|
_Miracle
|
 |
April 04, 2019, 05:25:24 AM |
|
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of. I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies. OK Great debate as usual. Techshare, I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life. Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long. Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation. The Rotary example wasn't antidotal. You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry. There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it. You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on... How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you. Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly. "the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more. |
There 'used' to be more truth in forums than anywhere else. Twitter: @cryptobitchicks Spock: "I am expressing multiple attitudes simultaneously. To which are you referring?" INTJ-A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 04, 2019, 05:55:36 AM |
|
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of. I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies. OK Great debate as usual. Techshare, I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life. Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long. Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation. The Rotary example wasn't antidotal. You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry. There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it. You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on... How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you. Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly. "the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more. And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from. You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so. The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1365
|
|
April 04, 2019, 02:53:05 PM |
|
^^^ The issue of controlled immigration is already addressed (USA). Consider that about one third of USA land is uninhabited. Also, consider that big cities show us that small cities could easily contain more population. Actually, there is the capability of the USA to hold many times the numbers of people that it contains. All one need do is look at the population that Bangladesh and India support. The issue of uncontrolled immigration doesn't have much to do with the idea of greater population. Some of what it really has to do with is: 1. The style of living of the current population; 2. Maintaining control of the existing population by not bloating it beyond controllable numbers (slavery maintenance); 3. Fear of what might happen if the population is allowed to increase rapidly. Regarding over-the-border aliens, all we need do is look at the history of the USA allowing Hispanic peoples up over the border in the past. The courts are set in place to handle the injury done by anyone, including illegals. If we have many more people doing injury, the courts can easily be expanded to handle more cases. If immigrants do injury, they can be forced into slave labor in the prisons as punishment. When this happens, immigrants won't want to come in any longer, or they will become law abiding citizens - remember, the country has room to hold many more people. Virtually all the talk about controlling immigration has to do with the fact that the people don't know how to properly use the court system. If they did, they would use the courts when necessary, both on immigrants who did harm, and also on government officials who did them harm. Which government officials are doing them harm? The ones who are taking away their right to travel on public lands without having anything other than hearsay as their reasoning. Which hearsay? The hearsay that unvaccinated people are a danger to the rest of the people, or even to vaccinated people. All of it is talk. There are no studies. In fact, the fact that the vaccinated people are scared of the unvaccinated, shows that vaccinations are causing derangement-by-vaccinations, so that the vaccinated have needless fear of the unvaccinated. The ban shows that it is the vaccinations, themselves, that are causing the ban to exist in the first place. Vaccinations are hazardous to all people... some immediately (autism in kids), and some later when they become fearful of nothing (because their brains are caused to act inefficiently by the vaccines). Or does anyone have double-blind test results that contradict this?  |
|
|
|
|
_Miracle
|
|
April 05, 2019, 05:02:04 AM |
|
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of. I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies. OK Great debate as usual. Techshare, I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life. Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long. Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation. The Rotary example wasn't antidotal. You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry. There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it. You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on... How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you. Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly. "the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more. And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from. You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so. The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs.
WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself? You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF. The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now. No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard) Meanwhile in the real world: I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”. |
There 'used' to be more truth in forums than anywhere else. Twitter: @cryptobitchicks Spock: "I am expressing multiple attitudes simultaneously. To which are you referring?" INTJ-A
|
|
|
yeosaga
Member
Offline
Activity: 223
Merit: 14
|
|
April 05, 2019, 06:37:02 PM |
|
Yes, I brought up immigration, and? I brought it up because it is the real cause of these outbreaks but everyone is so afraid of being politically incorrect everyone denies it even when the numbers clearly support this premise. The tiny minority of "antivaxxers" are simply being used as a scapegoat, a distraction, and another incremental infringement of human rights that the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of. I suppose it is just a coincidence that xenophobia is a synonym of racism eh? No of course you didn't call me racist, you just used an interchangeable word with racism to label me. I don't care what you identify as, you are still spouting leftist Marxist rhetoric regardless if you know enough to recognize this or not. Most Socialists, Marxists, and Communists like to think they are some thing else anyway because that is how they work, via re-branding, deception, and infiltration, and it will always "be different this time". Unfortunately people are usually too ignorant of political theory, psychology, and history to know they are spouting Marxist ideologies. OK Great debate as usual. Techshare, I prefer to have conversations and make an effort to talk to people online the same way I would in real life. Can't imagine standing in front of someone spouting off the way you do for too long. Sometimes you have an interesting point of view, this post isn't one of those times...it's some regurgitated Alex Jones BS: not interested in that conversation. The Rotary example wasn't antidotal. You don't have debates; you have these pre-formed diatribes you want to have made up from the current political punditry. There is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that actually addresses immigration issues I'm not going to get into some non-sensical argument online over it. You've got something to say about Muslims, how the Mexican Catholics are going to vote, on and on... How many Muslims and Mexican Catholics do you actually know? I don't mean "know of" ... I mean people that matter to you. Your signature in all caps is all anyone needs to know about you, you behave badly and complain about being treated badly. "the Fabians trying to take over our nation are oh so fond of." <---see that's funny Like when you compared socialism to a cocaine high <---truly brilliant; I liked the analogy the first time I read in an article, although admittedly I appreciated your guttural version just a little more. And I prefer to have a debate without the bullshit and dancing around peoples emotions because they can't handle facts. So tell me, if I am regurgitating political punditry, and there is no current political conversation being had anywhere right now that addresses immigration issues, what exactly am I regurgitating from? I am sorry your world view is limited to what those that own the media pre-approved for plebeian discussion, but that is not demonstrative of there being no legitimate discussion to be had. These are serious issues that sad little people who worry about feelings more than they do issues that can cause great physical suffering run away from. You lack any logical argument so you need to fall back on character attacks, assumptions, and accusations. You don't know shit about me or why that sig is there, so save your breath. Or have a logic based debate where you don't rely on all that lazy bullshit and perhaps I will become just a teeny bit less caustic. Either way I have no need to be liked by or need approval from anyone so if you don't like the way I communicate don't interact with me. I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so. The issue of uncontrolled immigration MUST be addressed, if it is not there will be no USA as we know it to speak of within the next 10 years because it will become the USSA, and some people would love that, which is why the real cause of these outbreaks must be obfuscated at all costs.
WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself? You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF. The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now. No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard) Meanwhile in the real world: I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”. Free speech exists to talk about the fringe subjects in the first place. Many want to simply silence anything controversial. This is a very bad idea, and will lead to very big problems if you allow people to silence one another. |
!ooh
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 05, 2019, 08:12:49 PM
Last edit: April 05, 2019, 09:00:05 PM by TECSHARE |
|
“I am going to continue to take a sledghammer to bad ideas regardless of who's feefees it hurts because the world desperately needs people like me to do so.”
WoW! (And I don’t mean wow in the happy Shibe sense) I mean “wow” you actually believe yourself?
You’ve got a lot to say about other people’s “feefees”: while you are sensitive AF.
The world doesn’t desperately need people like you, there are more than enough caustic flame wars happening on the internet right now.
No, I don’t like the way you “communicate” you just keep running your mouth (clicking away on your keyboard)
Meanwhile in the real world:
I’ll take advantage of bitcointalk’s “chill effect”. Yes, all your ideas are valid, and all my ideas are invalid. Why? Because you have declared them so of course! Tell me sweet summer child, what am I being overly sensitive about? The fact that you rely on everything EXCEPT logical fact based arguments? The world does need people like me, and I will tell you why. There is a reason that the saying "don't shoot the messenger" originated, because they ALWAYS shoot the the messenger when he carry's bad news. No one wants to be the one to have to stand up to speak unpopular truths because people like you, instead of having a discussion based on facts and logic resort to infantile marginalization tactics that not only prevent these difficult discussions from being had, but further create extremism by denying anyone with unpopular ideas an outlet for even being heard as this compulsive need for comfort increasingly isolates them. People like me are important because I don't give a fuck if you like me, and as a result I will discuss ideas that upset you or anyone else as long as they have basis in logic and fact. You want to live in a world where uncomfortable discussions are never had like a small child who wants the clouds to be made of cotton candy and glaciers made of ice cream because it is what makes you feel comfortable. People have an inherent need to belong, as a result no one is willing to step up and be the messenger destined to take those shots resulting in a disgusting hive mind herd mentality where free thought no longer exists. Your opinion of me and my methods are irrelevant. What is relevant is you are not presenting a logical fact based argument either because you are incapable, or you can not control your emotional state long enough to present one. Much like the vaccination debate itself, instead of a discussion where facts are presented and discussed it has become a focal point for ignorant and emotionally charged people to focus their discontent upon a small minority who wants nothing more than to just be left alone. You run away now, until next time when your emotion gets the best of you again and you blurt out some nonsense without backing it up, declare yourself the winner, and turn tail and run before you are exposed to the faults in your argument. Hopefully your perception of moral superiority comforts you from the bad ideas from the bad man. |
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 09, 2019, 12:02:42 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 10, 2019, 12:37:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1365
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:31:47 PM |
|
This might not get around the stupid laws that are taking away the rights to travel, but it is a start.
