ICO makes me sick

[Coin-Desk]

Not only you, but ICO has also made many more people sick. ICO now says people understand scam. Nobody wants to invest in ICO now. People are losing confidence in ICO day by day. Now the situation has happened that the money will be lost if ICO invested. So no one is investing in ICO anymore. I have stopped investing in ICO long ago. Because before that I had invested in ICO and ruined all my capital.

Thank you

[1713854591]

1713854591

[1713854591]

1713854591

[1713854591]

1713854591

[1713854591]

1713854591

[1713854591]

1713854591

[1713854591]

1713854591

[Ipwich]

Not only you, but ICO has also made many more people sick. ICO now says people understand scam. Nobody wants to invest in ICO now. People are losing confidence in ICO day by day. Now the situation has happened that the money will be lost if ICO invested. So no one is investing in ICO anymore. I have stopped investing in ICO long ago. Because before that I had invested in ICO and ruined all my capital.

Thank you

I'm sick for a year then, I have a lot of coins during the ICO and they aren't growing in value as expected.
At the situation now we can say it's already frustrating but we cannot complain since the market is not yet in full bullish trend.
If the market will be in bull market and the coins we are holding still will not grow, we can say goodbye to it as most likely they will not recover anymore.

[asus09]

No funds no project idea makes me sick and tired of ICO ,I never like the idea right from the beginning ,why? Well to me if you are the owner of your business or company and you have struggled a lot to build it you won't dare want to let go or see it crumbled and fail,this is not present in ICO cases ,ICO is just like "oh if not much funds then I will back off and reopen another project maybe we can reach the hard cap" ,well if every developers are the ones funding there projects they will be more serious to make it a successful one,the easy safe path of backing out if hardcap is never achieved makes it feel easy for every one especially the scammers, I'm not been heartless ,if you don't have money to fund your project just don't bother ,many coins out there have no ICO ,no premine ,no bullshit with fine price per coin ,they never want any funds ,coins like masari ,Loki,haven project, dero rely on nobody fund yet they perform better than hundreds of ICO.

sorry I just want to comment on what I think is conflicting.
You say ICO makes me sick with everything you think.
but this is contrary to your own joining a signature campaign, this is what becomes more hypocritical you say

[killat]

Just because you did not have good interactions with ICOs it doesn't mean there are no great ICOs, too.

You just need to do more research wben it comes to invest in crypto. You're the only responsible for your decisions.

[vectisitch]

hate ico's. the concept is ok for having the funds for development but how many times does that development actually take place? most turn out to be a big money grab. i look for projects that are not ico's, wit han open and known team that actively and constantly develop that project. ddaps are the way to go for future.

[iqlimasyadiqa]

Many people feel sad when they fail to choose the right ico projects. most ico projects in 2018 do have a bad reputation and only a few percent have a good reputation. that's what causes many people to fail and it definitely has an impact on a failure to invest and cause losses.

[Nivelir]

After constant misuse of ICO. More precisely, not correct analysis of this ICO project. I can say that today there are really great successful opportunities for the normal use of ICO projects. But I think that all this will not be very profitable before the start of the wave of demand for ICO

[distr@yopmail.com]

After constant misuse of ICO. More precisely, not correct analysis of this ICO project. I can say that today there are really great successful opportunities for the normal use of ICO projects. But I think that all this will not be very profitable before the start of the wave of demand for ICO

then ico will not improve, where now ICO is no longer in demand by investors because the security of their money is very risky to lose. The IEO may provide better convenience to investors than the ICO, but there will still be risks from an investment. still be careful and remain careful in investing new assets.

[SundayLottery]

Some kinds of businesses can't be developed without some financing. And you can't get money from banks etc as they don't finance greenfield projects. So ICO is maybe the only option for many project to get off the ground.

[florac9]

ICO idea of funding is not great anymore just imagine you wait for months before some ICO projects reach there fund target ,ICO is time wasting and IEO is just better and perfect solution

[dmty.0809]

Since the price of bitcoin has declined, many ico have ended scams or failed. Because many investors are retreating and don't want to buy their coins. Because they fear the coin has no value.

