure core rules do get activated. even if it means f**king off opposers by splitting the network to fake a consensus count in cores favour

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
rumexx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 11:50:37 AM
 #6

Hi guys, I would like to consult and find out if bitcoin scaling is possible ? I heard that bitcoin is in free swimming. Is that so ?)
THANKS FOR THE REPLY.

Your question is not clear. Kindly explain what you need to know about bitcoin. Bitcoin does not swim but it is being mined by nodes for a fee by the miners. That is why bitcoin running blockchain passes through a series of confirmation before reaching the final wallet. This process is measured by scalability which is how fast was the confirmation until its final destination is reached.
mk4
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 3817


🪸 NotYourKeys.org 🪸


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 12:51:38 PM
 #7

altcoins are created because teams that are not core are not being allowed to add their proposals for upgrades to bitcoins network because they dont fit cores roadmap

what should have happened was teams allowed to run their nodes on the bitcoin network, make their proposals and if a consensus is formed, then the network upgrades to the new features..
if there is no consensus. then so be it, back to the drawing board and find a new community acceptable feature

 but no, any non-core proposals end up in rekt campaigns or get challenged to f**k off so that core can remain the dominant power where by core even get to have their devs and friends make mandated rules that coerce and bypass consensus to ensure core rules do get activated. even if it means f**king off opposers by splitting the network to fake a consensus count in cores favour

I'm not going to agree nor disagree with you on your statement about bitcoin-core proposals as I'm still quite undecided, but this is definitely not most of the time the reason why altcoins are being created. Most(probably 90%+? just a guess) of altcoins are made because of different purposes("smart contracts" and stuff) and different overall structure(mostly PoS).  Probably only BCH and BSV could fall under "proposals not being allowed" you're referring to.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 01:31:18 PM
 #8

I'm not going to agree nor disagree with you on your statement about bitcoin-core proposals as I'm still quite undecided, but this is definitely not most of the time the reason why altcoins are being created. Most(probably 90%+? just a guess) of altcoins are made because of different purposes("smart contracts" and stuff) and different overall structure(mostly PoS).  Probably only BCH and BSV could fall under "proposals not being allowed" you're referring to.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

there have been many examples. but just imagine a community of 1000 plus developers making the best of bitcoin. rather than diluting things down into dozens of altcoins (im not talking about script kiddy forks/copy and paste coins)

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
talkbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1032


All I know is that I know nothing.


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 01:52:08 PM
 #9

If people had the least doubt that scaling is impossible, everyone would've switched to something else. Aside from the lightning network: https://medium.com/@ianedws/roadmap-to-bitcoin-developments-f7af59b6d122

Oh you'd be surprised. Check out Reddit r/cryptocurrency; where a lot of people think that bitcoin is centralized compared to their favorite altcoins, and where people think bitcoin is "outdated" or "old tech" and that their favorite altcoin is the best invention since the dawn of mankind.

Take a look at this: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/a5w4ew/serious_people_here_that_own_no_btc_why_not/

it is not about people thinking that, 90% of these cases are about people advertising their altcoins and they use buzzwords such as scaling, centralized, outdated technology,.... for it while most of their beloved altcoins are exact copies of bitcoin!!!

altcoins are created because teams that are not core are not being allowed to add their proposals for upgrades to bitcoins network because they dont fit cores roadmap

it is only true about 1% of altcoins such as Litecoin and IOTA. the rest of them such as BCH, XRP, DASH, ETH, ... and thousands of others are created to be pumped and dumped and they pretend they have created the coin because of what you said.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
coinwizard_
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 5

Most Advanced Crypto Exchange on the Blockchain


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 04:52:44 PM
 #10

The scaling problem opens up opportunities for other altcoins to succeed. The lightning network will help bitcoin, otherwise people will just have to settle for alts instead

CRYPTOCIRCLEX | THE MOST ADVANCED CRYPTO EXCHANGE ON THE BLOCKCHAIN
✪╠════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣✪
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3081


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 07:32:51 PM
 #11

altcoins are created because teams that are not core are not being allowed to add their proposals for upgrades to bitcoins network because they dont fit cores roadmap

what should have happened was teams allowed to run their nodes on the bitcoin network, make their proposals and if a consensus is formed, then the network upgrades to the new features..

