Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic)

[Jet Cash]

When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

[1713516593]

1713516593

[1713516593]

1713516593

[1713516593]

1713516593

[mdayonliner]

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

Dammit! it's another thread about Lauda   LoyceV needs to update this: All topics about Lauda in Meta and Reputation. Data are old now there.

[Slow death]

Lauda is a great member of this forum.

I remember this case: About Ethereum Plus (scam)

Lauda was very helpful

[Lauda]

Yeah! I think we should set a new trend: Regardless of what the subject of your thread is, include the word Lauda in the title somehow. 

[cryptohunter]

When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.

I have proven he is a liar and gave me red trust from him for daring to say I would inform people of that FACT

[Harkorede]

When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.

You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost cause... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

[cryptohunter]

When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.

You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.

You're never going to stop, are you ?  
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.

No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.

Whilst you are about it can you present anything else you find that I am wrong about?  go on ... get on with it. Demonstrate all those things I have been wrong about because as yet NOBODY has demonstrated that I am wrong about anything.

Until I see a complete removal of red trust abuse on my account then NO i will not stop presenting facts that is should not be there.
Well done.

[TMAN]

~snip~

FACT is no one gives a shit, please take all these personal attacks to the reputation section, you are really starting to fuck up meta. And no I will not remove my tags so you will leave us all alone - neither will the others.

[Jet Cash]

My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.

[cryptohunter]

My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.

are you completely thick as well....  your anecdotal experience does not preclude or protect or undo what I have proven he has done. Please start to understand this simple concept.

his own post history is not hearsay  - is there something wrong with you? do you know that something he has written himself which is a proven lie is not hearsay. You can understand this right?

I have proven he is a liar

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098591.0

I have proven he is an abuser of the trust system

I have proven his friend tman is an abuser of the trust system 2x now.

Do you deny either of those??

If so explain yourself now.

[Jet Cash]

>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.

[cryptohunter]

>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.

LOL .... ha ha that is refusal to review observable fact. Hmm a DT who says they are not interested in reviewing the truth. Is that what you are saying?

Well look the evidence is there above in this thread do you refuse to review it??

If so you need instant removal from DT and merit source you are not responsible.

I expect an answer or I want you removed from dt and merit source.

You can not as a DT refuse to read facts I am producing here for you to examine.

[TMAN]

>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.

ah man, Legend...

JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking

[cryptohunter]

>..<

I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.

ah man, Legend...

JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking

I prefer public analysis...........transparency is key.

I expect jet cash to examine the evidence provided in this thread and confirm

1. lauda is a liar.
2. Lauda will red trust you for presenting facts about this (even after he gets to call you a liar with no evidence many times)
3. Tman red trust abuse people ( as he stats in black and white for posting facts about it)

It is quite simple and there in black and white.

red trust is not there to stop people telling the truth it is there to allow people to tell the truth about wrong doing and untrustworthy behaviour.

I expect a full review

If jetcash refuses to do this after I have just told him  2 x and provided evidence on this thread then jetcash is also untrustworthy and complicit .  Or he is just a scared baby of lauda and his friends.

I want all my red trust removed else I will present the facts they should not be there. That is not blackmail that is reporting an abuse of the trust system. Got it.

@Harkorede

where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?

[stompix]

[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]

Clearly, you're infected with cattus vulgaris.
But, although I've sent a lot of merit in meta, never saw that reference before.
Please don't tell me it was always there  

[The Cryptovator]

Every one like Lauda because of it 

[cryptohunter]

Jetcash??

is mcdonalds wifi down again?  try burger king they are more reliable tp says.

I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

[Jet Cash]

Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

[TMAN]

Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

Man it’s all about the double sausage and egg McMuffin, unfortunately they don’t sell them where I am, many a time I have walked out the gym and started salivating about a maccies breakkie.

I was worried there when you started out, thought you were going to say that they banned you

[cryptohunter]

Jetcash??
I'm awaiting the review of my evidence provided above.

I haven't had a chance to read it, as I'm having to cope with some serious problems and unreasonable discrimination. McDonalds refused to serve me with a burger this morning at 9:45, and their justification was that they don't start cooking them until 10:30. I'm starting to feel that your evidence may be of a similar nature. Theymos has created a distributed model for the new trust system, so I'm going to allow the review to be distributed amongst the other DT1 members. I don't want to be accused of starting too many reports, and of monopolising the system.

Look at tman trying to get diverting with his superior mcdonalds knowledge. Gym hahaha


In other words Jetcash is  too scared to review the FACTS presented IN THIS THREAD that lauda lied.  Then lauda repeatedly called me a liar with no evidence and when I told him to stfu calling me that with no evidence or else I will encourage others to look into his history he red trusts me.

Well you need to be taken off of DT if you are scared to review my evidence because we need people with some courage.

I insist you review these facts POST HISTORY IN BLACK AND WHITE or be removed from DT.

If you think my evidence is anything like this mcdonalds nonsense you need to be removed from merit source because clearly you have a reading and comprehension issue.  

No read the facts and review them here in public.