Re: LoyceV vs theymos (and get your own Merit graph: up to 20 users per graph)

[LoyceV]

Oh damn! BOT TIME!!!

Not really: it takes a fraction of a second to extract the data, but about 10 minutes to create and post the graph. I'll need some more scripting before I process the requests (tomorrow).

Done: I've updated my script from something that took 5 minutes to make for 2 users with manual editing, into something a bit more flexible that accepts up to 10 users (screenshotting is still manual work). I'll process requests now.

ME vs chipmixer participants. Let's do an orgy of stats.

ALSO, I DARE YOU TO MAKE A CHART COMPARING THE MERIT RECEIVED BY THE CULT OF LAUDA,if you get the time of course and if it is possible.

Can you get me up to 10 users to compare per graph? Even better: use this format with only userIDs:

Code:

976210 879277 867786 820936

If you use this format, it's okay to ask for multiple sets.

THE CULT OF LAUDA

There's like 15-20 people in it now. Good luck Loycy (who's also a newbie member FYI).

I am?

(I feel we're gonna get moderated the hell out of this thread LOL)

Theymos read your mind:

In the "This is a self-moderated topic" warning, stats will now be printed about how many posts have been deleted if any posts have been deleted.

I'll clean up all off-topic posts, nothing personal

How about nullius, Coding Enthusiast, HCP & aliashraf

"if" you get the time me v SmartPayMINT

Me versus actmyname and HCP please

The tad-lesser image quality is due to me avoiding manual upload.

What did you use to create this? You're missing some details

hilariousandgo vs hilariousetc:

[1714067027]

1714067027

[1714067027]

1714067027

[S_Therapist]

I would appreciate to have a graph between mdayonliner vs S_Therapist since 4th October 2018. Is it possible?

[Lauda]

The tad-lesser image quality is due to me avoiding manual upload.

What did you use to create this? You're missing some details

I quickly hacked it through 4 pages of excel. What details are missing? The chart type is just different.

I would appreciate to have a graph between mdayonliner vs S_Therapist since 4th October 2018. Is it possible?

It's possible to adjust the starting date, but it's not worth adjusting everything just for the sake of it. You can see the trendline like this anyway.

[LoyceV]

I would appreciate to have a graph between mdayonliner vs S_Therapist since 4th October 2018. Is it possible?

I'm not adjusting my script for it, but you can find the approximate date (1538611200) and (mentally) remove the rest:

I quickly hacked it through 4 pages of excel. What details are missing? The chart type is just different.

The chart type removes most of the details.
My script outputs this as input for the spreadsheet:

Code:

