shdvb has the best "Attitude" when it comes to sending trust (BPIP)

[LoyceV]

At any time, he can add pagination to the code.

Theymos doesn't like doing that:

~ it's always a massive pain to add pagination to things...

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Is there a badge for Top senders of merit?  If there isn't  can you create one please. As of now I only have one badge on BPIP and will love to earn more believing my smeiit sending ratio can earn me top1000  Also maybe a smerit badge will encourage more awarding of smerit since humans enjoy receiving awards. Just saying...

[The Sceptical Chymist]

This isn't even my final form. I ran out of reports to catch up to.

So there's like a mecha-Godzilla-cat Lauda as well?  Nice, you can take the title from me cleanly--it's all yours, and I never thought I'd held such a thing until around last week anyway. 

I've become a little bit more reluctant to tag the old "alt accounts scamming bounties" members, but have at 'em if you like.  It's not like the number of scammers has decreased any in the past year or so. 

[Lauda]

This isn't even my final form. I ran out of reports to catch up to.

So there's like a mecha-Godzilla-cat Lauda as well?  

There's one that operates on catnip; as long as there is fuel humans like you have no chance.

I've become a little bit more reluctant to tag the old "alt accounts scamming bounties" members, but have at 'em if you like.  It's not like the number of scammers has decreased any in the past year or so.  

I'm not. It's unfortunate that some projects are getting scammed by both their "BM" and bounty hunters. I also vehemently dislike their "they are my 15 aunts"-type lies.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I'm not. It's unfortunate that some projects are getting scammed by both their "BM" and bounty hunters. I also vehemently dislike their "they are my 15 aunts"-type lies.

Not an insignificant part of me is giggling with glee that you're back on DT for this exact reason.  I never believed those excuses before either, but I did make a couple mistakes in tagging people based on data that users like mdayonliner (I think) and others had presented, like that airdropped dust of ETH (I think) that people got a while back that seemingly linked accounts but was nothing more than someone sending out dust.

Get ready for more threads about you if you aren't already--but I suspect you're more than ready for that.  And I mean more than the ones that popped up a few days ago when the new DT list got released.  Wheeee!

[Vod]

https://bpip.org/r/trustsent.aspx

Sending trust is becoming an important part of being on DT.

I was wondering if little badges would be useful, the same thing Theymos planned for the report system.
(And Theymos I hope you eventually release report numbers so that can be recognized like this as well)

[Quickseller]

The Pharmacist has sent more ratings then me Okay, time for kitty to wake up from winter sleep. Game on!

Did you just tag like 600+ accounts, just to be #1 again? You must have missed DT

I had nightmares about this and couldn't sleep, so I did some catching up. Or maybe I just casted a spell that automatically tagged all those people, who knows.

You sent 600 negative ratings in under 24 hours (closer to 22 hours)....just to have the most number of ratings sent? That works out to one every ~2.2 minutes assuming you were working the entire 22 hours with no breaks.

I can’t imagine you possibly did enough research to confirm each of those people are in fact scammers in that time. It seems to me that you just effectively excluded 600 people from participating in the marketplace for no reason other than to have an “award” for having sent the most number of ratings.

[TECSHARE]

The Pharmacist has sent more ratings then me Okay, time for kitty to wake up from winter sleep. Game on!

Did you just tag like 600+ accounts, just to be #1 again? You must have missed DT

I had nightmares about this and couldn't sleep, so I did some catching up. Or maybe I just casted a spell that automatically tagged all those people, who knows.

You sent 600 negative ratings in under 24 hours (closer to 22 hours)....just to have the most number of ratings sent? That works out to one every ~2.2 minutes assuming you were working the entire 22 hours with no breaks.

I can’t imagine you possibly did enough research to confirm each of those people are in fact scammers in that time. It seems to me that you just effectively excluded 600 people from participating in the marketplace for no reason other than to have an “award” for having sent the most number of ratings.

Like I have been saying for a long time, these "forum cops" advance their own reputation by stomping all over others, especially those that have no ability to resist them or have no recourse. This is an issue, and these people need to be restrained by tighter standards for rating since they refuse to restrain themselves and treat this community like a game they are trying to rank up in at all costs. This is sucking the life out of this community, and it will only be apparent to everyone far after it is too late to change anything.

