Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2019, 02:33:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 »
  Print  
Author Topic: DefaultTrust changes  (Read 42458 times)
TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 11:34:03 AM
 #1041

Well you have accused them. Clearly that means any complaints are invalid because your decisions and judgement are infallible are they? Life would be so much easier if you could just defame anyone who accuses you of anything amirite?
Yes, they do that and there is a very clear case of trust abuse happening with me. I am not engaged in any shady active here, even I don't earn form signatures by posting here and there is nothing scammy I have done which should state Warning: Trade with extreme caution!.

This is how they try to mob anyone here who tries to speak in some truth about there manipulative works. This is a clear case of lowering the value of once reputed account, without any prove of it being compressed.

Very interesting. What a shocker. Another person who has critical things to say punished with their own personal inquisition. I reviewed the case, and all I see is suspicion. There is no evidence of wrongdoing, just demands by the forum overlords for the user to prove their identity, and punishment for not doing so. I am sure it is just a complete coincidence this inquisition was rebirthed directly after them being critical of the trust police right? It is almost like they try to find anything they can to discredit and punish anyone who criticizes their inquisition type Barney Fife OCD forum cop behavior.

     I'm going to use an analogy here. Let's say someone lives in the US and just turned 21 two days ago. They decide to go to a nightclub, and somehow ends up losing their ID along the way. When the 21 years old goes to the nightclub, they discover that their ID is missing and the nightclub does not let them enter. Is the nightclub doing something wrong? After all, the person is 21 years old. They just don't have an ID.
     Unfortunately, it appears JusticeforYou has lost the keys that would have allowed him full reentry into our community. If I am not mistaken, Satoshi himself cannot even access his account here unless he can prove to the satisfaction of theymos that he is indeed Satoshi. So Justiceforyou has a privilege that the founder doesn't enjoy. At least he is free to post on this forum. We must take every precaution possible to ensure that this forum doesn't fall for a big con. You do realize that con is short for confidence, correct?
     I for one would hope that JusticeForYou finds a usb drive tucked away in a junk drawer, and is able to retrieve the private keys. Hopefully multiple keys that have no current UTXO attached to them so he doesn't have to reveal his wealth and can be totally vindicated. Also, JusticeForYou indicated that he sent a PM to theymos. Perhaps theymos himself feels that having access to the original e-mail is sufficient.

Yeah, after 8 years of being around here I know how it works, thank you for the patronizing explanation though.

You are missing the point completely. It is irrelevant if he can't prove it is his account, because first of all there is no victim making a claim. Now if some one he had harmed came forward, ok sure I wouldn't have any issue whatsoever.

However in this case he is simply SUSPECTED of not being the owner. While he can't prove he is, why should he have to? Oh right, because the forum police have decided that you are guilty until proven innocent. This is exactly why I advocate for a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before rating.

I am sure that it is absolutely coincidence all these people decided now would be a good time to negative tag him. I am sure this inquisition has nothing to do with the fact that he is critical of the very same behavior these people who rated him perpetrate on a daily basis. This is the plausible deniability of harassment, inquisition, and dog piling these people use to justify their behavior by systematically discrediting anyone who criticizes them.

1561041181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561041181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561041181
Reply with quote  #2

1561041181
Report to moderator
1561041181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561041181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561041181
Reply with quote  #2

1561041181
Report to moderator
COINSWITCH
Trade 300+ coins
No Login
No KYC
Get $5 on 1st order
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561041181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561041181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561041181
Reply with quote  #2

1561041181
Report to moderator
1561041181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561041181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561041181
Reply with quote  #2

1561041181
Report to moderator
1561041181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561041181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561041181
Reply with quote  #2

1561041181
Report to moderator
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1775


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 11:59:57 AM
 #1042

This is how they try to mob anyone here who tries to speak in some truth about there manipulative works. This is a clear case of lowering the value of once reputed account, without any prove of it being compressed.

Exactly, they try to force there words and just make the situation more worst for anyone speaking against there agenda. This is how they keep the system monopolized.

When did you stop speaking English?

