Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2024, 08:35:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. WTF?  (Read 49365 times)
postingthatsmypurpose
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 07:23:02 PM
 #181

I heard about one possibility that it might have landed on a Chinese Floating airport, which is undetechable from radars. The purpose is to use the reason to look for the aircraft to bring in ships, in order to take over Vietnam's ocean territory. Just an opinion Cheesy
IamCANADIAN013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 503



View Profile
March 16, 2014, 09:39:21 PM
 #182

Well this is an interesting conspiracy on the whole thing:

Malaysia Plane Crash: 20 All-Electric Car-Linked Green Tech Passengers On Board, Names Released

Via Tiffany Dtastic

Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved
by the Patent Office

4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders.

Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Freescale Semiconductor (20%)

If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders
equally share the dividends of the deceased if not
disputed in a will.

If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder
gets 100% of the wealth of the patent.

That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.

Who owns Freescale Semiconductor ??

Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone who owns Freescale.

Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane.
As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were
passengers on the missing plane.

Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by
passing wealth to their heirs. However, they cannot
do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane
went missing, the patent had not been approved.
Thus, Rothschild gets 100% of Patent once Patent
holders declared deceased.

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/malaysia-plane-crash-20-all-electric-car-linked-green-tech-passengers-on-board-names-released

--------------------------------------------

Kinda strange, why would they have that many staff on the same flight?  I thought that was a big no no because of possibilities such as this.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
 #183

My god, what a bunch of nonsense. Not even worth debunking, but FWIW, Freescale is a publicly traded company, it doesnt belong to any Rothschild (anymore), it IPO'd in 2011. Moreover patents are filed under the name of company employees, but they belong to the company. Lastly, Freescale is a competitor to ARM (one that isnt doing too well I might add), developing SoC IP, whatever green car patent they came up with is not likely to change the world. What do you think the patent is about, cars running on water or cold fusion?
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1032


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 02:14:27 AM
 #184

I heard about one possibility that it might have landed on a Chinese Floating airport, which is undetechable from radars. The purpose is to use the reason to look for the aircraft to bring in ships, in order to take over Vietnam's ocean territory. Just an opinion Cheesy

A ship thousands of feet long invisible to satellites?

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
LostDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 02:22:00 AM
 #185

I heard about one possibility that it might have landed on a Chinese Floating airport, which is undetechable from radars. The purpose is to use the reason to look for the aircraft to bring in ships, in order to take over Vietnam's ocean territory. Just an opinion Cheesy

A ship thousands of feet long invisible to satellites?

Yeah, belief in Twilight Zone stuff abounds here!

My $.02.

Wink

Corporations For Crypto
Protect Your Assets and Reduce Your Tax Liability With A Kansas Corporation!
We Demand Justice From BFL
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 05:59:41 AM
 #186

I heard about one possibility that it might have landed on a Chinese Floating airport, which is undetechable from radars. The purpose is to use the reason to look for the aircraft to bring in ships, in order to take over Vietnam's ocean territory. Just an opinion Cheesy

A ship thousands of feet long invisible to satellites?
Ship is in stealth mode?  Cheesy

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
BitcoinQTlol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 12:47:10 PM
 #187

i heard the plane just landed on the moon, CNN's words not mine...
acs267
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 01:11:45 PM
 #188

i heard the plane just landed on the moon, CNN's words not mine...

I swear I just saw it on Ghosts!

Damn near thing scared the shit out of Elias.
mprep
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612


In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 02:50:36 PM
 #189

I heard about one possibility that it might have landed on a Chinese Floating airport, which is undetechable from radars. The purpose is to use the reason to look for the aircraft to bring in ships, in order to take over Vietnam's ocean territory. Just an opinion Cheesy

A ship thousands of feet long invisible to satellites?
Ship is in stealth mode?  Cheesy
An invisible ship made out of a new material not known to society.

kuroman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:32:21 PM
 #190

Suicide is possible, but the things there is not a single floating debris to be found and it's been more than a week that they've been looking
RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 03:44:13 PM
 #191

The most likely, logical and simple explanation is normally the right one. Who could have done this? The crew seems most likely to me; I see why they are focusing on this theory. Someone started shutting down comms with the outside world then drove off with a plane making no demands or claims. It must surely be in the ocean, right? You would need a big airstrip to land that pig, and I can't see that going unnoticed.
I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide.  What an screwed-up thing to do.   Undecided

