[Ask] Lauda's red trust policy

[allahabadi]

People like yourselves are a plague on this forum... I wish someone would just create bountyhuntertalk.org.

What is wrong with you It is very clear that Lauda is the witch here and OP isn't abusing anything. Just ask my friend of a friend reliable source.

Can Someone give Merit to this, please ?  Thanks

Can someone tag you and Lauda for collaborative efforts on merit-begging; this is very serious...  

Find a post of me that you see as begging[1]... such non sense[2] you're saying mate, that's why you didnt get as much as I can[3].

Lauda has his reasons for this. And I find his comment as a positive one.[4]

[1] https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/humour
** Stop acting like Drax and take everything verbatim without getting the context or the emoji. I refuse to believe that you don't get it as you clearly understood that Lauda was joking when she confessed to being a witch.

[2] It was supposed to be non-sense.

[3] Merit-flaunting.

[4] Huh! No context at all.

P.S. Yes you do have 2 more merits; guess it makes you happy; gloat over it; gives you a purpose in your otherwise mundane life; motivates you to do whatever it is you want (possibly rank-up)...

P.P.S. I just saw that 7 of those merits came from a post where you took the new merits requirements seriously and wanted to calculate them, another 9 from a post where you elucidate methods to obtain merit... No wonder you are fixated; I do want merits too; but I doubt if I'll ever flaunt them around or take to boot licking to earn them...

Thanks for the quote

[1715637249]

1715637249

[1715637249]

1715637249

[o_e_l_e_o]

P.P.S. I just saw that 7 of those merits came from a post where you took the new merits requirements seriously and wanted to calculate them, another 9 from a post where you elucidate methods to obtain merit... No wonder you are fixated; I do want merits too; but I doubt if I'll ever flaunt them around or take to boot licking to earn them...

I didn't realise he was the same guy. The joke went totally over his head in that thread too.

[Arian247]

In this age and time you're lending your wallet to your nephew dude get your story right because your complaints sounds baseless

[Quickseller]

I would suggest contacting Blazed, hilariousandco and saltyspitton about this issue. They are why lauda is in the default trust network.

I have no idea why any of them would want to be associated with someone like lauda.

Pretty obvious we feel he does a good job at this point? When will you stop obsessing over this and just move on?

I am not sure if you are being serious or are trolling. I think you should review the number of people who have excluded lauda from their trust list and reevaluate your conclusion that community consensus is that lauda is doing a "good job"

I don't think it is unreasonable to expect either Lauda to be held accountable for his trust ratings, nor for you to be held accountable for those you have on your trust list. Nor should it be unreasonable for people to discuss with you the ratings your trust list directly results in showing up by default.

[o_e_l_e_o]

I am not sure if you are being serious or are trolling. I think you should review the number of people who have excluded lauda from their trust list and reevaluate your conclusion that community consensus is that lauda is doing a "good job"

I think you should review the amount of negative trust you have and reevaluate your conclusion that community consensus is that we care about your endless and repetitive spamming.

I don't think it is unreasonable to expect either Lauda to be held accountable for his trust ratings, nor for you to be held accountable for those you have on your trust list. Nor should it be unreasonable for people to discuss with you the ratings your trust list directly results in showing up by default.

What is unreasonable is for you to start multiple nonsense threads and derail multiple other threads all on to the topic of Lauda for your ridiculous personal vendetta, especially when everyone you are trying to rope in to your delusions is telling you kindly to STFU.

[actmyname]

Yeah. Removed my tag. I was wrong.

You know how I feel about A->B linkages. Insufficient evidence to induce a tag, I would say.

[maronk]

Yeah. Removed my tag. I was wrong.

You know how I feel about A->B linkages. Insufficient evidence to induce a tag, I would say.

Thank's you  Sir

Hopefully Lauda can understand my case and do further research

[Lauda]

Yeah. Removed my tag. I was wrong.

You know how I feel about A->B linkages. Insufficient evidence to induce a tag, I would say.

You are setting a precedent where catbat has to think/work more. You will be cleaning the Cult's bathroom this week.

Hopefully Lauda can understand my case and do further research

Computing..

[maronk]

Yeah. Removed my tag. I was wrong.

You know how I feel about A->B linkages. Insufficient evidence to induce a tag, I would say.

You are setting a precedent where catbat has to think/work more. You will be cleaning the Cult's bathroom this week.

Hopefully Lauda can understand my case and do further research

Computing..

If true, then I will accept it gracefully

There is no evidence at all that my address was used to receive the results of all the bounty he followed
He just stole my address and pasted it on his bitcointalk account profile