Except for the part where that's total drivel and several alternative clients have proposed different upgrades over the years.  You're running a non-Core client on the BTC network right now, so clearly it is "allowed".  There is nothing to stop anyone coding a brand new client which is compatible with the current consensus rules, so it runs on the BTC network, but proposes changes to the protocol rules at any desired activation threshold.  How can it be "not allowed" in a permissionless system?  You're the one who's trying to make it so that devs are "not allowed" to do stuff.  Stop being a hypocrite.

..JAMBLER.io..Create Your Bitcoin Mixing
Business Now for   F R E E 
▄█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████▀████████████████████
███▀█████▄█▀███▀▀▀██████
██▀█████▄█▄██████████████
██▄▄████▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██████
█████▄▄▄██████████▀▄████
█████▀▄█▄██████▀█▄█████
███████▀▄█▀█▄██▀█▄███████
█████████▄█▀▄█▀▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
      OUR      
PARTNERS

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
▄█████████████████████████████
████████▀▀█████▀▀████████
█████▀█████████████▀█████
████████████████████████
███████████████▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████▀█████████
████████████████████████
█████▄█████████████▄█████
████████▄▄█████▄▄████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
   INVEST   
BITCOIN

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
100bitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 858
Merit: 423


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2018, 07:35:22 PM
 #12

Hi guys, I would like to consult and find out if bitcoin scaling is possible ? I heard that bitcoin is in free swimming. Is that so ?)
THANKS FOR THE REPLY.
If you are serious about your query, you may like to surf through this - https://scalingbitcoin.org/presentations

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 07:59:18 PM
 #13

altcoins are created because teams that are not core are not being allowed to add their proposals for upgrades to bitcoins network because they dont fit cores roadmap

what should have happened was teams allowed to run their nodes on the bitcoin network, make their proposals and if a consensus is formed, then the network upgrades to the new features..

Except for the part where that's total drivel and several alternative clients have proposed different upgrades over the years.  You're running a non-Core client on the BTC network right now, so clearly it is "allowed".
There is nothing to stop anyone coding a brand new client which is compatible with the current consensus rule

yes nothing stops that...(being compatible with active rules) until core want a change. then things like august 2017 occur where those that dont want core updates get thrown out the network

s, so it runs on the BTC network, but proposes changes to the protocol rules at any desired activation threshold.  How can it be "not allowed" in a permissionless system?  You're the one who's trying to make it so that devs are "not allowed" to do stuff.  Stop being a hypocrite.

2009-2013 bitcoin was not a permissioned system. but now core is able to control the flow of upgrades and throw out anyone that wishes to dismiss core.

your the hypocrit that flip flops saying core cant do something because they are not allowed due to community concensus, then you flip flop to say they should be allowed because no one should tell them not to.

everyone seen the REKT campaigns. everyone seen the split in august 2017. you cant deny that.

now tell me what other FULL NODES are allowed to make proposals that have not been rekt or thrown off the network.
.. wait for it.. oh there are none. the only non core full nodes on the network are the ones that have to follow core rules and be compatible to cores roadmap if they want to stay on the network. not following cores rules when core want to upgrade does not stop core. but does throw core objectors off the network.
if any other team done what core supports done . guess what. core would rekt them off.

doomad you have been shown on many topics. i have told you to atleast look at the blockchain data and history but it seems after just days you try to poke your had into new conversations and pretend months of proving you wrong never happened and you just start your core defending and ass kissing core devs all over again.

you cant change history by insulting me. the blockchain daya is the blockchain data. it is immutable and anyone can check that forks occured. this forum although not immutable can show the rekt campaigns.

the nodes can show there has not been

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
AltcoinTradingSignal.com
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2018, 08:21:28 PM
 #14

The lightning network is still in works, and it just needs for it to become public. It will solve tons of bitcoin network related problems including low transaction times, high transaction fees, and scalability.

