This is ridiculous ... Considering that yesterday three users wrote to me in a PM, whose names appear in this list. (Users who haven't published anything for about a year or two).
So much time has passed, and I do not remember under what circumstances I did this
report.
But the fact is, I would never waste time on these accounts if I didn't have enough evidence, (
2 years ago). And I changed my feedback to neutral, as I could not find information in my records about the transactions linking these 4 accounts. I will return
Neg feedback if I find it.
The problem is that campaign managers are oblivious to neutral feedback, and I'm not sure if it's worth changing.
I am talking about the totality of all these facts, without considering them separately.1. The screenshot was taken about a few months after Tarable took part in the bounty campaign we're talking about,
(that is, these four accounts were seen in two bounty campaigns).
2. Also, all 4 accounts were registered on the forum with a very short interval.
3. Last Active: (Almost synchronous online).
4. All four accounts have a posting history in the same local section, Altcoins (Bahasa Indonesia).
5. Tarable and these three other accounts are perfect examples of Bump Spammer/Shitposter, (
a lot of one-liners posts).
