BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[Ruttoshi]

~
Making a bet with odds of 1.01 maybe for those who have big money it can still be done because at least it can give a little bigger return but for small-scale bets it doesn't mean anything, for example when we bet at that odds with $100 then the winnings we will get are only $1 and that for me is not really worth it.

Even though it can get an instant profit but something like this is definitely not gambling and it doesn't fit into my version of gambling so I prefer to avoid this because not only do I not like this scheme, I also realize that I'm gambling with small money so there won't be any fun even if I win with odds of 1.01.

The question is whether the odd 1.01 is worth the risk which is irrespective of the bet amount because the rewards will be based on the bet amount, if it's 100 dollar bet we will get 1 dollar more, the same goes for 1000 bet which will give us 10, so in my opinion it's too big a risk for merely nothing so it's better to take high risky bets with low bet amount than these and in those games even one win can give a decent chunk.

I wouldn't bother to bet on such odd because the profits does not worth it, maybe i will rather let it slide. Imagine using big amounts to bet on a very small odd like 1.01, what if you lose your bet because winning isn't a guarantee despite that the odd is very small. We have seen where an underdog with high odd win the favorite team. It's better to play safe and go for a higher odd like 1.2 and above.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

~
Making a bet with odds of 1.01 maybe for those who have big money it can still be done because at least it can give a little bigger return but for small-scale bets it doesn't mean anything, for example when we bet at that odds with $100 then the winnings we will get are only $1 and that for me is not really worth it.

Even though it can get an instant profit but something like this is definitely not gambling and it doesn't fit into my version of gambling so I prefer to avoid this because not only do I not like this scheme, I also realize that I'm gambling with small money so there won't be any fun even if I win with odds of 1.01.

The question is whether the odd 1.01 is worth the risk which is irrespective of the bet amount because the rewards will be based on the bet amount, if it's 100 dollar bet we will get 1 dollar more, the same goes for 1000 bet which will give us 10, so in my opinion it's too big a risk for merely nothing so it's better to take high risky bets with low bet amount than these and in those games even one win can give a decent chunk.

I completely agree with you bud, I would rather bet on a game with higher risk but with better odds then bet on a game they is less of a risk with a low odd of 1.01, in real sense, this bet is way more risky than the other bet with a higher odds but with higher risk of losing.

Sometime ago, we have had a discussion on this board about a gambler who betted around $1.4 million dollars on a game of 1.01 odds to potentially make around $11k in profit, but unfortunately, the game was lost and that was how he lost his money.

Now, imagine losing $1.4 million dollars in the process of chasing just $11k, this is absolutely stupid of I am asked, what exactly do I need $11k for when I already have $1.4 million dollars? It's true that $11k is enough to change a person's life, but honestly speaking, this amount of money is not worth the risk of losing $1.4 million.

[Boiyboomers]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

Excuse me for asking, but what would be the advantage of deleting the account for a specific period of time?

Can't you create another account now?
Would you like to recover because your account has a good VIP level?

I lost over $1000 on that day and want to stop for a while,  then I decided it to get in touch with support and asked to exclude my account for 1 year.

My account is only gold vip  account, but it took much money from my saving. If I can't get it back then I must stop from bcgame.

[holydarkness]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

PM me your UID, I'll reach my contact. Hopefully we'll get a broader context. If you don't have any access to your UID, give me your email address and perhaps username or other identifier that you can get. It'll help my contact zeroing into your account.

Was there anything valuable on your account left? If there was nothing left, maybe you can just make another account and dont stick to the past? [...]

Bad idea. In any casino, following an exclusion [even when the person is currently in the middle of an exclusion period or already choose to permanently excluded] if someone create a new account, it'll be an insta-ban and give the casino right to confiscate everything as it'll be considered as circumventing self-exclusion.

[Wiwo]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

Was there anything valuable on your account left? If there was nothing left, maybe you can just make another account and dont stick to the past? I dont know what would drive people to return to their old and empty accounts? History of bets, that can trigger some emotional memories? I can suppose that people might worry about high level account and higher rakeback % or smth like that, but do people really pay attention to such things? For me, a win was always more important than money I would be able to recover later.

