DefaultTrust changes

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Thanks to everybody who put me in their custom trust list/settings. Feeling very honoured, will do my absolute best to tag scammers & help fellow posters here.

I’m always available to chat so if anybody needs advice or help feel free to PM me.



LFC

[1714029465]

1714029465

[1714029465]

1714029465

[1714029465]

1714029465

[1714029465]

1714029465

[mikeywith]

Removed:

Code:

greenplastic
EcuaMobi
JohnUser

Those users are inactive for more than 3 days.

Does this mean they won't be back to DT1 till next month ?

i am asking because EcuaMobi has a member on his trust list that i consider to be the most active scam buster on the digital goods board, and now he is not DT2 anymore, not sure if i should echo his feedbacks "they are a lot" or just wait till EcuaMobi is back on DT1.

[suchmoon]

Does this mean they won't be back to DT1 till next month ?

Yes.

i am asking because EcuaMobi has a member on his trust list that i consider to be the most active scam buster on the digital goods board, and now he is not DT2 anymore, not sure if i should echo his feedbacks "they are a lot" or just wait till EcuaMobi is back on DT1.

Who is it? Might be easier to just add the user to DT2 if they're worthy.

[asche]

Removed:

Code:

greenplastic
EcuaMobi
JohnUser

Those users are inactive for more than 3 days.

Does this mean they won't be back to DT1 till next month ?

i am asking because EcuaMobi has a member on his trust list that i consider to be the most active scam buster on the digital goods board, and now he is not DT2 anymore, not sure if i should echo his feedbacks "they are a lot" or just wait till EcuaMobi is back on DT1.

You could mention him here for starters. Some DT1 might want to add him. That would solve your "issue".

Edit: suchmoon you beat me to it.
Typing on smartphone is a pain in the ass

[tmfp]

Removed:

Code:

greenplastic
EcuaMobi
JohnUser

Those users are inactive for more than 3 days.

Does this mean they won't be back to DT1 till next month ?

i am asking because EcuaMobi has a member on his trust list that i consider to be the most active scam buster on the digital goods board, and now he is not DT2 anymore, not sure if i should echo his feedbacks "they are a lot" or just wait till EcuaMobi is back on DT1.

EcuaMobi's on my (and other DT1) inclusion list(s) so he'll still be on DT2 and his trust ratings will still show by default.
Or doesn't it work like that any more?


Ignore that, misread your post.

Although I'll take the opportunity to repeat my misgivings about the "3 days inactive" proviso. Trust will be flashing on and off like traffic lights because a DT member might actually want to be internet free occasionally. Y'know, like vacations?
Or is it meant to be some sort of "dedication to the cause" measurement?

[mikeywith]

Who is it? Might be easier to just add the user to DT2 if they're worthy.

This is the user https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=400366

He does have a problem with "References" and not enough details on some feedback which i have advised him to work on before, but he certainly is a top notch scam buster.

Until theymos implements a way to automatically re-list the inactive user as soon as they become active again, then 3 days is way too short IMO

[SebastianJu]

3 days of Inactivity are hefty. I thought the "no post in two weeks and you are out" rule is already a bit hard but at least somewhat more understandable.

[coinlocket$]

I'm curious to know why minerjones (Most Trusted user) excludes theymos (Admin). Is there a story I missed?

He added around half of dt1 list on his ditrust list (me too) around 2 weeks ago, the reason is still unknown, of course he dosesn't need to explain his motivation, I've only posted the fact.

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-25_Mon_21.39h/346731.html

1. ~theymos (DT1! (36) 3939 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~HostFat (DT1 (-4) 78 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~TECSHARE (DT1 (-2) 191 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~phantastisch (DT1! (3) 237 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~OgNasty (DT1! (0) 583 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~CanaryInTheMine (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~mprep (DT1! (16) 294 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~Dabs (DT1! (2) 118 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~Welsh (DT1! (14) 421 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~cryptodevil (DT1! (10) 95 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. ~JohnUser (DT1! (1) 205 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. ~sapta (DT1! (2) 151 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ~tmfp (DT1! (9) 242 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. ~Quickseller (310 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. ~zazarb (DT1 (-3) 482 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. ~WhiteManWhite (DT1 (-2) 54 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. ~LeGaulois (DT1! (5) 472 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. ~TheFuzzStone (DT1 (-2) 210 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. ~Jet Cash (DT1! (6) 1019 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. ~Lafu (DT1! (11) 409 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. ~xtraelv (DT1! (14) 1005 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. NEW ~Fattcatt (73 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. Removed ~krogothmanhattan (DT1! (12) 860 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. ~Halab (DT1! (6) 150 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. ~theyoungmillionaire (DT1! (3) 590 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. ~o_e_l_e_o (DT1! ( 1235 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. ~iasenko (DT1! ( 764 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. ~coinlocket$ (DT1! (16) 679 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. ~Alex_Sr (DT1! ( 543 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. ~taikuri13 (DT1! (5) 428 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. ~Coolcryptovator (DT1! (10) 533 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. ~ICOEthics (DT1! (16) 446 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[suchmoon]

In my haste I missed one important change: Blazed has been removed. I'm guessing inactivity too.

