DefaultTrust changes

[TMAN]

Will check it out for sure.
Not saying you are wrong, only using bad language has a way to make you lose relevance

I hear ya dude, but I have the vocab of a builder unfortunately.. sometimes it is expressed when I am fighting a brick wall..

[1713877495]

1713877495

[1713877495]

1713877495

[suchmoon]

Please use the other 15 threads you already have for that garbage. TYVM.

[asche]

snip

Can you leave the drama outside Meta?

It's not really what it is meant for.

[TMAN]

snip

Can you leave the drama outside Meta?

It's not really what it is meant for.

i'm with you - lets all move to Rep..

[Bibite]

user: asche

I would not trust someone who was interested to make a deal with a DT1 only to get a green trust. It clearly shows how shady people can be when it's about their own interest.
His whole feedback is questionable knowing this


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5074020.msg48161118#msg48161118
https://web.archive.org/web/20190116173729/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5074020.msg48161118

Edit: Honnêtement j'ai déjà caressé l'idée de trouver un trade à faire avec un DT juste pour gagner un green trust DT...

translated
Edit: Honestly I have already had the idea of finding a trade to do with a DT just to win a DT green trust....


I have of course a lot more spicy stories to bring soon... I just found this accidentally while searching for something...

[asche]

user: asche

I would not trust someone who was interested to make a deal with a DT1 only to get a green trust. It clearly shows how shady people can be when it's about their own interest.
His whole feedback is questionable knowing this


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5074020.msg48161118#msg48161118
https://web.archive.org/web/20190116173729/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5074020.msg48161118

Edit: Honnêtement j'ai déjà caressé l'idée de trouver un trade à faire avec un DT juste pour gagner un green trust DT...

translated
Edit: Honestly I have already had the idea of finding a trade to do with a DT just to win a DT green trust....


I have of course a lot more spicy stories to bring soon...

This was actually because of the centralisation of the Trust System.

So what happened actually made me right.
Wanna discuss this more. Please make a topic in Reputation. I will be delighted to explain my point of view.

Also you should know this is irony since DTs hardly give reputation for single trades. But maybe it takes more than half a brain to read between the lines.

Cheers

Edit: Let me offer a proper translation because yours sucks:

"Honestly I even considered making a trade with a DT to get a green trust"

Adding the whole post for context.

Les plus reconnu ou les plus actifs ?

+ actif je pense, car pour moi reconnu il faudrait prendre en compte la trust de manière plus forte je pense

Le score prend en compte trust & merit.

Sauf que vu que ça utilise le réseau DT, ici pas grand monde aura un score différent de 0 sur la partie Trust.

Edit: Honnêtement j'ai déjà caressé l'idée de trouver un trade à faire avec un DT juste pour gagner un green trust DT...

This was about the recognition score on BPIP and the fact you can't get a "good" score if you have 0 trust from DT.

[Bibite]

I have a lot more to post, don't worry, I don't have to post in reputation or idk, I wanted to show how unreliable the DT is now, as I pointed earlier in this discussion, I just wanted to give an exemple.

edit:
Ahhhhhh the centralization excuse and the 'your English sucks' but nope....

translated
Edit: Honestly I have already had the idea of finding a trade to do with a DT just to win a DT green trust....

Honnetement j'ai deja eu l idee de trouver un trade à faire avec un DT pour gagner un green trust d'un DT

It's the same as I said, any user speaking french (not any of your buddies with who you were exchanging merits since months just for the sake of 'look at me I AM SWAG WITH MY MERITS') can confirm I translated as it should be

now you talk about the context, let's talk...
it doesn't help you more...


You can spend your time to find something else, as I said I have a lot more

[JohnUser]

translated
Edit: Honestly I have already had the idea of finding a trade to do with a DT just to win a DT green trust....

Honnetement j'ai deja eu l idee de trouver un trade à faire avec un DT pour gagner un green trust d'un DT

Tu sors du contexte, relis tout le thread, d'où ça émerge.

In English : You are out of context. Please read the whole thread you are quoting again.

[Bibite]

nope


T

The most recognized or the most active?