"Unix time" "mdayonliner" "S_Therapist"
1516831941 0 0
1517075726 4 0 
1517112695 5 0 
1517550793 6 0 
1517651682 7 0 
1517653628 8 0 
1519564316 9 0 
1519620530 10 0 
1519759585 11 0 
1519864827 12 0 
1520113709 19 0 
1520373605 21 0 
1521569424 22 0 
1521581030 23 0 
1521915823 28 0 
1523004559 29 0 
1523121577 31 0 
1523759974 34 0 
1523774253 35 0 
1523957188 36 0 
1523968730 37 0 
1524077183 38 0 
1524376174 39 0 
1524484807 40 0 
1524494658 41 0 
1524502052 42 0 
1524509848 43 0 
1524511586 44 0 
1524512345 45 0 
1524598801 50 0 
1524823665 51 0 
1524835188 52 0 
1524976010 53 0 
1525116354 54 0 
1525127612 55 0 
1525157479 56 0 
1525469484 57 0 
1525530966 58 0 
1525719821 61 0 
1525862883 62 0 
1525882853 63 0 
1525884161 64 0 
1525887109 65 0 
1525965873 66 0 
1525989153 67 0 
1526106715 68 0 
1526300799 73 0 
1526302986 74 0 
1526312873 75 0 
1526325871 76 0 
1526404654 77 0 
1526464500 78 0 
1526499073 79 0 
1526500837 80 0 
1526521866 81 0 
1526568438 82 0 
1526574645 83 0 
1526671657 93 0 
1526834752 94 0 
1526874530 97 0 
1526877150 98 0 
1526878857 100 0 
1526879580 101 0 
1526905102 102 0 
1526912627 103 0 
1527010190 104 0 
1527062241 106 0 
1527138707 107 0 
1527143636 108 0 
1527197372 109 0 
1527463582 110 0 
1527505928 111 0 
1527529418 112 0 
1527580889 113 0 
1527700035 114 0 
1527809764 115 0 
1527878596 116 0 
1527930942 117 0 
1527946367 118 0 
1527982787 119 0 
1528023786 120 0 
1528120915 121 0 
1528220986 123 0 
1528238007 124 0 
1528292979 125 0 
1528296514 130 0 
1528310468 131 0 
1528656262 141 0 
1528711204 142 0 
1528809943 143 0 
1529247442 144 0 
1529399174 146 0 
1529434058 147 0 
1529523077 148 0 
1529604683 150 0 
1529643232 151 0 
1529720035 156 0 
1529748809 157 0 
1529753826 158 0 
1529773449 159 0 
1529774891 160 0 
1529808646 161 0 
1529843054 162 0 
1529846875 163 0 
1529857774 164 0 
1529886336 165 0 
1530023392 166 0 
1530077422 167 0 
1530301422 168 0 
1530361870 169 0 
1530366204 170 0 
1530406986 171 0 
1530409776 174 0 
1530467442 175 0 
1530699708 176 0 
1530732441 181 0 
1530781288 182 0 
1530848624 183 0 
1530937534 184 0 
1531075286 186 0 
1531608213 187 0 
1531838459 188 0 
1532100155 190 0 
1532372597 192 0 
1532373944 193 0 
1532385130 194 0 
1532511134 196 0 
1532558413 197 0 
1532596051 198 0 
1532670947 203 0 
1532710238 204 0 
1532710257 205 0 
1532710320 206 0 
1532717187 207 0 
1532717595 208 0 
1532782664 209 0 
1532856058 210 0 
1532895140 211 0 
1532913612 215 0 
1532941164 216 0 
1532976191 217 0 
1532982804 222 0 
1532982998 224 0 
1533027194 225 0 
1533032616 226 0 
1533032627 227 0 
1533048571 228 0 
1533050951 229 0 
1533193471 231 0 
1533196635 232 0 
1533208094 233 0 
1533210115 234 0 
1533327147 235 0 
1533333930 237 0 
1533445976 239 0 
1533875516 240 0 
1533892954 241 0 
1533977158 242 0 
1534048223 243 0 
1534068334 244 0 
1534156593 245 0 
1534160726 246 0 
1534161708 247 0 
1534167671 250 0 
1534281515 257 0 
1534288919 258 0 
1534360014 260 0 
1534457806 261 0 
1534865896 262 0 
1535010113 263 0 
1535098839 265 0 
1535108645 266 0 
1535274037 267 0 
1536602209 268 0 
1536686639 269 0 
1537113350 270 0 
1537360975 272 0 
1537633426 273 0 
1537681428 274 0 
1537790773 275 0 
1537792747 280 0 
1537798686 282 0 
1537874369 283 0 
1537883650 284 0 
1537983340 286 0 
1537986665 288 0 
1538517753 290 0 
1538649767 290 1 
1538685549 290 5 
1538704840 297 5 
1538864601 297 6 
1538913187 297 7 
1538960694 297 12 
1539344575 297 13 
1539516709 297 14 
1539610912 297 15 
1539634874 297 16 
1539663650 297 18 
1539789944 297 20 
1539978771 297 22 
1540044981 297 23 
1540059636 297 24 
1540069914 297 25 
1540081816 297 29 
1540331673 297 33 
1540637797 297 34 
1540912590 297 35 
1541236105 297 36 
1541366235 297 37 
1541406934 297 38 
1541411036 297 39 
1541522787 297 43 
1541810541 297 47 
1541949077 297 48 
1541954649 297 49 
1542124931 298 49 
1542151828 298 50 
1542304284 298 51 
1542310963 298 52 
1542410827 298 53 
1542430943 298 54 
1542445739 298 55 
1542651870 298 56 
1542701982 298 57 
1542705477 298 58 
1542710111 298 59 
1542740623 298 60 
1542792683 298 61 
1542824517 298 64 
1542840998 298 65 
1542843074 298 69 
1542844336 298 70 
1543133265 298 71 
1543150465 298 72 
1543152646 299 72 
1543234721 299 73 
1543235353 299 74 
1543239816 299 79 
1543242576 299 80 
1543249885 299 84 
1543321329 299 85 
1543325303 299 86 
1544101738 300 86 
1544127215 300 87 
1544372791 304 87 
1544386347 305 87 
1544429214 306 87 
1544431108 308 87 
1545246088 310 87 
1545258247 315 87 
1545653842 315 89 
1545765606 317 89 
1545803716 318 89 
1545803735 319 89 
1545835832 320 89 
1546394947 320 90 
1546419005 320 91 
1546626858 321 91 
1546662453 321 92 
1546673182 321 93 
1546683937 321 94 
1546730383 321 95 
1546782891 321 96 
1546841171 321 98 
1546874183 321 100 
1546961084 321 101 
1546964861 321 108 
1546997846 321 109 
1547015295 321 112 
1547015433 321 114 
1547020742 322 114 
1547035360 323 114 
1547044243 323 116 
1547084084 323 123 
1547092934 323 133 
1547178306 323 134 
1547189996 323 135 
1547198127 324 135 
1547217877 324 137 
1547218341 324 139 
1547219865 324 140 
1547227304 324 142 
1547230514 324 162 
1547232041 324 167 
1547234916 324 169 
1547242245 324 170 
1547263408 324 176 
1547305502 324 177 
1547306998 324 178 
1547310844 324 197 
1547316015 324 201 
1547317528 325 201 
1547320171 326 201 
1547332155 326 203 
1547332476 326 205 
1547347133 326 210 
1547370523 328 210 
1547371629 329 210 
1547381418 329 214 
1547474378 329 215 
1547533318 329 216 
1547708485 329 217 
1547721808 330 217 
1547779493 330 217

A test with the "Top 10" Merit Receivers (excluding theymos and satoshi):

Code:

1582324 459836 234771 487418 1067333 397737 479624 1188543 290195 30747

[bones261]

Meh, this thread makes me feel totally inadequate.   I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies. Oh well, at least no one is siccing their pitbull on me, yet, when I come down the chimney.