[coinbirds]

ICOs scammed so many investors and that is the reason why they collected only $180 million in the
Q1 like 60 x times less than same period last year. IEOs are the new successful model of fund raising.

[2tang]

ICO competition is indeed tight so it is only natural that there are many ICOs who fail to reach their targets, if from the beginning it is not good then trying again will produce the same thing so that it would be better for them to back down when they want to retreat should they want to return all funds which they get from investors so investors do not lose money
I think it's a good way to retreat

[KrakenZ]

ICO is one of the important problems in crypto currencies. I really regret for developers who do not have careful planning so that many ICOs fail or are destroyed in the middle of the road. It's a pity if the ICO fails or breaks so it has to retreat and start with a new project again. if indeed the developer is unable to make ICO well and run it, it is better to create coins without ICO. To run an ICO requires very large funds and competition in the crypto currency is very strict. We must be required to be truly responsible for running the ICO.

[cryp24x]

At some point I agree with you but come to think of it. In real world, some businessman don't have enough funds to do business but the idea of having a business never stops because some wanted to do business too. They have funds but don't have the idea. That is why ICO was created for those people who have the idea but don't have enough funding. I hope this concept will be use properly and effectively.

[etherclassic]

At some point I agree with you but come to think of it. In real world, some businessman don't have enough funds to do business but the idea of having a business never stops because some wanted to do business too. They have funds but don't have the idea. That is why ICO was created for those people who have the idea but don't have enough funding. I hope this concept will be use properly and effectively.

I agree with you, just because of there are many ICOs projects failed does not mean all of ICOs are bad however it is about the management of the ICOs projects which will make successfull of the ICOs projects and the ICOs is addoption on cryptocurrencies space the old way is IPO on the stocks market, so hopefully the people does not blame the ICOs its self it will make better to cryptocurrencies space.

[TIDOVEE]

Well, I want to believe some ICO are intending to meet up but couldn't just help themselves at a stage, some decides to extend their date in order not to disappoint us. Although, there are surer ICO with confirmed sources of fund. Don't let us blame them, there are space of we also detecting less of the poor ICO.

[deredevil]

This is natural, with the current conditions like ico that make us sometimes pessimistic about bitcoin and other coins having decreased and we do not know when everything will be normal again, but whatever we must believe that crypto will rise again even when no one know because indeed cryptocurrency is difficult to predict

[demonz666]

No funds no project idea makes me sick and tired of ICO ,I never like the idea right from the beginning ,why? Well to me if you are the owner of your business or company and you have struggled a lot to build it you won't dare want to let go or see it crumbled and fail,this is not present in ICO cases ,ICO is just like "oh if not much funds then I will back off and reopen another project maybe we can reach the hard cap" ,well if every developers are the ones funding there projects they will be more serious to make it a successful one,the easy safe path of backing out if hardcap is never achieved makes it feel easy for every one especially the scammers, I'm not been heartless ,if you don't have money to fund your project just don't bother ,many coins out there have no ICO ,no premine ,no bullshit with fine price per coin ,they never want any funds ,coins like masari ,Loki,haven project, dero rely on nobody fund yet they perform better than hundreds of ICO.

I think it is a risk that we must accept when entering an uncertain crypto world. if you invest, you should choose coins that have survived in the crypto market, which are the top 10 coins in the coinmarket. this will minimize the risk of loss. but if I want to get a free token from the ICO project I think there's nothing wrong with following a bounty campaign. although now many bounties are scam but there are still successful bounties. we only need to be careful and do research before the project joins the ICO.

[tomboi]

Companies to run are of course necessary and large. So they make ICO with the aim of raising funds. However, many ICOs failed to raise funds. This is due to a decline in investor confidence in the ICO project. In this situation it is better to invest in coins that have very large trading volumes.