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 08:36:38 PM
 #15

The lightning network is still in works, and it just needs for it to become public. It will solve tons of bitcoin network related problems including low transaction times, high transaction fees, and scalability.

LN is not a bitcoin feature. its a separate network. for multiple different coins to use.
it does not scale bitcoin it simply makes people use something that is not the bitcoin network

here is the illusion- demythed
bitcoin is be your own bank.. so imagine we are the banks and the onchain network is the SWIFT network that takes 10 minutes to settle. but the swift banking network only manages at best 7tx/s and averages 3tx/s

now imagine LN(visa) come along. and say if you lock your balance up into out factories(vaults) you can use a visa network that also supports the euro, yuan, pound and other currencies..

now is this scaling the swift network or making less people want to use the swift network. think about the 3tx/s on the swift network. is it increasing beyond 7tx's.. is it really at 28tx's right now....... nope

instead the swift network is still around 3tx's even though blocks are 'full' and so people are just going to avoid wanting to return to the swift network. they will just let their funds remain lucked in visa vaults and just play around with visa payments and if they dont want to use visa no more eventually find the swift network still too expensive and slow and non-innovative to return to. thus they will atomic swap and withdraw other currencies on a better be your own bank network such as euros "faster payment"

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3081


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 08:37:59 PM
 #16

your the hypocrit that flip flops saying core cant do something because they are not allowed due to community concensus, then you flip flop to say they should be allowed because no one should tell them not to.

It's not a flip flop, you dullard.  They can code anything, but it doesn't mean anything unless users agree with it and run it.  You're the one proposing the impossible where everyone has to agree on what they can code before they're "allowed" to code it.  Get a clue.  Describing what you advocate as "impractical" would be the understatement of the millennia.  In terms of the size of blocks and overall throughput, Bitcoin has exactly as much "scaling" (the size of blocks is arguably unrelated to scaling, but don't let that stop you) as its users currently desire.  That may change in future, so just wait patiently like a sane person.


everyone seen the REKT campaigns.

And everyone can see your ongoing REKT campaign.  It's just less effective than its predecessors.


now tell me what other FULL NODES are allowed to make proposals that have not been rekt or thrown off the network.
.. wait for it.. oh there are none. the only non core full nodes on the network are the ones that have to follow core rules and be compatible to cores roadmap if they want to stay on the network. not following cores rules when core want to upgrade does not stop core. but does throw core objectors off the network.
if any other team done what core supports done . guess what. core would rekt them off.

You can't even reach agreement on what a full node is.  You want to hold the untenable position that non-SegWit nodes are not full nodes but should still have a say in what consensus is.  I say you run a full node, you say you don't.  There is literally no reasoning with you.  Clearly you haven't been forked off the network yet, which is a real shame.  I wish it were that easy to get rid of you.  Again, if users didn't like the current rules, they would run different code.  Again, despite your inane protests, users are running Core's code, which means they agree with Core's scaling roadmap.  Or do you think they are all idiots who run code they hate?  You're like those door-to-door religious cranks who think people are so stupid that they couldn't find one of your churches if they wanted to convert to your batshit insane belief system.


doomad you have been shown on many topics. i have told you to atleast look at the blockchain data and history but it seems after just days you try to poke your had into new conversations and pretend months of proving you wrong never happened and you just start your core defending and ass kissing core devs all over again.