With self exclusions he will not be allowed to make another account in BC games and for life it gona remains like that, so advising him to make another account is totally out of place for now, most of the time we failed to check things propwr before we implement them, and this is one of such cases.

But just as the guy said he own a VIP account and intend to take a 1 year cool off period but ended up being permanent self exclusions so is a big lose for the gambler really.

[TopTort777]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

Was there anything valuable on your account left? If there was nothing left, maybe you can just make another account and dont stick to the past?

that would be against terms of service as once you permanently exclude yourself (even by mistake) the casino is required to never let you play on their site again. if he created a new account, he would just get banned.

I would say that it is a strange logic, that casino give you only one chance=one account, and if something happens (like with that guy, who was trying to be self excluded, instead got his account deleted), you have no chance to return. Why would not casino give a second chance to have an account, if you tell them your story?

The casino are so fond of amount of clients they have, that they dont want their former client to return? The casino only believe in "one final decision"? For instance, what is something got changed in my life and with me, that means I cant change my decision?

[xLays]

Did anyone else receive an email about free $10 with no wagering requirement? But when I redeemed the code, only $2.92 was credited and it came with 30x wagering requirement.
I was hoping to use the $10 to bet on the FIFA Club World Cup, but it turns out only $2.92 and it can only be used on bcgame original and slots. 
I'm only VIP 8 Silver here on BC.Game, which means I’ve already wagered around $5,000.

Here's the proof of email: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYvfm
Here's the proof of the amout I received from the code: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYkQ1

[darbitmobilerecovery]

Did anyone else receive an email about free $10 with no wagering requirement? But when I redeemed the code, only $2.92 was credited and it came with 30x wagering requirement.
I was hoping to use the $10 to bet on the FIFA Club World Cup, but it turns out only $2.92 and it can only be used on bcgame original and slots. 
I'm only VIP 8 Silver here on BC.Game, which means I’ve already wagered around $5,000.

Here's the proof of email: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYvfm
Here's the proof of the amout I received from the code: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYkQ1

30x as a wagering requeriment is a lot, and is not gonna be easy to redeem, i know a lot of people are gonna say, in casino and slots you can do some moves to reach thex30 at minimum risk, but i dont think so, plus if you are like me who is most on sports betting x30 is crazy.

[Findingnemo]

this is old, but there was someone who lost a $1.4 mil bet on 1.008x odds: https://x.com/darrenrovell/status/1614603901021437954
risking 1.4 million to win $11,200 is one of the dumbest bets i ever seen.

This can be used as the best example whenever there's a debate and people argue that lower odds are safe bets.

~
My account is only gold vip  account, but it took much money from my saving. If I can't get it back then I must stop from bcgame.

You should never gamble to multiply your savings, it should be considered as an expense not an investment. I see that your case has now been forwarded to the team. Hopefully, you will get access soon, and when you come back just keep that in mind.

Did anyone else receive an email about free $10 with no wagering requirement? But when I redeemed the code, only $2.92 was credited and it came with 30x wagering requirement.

Here's the proof of email: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYvfm
Here's the proof of the amout I received from the code: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYkQ1

The catch is up to $10, which doesn't necessarily mean there will be a guaranteed $10. And no deposit required is what is mentioned.

[Odusko]

Did anyone else receive an email about free $10 with no wagering requirement? But when I redeemed the code, only $2.92 was credited and it came with 30x wagering requirement.
I was hoping to use the $10 to bet on the FIFA Club World Cup, but it turns out only $2.92 and it can only be used on bcgame original and slots. 
I'm only VIP 8 Silver here on BC.Game, which means I’ve already wagered around $5,000.

Here's the proof of email: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYvfm
Here's the proof of the amout I received from the code: https://www.talkimg.com/image/UuYkQ1

30x as a wagering requeriment is a lot, and is not gonna be easy to redeem, i know a lot of people are gonna say, in casino and slots you can do some moves to reach thex30 at minimum risk, but i dont think so, plus if you are like me who is most on sports betting x30 is crazy.

