I'm currently trying to "add" ICOethics to my linkedIn contacts, so that he could verify that this account is MY account (this part is really grotesque...
Please DO NOT try to connect with us on Linkedin. We are no longer interested to help you at all.
We gave you a chance to help you to verify your account, and this was your answer:
I'm not connecting to anybody just because it has been requested to prove that I'm not a fraud...
... and you still think this is "really grotesque"... Find someone else to verify your account. Now lets the public and investors decide.
"grotesque" because (again, can you read carefully?) my LinkedIn has been online for more than 5 years. Gosh I've been preparing that scam for a long time
So that's what you call being an "investigator"? Calling people scammers, telling you to prove themselves by posting some videos + sending a msg on linkedIn, which I did, even if that didn't seem necessary (no offense meant with my "grotesque" adjective... but please try to empathize and think the other way "How would I feel if..."), I can give you an easy example:
I'm creating a (anonymous) profile in a forum and on linkedIn, I call myself "investigator" and I claim that I'm trying to catch as many ICO/crypto frauds as I can. Simultaneously, I'm working with some competition and I'm helping them by using one of the oldest tricks known: trying to make as many other competitors as possible look like fraud.
Now please don't consider this last phrase was about you, because I don't know you and I wouldn't call you a fraud or anything unless I actually have some PROOF about it. it's just a quick example of how you can misjudge someone based upon a few suspicions - and it's also very easy to manipulate everyone to think one way, especially since people can sometimes read very fast and don't put too much thought into it...
Again, that's how Justice works in most countries:
- catch people "on the act",
- get blatant proofs, THEN accuse them,
- offer them to defend themselves (because it's one of the human rights),
- listen carefully to the words they say and the proofs they show you, without making them sound different than what they really implicate.
- get to the conclusion, keeping in mind that only proven facts matter. (it might look like beer, smell like beer, even partly taste like beer, but it's not beer, it's Buckler)
- act fairly according to those conclulsions.
Here I've been personally attacked and judged even though I showed all the will to cooperate (and I'm sorry again, do I personally have anything to prove concerning my linkedIn profile? What's your legitimacy concerning the fact that you're the one(s) to be able to certify a person's existence? Trust/merit points are not gonna be taken seriously... everybody knows there are many ways to get 1000+ merits within a small period of time. Now I wonder if someone's gonna say "oh you're definitely a scammer, you know how to..."
see, I'm just 44, been in this world for a few years, I know how things work and I know that lots of peeps are trying to get things the easiest way, which btw is also the reason why cryptos are so hyped amongst people who are hoping to make a quick buck without lifting a finger)
At least, please remove those "untrust" marks... or feel free to check through my historic, see by yourself if I really look like a scammer? Does the way a person has been previously behaving sound like something to consider before calling him a fraud/scammer?
and dear God, "This person promoted another scam - paycore. see reference" -> I didn't "promote" anything! I translated a bitcointalk Ann!
please go on, the more you're writing the more you're discrediting yourself...
I'm out, enough time lost on this BS