[Lauda]

I quickly hacked it through 4 pages of excel. What details are missing? The chart type is just different.

The chart type removes most of the details.
-snip-

Which is exactly what is supposed to do. You're forgetting who your target audience is and what information they actually need to see from these comparisons. Trust me, those details are irrelevant and you've just created more work for yourself.  
I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.

[LoyceV]

Meh, this thread makes me feel totally inadequate.  I feel like Santa Clause getting no milk and cookies.

A cryptic challenge, I like it! Here's your graph:

Trust me, those details are irrelevant and you've just created more work for yourself.  

The details came out like this on their own, I didn't do anything for it

I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.

The only reason I left it in, is to emphasize the graph starts the second theymos sent the first Merit. I've made it human readable now.

[Lauda]

Trust me, those details are irrelevant and you've just created more work for yourself.  

The details came out like this on their own, I didn't do anything for it

Fair enough.

I simplified it to 8 fixed UNIX timestamps. Could always trivially make it more or less detailed, but I don't see a reason to do this.

The only reason I left it in, is to emphasize the graph starts the second theymos sent the first Merit. I've made it human readable now.

Hmm, I think the default for this was 10 points where I only had 8 (or it may be due to me extending the graph size). As I previously said, it was quick hack I threw from your dump. Either way, I will probably redo it at some later time. At least we got double graph-making power now; should speed up things when one of us isn't around.

[Welsh]

Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting. A few of his reports would be interesting to compare, actually.

[Lauda]

Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting.

Nevermind. I read that link as top merit receivers!
Mine supports 50, but it is rather annoying to set that up. 50 UUIDs.

[LoyceV]

Pitting the top 10 or top 50 if it's not too much trouble! Against each other from Vod's most recognized users on Bitcointalk would be interesting. A few of his reports would be interesting to compare, actually.

One graph with 50 users will be impossible to read, and any graph with theymos in it gets "compressed" vertically.
Most Recognized 2-11:

Code:

30747 11425 101872 38894 64507 60820 24140 164822 113670 51173

(I can do more if you give me the exact userIDs like above; I'm lazy)

[DdmrDdmr]

Actually, these type of charts are rather interesting to play around with. For fun ,I’ve silently added a similar one to the Merit Dashboard (Received Merit Charts tab). What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.

[LoyceV]

What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.

Something like: exclude the top 200 Merit receivers and all Merit earned in Meta? That's very tempting to do

[Lauda]

Code:

30747 11425 101872 38894 64507 60820 24140 164822 113670 51173

(I can do more if you give me the exact userIDs like above; I'm lazy)

This. The most annoying part of this is fetching the UUID + name.

[DdmrDdmr]

What’s interesting is to be able to play around with filters and do stuff like delimit the time scope when the chart should add the sMerits, or the boards they were received in.

Something like: exclude the top 200 Merit receivers and all Merit earned in Meta? That's very tempting to do

Nah, can't be bothered to build a custom variable, but we can exclude Meta for example. Excluding Meta, my chart is pretty common.

[LoyceV]

This. The most annoying part of this is fetching the UUID + name.

For the names: http://loyce.club/Merit/usernames.html

[DarkStar_]

Can you get me up to 10 users to compare per graph? Even better: use this format with only userIDs:

Code:

976210 879277 867786 820936

If you use this format, it's okay to ask for multiple sets.

@pugman if you still wanted the comparison, here are all userIDs in the ChipMixer campaign:

Code:

557798
299894
525056
458393
153041
397737
99837
379147
374061
867786
375981
667916
696532
308793
306338
507856
405464
175361
552813
543626
803757
403303
886521
155345
901859
783422
459836
877396
136484
68364
405889
171896
109482
164749
154539
338591
143168
903702
579628
162680
487418
325061
370611
465017
1059082
381705
84521
85033
1112531
334898
787736
1291828
187618
1582324
1169179
662570
359716
533583
1188543

[Lauda]

Can you get me up to 10 users to compare per graph? Even better: use this format with only userIDs:

Code:

976210 879277 867786 820936

If you use this format, it's okay to ask for multiple sets.

@pugman if you still wanted the comparison, here are all userIDs in the ChipMixer campaign:

-snip-

Here's the first 10 from that list which I did as a self-test. A graph with so many users would be a real mess IMO. Pugman pick a subset of users if you want a comparison (preferably without hilariousetc - as you can see above it does not scale well ).

[marlboroza]

mdayonliner vs S_Therapist

mdayonliner vs S_Therapist

S_Therapist vs mdayonliner http://archive.is/m1EqT#selection-12058.1-12058.2

It is posted above. Scroll up thread. How have you missed it?

[LoyceV]

ME vs chipmixer participants. Let's do an orgy of stats.

You asked for it Thanks to DarkStar_, here it is:

(direct link to image)
My spreadsheet was not happy with this