Stake allocation

[glendall]

I don't think there is anything wrong with the allocation,
actually the wrong thing is people who have multiple accounts and follow one project with that multiple account, this is a cheating thing,
and also if you want to get merit try to make a quality post, I'm sure you will get it.

[1715419721]

1715419721

[1715419721]

1715419721

[1715419721]

1715419721

[Tramle091296]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

You can think of it as a bias but its in the system even they are not good at posting they get that rank based on the old BTT. Stake allocation is always favor for those who have higher ranks your right about it but we cant do anything about it. just focus on getting a merit because the admins create a merit system to avoid spamming account to get advantage on this forum.

[ranman09]

So many posts of the same thing. It's simply because of the;

Space a rank can provide for the signature.

Larger space means larger advertisement which is why they are paid the most.

[agatha90]

It is true, the greater the level, the more stakes he can get. For that we have to creatively make a post to get merit and go up to the next level.

[akungagal]

I don't think there is anything wrong with the allocation,
actually the wrong thing is people who have multiple accounts and follow one project with that multiple account, this is a cheating thing,
and also if you want to get merit try to make a quality post, I'm sure you will get it.

i agree with you,
indeed there is nothing wrong with that. we only need to work smarter to get merit and increase rank. so the allocation of stake will be in accordance with what we want and we don't need to complain about this anymore.

[coinsycrip09]

i don't think that's a problem, because they have worked hard to increase their rank. and it's normal for them to get paid according to their rank.

you have to work harder to make quality posts so you will get merit. and also you will get the same stake allocation as them if your rank increases like them. so you don't have to complain about this anymore.

[Perie200]

The forum is developing and the admins increased the difficulty of earning grades. There's a + and -. But overall, when you join any project must understand that the earnings of newcomers on the forum is not particularly large, even the legendary users sometimes get mere pennies for their not an easy job. The main thing is not to miscalculate with the project and thoroughly study it before joining.

[karagun125]

High ranks gets more stakes than lower ranks, that it, we cannot do anything about it. Why not we strive hard and post some quality post in this bitcointalk to rank? So that we can also experienced given large stakes.

[elzjmirra]

I think this is right and there are not many problems. The amount of stake allocation according to our account ranking, the greater the ranking, of course, will receive more stakes and for the number of posts according to the project management regulations. If there are people who don't comply with the rules they don't get a bet.

[Kriptos]

I think they only appreciate the struggle of the participants. because it's not easy their struggle from Junior members to the top level like Legendary. so in order not to become a social gap they provide stakes according to the rank of the participants.

[Natalim]

I think they only appreciate the struggle of the participants. because it's not easy their struggle from Junior members to the top level like Legendary. so in order not to become a social gap they provide stakes according to the rank of the participants.

That's one of the reason, reaching a high rank is not easy, we spend time and we have more post in this forum.
Merit system plays a big rule for the improvement of the forum, the account farmer are losing their job because it's not easy to rank without receiving merits.

[Serco]

I think they only appreciate the struggle of the participants. because it's not easy their struggle from Junior members to the top level like Legendary. so in order not to become a social gap they provide stakes according to the rank of the participants.

That's one of the reason, reaching a high rank is not easy, we spend time and we have more post in this forum.
Merit system plays a big rule for the improvement of the forum, the account farmer are losing their job because it's not easy to rank without receiving merits.

if administrator didn't apply merit system there will massive cheater in any campaign.i think this is right rules for all of us bitcointalk member.and if there is differences about stakes based on rank its normal.

[shakesbear]

It's a fair system, I support it.  Sometimes some bounty company give stake for messages with merit, but it's very rare because it's really hard to get merit.

[Balzhi]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

when sr.members registered in bitcointalk you did not even hear about cryptocurrency. legends and heroes deserve their stakes. they working here much longer than you.

[Ini35]

Rank sometimes not a determinant. Although, others with higher ranks may earn more, but how you utilize the reward you are being paid will determine how much you will get at the end.
If you still know how to hold a good coin, you will earn more.

[innocentone]

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I believe the stake that they are getting is well deserved because in their signature, compared to the signature of jrmember, the links can be clicked and it is more visible. Besides, the stake allocation discrepancy is on the signature campaign only, you can join content creation and the stakes allocated is the same.

[jrrsparkles]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

when sr.members registered in bitcointalk you did not even hear about cryptocurrency. legends and heroes deserve their stakes. they working here much longer than you.

For working or contributing? Most of the people doesn't deserve any rewards or their stakes because they are not making any good contribution to the project by posting spams.But their signature is more visible compared to less ranls on that basis their stakes are okay.

[hell_slayer]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Such differences in payments are due to differences in the signature and the ability to wear an avatar. At this forum, the signatures of the participants vary greatly in their abilities depending on the rank and the better the signature, the better this person can advertise the project, respectively, his work will be paid better. Everything is absolutely logical and correctly done IMO.

[bakermaker123]

Stake allocation for me is kind of unfair because of we have entered the scene of bitcointalk forum the same time sr.members and other legendary enters, we will be sr.members and legendary too. And we work as hard and the same as them that's why I think it is unfair.

[bison]

Stake allocation for me is kind of unfair because of we have entered the scene of bitcointalk forum the same time sr.members and other legendary enters, we will be sr.members and legendary too. And we work as hard and the same as them that's why I think it is unfair.

That has become a good rule because sharing the stake system will make the members of this group the spirit to be the best and increase the ranking by contributing to this forum to be better so you can get merit to get an increase in ranking .