BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[mitchr4]

I saw this on X, but I couldn’t find the name of the game. So I brought it here to ask if any of you guys have an idea what it’s called.

I’m looking to try something new since I’ve been pretty unlucky with the classic games lately.

https://x.com/bcgame/status/2012412790527709426

That looks like The Dog House Dog or Alive from Pragmatic Play. It's a pretty popular slot with a cowboy and dog theme. Hope you have better luck with this one than the classic games!

[UmerIdrees]

I have also think about this to somehow be one of the problem they are having regarding this deposit issues all the time from there country because since they go through a means before it can be deposited it could be that those third party are the ones doing it, I have also been using fiat on this casino and deposit has always been credited after payment. To disable fiat from them is the best since the complaints is becoming much while other countries there deposit are not having problem will continue with it, perhaps after then, they can be using crypto till the casino will resolve what they should do.

That’s right, we don’t force a payment option if it has issues. Luckily for me, I don’t have any problem with fiat deposits. It’s not even a bank transfer, just a payment app, and it gets credited instantly. I gambled again last night, but I was unlucky. In less than an hour, all my money was gone playing slots. Still, I had fun, so I guess that’s part of it.

I am surprised as to why you people are still using fiat to make deposits in the crypto casino. Isn't it better and safer to use cryptocurrencies to deposit and withdraw from the gambling site? You remain anonymous and a lot of other benefits.

It will just create complications with fiat deposits as banks/credit cards' source of funds are traced, and they wouldn't like the source of the funds to be coming from gambling sites, especially in cases when gambling isn't looked at as something noble and legal.

[Sanitough]

I saw this on X, but I couldn’t find the name of the game. So I brought it here to ask if any of you guys have an idea what it’s called.

I’m looking to try something new since I’ve been pretty unlucky with the classic games lately.

https://x.com/bcgame/status/2012412790527709426

That looks like The Dog House Dog or Alive from Pragmatic Play. It's a pretty popular slot with a cowboy and dog theme. Hope you have better luck with this one than the classic games!

Thanks, it really helps. I tried using the search button with the name of the game you mentioned, and a lot of results showed up, but looks like there are different versions of it.

Anyway, I think I’ll give this game a try. Let’s see if my luck is better here compared to games like Gates of Olympus.

I am surprised as to why you people are still using fiat to make deposits in the crypto casino. Isn't it better and safer to use cryptocurrencies to deposit and withdraw from the gambling site? You remain anonymous and a lot of other benefits

Probably for convenience. With fiat, you can spend it right away after withdrawing. With crypto, you still need to convert it to fiat before you can actually use it, so that extra step makes a difference.

[Cointxz]

I saw this on X, but I couldn’t find the name of the game. So I brought it here to ask if any of you guys have an idea what it’s called.

I’m looking to try something new since I’ve been pretty unlucky with the classic games lately.

https://x.com/bcgame/status/2012412790527709426

That looks like The Dog House Dog or Alive from Pragmatic Play. It's a pretty popular slot with a cowboy and dog theme. Hope you have better luck with this one than the classic games!

Thanks, it really helps. I tried using the search button with the name of the game you mentioned, and a lot of results showed up, but looks like there are different versions of it.

Anyway, I think I’ll give this game a try. Let’s see if my luck is better here compared to games like Gates of Olympus.

It’s true that there’s a lot version for the dog house slot games franchise but the one @mitchr4 mentioned which is the dog or alive which is the exact one on the screenshot.

That’s the specific version I frequently played. Pragmatic always releases tons of version on their popular slot games that makes it very confusing sometimes what to choose.

[Sanitough]

Anyway, I think I’ll give this game a try. Let’s see if my luck is better here compared to games like Gates of Olympus.

It’s true that there’s a lot version for the dog house slot games franchise but the one @mitchr4 mentioned which is the dog or alive which is the exact one on the screenshot.

That’s the specific version I frequently played. Pragmatic always releases tons of version on their popular slot games that makes it very confusing sometimes what to choose.

So how was your experience with this game compared to the other popular ones from the same provider? Have you actually won big on it?

By the way, for those of you who regularly play slots, can you suggest some games I should try as well?
So far, the ones I checked aren’t blocked in my region, so I might as well try a variety of games.

Just looking to enjoy some free time and see what works for me. 

[rigs3130]

Anyway, I think I’ll give this game a try. Let’s see if my luck is better here compared to games like Gates of Olympus.

