Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2019, 06:09:32 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 88 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 42188 times)
TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:33:27 PM
Merited by bones261 (1), Alex_Sr (1), Coolcryptovator (1)
 #601

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  Cry

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
1560708572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560708572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560708572
Reply with quote  #2

1560708572
Report to moderator
1560708572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560708572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560708572
Reply with quote  #2

1560708572
Report to moderator
1560708572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560708572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560708572
Reply with quote  #2

1560708572
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560708572
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560708572

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560708572
Reply with quote  #2

1560708572
Report to moderator
Alex_Sr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 811


HOLD BITCOIN! Fiat - SCAM!


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:36:06 PM
 #602

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  Cry

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

Unexpectedly! And very nice! Thank you man!

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
1miau
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 990


ChipMixer Miau


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:44:18 PM
Merited by Foxpup (3), morvillz7z (1)
 #603

The main reason that I went for this solution rather than forcing custom lists is that I would like to show some trust indicator to guests. But before doing that, I want to see whether these modifications can actually be made to work. If not, then I may go to the force-custom-lists solution, and that's incompatible with guests seeing any trust indicators.
I appreciate the decision of showing trust to guests. Here is another reason why it's important to enable it soon:

In my new topic for newbies about Bitcoin vanity addresses (vanitygen) user Velkro left a comment and he supports bitcoinvanitygen. com a well known online 3rd-party scamsite for vanity addresses in his signature. Users from outside of the forum don't see his trust rating and can't follow the links to his trust page to read more. If we don't warn manually, like LoyceV and I did, it's still very likely that users from outside the forum will get scammed.



TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 06:57:21 PM
 #604

Once there's more than 100 users who would be selected to DT1

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.

TheFuzzStone - he was added today, myself, suchmoon and your lover all excluded him - myself mainly due to his retarded thread yesterday

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096740.0  which shows he has no place being in any position of trust.

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge - if this happens every month it wont take long until the whole system is a mockery - My suggestion would be to remove all excluded DT members "votes and exclusions" from the calculation, this will give a cleaner system.


.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
TheFuzzStone
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 1092
Merit: 913


keybase.io/thefuzzst0ne


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 07:00:29 PM
 #605

Once there's more than 100 users who would be selected to DT1

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.

TheFuzzStone - he was added today, myself, suchmoon and your lover all excluded him - myself mainly due to his retarded thread yesterday

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096740.0  which shows he has no place being in any position of trust.

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge - if this happens every month it wont take long until the whole system is a mockery - My suggestion would be to remove all excluded DT members "votes and exclusions" from the calculation, this will give a cleaner system.



"Don't trust. Verify."  Smiley --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096740.msg49232976#msg49232976

TheFuzzStone
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 1092
Merit: 913


keybase.io/thefuzzst0ne


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 07:04:57 PM
 #606

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge
Lauda was excluded until today. For you two, see this please.



cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:05:30 PM
 #607



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096740.0  which shows he has no place being in any position of trust.

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge - if this happens every month it wont take long until the whole system is a mockery - My suggestion would be to remove all excluded DT members "votes and exclusions" from the calculation, this will give a cleaner system.



Yeah that sounds like more powers to centralise

LOL what about your abuse of the DT system and the fact you support a proven liar or maybe the fact you feel the need to splatter your sexually deviant posts all over the board?

or this
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0


You admitted red trusting people for presenting facts relating to scams.  


bill gator
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1025



View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:05:55 PM
Merited by theymos_away (5), OgNasty (1)
 #608

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.

I disagree. I think this gives the kind of decentralization and depth to the trust system that we're trying to achieve. This avoids making it so a handful of DT1 users are able to control the entire DT.

Those users that are excluded from DT1, but meet all of the other criteria of the new system are certainly members that should have their votes be valid, in my opinion.

Side-Note: I am not advocating for TheFuzzStone, as I have no idea who that is.
Lauda
GrumpyKitty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2073


Modern Liberalism is a Mental Disorder


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:08:43 PM
 #609

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.
I disagree. I think this gives the kind of decentralization and depth to the trust system that we're trying to achieve. This avoids making it so a handful of DT1 users are able to control the entire DT.
Those users that are excluded from DT1, but meet all of the other criteria of the new system are certainly members that should have their votes be valid, in my opinion.
Which promotes gang-like retaliatory exclusions [1] (the first case is TheFuzzStone, who only excluded TMAN and suchmoon because they excluded him (for legitimate reasons)). As per the OP, retaliation is not welcome. Therefore, I'm unsure what's theymoses game theory reason for allowing this.