The gospel according to Satoshi - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Free bitcoin in ? - Stay tuned for this years Bitcoin hunt!
TheBeardedMann
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 07:50:21 PM
 #192

mprep
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612


In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 07:51:46 PM
 #193


The NSA only cares about it's citizens the most. Or maybe THEY hijacked the plane for unknown reasons? Shocked

GigaCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 251


Giga


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 07:53:54 PM
 #194

Suicide is possible, but the things there is not a single floating debris to be found and it's been more than a week that they've been looking

he could've landed it softly on the water, causing it to drown slowly into the depths of the ocean.

Also the Indian Ocean is massive, so even with debris it might take a few months or years (depending on how extensive the search is) for it to be found.

Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2014, 08:32:36 PM
 #195

The most likely, logical and simple explanation is normally the right one. Who could have done this? The crew seems most likely to me; I see why they are focusing on this theory. Someone started shutting down comms with the outside world then drove off with a plane making no demands or claims. It must surely be in the ocean, right? You would need a big airstrip to land that pig, and I can't see that going unnoticed.
I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide.  What an screwed-up thing to do.   Undecided
It needs around 1200m to land. Some sort of highway would do.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
March 18, 2014, 08:35:19 AM
 #196

Suicide is possible, but the things there is not a single floating debris to be found and it's been more than a week that they've been looking

The search area now covers almost half the planet. Its already tricky to find debris if you know where to look, its a monumental task if you have no idea where to look. People (myself included) just dont grasp how vast the ocean's are.

he could've landed it softly on the water, causing it to drown slowly into the depths of the ocean.

Chances of landing softly on an ocean are slim to non existent. I cant recall a single instance where a passenger plane landed mostly intact on an ocean (river or lake is a different story).
IamCANADIAN013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 503



View Profile
March 18, 2014, 08:46:29 AM
 #197

My god, what a bunch of nonsense. Not even worth debunking, but FWIW, Freescale is a publicly traded company, it doesnt belong to any Rothschild (anymore), it IPO'd in 2011. Moreover patents are filed under the name of company employees, but they belong to the company. Lastly, Freescale is a competitor to ARM (one that isnt doing too well I might add), developing SoC IP, whatever green car patent they came up with is not likely to change the world. What do you think the patent is about, cars running on water or cold fusion?

I wasn't expecting people to take it seriously, but it does make for an interesting theory. Conspiracy or not.  Still though, why put that many from one company on one flight? Seems strange, anyways, if you want to read some interesting theory's, check out Jesse Ventura's Facebook page.

If anything, it makes for some good reading while on the crapper.
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
March 18, 2014, 09:02:56 AM
 #198

My god, what a bunch of nonsense. Not even worth debunking, but FWIW, Freescale is a publicly traded company, it doesnt belong to any Rothschild (anymore), it IPO'd in 2011. Moreover patents are filed under the name of company employees, but they belong to the company. Lastly, Freescale is a competitor to ARM (one that isnt doing too well I might add), developing SoC IP, whatever green car patent they came up with is not likely to change the world. What do you think the patent is about, cars running on water or cold fusion?

I wasn't expecting people to take it seriously, but it does make for an interesting theory. Conspiracy or not.  Still though, why put that many from one company on one flight? Seems strange, anyways, if you want to read some interesting theory's, check out Jesse Ventura's Facebook page.

If anything, it makes for some good reading while on the crapper.

Evil Unicorns were behind 9/11 is an interesting theory. And unless you want to read wild speculation based on absolutely nothing peddled by fantasists I'd avoid Jessie Ventura's Facebook page.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 1219


View Profile
March 18, 2014, 02:37:11 PM
 #199

I am 99.99% sure that the plane has safely landed in the rebel held region of the Kachin State in Myanmar (Burma).

Here is the reason why:

1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .

2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.

3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.

4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.

5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.

6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
mprep
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612


In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce


View Profile WWW
March 18, 2014, 07:06:00 PM
 #200

I am 99.99% sure that the plane has safely landed in the rebel held region of the Kachin State in Myanmar (Burma).

Here is the reason why:

1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .

2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.

3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.

4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.

5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.

6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
That actually makes sense. So the Myanmar rebels have hijacked the plane?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!