30x wagering is indeed a lot and no way that the gambler will definitelyake anything out that offers, although the casino don't give you those bonuses to win from them, but rather a means to keep you going even while you are low of balance but still want to continue playing, at that point casino bonuses are the best for such situations.

[holydarkness]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

Was there anything valuable on your account left? If there was nothing left, maybe you can just make another account and dont stick to the past?

that would be against terms of service as once you permanently exclude yourself (even by mistake) the casino is required to never let you play on their site again. if he created a new account, he would just get banned.

I would say that it is a strange logic, that casino give you only one chance=one account, and if something happens (like with that guy, who was trying to be self excluded, instead got his account deleted), you have no chance to return. Why would not casino give a second chance to have an account, if you tell them your story?

The casino are so fond of amount of clients they have, that they dont want their former client to return? The casino only believe in "one final decision"? For instance, what is something got changed in my life and with me, that means I cant change my decision?

That's why casinos give cooling-down period prior to self-exclusion being implemented, to make sure the player are sure with the request as it can't be retracted mid-way once undertaken. And why only one chance one account? because it's self exclusion. It means the players requesting to be excluded because they can't help themselves from compulsive gambling. We can call it a cry for help, if that make the logic easier to understand.

If casinos give another chance following permanent self exclusion and/or allowing another account to be created during the self-exclusion period, that means they facilitate problematic gambling and encourage gambling addiction, of which against the Gambling Responsible Act. So yes, one chance=one account, if it's related to exclusion.

And what should the player do?

We can try by get him to PM me his UID so I can reach my contact and get a broader narrative of his situation. Whether he only ask for one year exclusion and something else happens due to technical error or he did ask for permanent exclusion, regretted it [something got changed in his life and with him that make him change his decision], and invented the story. Won't be the first instance, if we're talking about self-exclusion and compulsive gambling.

One thing for sure though: creating another account mid-exclusion or after permanent-exclusion is a recipe for disaster. In all casinos.

[Raflesia]

~
Making a bet with odds of 1.01 maybe for those who have big money it can still be done because at least it can give a little bigger return but for small-scale bets it doesn't mean anything, for example when we bet at that odds with $100 then the winnings we will get are only $1 and that for me is not really worth it.

Even though it can get an instant profit but something like this is definitely not gambling and it doesn't fit into my version of gambling so I prefer to avoid this because not only do I not like this scheme, I also realize that I'm gambling with small money so there won't be any fun even if I win with odds of 1.01.

The question is whether the odd 1.01 is worth the risk which is irrespective of the bet amount because the rewards will be based on the bet amount, if it's 100 dollar bet we will get 1 dollar more, the same goes for 1000 bet which will give us 10, so in my opinion it's too big a risk for merely nothing so it's better to take high risky bets with low bet amount than these and in those games even one win can give a decent chunk.

That's why I don't do that because in the end even though there will be a win that we can get with a probability of 99 percent but still when the situation is unexpected and there are some things that are not wanted then it could end tragically so I prefer to skip bets like this and switch to other bets. In the Benfica vs Auckland match it really happened but I prefer to be over at that time with better odds than 1x2 with odds of 1.01 because in the end this is not like betting and for small bettors like me something like this will only waste time and increase risk.

Did anyone else receive an email about free $10 with no wagering requirement? But when I redeemed the code, only $2.92 was credited and it came with 30x wagering requirement.
I was hoping to use the $10 to bet on the FIFA Club World Cup, but it turns out only $2.92 and it can only be used on bcgame original and slots. 
I'm only VIP 8 Silver here on BC.Game, which means I’ve already wagered around $5,000.

At least once a month or twice a month I always get emails like this but in the end this can only be for some predetermined games including slots (not all slots can be done) and of course for betting on sports betting it can't be done either, but even so this is good enough to give at least a few spins on the slot because this can also test your luck even though the wager must clearly be pursued
I always play games (with this bonus) in several places especially for Duck Hunters which I always play.

[Issa56]

I have requested "one year self exclusion " for my account on December, 5th 2023. Last week I contacted the support team, but one of their support said I have requested permanent exclusion. Ofcourse it was a mistake, I lost my account now.

