I don't know why opening a thread in this section you should answer the accusations in the thread where you are posted not creeating another one, why not show all your proof there, this is not the right section to do this, if this is not a scam project, then show all the materials why it is not so in the scam accusations.

I don‘t see anyone shouting „no scam.“ People are just questioning the validity of the scam accusations. And as it was pointed out already, the accuser has been silent now for several days, despite this project having provided a detailed statement. This whole thing smells fishy to me. It appears more like a smear campaign than a honest review. But everyone should make up their own mind.

For everyone, if you are trying to show your profiles in LinkedIn and some registration documents, and say that you are not a scam - please, don't. Enough of this bullshit.

We have a very clear definition of what a scam is - it is an event (company) aimed at misleading someone (investors) in order to obtain an undue advantage.
A project can become a scam along the path of its development, for example, if I saw that there is no development, but there's investor cash - why don't you keep quietly to yourself? Or initially, when the project doesn't plan any development and the task is to depict vigorous activity shoving investor's cash in the pockets.

The company may have ALL documents. And even some licenses, IDK. But if we consider that the project is a scam (the definition is above), then we try to prove our point of view reasonably.
If the audience, for some reasons, listens to ANONYMOUS worthless, coward bloggers no one cares about but not to the GREAT luminaries of the business that lead them to the future and millions of bucks then it's probably worth making some conclusions.