PARTY POOPERS Anti-vaxxer parents hold ‘measles parties’ to give their kids the deadly virus so they become immune and don’t need MMR jabParents are hosting "measles parties" so their kids can contract the deadly virus instead of getting the jab, it has been reported.
City health officials blasted parents after they were found encouraging their un-vaccinated kids to get the virus from each other in Brooklyn, New York.
Some 285 cases of measles have been confirmed in New York since October
Anti-vaxxer parents in New York have been found to host parties in hopes their un-vaccinated children get infected with measles (stock image)
The movement against the MMR vaccine, which protects against measles, mumps and rubella, is largely thought to stem from the work of Andrew Wakefield.
The now discredited UK doctor penned a damning research paper claiming a link between the MMR vaccine, autism and bowel disease.
The study was retracted in 2010 but the paper has had a lasting influence with the "anti-vaxxer" movement particularly taking off in America.
And the movement has sparked concern amid the current measles outbreak in New York – the largest the city has seen since 1991.
It is believed misguided parents are hosting "measles parties", encouraging their young, un-vaccinated children to spread measles with the idea that once a child has contracted it, they will be immune.
The "parties" are similar to "pox-parties" where kids were encouraged to contract chickenpox from each other.
These were popular before the introduction of the varicella vaccine in 1955.
It is now widely recognised by health officials that vaccinating a child is far safer than deliberately infecting them.
MEASLES OUTBREAK
The measles virus is highly contagious and in some cases can lead to death.
The city's health commissioner said she was "particularly concerned" about these parties and urged parents to get the MMR vaccine for their children.
She said: "I understand that parents may be afraid of getting their children vaccinated.
"I know that getting vaccinated is far safer than getting measles."
According to the NHS, the MMR vaccine is "a safe and effective combined vaccine that protects against 3 separate illnesses – measles, mumps and rubella (German measles) – in a single injection.
"The full course of MMR vaccination requires 2 doses.
"Measles, mumps and rubella are highly infectious conditions that can have serious, potentially fatal complications, including meningitis, swelling of the brain (encephalitis) and deafness." The dangers in this are that if the kids received many other vaccinations in the past, their immune systems might be weakened enough that they will be greatly harmed by simple measles, or even killed. If this happens, government will have the duty to prosecute them, and they won't have any way to fight government off. If they want to do it right, they have to learn common law and sue the pants off the individuals (doctors and government officials) who suggested that vaccines were save in the first place. After all, there aren't any safety studies that have any real value, and there aren't any long-term safety studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 28, 2019, 01:04:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tvbcof
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
|
|
April 28, 2019, 05:03:41 AM |
|
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  That would be a better point if your stone-age relatives had been making nuclear reactors to their heart's content. If my forefather's immune systems didn't work without vaccines I wouldn't be here. All I want is the right to have my body work in a manner which has proven effective for the last couple hundred million years. I don't trust Merck Pharmaceutical's scientists enough to outsource my immune system function to them. But if you do, 'God Bless, Move forward.' None of us so-called 'anti-vaxxers' are trying to make that decision for you. Living in society means that you make some concessions in order to stay a part of a community. Rockland County has said that in order to stay a part of their community, you must be vaccinated, otherwise they don't want you there. That said, if you want to truly make it fair, since its a retroactive change, I'd argue that they should pay for those that want to move because of the change.
Soon we'll wish we had the ole Russian policy of shipping us off to Siberia, because they probably don't care what you do there.
By your logic the following 'dangerous' people should be shipped off for the protection of the citizens: - People who 'cannot be' vaccinated for some reason. You know: cancer, aids, from elite families who know better, etc.