[peloso]

from LFC_Bitcoin tagged me message

"Attempting to publicly build an army of shitposters, alts, butthurt posters etc to try & manipulate DT."

where is my army of shitposters? where is my alts? where proofs? and now this liar in DT1
where is justice ? and you say im colludig?
i ask AGAIN WHERE IS JUSTICE ?
so this is the reason thant i not trust D1 and removed it

[Vod]

In my haste I missed one important change: Blazed has been removed. I'm guessing inactivity too.

That's excellent - Blazed was the biggest trust abuser.  He added any person who trusted him for anything to his DT2 list - boosting his trust level artificially.

[The Cryptovator]

I'm curious to know why minerjones (Most Trusted user) excludes theymos (Admin). Is there a story I missed?

Same here, minerjones exclude more than 50% DT1. Wondering how he have exclude admin  . Just noticed now from DTVIEW and visit this thread to know about update.

However, welcome all new DT1. Hope we can work together to keep clean this forum.

[tranthidung]

Update for 7 weeks after the implementation of Default Trust Change:
If nothing new happen next days/ weeks, the delayed effects of Default Trust Change on merit circulations tailed off over the last 7 weeks.
If nothing strange occurs, I will stop doing analysis in the topic when the ten weeks later passed (3 more weeks).
Colors:
- Red: Decrease
- Green: Increase.

Two week later:
Median: + 37.1
Mean: + 24.2

Three weeks later:
Median: + 15.9
Mean: + 15.5

Four weeks later:
Median: + 15.6
Mean: + 11.1

Five weeks later:
Median: + 6.2
Mean: + 6.4

Six weeks later:
Median: + 4.2
Mean: + 3.5
Seven weeks later:
Median: + 4.2
Mean: + 2.7
More details such as methods of the calculation, can be found there, Tracking the difference of merit circulations with Default Trust Changes

[LFC_Bitcoin]

from LFC_Bitcoin tagged me message

"Attempting to publicly build an army of shitposters, alts, butthurt posters etc to try & manipulate DT."

where is my army of shitposters? where is my alts? where proofs? and now this liar in DT1
where is justice ? and you say im colludig?
i ask AGAIN WHERE IS JUSTICE ?
so this is the reason thant i not trust D1 and removed it

Show theymos some damn respect & keep your pathetic off topic whining out of this thread. You’ve been tagged red by 3 different people. You are untrustworthy.

I’m not engaging with you any further.

[SebastianJu]

Strange of minerjones. Only things I can think about is that it might be a test in regards to how this setup would affect something in the new trust scheme. Might as well be that the account was sold? Doubt it though.
The only other thing that comes to mind is what the bitcoin community split the most in the last years. Did he block users that are strong supporters of lightning project or that are the opposite? I guess most in DT1 wouldn't be against it at a so high percentual rate than the average user but half of the list sounds a little bit like it could be something ideologic like that.

[Lauda]

I'm curious to know why minerjones (Most Trusted user) excludes theymos (Admin). Is there a story I missed?

Same here, minerjones exclude more than 50% DT1. Wondering how he have exclude admin  .

He does not have to explain anything and one should be able to exclude theymos without others poking around like there's lava flowing everywhere.

Might as well be that the account was sold? Doubt it though.

Facepalm.

[peloso]

Show theymos some damn respect & keep your pathetic off topic whining out of this thread. You’ve been tagged red by 3 different people. You are untrustworthy.

I’m not engaging with you any further.

i answered you here
so you can shut up and can continue licking asses and no more answer me i not write to you
and you in DT1 is big mistake you abuse trust system

[TECSHARE]

I'm curious to know why minerjones (Most Trusted user) excludes theymos (Admin). Is there a story I missed?

Same here, minerjones exclude more than 50% DT1. Wondering how he have exclude admin  .

He does not have to explain anything and one should be able to exclude theymos without others poking around like there's lava flowing everywhere.

Might as well be that the account was sold? Doubt it though.

Facepalm.

Yes, people explaining their exclusions that just so happen to perfectly list everyone who has been critical of them should not be forced to explain their choices, because then they might have to take responsibility for them. It is best these kind of choices are done in the dark with no oversight much like the previous broken system. Everyone knows democracy works great in the dark!

[o_e_l_e_o]

Yes, people explaining their exclusions that just so happen to perfectly list everyone who has been critical of them should not be forced to explain their choices, because then they might have to take responsibility for them. It is best these kind of choices are done in the dark with no oversight much like the previous broken system. Everyone knows democracy works great in the dark!

This is just nonsense. I've never been critical of minerjones and I'm on his exclusion list, and I'd wager many others are in the same boat as he excluded many of the new DT1 members. His reasoning for excluding me is his own and needs no explanation, but your statement above is provably incorrect.

Also interesting that he excluded you, which prompted you to take him off your trust list and add him to your exclusion list. Why haven't explained your reasoning for excluding someone who has been critical of you? Why did you make that choice in the dark with no oversight?

[Jet Cash]

MinerJones may have excluded me because I stated that the mods in the mining forum are rubbish and damaging the forum. I think that that speaking the truth should be a positive factor, and not a negative one.