Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 10:34:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lightning network proposal, use U2F tokens as hardware wallets  (Read 158 times)
TACIXAT (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 9


View Profile
December 15, 2018, 08:29:04 PM
 #1

Detailed here - https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/issues/535

Basically, by adding support for curve secp256r1 we would enable people to use U2F tokens as hardware wallets. This means there would be a like-cash mechanism for off-chain transactions. You could hand someone a U2F token as payment.
1713998083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713998083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713998083
Reply with quote  #2

1713998083
Report to moderator
1713998083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713998083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713998083
Reply with quote  #2

1713998083
Report to moderator
1713998083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713998083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713998083
Reply with quote  #2

1713998083
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713998083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713998083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713998083
Reply with quote  #2

1713998083
Report to moderator
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
December 16, 2018, 08:26:09 PM
Merited by Foxpup (5)
 #2

I would be strongly opposed to adding support to secp256r1-ecdsa to Bitcoin, particularly for this rather shallow application.  r1 is slow to work with, now officially recommended against by the NSA, normal ECDSA cannot be batch verified and cannot be easily used as a threshold or adaptor signature.

There are many hardware wallets out there already, and U2F devices do not make for a good hardware wallet because they lack a display so that users can have any idea what they're signing (so they provide limited protection against a hacked computer).

If there is need for a U2F like device that works with bitcoin they could as easily be produced as ones that don't (including dual mode devices) but there just doesn't appear to be enough demand for that... accordingly, there isn't enough demand to add inferior cryptography to Bitcoin.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!