Delete 1-2 feedback yearly?

[DireWolfM14]

Will let the post die in shame.

There's no shame in presenting an idea that you feel will have benefit to the forum, even if it does get shot down in flames.   

I don't like the idea automatically removing old trust, or even forcing review of the feedback after a certain amount of time.  I prefer The Pharmacist's approach.  And, if the member want those who left negative feed back to review that feed back, he can post a thread about it in the Reputation board.  It has been demonstrated that can end with positive results.

[1714102758]

1714102758

[1714102758]

1714102758

[morvillz7z]

If you get one them from high rank account your account is dead. You can't learn from it.

I think I misread it the first time, did you mean earn, not learn? Since you mention bounty abuse, I presume you have in mind bounty spammers, right? Always thought they associate themselves with earning and not learning. 

Anyway, after mentioning feedback spammers several times, would you be kind and share which DT members have abused their status by giving excessive ratings? Give us a few examples.

[Pmalek]

No, that wouldn't work in that way and let me give you an example why not.
Lets say you are trying to buy 2 BTC for USD and the person you deal with ends up scamming you, he takes your money and he is gone (yes I know you should use escrow but just hear me out). He gets tagged by DTs. Two years have passed and he can now delete his feedback and can freely scam again. Would you be willing to make another deal with the same user again or recommend that someone else does it? After all, his negative trust has now been removed.

The only way in which this could work is by taking a look at each case individually. Like you suggested, someone who gets tagged for Bounty abuse or wearing a signature of a scam ICO (without being aware it is a scam for whatever reason) should get a chance to redeem himself after some time has passed if he has shows signs of improvement. But giving everyone the freedom to delete the trust ratings they don t agree with is a dangerous thing.

[JanEmil]

No, that wouldn't work in that way and let me give you an example why not.
Lets say you are trying to buy 2 BTC for USD and the person you deal with ends up scamming you, he takes your money and he is gone (yes I know you should use escrow but just hear me out). He gets tagged by DTs. Two years have passed and he can now delete his feedback and can freely scam again. Would you be willing to make another deal with the same user again or recommend that someone else does it? After all, his negative trust has now been removed.

The only way in which this could work is by taking a look at each case individually. Like you suggested, someone who gets tagged for Bounty abuse or wearing a signature of a scam ICO (without being aware it is a scam for whatever reason) should get a chance to redeem himself after some time has passed if he has shows signs of improvement. But giving everyone the freedom to delete the trust ratings they don t agree with is a dangerous thing.

It depends what angle you look from. I look from the angle where 1000 accounts that don't scam get useless. But I have seen the fight is lost