Sometime between August 2017 and November 2018.

Sure I'm full of ideas...

How about the Bitcoin Shark Tank?

What you do is get 5 Bitcoin investors together to listen to people pitch their ideas. Then those that come begging for Bitcoin will have to explain their idea, show how much they earned so far, and what their projections are for the next year. Then the Bitcoin Sharks will either make an offer or kick them out. Funny thing tho... All those that came begging for money on the 'real' Shark Tank with just an 'idea' got kicked out pretty quickly.

I understand missing their/there occasionally; most of us do it on occasion. But this guy went from having an extremely strong command of the English language (native speaker) to knowing it as a second language. He went from not posting in Meta too often to almost exclusively posting in Meta, and now Reputation because he's involved there (not their). It seems like he was awoken to perform a specific task.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 12:24:53 PM
 #1043

This is how they try to mob anyone here who tries to speak in some truth about there manipulative works. This is a clear case of lowering the value of once reputed account, without any prove of it being compressed.

Exactly, they try to force there words and just make the situation more worst for anyone speaking against there agenda. This is how they keep the system monopolized.

When did you stop speaking English?

Sometime between August 2017 and November 2018.

Sure I'm full of ideas...

How about the Bitcoin Shark Tank?

What you do is get 5 Bitcoin investors together to listen to people pitch their ideas. Then those that come begging for Bitcoin will have to explain their idea, show how much they earned so far, and what their projections are for the next year. Then the Bitcoin Sharks will either make an offer or kick them out. Funny thing tho... All those that came begging for money on the 'real' Shark Tank with just an 'idea' got kicked out pretty quickly.

I understand missing their/there occasionally; most of us do it on occasion. But this guy went from having an extremely strong command of the English language (native speaker) to knowing it as a second language. He went from not posting in Meta too often to almost exclusively posting in Meta, and now Reputation because he's involved there (not their). It seems like he was awoken to perform a specific task.

What specific task?

Also what if he was not a native speaker. I don't see any examples of exemplary English, I see adequate command of English. Maybe he has not had a reason to use English for some time and has gone back to his native tongue and his English has got a little rusty.



I see that

1. he has the original email (so not the usual hack due to the forum being compromised)
2. he is not sig spamming like 99% of people on meta so this demonstrates likely he does not need btc dust
3. he seems familiar with the history of the account
4. no vip has come forward to say their account was hacked.
5. No proof of hack or account sale at all.

Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.


nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1775


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 12:41:07 PM
 #1044

What specific task?

I'm going to get back to you about that, don't worry.

Also what if he was not a native speaker. I don't see any examples of exemplary English, I see adequate command of English.

Nope, before the re-awakening his English was master class. Almost perfect by forum standards. I'm going to perform a comparative analysis of the two different time periods when I have some free time.

Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.

I actually agree with you here but if it is proven then the red trust is warranted. This is yet to be determined.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
bones261
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1616


My hat is in storage. https://ibb.co/YLkPgXb


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 12:49:49 PM
 #1045


Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.



The only problem with Neutral trust is if a person has a zero trust rating,  many people don't even bother to check the trust comments. Perhaps a message under trust to "click here to read peer comments" should be warranted.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 12:50:57 PM
Last edit: February 02, 2019, 01:05:18 PM by cryptohunter
 #1046

What specific task?

I'm going to get back to you about that, don't worry.

Also what if he was not a native speaker. I don't see any examples of exemplary English, I see adequate command of English.

Nope, before the re-awakening his English was master class. Almost perfect by forum standards. I'm going to perform a comparative analysis of the two different time periods when I have some free time.

Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.

I actually agree with you here but if it is proven then the red trust is warranted. This is yet to be determined.

Well, exactly, as it is to be determined it should remain at neutral. Persons are innocent until proven guilty not the other way around.

@Bones.

People who are going to do a trade that they will not use escrow for or they are vulnerable at any point should be reading everything they can about the person including the neutral ratings.
However, I do agree I  think there could be a different warning for things like possible account change ownership or proven account change ownership. Since people may purchase an account just to earn at a higher rate and never scam anyone.