[1] You got nothing to lose (probably), and you get obsessed by negative emotions. If you don't get in, you won't feel permanently excluded to begin with.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:09:11 PM
 #610

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge
Lauda was excluded until today. For you two, see this please.


Liar,  you ~ me and Suchmoon after we both had Excluded you - dont bother lying I saw it when I looked at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview once the new list was announced.

also read the fucking rules man

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
TheFuzzStone
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 1092
Merit: 913


keybase.io/thefuzzst0ne


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 07:11:05 PM
 #611

for legitimate reasons
Which are?  Smiley

and you get obsessed by negative emotions
No at all! About negative emotions I answered you here.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 3478


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:13:06 PM
Merited by bill gator (2)
 #612

and to back that up he has excluded all 3 of us who kicked him for no other reason than revenge - if this happens every month it wont take long until the whole system is a mockery - My suggestion would be to remove all excluded DT members "votes and exclusions" from the calculation, this will give a cleaner system.

Does it matter though? I excluded him because I just don't want his ratings or the ratings of his "unique subordinates" (members of TheFuzzStone's trust list who aren't included by other DT1 members) to pollute the trust scores I'm seeing. Same reason I excluded some others. The fact that it kicks them out of DT1 is a result of multiple users doing the same and that retaliatory exclusion is meaningless because it can't achieve the same result. On the other hand, if those who include TheFuzzStone see this tantrum and change their minds - that's great. In general though I think exclusions should be more common and less drama-prone, particularly once we get close to 100 members.

TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:15:57 PM
 #613


Does it matter though?

yes because if there are 2 unknowns added every month, we ~ and they retaliate with ~.. how long till the whole of DT-1 is full of excluded people?

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
bill gator
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1025



View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:20:10 PM
 #614

Which promotes gang-like retaliatory exclusions [1] (the first case is TheFuzzStone, who only excluded TMAN and suchmoon because they excluded him (for legitimate reasons)).

I feel like this is already going on and these changes actively work against it. For example, TMAN and owlcatz have excluded me without explanation even though I have reached out for one via PM. I'm conflicted whether or not to exclude them, because aside from their surprising and sudden exclusion of myself we have had nothing but positive interactions and even transactions (with owlcatz). Most of their feedback, in fact almost all of it I can agree with wholeheartedly. I am failing to find a legitimate reason for them to have done so, and so I am only able to conclude that their trust-list seems to be frivolous and unprincipled to some extent until further explanation is provided. I am giving these users the benefit of the doubt at the moment, and hoping they provide me with an explanation at some point, because I have never had a problem with them.

As per the OP, retaliation is not welcome. Therefore, I'm unsure what's theymoses game theory reason for allowing this.

I think there is justification behind excluding somebody that excludes you. Unless you are distrusting of yourself and approve of their exclusion, how can you do anything other than disagree with their exclusion? Once you realize that you disagree vehemently with their trust-network, it makes perfect sense to exclude that person from your own trust-network. All of this is assuming you disagree with their reasoning to exclude you in the first place, but in rare circumstances there is agreement and accountability from the excluded that wouldn't be appropriate in most cases. Self-Defense is different from retaliation, is it not?
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1410


大智若愚


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:21:33 PM
 #615

yes because if there are 2 unknowns added every month, we ~ and they retaliate with ~.. how long till the whole of DT-1 is full of excluded people?

The ultimate in decentralization  Cheesy

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:21:44 PM
 #616

Allowing Excluded DT-1 Members votes to still be active is a hole in the system.
I disagree. I think this gives the kind of decentralization and depth to the trust system that we're trying to achieve. This avoids making it so a handful of DT1 users are able to control the entire DT.
Those users that are excluded from DT1, but meet all of the other criteria of the new system are certainly members that should have their votes be valid, in my opinion.
Which promotes gang-like retaliatory exclusions [1] (the first case is TheFuzzStone, who only excluded TMAN and suchmoon because they excluded him (for legitimate reasons)). As per the OP, retaliation is not welcome. Therefore, I'm unsure what's theymoses game theory reason for allowing this.

[1] You got nothing to lose (probably), and you get obsessed by negative emotions. If you don't get in, you won't feel permanently excluded to begin with.

I thought you said there were no gangs?  so now there are gangs? just you are not in a gang even though looking and bpip fans and receivers lists and dt list support and posting history makes it look like you are?

Or one gang says no other gangs allowed?

Perhaps game theory says gangs must be combated with other gangs? makes sense to me

I mean tman, suchmoon, lauda,  gang... complaining about other gangs and their exclusion?