It’s true that there’s a lot version for the dog house slot games franchise but the one @mitchr4 mentioned which is the dog or alive which is the exact one on the screenshot.

That’s the specific version I frequently played. Pragmatic always releases tons of version on their popular slot games that makes it very confusing sometimes what to choose.

So how was your experience with this game compared to the other popular ones from the same provider? Have you actually won big on it?

By the way, for those of you who regularly play slots, can you suggest some games I should try as well?
So far, the ones I checked aren’t blocked in my region, so I might as well try a variety of games.

Just looking to enjoy some free time and see what works for me. 

Hey, are you an authorized BC Game representative,, can you please look into my complaint ? Or bring it forward to the people that make decisions at BC.Game please

[Haunebu]

It could only really be an issue if there’s a real complainant. What we’re seeing here isn’t enough to be a solid basis. Most complainants have limitations anyway, they don’t want to reveal their identity, and because of that it’s hard to build an actual case.

Complaints in general are normal. Even Stake has complaints, 1xBit has tons of them and they’re still operating.

The way I see it, BC.Game has managed to maintain a decent reputation here.
And honestly, some accusations should just be ignored, especially when they’re baseless.

Some of the stuff that you stated makes zero sense whatsoever. Firstly, 1xbit is a proven scam site which has a shit ton of scam accusations in this forum and elsewhere and they are only operating thanks to their connection with their sister site(1xbet). Many of the accusations are legit.

Secondly, BC.Game isn't a proven scam site like 1xbit, but many of the accusations against them are legit too(KYC, Payment processor etc). Their reputation in this forum keeps sinking with time.

[rigs3130]

I understand the skepticism, but this is not a vague or anonymous accusation, nor is it a single isolated complaint.

The issue is patterned behavior under VIP-only promotions, not a misunderstanding of generic bonus terms.

In my case, as an SVIP-level user, I was explicitly encouraged by my VIP Host to download the app to participate in VIP-only in-app promotions. Two separate promotions are relevant:

A VIP Flash promotion with a very large wagering requirement (hundreds of thousands in turnover), where the balance was allowed to accumulate normally during wagering and then retroactively reduced after completion.

A separate VIP Prime Mission (in-app) promotion with a 40x turnover requirement, where the exact same thing occurred:
– unrestricted balance growth during wagering
– wagering fully completed
– accumulated winnings forfeited after completion, leaving only the original bonus amount

In both cases:

There was no explicit disclosure in the app, promotion page, rollover interface, or bonus metadata stating that winnings above the original bonus would be forfeited after wagering.

No real-time cap, warning, or notice was applied during wagering.

The forfeiture was justified only after the fact, once wagering was completed.

This isn’t about refusing to reveal identity — the issue is whether material conditions were disclosed upfront. If a promotion operates on a “only the original bonus survives” model, that is not a minor detail; it fundamentally changes the expected outcome and must be disclosed as clearly as the wagering requirement itself.

For context, BC.Game’s own published VIP Prime Mission terms state that Bonus Money is credited, can be used for betting, and requires a 40x turnover to withdraw. They do not state that accumulated winnings are voided after completion. Other BC.Game bonuses following the same turnover model allow accumulated winnings to be withdrawn once wagering is met.

That’s why this has been raised both here and on Casino Guru: it’s not an attempt to damage reputation, but to ask a straightforward question that hasn’t been answered constructively by any BC.Game representative so far:

Where is this post-wagering forfeiture condition explicitly disclosed before participation?

If it exists, it should be easy to point to. If it doesn’t, then calling the concern “baseless” isn’t accurate — it’s a disclosure issue.

[Questat]

Hey, are you an authorized BC Game representative,, can you please look into my complaint ? Or bring it forward to the people that make decisions at BC.Game please

He’s not, and there’s no authorized representative here other than BC.Game itself, since they’re the ones who created this thread.

Looking at the account, it was last online on January 13, so there’s a good chance he hasn’t even seen the recent comments yet. If you’re not satisfied with the casino’s online support, the only real option is to wait until the account comes back online and responds here.

[mirakal]

Some of the stuff that you stated makes zero sense whatsoever.

Give it 1% 

Firstly, 1xbit is a proven scam site which has a shit ton of scam accusations in this forum and elsewhere and they are only operating thanks to their connection with their sister site(1xbet). Many of the accusations are legit.

I’m pretty aware of their reputation on the forum, so yes, they’re considered a scam. What I’m saying is that despite all that, they’re still operating.
I’m not playing on those sites myself, but the fact that I can still access them right now means there are probably still users gambling there. And those users could eventually end up as new victims.