I personally believe trust should be for people that are likely to scam . All other "opinions" about that person should be in a separate feedback area which could just be called "other feedback" . In this case a person that was highly generous and has not done anything wrong  now has a big red label that suggests he is a scammer.

We should be really pushing people to do   their own investigations on the person they will trade with before trading rather than relying on a score corrupted by subjective opinions.

Whatever their trust score I would try and use DDE for anything of real value.



TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 01:12:06 PM
Merited by bones261 (1)
 #1047


Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.



The only problem with Neutral trust is if a person has a zero trust rating,  many people don't even bother to check the trust comments. Perhaps a message under trust to "click here to read peer comments" should be warranted.

That is the issue. The trust system is supposed to be a simple guide for noobs right? Unfortunately though no system is free from exploitation. We should be encouraging users to use the green and red numbers as a QUICK REFERENCE, then to do their own due diligence before trading. By overly applying the ratings we are just creating signal noise and confusion allowing this kind of manufactured crime of suspicion creating complete ambiguity as to who is actually a scammer and who is not. The net is too wide so you catch too many innocents, or for very petty reasons, people notice, then the whole system becomes useless for its intended purpose.

We need a standard of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws for leaving a negative rating, otherwise it can never be a useful quick reference as explained above. Even if it WAS a good quick reference, teaching noobs to just use those numbers and not do due diligence is feeding them into a wood chipper of fraud by teaching them to trust a system that can be manipulated. Furthermore these trust police feed into this feeling by giving the perception that they actively stop scams.

I am sorry but this whole thing that has arisen here is what we call a clusterfuck and it needs to stop. I can't even imagine how much more we could have accomplished if all of this energy was redirected towards constructive things rather than playing cops and robbers and ripping apart the foundation of the cohesiveness of the culture of the forum itself.

Slow death
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 693



View Profile
February 02, 2019, 01:17:46 PM
 #1048

[...]

what country are you from? I asked this question here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5071290.msg49546606#msg49546606


cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1155

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 01:25:56 PM
 #1049


Someone with vast BTC does not need to answer that question and should not.

I see this line of questioning... show us all of your btc, tell us your ip and country of origin ... tell us your native language as a line of questioning that is not suitable here on this forum. I would not reveal my own native language or which country I am originally from and why should I.  If I were a vip member I would be doing all I could to throw people off of my scent.

Probably using tor, vpn , someone elses wifi,  putting on fake lack of english writing skill etc... all totally within his right and you guys seem to be pumping him for and bringing unwarranted attention to these personal details.

Meantime you are all spamming away your sigs for btc dust whilst he gave more to the forum with donations that you will likely ever earn here.

Had it dawned on persons here that he may well want to give the appearance of losing his btc, not being native English speaking etc to mask his ID now he is vastly wealthy?

There are many possible explanations that he may not want to divulge for perfectly understandable reasons.

Innocent until proven guilty. It is quite simple.

neutral trust at a max or prove the account is hacked


TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 01:31:02 PM
 #1050


Someone with vast BTC does not need to answer that question and should not.

Can everyone see how this constant default position of inquisition is not only not a desirable user experience, but can literally be dangerous to the physical safety and freedom of users?

JusticeForYou
VIP
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 271


"Blockchain is the next big thing after Internet"


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 04:11:26 PM
 #1051

what country are you from? I asked this question here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5071290.msg49546606#msg49546606
Please note, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here.


5░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░▄██████████▄
░░░██████████████
░░██████▐▌██████
█████░░░░░░░▀█████
██████▄▄░░▄▄░░██████
████████░░▀▀▄██████
████████░░▄▄▄░░█████
██████▀▀░░▀▀▀░░█████
█████░░░░░░░░█████
░░██████▐▌██████
░░░██████████████
░░░░▀██████████▀
░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀
░░░
░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░▄██████████▄
░░░██████████████
░░██████▐▌██████
█████░░░░░░░▀█████
██████▄▄░░▄▄░░██████
████████░░▀▀▄██████
████████░░▄▄▄░░█████
██████▀▀░░▀▀▀░░█████
█████░░░░░░░░█████
░░██████▐▌██████
░░░██████████████
░░░░▀██████████▀
░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀▀▀
░░░
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1410


大智若愚


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 04:14:27 PM
 #1052


Please note sir, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong sir. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here. sir

FTFY

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1775


Permanent Tourist


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 04:28:15 PM
 #1053


Please note sir, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong sir. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here. sir

FTFY



Sorry, couldn't help myself.