- Similac babies who are not getting protection from their mothers.
- Anyone for whom the vaccine 'didn't take'. Some people simply don't generate a significant immune response.
- Anyone for whom the vaccine has worn off.
- Anyone who's been injected with pertussis vaccine and thus can be persistent asymptomatic carries of the wild-type bacteria.
Basically the best citizens to have are those who've had most or all of the piss-ant childhood right-of-passage ailments and are thus immune for life and pass on their immunity to their child during the critical phase of the child's immune system development. In our modern societies which exhibit good sanitation practices you would actually get a lot more bang for the buck by banishing people who get caught speeding. --- Whether the pro-vaxxers know it or not, this isn't about 'protecting society'. It's about complying with the dictates handed down by 'leadership', proving that they are a good little servant who will do as your told, unquestioningly believe the priest class ('doctors', 'scientists'), and generally be non-threatening worker bees. The hope in their minds is that be being complaint, and in fact enthusiastic supporters, they will be given a seat at the table when the shit hits the fan. Sadly for them nothing could be farther from the truth. The contempt that 'the powers that be' have for these drones knows no bounds. |
sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
May 02, 2019, 11:29:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KingScorpio
|
|
May 02, 2019, 09:05:31 PM |
|
you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines. |
|
|
|
yeosaga
Member
Offline
Activity: 223
Merit: 14
|
|
May 02, 2019, 09:31:53 PM |
|
you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines. People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them. |
!ooh
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1365
|
|
May 02, 2019, 10:14:41 PM |
|
Many people are happy that there are vaccines. Why? Because they know that they will be banned from public places. This gives them an excuse so they don't have to fight with their kids about it. I mean, "Hey kid. You want to get stabbed or banned? Btw, choose getting stabbed, and you get banned from home." After all, these days most public places are disgusting. |
|
|
|
|
KingScorpio
|
|
May 02, 2019, 11:55:44 PM |
|
you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines. People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them. they have to read, where i live you can read all side effects, i doubt its possible to lie in pharmaindustry. |
|
|
|
yeosaga
Member
Offline
Activity: 223
Merit: 14
|
|
May 03, 2019, 12:25:38 AM |
|
you want americans child mortality to be as high as african or afghan child mortality? be happy that there are vaccines. People are happy that there are vaccines. As far as I can tell, people want to better understand the full side effects of them. they have to read, where i live you can read all side effects, i doubt its possible to lie in pharmaindustry. It is one thing to read something, and it is another to understand what is being read. |
!ooh
|
|
|
chengha937
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
May 03, 2019, 12:31:45 AM |
|
I really think that it is right do to this as to ensure public safety. It is important for kids to be vaccinated so that they will not obtain diseases that can be contagious to anyone. I truly think that it is an act of securing public welfare and security.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1365
|
|
May 03, 2019, 01:35:59 AM |
|
Here's the real reason why we have open borders... even though both parties are proclaiming that they are doing something about illegals.
BIOLOGICAL INVASION: Disease-infested illegals are being intentionally deposited in cities across America after being exposed to tuberculosis, measles and other infectious diseasesMost conservatives believe that the Left-wing Democrat Party opposes President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure our borders and enforce all immigration laws because they want to flood the country with ‘new voters.’
That’s true to an extent, but that’s far from the whole story.
The primary objective of the American Left — and, really, the global Left — is the destruction of the United States as founded, period. This is something you should never forget because the United States stands as the one beacon of true individual freedom and liberty the world over; if we fall, there is no similar country to take our place.
Thus, if you look at the issues that are important to Democrats and you examine their political objectives and view the policies they pursue through this lens, you can begin to understand why they do the things they do.
Take the migrant invasion currently occurring along our U.S.-Mexico border. To any rational American, the right thing to do would be to give the president and our governing institutions all the diplomatic, financial, and physical tools required to secure it. But instead, Democrats fight the president tooth and nail.
And what’s happening? Not only are the migrants overwhelming our ability to handle the onslaught, because of the way our laws are written — and because Democrats refuse to work with Republicans and the president to change them — federal immigration officials have been forced to release disease-ridden migrants into our cities, thus exposing Americans to diseases we eradicated long ago.
|
|
|
|
|