+ more active I think, because for me recognized it would be necessary to take into account the trust in a stronger way I think

The score takes into account trust & merit.

Except that since it uses the DT network, here not many people will have a score other than 0 on the Trust part.

Edit: Honestly I have already had the idea of finding a trade to do with a DT just to win a DT green trust....

by the way
you are fast to reply to his PM  

don't worry I have you on my list as well

[asche]

You can spend your time to find something else, as I said I have a lot more

See you in reputation.

[JohnUser]

~~

by the way
you are fast to reply to his PM 

don't worry I have you on my list as well

On TG yes, so ? I'm on your list, damn..

[Bibite]

You can spend your time to find something else, as I said I have a lot more

See you in reputation.

Me no, someone else...surely

JohnUser
TG stands for?

[asche]

Me no, someone else...surely

JohnUser
TG stands for?

Keep ignoring the rules of the forum. Sure.

TG = telegram

[Bibite]

I am not ignoring the rule. I am participating in a discussion about the DT changes. I wanted to show an example of the weakness with the DT change so I believe I am in the right place=>> the DT changes discussion

syl...

[asche]

I am not ignoring the rule. I am participating in a discussion about the DT changes. I wanted to show an example of the weakness with the DT change so I believe I am in the right place=>> the DT changes discussion

syl...

So you believe I am Sylon? Quite funny.

Please make that unfunded accusation, and I will be pleased to tag you (not a threat, simple cause -> effect relation)

archive.is/JFpKi

[TMAN]

I am not ignoring the rule. I am participating in a discussion about the DT changes. I wanted to show an example of the weakness with the DT change so I believe I am in the right place=>> the DT changes discussion

syl...

Rep is the best place for this, “if” you prove to be correct you can link the rep thread into a post here, asche deserves the right to defend himself buddy

[LoyceV]

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone) 

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

It feels like DT has much more inflation that Bitcoin at the moment. Take Alex_Sr's Sent feedback for example: he started sending green trust the moment he was on put on DT. Look at his feedback on DabLjat:

Expert on trust issues and active user!

Let me focus on the last 2 words: "active user". The account is 7 months young, has 104 posts, and (who would have thought!) he too started dropping green and red trust the same day!

I've been away since I was put on DT1, and I have a lot of reading to do to catch up, but my first impression is that there's already a circle jerk even more controversy when certain accounts suddenly leave each other trust and add each other to their trust list. And just like the hostile takeover I described, a dozen users can easily add all of them on DT, and turn all of them to +110 (after 10 months).

Just a thought: I've seen users counter negative trust, countering positive trust would be a new thing.

[TMAN]

Just a thought: I've seen users counter negative trust, countering positive trust would be a new thing.

No need, @Alex I have had to drop you, even though you have been active with the tagging - all those positive trusts with no references are not cool.

Please PM me to justify them also I don’t like the non english trust, let’s talk this through and fix the issues then we can get you back on my trust list.

Thanks Loyce, ashamed I missed this myself TBH

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Take Alex_Sr's Sent feedback for example

Ugh.  Some of the members he left trust for probably deserve it, but this is exactly what a new DT2 member shouldn't be doing.  When I got added to DT2 last year, I got quite a few PMs from DT members suggesting some changes to my feedbacks and recommendations that I hand out positives very conservatively.  New DT members should not be going nuts, handing out green trust like that--especially without reference links, but even with the links I think they ought to just slow down and not go on a positive (or negative) trust rampage.

I'm not going to act as far as exclusions or counter-negs.  Hopefully Alex_Sr (and anyone else who's doing the same thing) will see this thread and maybe think twice about his feedbacks. 

[Lauda]

I was on the DT2 list for a very short time. Just started to paint the farmers account - immediately disappeared from the list (probably due to the fact that dropped TheFuzzStone)  

Added you in under me man, you should be on DT

It feels like DT has much more inflation that Bitcoin at the moment. Take Alex_Sr's Sent feedback for example: he started sending green trust the moment he was on put on DT. Look at his feedback on DabLjat:

Included by Lafu. I have no idea why.

No need, @Alex I have had to drop you, even though you have been active with the tagging - all those positive trusts with no references are not cool.

I can pick up the slack; no need really.