[Vod]

Like I have been saying for a long time, these "forum cops" advance their own reputation by stomping all over others, especially those that have no ability to resist them or have no recourse. This is an issue, and these people need to be restrained by tighter standards for rating since they refuse to restrain themselves and treat this community like a game they are trying to rank up in at all costs. This is sucking the life out of this community, and it will only be apparent to everyone far after it is too late to change anything.

I agree with you.   

I've been doing what I do successfully for a few years, so I won't start second guessing myself.  If Theymos wants to state the explicit rules, those that do things differently may have to leave.   But I believe rules are needed if only to control trolls like yourself and Quickie.

Until he sets rules though, I am going to continue my pattern of tagging people I do not trust.

[TECSHARE]

Like I have been saying for a long time, these "forum cops" advance their own reputation by stomping all over others, especially those that have no ability to resist them or have no recourse. This is an issue, and these people need to be restrained by tighter standards for rating since they refuse to restrain themselves and treat this community like a game they are trying to rank up in at all costs. This is sucking the life out of this community, and it will only be apparent to everyone far after it is too late to change anything.

I agree with you.  

I've been doing what I do successfully for a few years, so I won't start second guessing myself.  If Theymos wants to state the explicit rules, those that do things differently may have to leave.   But I believe rules are needed if only to control trolls like yourself and Quickie.

Until he sets rules though, I am going to continue my pattern of tagging people I do not trust.

I can see your OCD has been triggered again unfortunately. For the crime of replying to your asinine comments to me in other threads, I can see you are going to repeat your obsessive stalking behavior of the past because your fragile ego can not handle criticism without a total mental breakdown. I will quote you:

lol - you ignorant fool.  Stay on topic (this is NOT ABOUT YOU)  or stop posting :  local rule

As we were discussing before your attempt to make this about you, this is about more than a single individual, it is about a poorly designed system of trust which allows for systemic abuse by certain users while they hide in the ambiguity of there being no set standards for leaving negative ratings. As a result the trust system becomes cover for frauds via abusive trust ratings, as opposed to a system of calling out fraud.

[Lauda]

You sent 600 negative ratings in under 24 hours (closer to 22 hours)....just to have the most number of ratings sent? That works out to one every ~2.2 minutes assuming you were working the entire 22 hours with no breaks.

I can’t imagine you possibly did enough research to confirm each of those people are in fact scammers in that time. It seems to me that you just effectively excluded 600 people from participating in the marketplace for no reason other than to have an “award” for having sent the most number of ratings.

Keep whining, that won't change the fact that my accuracy remains consistent. The number you quoted is low for what I can manage, I just ran out of your accounts to tag. Pathethic fool.

I was wondering if little badges would be useful, the same thing Theymos planned for the report system.

That may work if I were not #1 on the list, some trolls gotta complain.

[Quickseller]

You sent 600 negative ratings in under 24 hours (closer to 22 hours)....just to have the most number of ratings sent? That works out to one every ~2.2 minutes assuming you were working the entire 22 hours with no breaks.

I can’t imagine you possibly did enough research to confirm each of those people are in fact scammers in that time. It seems to me that you just effectively excluded 600 people from participating in the marketplace for no reason other than to have an “award” for having sent the most number of ratings.

Keep whining, that won't change the fact that my accuracy remains consistent. The number you quoted is low for what I can manage, I just ran out of your accounts to tag. Pathethic fool.

I was wondering if little badges would be useful, the same thing Theymos planned for the report system.

That may work if I were not #1 on the list, some trolls gotta complain.

Perhaps you could explain how it was that you were able to research that many accounts in that short of time....or is this an admission that you don’t care about actual guilt when you tag people?

There is an argument that theymos should undo all of your moderator actions after this has come out in order to ensure no one is harmed as a result of your carelessness. If not then your moderator actions should certainly be heavily scrutinized and throughly reviewed.

[Vod]

Perhaps you could explain how it was that you were able to research that many accounts in that short of time....or is this an admission that you don’t care about actual guilt when you tag people?

Maybe Lauda had researched them prior?