You've been told many times that your interpretation of said data and history borders on the psychotic.  And that's when you're not just plain making shit up.  Try taking off the tinfoil hat and being less paranoid.  Your ideas for scaling (stop derailing the thread and stick to scaling, which is the actual topic) are terrible and hardly anyone agrees with them.  Go away with your EC crap.  We don't want it.

..JAMBLER.io..Create Your Bitcoin Mixing
Business Now for   F R E E 
▄█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████▀████████████████████
███▀█████▄█▀███▀▀▀██████
██▀█████▄█▄██████████████
██▄▄████▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██████
█████▄▄▄██████████▀▄████
█████▀▄█▄██████▀█▄█████
███████▀▄█▀█▄██▀█▄███████
█████████▄█▀▄█▀▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
      OUR      
PARTNERS

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
▄█████████████████████████████
████████▀▀█████▀▀████████
█████▀█████████████▀█████
████████████████████████
███████████████▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████▀█████████
████████████████████████
█████▄█████████████▄█████
████████▄▄█████▄▄████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
   INVEST   
BITCOIN

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 08:50:16 PM
Last edit: December 14, 2018, 09:26:40 PM by franky1
 #17

mr MEANDER off topic doomad.. this is the several topic where by you have tried to meandr the topic into social drama to defend a dev.. but you poked the bear. so ill bite

It's not a flip flop, you dullard.  They can code anything, but it doesn't mean anything unless users agree with it and run it.  You're the one proposing the impossible where everyone has to agree on what they can code before they're "allowed" to code it.

you have been told several times
core can code what they like. they can write what they like. but making mandated for the community to accept it or "fork off" is not what consensus is.
if they cant get a fair consensus vote they should go back to the drawing board and compromise thir ego's to make something the community would accept without having to use mandates and consensus bypasses.

EG if they stuck with the 2015 agreement of majority they would have got segwit activated by late 2016 without a split, and the rest of the community would have got a bigger base block.. but we both know thats not what the core roadmap wanted. so that didnt happen. instead core got things how they wanted due to the august '17 mandate because they knew the november '17 deadline was approaching and they only had 35% community vote. whn the mandate first become publicised

you have been told that several times now
plus i am not demanding anything. im pointing out the obvious
show me where i demand. show me code where i have made mandated proposals

you wont find any. but i can show you code by core devs that mandate and bypass consensus..
i already have. many times. again your forgetful because you want to pretend core are your kings and deserve to be the controllers of bitcoins code where the only route forward is a core roadmap

if you dont like what i have to say hit the ignore button. i also showed you where to find it many times


oh and if you think as a average joe that if you kiss enough dev's ass that you can make money on LN, sorry to burst your bubble but you wont.
the LN factories will make the money. and they will be run by the portfolio group of DCG.co
i say this as i find it strange that your not interested in the bitcoin network, but your always found defending devs that wish to scream "blockchains cant scale, LN is the future"
in the last 3 years the devs have no interest in scaling the bitcoin network. thir roadmap has been to make the network compatible with others to divert users away from the network. and only innovate smart contracts just to not make the tx/s even worse than 3tx's

so staying with the topic
if you think bitcoin has scaled then show me a single day where bitcoin has had over 600,000 tx for the day (7tx/s)
come on show me when blocks are full that there are more tx/s than numbers satoshi mentioned back in 2009-10 (7tx/s). show me the idea where devs pretend the 4mb is full utility space = 28tx/s (2.4mill tx a day)
come on show my their promises from 3 years ago

if you can show me how they have scaled bitcoin in the last 3 years. and i dont mean make bitcoin compatible to be bypassed when core deem fit and compatible with other non bitcoin networks to sway people away from bitcoin.
i actually mean scaling bitcoin.
show me stats of atleast 600,000tx a day and ill shut my mouth. come on. show me some stats
or are you just here to defend dev's ego

stats please not social drama and insults.. just stats.
if you only wish to reply with insults. save yourself some time. as your reply will just be void of any substance

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3081


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 09:09:51 PM
 #18

It's not a flip flop, you dullard.  They can code anything, but it doesn't mean anything unless users agree with it and run it.  You're the one proposing the impossible where everyone has to agree on what they can code before they're "allowed" to code it.

you have been told several times
core can code what they like. they can write what they like. but making mandated for the community to accept it or "fork off" is not what consensus is.