Secondly, BC.Game isn't a proven scam site like 1xbit, but many of the accusations against them are legit too(KYC, Payment processor etc). Their reputation in this forum keeps sinking with time.

Assuming you’re referring to scam accusations posted on the forum, which I honestly haven’t checked yet, it does make me wonder why the community still hasn’t tagged them. That makes me think the accusations might lack solid evidence, or at least not enough to completely damage the casino’s reputation. Around here, tags aren’t given lightly. So if nothing has happened so far, it probably means the claims aren’t strong enough yet, or they’re still being questioned by the community.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Secondly, BC.Game isn't a proven scam site like 1xbit, but many of the accusations against them are legit too(KYC, Payment processor etc). Their reputation in this forum keeps sinking with time.

What accusations are you referring to here? I haven't really been following the scam accusations here in the forum lately, but the ones I remember were all cleared up and 90% of them were legitimate payment refusals by BC.Game.

I wouldn't consider the KYC cases to be confirmed scam attempts either... BC.Game doesn't require KYC from its customers for fun, but is forced to do so by the various licenses the site holds. What you can hold against them – and many other sites – is that KYC is often only required for larger payouts. Unfortunately, this is common practice in the crypto online casino industry.

[rigs3130]

For transparency, I’m closing my updates here.

I followed all internal escalation paths provided by BC.Game, including live support, VIP support, and the CEO Letterbox, which BC.Game states is specifically for algorithm transparency and VIP service quality concerns.

My issue falls under both categories. I submitted a detailed CEO Letterbox report (with screenshots) and received no acknowledgment or response, while live support continued to redirect me back to the same channel without taking ownership or issuing a written position.

At this point, internal resolution has been exhausted. I’m no longer engaging with live support and will proceed through external review channels if needed.

I’m not making accusations or asking for tags — just documenting the process and outcome for the record.

[PX-Z]

I wouldn't consider the KYC cases to be confirmed scam attempts either... BC.Game doesn't require KYC from its customers for fun, but is forced to do so by the various licenses the site holds. What you can hold against them – and many other sites – is that KYC is often only required for larger payouts. Unfortunately, this is common practice in the crypto online casino industry.

There are lots of withdrawal issue of bcgame lately even on the first page of scam accusation board. As well as deposit issues, i guess there is wrong with their banking/disburesement account/s.
Also, if they require you to submitted kyc info, they reject your submission (probably blurred, not clear details) don't allow to resubmit again, then eventually close the account, live support don't answer your question and automatically close your ticket. It's unfair, right? That's how bcgame complaints on that board.

[Haunebu]

Assuming you’re referring to scam accusations posted on the forum, which I honestly haven’t checked yet, it does make me wonder why the community still hasn’t tagged them. That makes me think the accusations might lack solid evidence, or at least not enough to completely damage the casino’s reputation. Around here, tags aren’t given lightly. So if nothing has happened so far, it probably means the claims aren’t strong enough yet, or they’re still being questioned by the community.

There's lots of solid evidence out there supporting those accusations, but they are primarily related to their unethical ways of withholding player funds and not outright scamming which is why they were not tagged though that could change in the future as their reputation keeps sinking.

What accusations are you referring to here? I haven't really been following the scam accusations here in the forum lately, but the ones I remember were all cleared up and 90% of them were legitimate payment refusals by BC.Game.

They have proven themselves to be one of those sites that use KYC as a tool to try and avoid paying out(Small or Big amounts). Their FIAT payment processor is completely broken these days. They aren't outright scammers, but there are far better alternatives than these greedy morons.

[Questat]

There are lots of withdrawal issue of bcgame lately even on the first page of scam accusation board. As well as deposit issues, i guess there is wrong with their banking/disburesement account/s.
Also, if they require you to submitted kyc info, they reject your submission (probably blurred, not clear details) don't allow to resubmit again, then eventually close the account, live support don't answer your question and automatically close your ticket. It's unfair, right? That's how bcgame complaints on that board.

I guess in that case it really depends on how gamblers evaluate it. Even if there are a number of scam accusations against a casino, as long as their rep account here is still clean, most gamblers will assume everything is fine.

Personally, I’m using this casino for both betting and casino games, and I haven’t faced any problems so far. Of course, my experience might not be the same as others.

As for deciding whether they’re guilty or not, I think that’s up to DT members in the end. But if you ask me right now, I’ll still continue using the casino.