Are gang inclusions allowed ? just not exclusions? I don't get how it works?

What about the legitimate reasons he may have been excluding for?

1. supporting liars.
2. being liars
3. implicated in extortion rackets
4. trust system abuse
5. something about escrowing that people were complaining about


I mean just adding possible insights into things I could not say for sure. However I would certainly exclude you those kinds of people from a trust based system

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 3478


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:26:47 PM
Merited by bones261 (2)
 #617


Does it matter though?

yes because if there are 2 unknowns added every month, we ~ and they retaliate with ~.. how long till the whole of DT-1 is full of excluded people?

I'm just saying that "~" shouldn't be seen as a weapon to kick someone out. I don't trust someone's judgement and/or their trust list - I exclude them. But they have been "elected" just like me so I can't really claim that they shouldn't have a right to "vote" inside DT1.

Besides I suspect there could be some mutual annihilation / chicken-and-egg problems if exclusions are made to work the way you're suggesting. Let's say you get excluded by a bunch of people offended by you calling them "princess" and TheFuzzyStone's exclusion of you tips your balance to negative and you both have the same exact score otherwise. Which one of you should be excluded?

TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:27:11 PM
Merited by Slow death (1)
 #618

yes because if there are 2 unknowns added every month, we ~ and they retaliate with ~.. how long till the whole of DT-1 is full of excluded people?

The ultimate in decentralization  Cheesy

Yes.,  Retaliatory exclusions are going to be the new fad. Tie those with people being afraid to exclude and we have as much as a shit show as the last system

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
Lauda
GrumpyKitty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 2073


Modern Liberalism is a Mental Disorder


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:28:31 PM
 #619

Which promotes gang-like retaliatory exclusions [1] (the first case is TheFuzzStone, who only excluded TMAN and suchmoon because they excluded him (for legitimate reasons)).
I feel like this is already going on and these changes actively work against it.
Some users agreeing to exclude certain users (privately or publicly) isn't any kind of gang nor retaliation.

For example, TMAN and owlcatz have excluded me without explanation even though I have reached out for one via PM. I'm conflicted whether or not to exclude them, because aside from their surprising and sudden exclusion of myself we have had nothing but positive interactions and even transactions (with owlcatz). Most of their feedback, in fact almost all of it I can agree with wholeheartedly. I am failing to find a legitimate reason for them to have done so, and so I am only able to conclude that their trust-list seems to be frivolous and unprincipled to some extent until further explanation is provided. I am giving these users the benefit of the doubt at the moment, and hoping they provide me with an explanation at some point, because I have never had a problem with them.
I wouldn't know. However, why would you exclude someone just because they exclude you especially given that you agree with most of their feedback? That's not how you are supposed to use this system. And no, they don't owe you an explanation just as you wouldn't owe anyone one.

I think there is justification behind excluding somebody that excludes you. Unless you are distrusting of yourself and approve of their exclusion, how can you do anything other than disagree with their exclusion? Once you realize that you disagree vehemently with their trust-network, it makes perfect sense to exclude that person from your own trust-network. All of this is assuming you disagree with their reasoning to exclude you in the first place, but in rare circumstances there is agreement and accountability from the excluded that wouldn't be appropriate in most cases. Self-Defense is different from retaliation, is it not?
Disagreeing with someone's exclusion of self, and then excluding them because of it is not self-defense. It is retaliation (look up definitions and examples if unsure).

Besides I suspect there could be some mutual annihilation / chicken-and-egg problem if exclusions are made to work the way you're suggesting. Let's say you get excluded by a bunch of people offended by you calling them "princess" and TheFuzzyStone's exclusion of you tips your balance to negative and you both have the same exact score otherwise. Which one of you should be excluded?
Although very unlikely, good question.

Yes.,  Retaliatory exclusions are going to be the new fad. Tie those with people being afraid to exclude and we have as much as a shit show as the last system
Kind-of. It will be very hard to keep track of everyone as is.

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1528

www.gunbot.uk/tman/ - LEGENDARY SELF MADE BITCHES


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 07:33:41 PM
 #620


Besides I suspect there could be some mutual annihilation / chicken-and-egg problems if exclusions are made to work the way you're suggesting. Let's say you get excluded by a bunch of people offended by you calling them "princess" and TheFuzzyStone's exclusion of you tips your balance to negative and you both have the same exact score otherwise. Which one of you should be excluded?

Fuck you and your legitimate questions.. guess we will have to see how bad the situation gets

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 88 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!