I guess you should blame yourself for that kind of mistake, the mistake is from you, and the gambling site did what you requested for, it might be a mistake, but the gambling site doesn’t know that. Since your account have been permanently ban, then you can just create another a account, and keep on enjoying your gambling. I don’t know if you are having funds in the account, but if you are having, then sorry for your loss, but I don’t think you will leave funds in your account and request for temporary ban, and I don’t really know why you requested for ban at the first place.

[Zwei]

I would say that it is a strange logic, that casino give you only one chance=one account,

not strange at all. most casinos nowadays offer bonuses as one time promos and incentives for new users, etc... if they allowed multiple accounts, those promos would be abused like crazy.

and if something happens (like with that guy, who was trying to be self excluded, instead got his account deleted), you have no chance to return. Why would not casino give a second chance to have an account, if you tell them your story?

The casino are so fond of amount of clients they have, that they dont want their former client to return? The casino only believe in "one final decision"? For instance, what is something got changed in my life and with me, that means I cant change my decision?

that's what a perma self exclusion is for, your account gets closed, and you are not allowed to return for life. casinos are both morally and sometimes legally required to do that once you ask for it.
it does not matter if you change your mind, or whatever. a self exclusion, whether it's a day, a week, a month, or permanent, is a final decision and never to be lifted, unless it was a technical error, a mistake by the casino, your account got hacked, or something like that.

on the other hand, if you like rage close your account without requesting a self exclusion, you can always come back and open a new account, you just need to make sure to check with support first to avoid any problem.

[TopTort777]

But people have a habit to change their decisions. 35 years ago I wanted to be a firefighter. After many years, I have chosen different profession. People opinion change with time, after a decision. Not saying that casinos should immediately welcome their former clients who have chosen self exclusion, but will it be bad if a gambler returns after 10 years? From ToS - yes, as solution would be having another account. From moral point of view - I would give a chance if a person really wants to return.

[God Of Thunder]

Hey guys, does anybody see this warning on the BC game thread?



I am not sure why I am seeing this warning. I checked the reference, and it seems the scam accusation was resolved. But the flag is still on their profile, and it shows a warning to me. I assume it if because of the custom trust list. But I am curious if anyone else sees this warning when you visit the BC game thread. Gekkebelg should ask people to remove their support since the issue was solved already.

[Strongkored]

@God Of Thunder
I check the condition is back to normal, there are no more warnings, you may refresh your browser also
The bc.game representative account is also back to normal.

[TopTort777]

Its because users who God of Thunder trust gave negative trust to topic starter, but you, Strongkored, have different guys in your trust list. Or its something like that I also dont have this warning, as I dont see negative trust in OP trust list. Anyway, is there a real problem with bc.game to make eveyone of us cautious? i dont see any except some individuald have problems, but there will be always those who are happy and unhappy with service. ( or show me a casino that has no problems or accusations)

[OcTradism]

Its because users who God of Thunder trust gave negative trust to topic starter, but you, Strongkored, have different guys in your trust list. Or its something like that I also dont have this warning, as I dont see negative trust in OP trust list. Anyway, is there a real problem with bc.game to make eveyone of us cautious? i dont see any except some individuald have problems, but there will be always those who are happy and unhappy with service. ( or show me a casino that has no problems or accusations)

BC.Game has been here a long time and has spent decent efforts and fund for building up their platform as well as marketing. It is like other businesses that are imperfect and surely there are issues but I did not see BC.Game has terrible problems structurally or operationally.

DT trust list is personally and you can customize it for you own needs. If you don't try to manipulate trust lists forum-wide or fake trust feedback of an account, it is fine individually.

[salad daging]

Auckland is the most amateur team. BC game bookies do not give odds on this team, while I see other bookies giving odds of 1.01x which is the same as without odds.



The day I made a combo bet by betting on the favorite team only according to the bookie, I felt this was quite sure even though Bayern Munich's odds were a bit big which is likely where Benfica will put up a fight, but statistically Bayern Munich might be better than Benfica so bet on it.