OK, back to the regularly scheduled drama and dire seriousness.

......
.L I V E C O I N . N E T.
.
..PROFITBOX..
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
█████████████▄  ▄████████████
    █████████████████████████
  ██████████▀    ▀█ ▀████████
████  █████▀  ▄▄  ▀█  ▀██████
  ████████▀  ▄██▄  ▀█   ▀████
    ██████   ▀██▀   ██   ████
  █████████▄      ▄██████████
██  █████████▄  ▄████████████
  ███████████████████████████
██  █████████████████████████
  █████████████████████▀ ███
█████████████████████▀   ███
    █████████████▀     ████
  █████████████▀   ██    ████
████  █████▀     ██    ████
  ███████▀   ██    ██    ████
    █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████    ██    ██    ████
██  █████    ██    ██    ████
  ███████████████████████████
.....
TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 04:54:19 PM
Last edit: February 16, 2019, 09:23:57 PM by TECSHARE
 #1054


Please note sir, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong sir. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here. sir

FTFY



Sorry, couldn't help myself.

OK, back to the regularly scheduled drama and dire seriousness.

Interesting how it is always a joke when it goes the other way but the sky will fall if your own accusations are unheeded.

Does anyone else see the hypocrisy of making a joke of the guy defending himself from mere accusations of suspicion, but the accusations themselves are of utmost importance apparently. I am sure it is just a total coincidence these accusations escalated to negative ratings shortly after this user started raising issues of abuse in meta.

Funny how this serious discussion is suddenly so boring. So hey lets liven it up a bit with some more drama, so all the arguments can be dismissed and the topic slid to some other side issue right? You cry about drama but you simultaniously make a joke out of serious discussion. You add nothing.

qwk
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 2118


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 05:16:21 PM
 #1055

Neutral trust with a warning the account "may be" changed hands is enough.
The only problem with Neutral trust is if a person has a zero trust rating, many people don't even bother to check the trust comments.
That is the issue. The trust system is supposed to be a simple guide for noobs right?
At least that's my interpretation of the trust system.
I personally will deal with people with a negative trust rating, for example.
The trust system is a warning to noobs:
Be cautious, the person you're dealing with is considered likelier to rip you off than the mean by other, more experienced users.


Unfortunately though no system is free from exploitation.
Fortunate for us that the trust system itself has a built-in mechanism to cope with abuse: the trust list.
A person abusing trust is likelier than the mean to be excluded from trust lists with "~".
Of course, it's not a perfect system, but I personally feel that blatant abuse will not go unnoticed / unsanctioned.


We should be encouraging users to use the green and red numbers as a QUICK REFERENCE, then to do their own due diligence before trading.
Absolutely.
We should also encourage them to build their own trust lists.


The net is too wide so you catch too many innocents
True, but not really important.
Since we're not dealing with accusations of a crime in front of a court, I've always stood for "shoot first, ask questions later".
"Innocent until proven guilty" is not the way to go with a trust system, IMHO.

The only harm done to an "innocent negged user" is a loss of reputation and maybe some income from (what I consider) SPAM.
There's no absolute right for a user on an online forum to generate income from the forum, and there's no right to being liked.
Ergo, no rights are infringed.

As for people who feel mistreated, I feel with you, but that doesn't change my attitude.
I mean, come on, we're all basically nerds here, we all know how it feels not to be loved, right?
It hurts, but you'll get over it and hopefully come out stronger.