[mirakal]

Assuming you’re referring to scam accusations posted on the forum, which I honestly haven’t checked yet, it does make me wonder why the community still hasn’t tagged them. That makes me think the accusations might lack solid evidence, or at least not enough to completely damage the casino’s reputation. Around here, tags aren’t given lightly. So if nothing has happened so far, it probably means the claims aren’t strong enough yet, or they’re still being questioned by the community.

There's lots of solid evidence out there supporting those accusations, but they are primarily related to their unethical ways of withholding player funds and not outright scamming which is why they were not tagged though that could change in the future as their reputation keeps sinking.

In that case, let’s just leave it to the gamblers to judge the casino themselves. At least the information is out there, and if they take time to explore the forum, they’ll see those scam accusations and decide for themselves. Since DT doesn’t seem to treat it as a serious issue, then nothing major is happening for now. Still, the important part is knowing how to minimize the risk on our end.

And if things eventually go downhill for that casino, others will simply take its place.  In the end, it’s not really a big loss for us as players since there are always other options.

[adultcrypto]

I guess in that case it really depends on how gamblers evaluate it. Even if there are a number of scam accusations against a casino, as long as their rep account here is still clean, most gamblers will assume everything is fine.

Personally, I’m using this casino for both betting and casino games, and I haven’t faced any problems so far. Of course, my experience might not be the same as others.

As for deciding whether they’re guilty or not, I think that’s up to DT members in the end. But if you ask me right now, I’ll still continue using the casino.

I have also used the platform for long and I have not had any issue. Sometimes I wonder what is going on that so many people complain of issues with the platform when I have not had such experience. It is already obvious that lost of those complaints are coming from Indians that use fiat deposit and withdrawals. This makes me believe that BC.Game may not entirely be at fault in all of these but the problem will be with the payment processors that refused to credit the money to the right people. I will be happy to see anyone who deposited or made withdrawal in crypto come forward to complain so we know if the issue is really different from what we know.

[Lakai01]

They have proven themselves to be one of those sites that use KYC as a tool to try and avoid paying out(Small or Big amounts). Their FIAT payment processor is completely broken these days. They aren't outright scammers, but there are far better alternatives than these greedy morons.

You probably mean the cases of Indian players who tried to cash out in their local currency (Indian rupee) and where the payout did not work, is that right?

As far as I know, this had to do with the payment provider itself and not with a specific casino. Several casinos were affected by the problem, not only crypto casinos but also large, internationally operating online casinos.

If you have other cases that are unrelated to the Indian rupee incident, I would of course be very grateful for any links.

But basically, your statement is correct of course: no one is forced to play at BC.Game. However, I would not describe the people behind BC.Game as "greedy morons." 

[rigs3130]

Since my winnings got taken forfeitted, back to BC Game (they are treating my bonus code I used as if it were a new player bonus, returning only the bonus amount being $5) - theres been new return to play 100% campaigns, and bc game giving back to players - - its just a bad experience at the moment overall, since my winnings come from genuine game outcomes, and there was a significant wager prior to the win that went into producing the win amount overall even if it come from a bonus code the original funds, i wagered it 40x and to be a SVIP4 and find out at this stage of my account and game play and VIP status.

[Questat]

I guess in that case it really depends on how gamblers evaluate it. Even if there are a number of scam accusations against a casino, as long as their rep account here is still clean, most gamblers will assume everything is fine.

Personally, I’m using this casino for both betting and casino games, and I haven’t faced any problems so far. Of course, my experience might not be the same as others.

As for deciding whether they’re guilty or not, I think that’s up to DT members in the end. But if you ask me right now, I’ll still continue using the casino.

I have also used the platform for long and I have not had any issue. Sometimes I wonder what is going on that so many people complain of issues with the platform when I have not had such experience. It is already obvious that lost of those complaints are coming from Indians that use fiat deposit and withdrawals. This makes me believe that BC.Game may not entirely be at fault in all of these but the problem will be with the payment processors that refused to credit the money to the right people. I will be happy to see anyone who deposited or made withdrawal in crypto come forward to complain so we know if the issue is really different from what we know.

Looks like it, which is why we shouldn’t be too quick to judge. There are people like me who don’t really have any issues with fiat deposits and withdrawals on this site.

Regulations vary from country to country, so problems like this can happen. If someone keeps running into issues, then trying crypto might be the easier solution, and if that still doesn’t work, just leave the casino. Simple as that.