Consensus is whatever those securing the network decide it is.  Not you.  90%+ of the network hashrate and thousands of nodes reached consensus and decided it was SegWit.  SegWit has helped with scaling (which is the topic, so please stop derailing the topic).


you have been told that several times now
plus i am not demanding anything.

You're demanding that everyone has to agree before anyone can code anything
You're demanding that no one can code anything with a predetermined activation date
You're demanding that no one utilise softforks in their code
You're demanding that no users start any REKT campaigns
You're demanding that Core contributors shouldn't be allowed to propose new ideas because Core is just a reference client

Also, the topic is scaling, please stick to that.


if you dont like what i have to say hit the ignore button. i also showed you where to find it many times

If you can't stick to the topic, start a new thread.  I can point out the new topic button if you need assistance with that.

..JAMBLER.io..Create Your Bitcoin Mixing
Business Now for   F R E E 
▄█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████▀████████████████████
███▀█████▄█▀███▀▀▀██████
██▀█████▄█▄██████████████
██▄▄████▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██████
█████▄▄▄██████████▀▄████
█████▀▄█▄██████▀█▄█████
███████▀▄█▀█▄██▀█▄███████
█████████▄█▀▄█▀▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
      OUR      
PARTNERS

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
▄█████████████████████████████
████████▀▀█████▀▀████████
█████▀█████████████▀█████
████████████████████████
███████████████▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████▀█████████
████████████████████████
█████▄█████████████▄█████
████████▄▄█████▄▄████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
   INVEST   
BITCOIN

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4172
Merit: 4370



View Profile
December 14, 2018, 09:18:43 PM
Last edit: December 14, 2018, 09:50:26 PM by franky1
 #19

It's not a flip flop, you dullard.  They can code anything, but it doesn't mean anything unless users agree with it and run it.  You're the one proposing the impossible where everyone has to agree on what they can code before they're "allowed" to code it.

you have been told several times
core can code what they like. they can write what they like. but making mandated for the community to accept it or "fork off" is not what consensus is.

Consensus is whatever those securing the network decide it is.  Not you.  90%+ of the network hashrate and thousands of nodes reached consensus and decided it was SegWit.

i have been talking about scaling. you have been talking about your love and loyalty to core devs
but to address your meanders, just to put you to bed, yet again

nodes were thrown off the network in august to FAKE count consensus
other nodes were told they didnt need to upgrade to vote in favour of segwit because core bypassed them. they were not counted.
core got their FAKE95% not by doing true consensus.
the amount of nodes that were actually fully segwit ready was not even 50%

you know this.
it has been discussed repeatedly in many topics.. which you butt in to meander off topic by poking the bear simply because i mention core in negative light as part of the topic
you trying to bring it up again as if you are bringing up fresh info. is your flaw.
do i really need to suggest to you to do some research

so staying with the topic
if you think bitcoin has scaled then show me a single day where bitcoin has had over 600,000 tx for the day (7tx/s)
come on show me when blocks are full that there are more tx/s than numbers satoshi mentioned back in 2009-10 (7tx/s). show me the idea where devs pretend the 4mb is full utility space = 28tx/s (2.4mill tx a day)
come on show my their promises from 3 years ago

if you can show me how they have scaled bitcoin in the last 3 years. and i dont mean make bitcoin compatible to be bypassed when core deem fit and compatible with other non bitcoin networks to sway people away from bitcoin.
i actually mean scaling bitcoin.
show me stats of atleast 600,000tx a day and ill shut my mouth. come on. show me some stats

or are you just here to defend dev's ego

stats please not social drama and insults.. just stats.
if you only wish to reply with insults. save yourself some time. as your reply will just be void of any substance