We need a standard of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws for leaving a negative rating
And who would watch over compliance to this standard?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


I am sorry but this whole thing that has arisen here is what we call a clusterfuck and it needs to stop.
Clusterfuck, that's what it is. I blame Lauda. Tongue
No, seriously, the people bitching about their "unjust" trust ratings are the clusterfuckers here, if you ask me.
Just get over it, guys, you're not gonna change it anyway.
Complain as you might, the trust system in its current state is most likely to stay for a while.
I seriously doubt that theymos will rework it anytime soon.

All free men, wherever they may live, can use Bitcoin, and, therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words "Ich bin ein Bitcoiner!"
tmfp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1410


大智若愚


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 05:22:33 PM
 #1056


<snip> You add nothing.

I'm just having a laugh at the absurdity of believing that the current grammar and posting syntax of this "Justice" account resemble, in any way, that of past BTC_bear posts.
And a bonus smile at your obsessive contrarianism, which I first recall encountering during the WoodCollector saga.

But hey, I'm just an arriviste, cult member, whatever, self righteous, other stuff, forum ruining "scam buster", WTF do I know?

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 05:35:10 PM
Last edit: February 02, 2019, 05:54:37 PM by TECSHARE
 #1057


<snip> You add nothing.

I'm just having a laugh at the absurdity of believing that the current grammar and posting syntax of this "Justice" account resemble, in any way, that of past BTC_bear posts.
And a bonus smile at your obsessive contrarianism, which I first recall encountering during the WoodCollector saga.

But hey, I'm just an arriviste, cult member, whatever, self righteous, other stuff, forum ruining "scam buster", WTF do I know?

Is is absurd or irrelevant? Why is it the position consistently needs to be shifted away from this poor standard of evidence and the negative results back to the suspicion on this person demanding him to confirm his account for no particular reason other than to satiate the desires of people with nothing better to do? You know what is absurd is you arguing against a standard of evidence with that signature tag on.

Again bravo for demonstrating once again several people here are struggling with every tool they have to put everyone who questions them on the defensive by hook or crook, and the topic itself is only secondary.

Why should anyone care that this kind of behavior can get people thrown in prison, robbed, or killed in their home nations for no other reason than some people here have nothing better to do than play private investigator?

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 3528


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
February 02, 2019, 06:54:47 PM
Merited by tmfp (1)
 #1058

Why should anyone care that this kind of behavior can get people thrown in prison, robbed, or killed in their home nations for no other reason than some people here have nothing better to do than play private investigator?

BTC_Bear/JusticeForYou has already disclosed having large amounts of BTC years ago. Asking for a signed message is typical when an account is suspected to have changed hands and doesn't put them into any more danger and it doesn't disclose IRL identity.

If my account starts posting with an Indonesian accent I sure as hell hope that "investigators" paint it red up the wazoo as soon as possible. While you would wait for it to scam someone.

Slow death
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 693



View Profile
February 02, 2019, 07:08:41 PM
 #1059

what country are you from? I asked this question here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5071290.msg49546606#msg49546606
Please note, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here.



OK, back to the regularly scheduled drama and dire seriousness.

this drama will only go the other way: "DT did this and that" instead of maintaining focus on the VIP account. Now any discussion the focus change to something like: " DT did this and that ". in the Meta and reputation is flooded with themes like this "DT did this and that"



TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1345


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2019, 07:20:09 PM
 #1060

what country are you from? I asked this question here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5071290.msg49546606#msg49546606
Please note, this is again an attempt to hamper my personal repo and get unwanted info from me which is totally wrong. I can keep my identity as much as anonymous I want on the forum no one could force me to reveal my personal things here.



OK, back to the regularly scheduled drama and dire seriousness.

this drama will only go the other way: "DT did this and that" instead of maintaining focus on the VIP account. Now any discussion the focus change to something like: " DT did this and that ". in the Meta and reputation is flooded with themes like this "DT did this and that"

It is almost like this is the forum and thread for discussing the issues with the trust system and you keep wanting to make it about this person's imagined crimes instead of the topic of the counterproductive nature of the current administration of it.

Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!