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3081


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
December 14, 2018, 10:14:56 PM
Last edit: December 14, 2018, 10:32:48 PM by DooMAD
 #20

nodes were thrown off the network in august to FAKE count consensus
other nodes were told they didnt need to upgrade to vote in favour of segwit because core bypassed them. they were not counted.
core got their FAKE95% not by doing true consensus.
the amount of nodes that were actually fully segwit ready was not even 50%

you know this.
it has been discussed repeatedly in many topics.. you trying to bring it up again like you ar bring up fresh info. is your flaw.
do i really need to suggest to you to do some research

As I continue to point out and you willfully ignore, you are talking about nodes running the /BTC1 client.  Those are the clients that were disconnected from the network due to concerns over replay protection.  BU have not been forked off.  XT have not been forked off.  TRB have not been forked off.  Classic have not been forked off.  BCH forked of their own volition, just like they announced they would months earlier.  BCH nodes don't count towards consensus on this chain, despite the fact you clearly wish they did.  Obviously some of the people that previously ran nodes on the BTC network made the decision to follow the BCH chain instead.  They chose that.  But you just want to pretend that they were all forced out.  As always, the reality is very different to what you portray.

It's worth pointing out that BTC1 also would have forked voluntarily if it meant they got the 2MB blocks they wanted.  I'd have followed that chain alongside this one and held both coins if that had happened.  But the main point is, you need to stop deliberately conflating BCH and BTC1 like a manipulative shitweasel.  It only makes you look even more dishonest than I already think you are.

Also, please tell us how Core faked the 90%+ hashrate that locked in SegWit.  Can't wait to hear what fantastical imaginary delusions you come up with in an attempt to explain that one away.  

Just accept that your REKT campaign is dead in the water, that you have barely any support for your "emergent consensus" lunacy and that BTC will increase on-chain scaling as and when users are ready to support that.  Just wait patiently if you want larger blocks.  Why is that so hard for you?  You might be ready, but others are not.  You can't force other nodes to accept larger blocks, just like they can't force you to validate SegWit transactions.  You run what you want to run, we'll run what we want to run (and you'll probably continue to cry that it's not fair for various illogical "reasons").



//EDIT:  So you went back and added more to your post to look appear as though you do actually want to discuss scaling instead of your broken interpretation of consensus.  How very convincing.   Roll Eyes

so staying with the topic
if you think bitcoin has scaled then show me a single day where bitcoin has had over 600,000 tx for the day (7tx/s)
come on show me when blocks are full that there are more tx/s than numbers satoshi mentioned back in 2009-10 (7tx/s). show me the idea where devs pretend the 4mb is full utility space = 28tx/s (2.4mill tx a day)
come on show my their promises from 3 years ago

I'm pretty sure the onus is on you to first prove that we were promised by a developer that the full 4mb would definitely be used.  Every time I saw a dev comment on this matter, they were quite clear that the full 4mb would be highly improbable and that the average would definitely be less than that in practice.


..JAMBLER.io..Create Your Bitcoin Mixing
Business Now for   F R E E 
▄█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████▀████████████████████
███▀█████▄█▀███▀▀▀██████
██▀█████▄█▄██████████████
██▄▄████▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄██████
█████▄▄▄██████████▀▄████
█████▀▄█▄██████▀█▄█████
███████▀▄█▀█▄██▀█▄███████
█████████▄█▀▄█▀▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
      OUR      
PARTNERS

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
▄█████████████████████████████
████████▀▀█████▀▀████████
█████▀█████████████▀█████
████████████████████████
███████████████▄█████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████▀█████████
████████████████████████
█████▄█████████████▄█████
████████▄▄█████▄▄████████
▀█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
   INVEST   
BITCOIN

.
█████████████████████████████████████████████████
████▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████▀
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!