[ANN][SHA]SHACoin2 - Dead Revival - Virtual & Physical Coin - Faucet

[nohow82]

Our SHA Network stopped for 17 hours.
I don't know why. It works well in past 9 months.
here are some clue before it happened.

1. We saw a new top1 address with 15 million SHA Coins.
2. 30+ nodes up and down to normal ~18
3. difficulty up to 6.5+ and down to 1

check this
blocks" : 525599,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 14.03751155,
"proof-of-stake" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2
},
"blockvalue" : 1,
"netmhashps" : 0.00000000,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033.38195707,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 49914972,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 49914972
},
"stakeinterest" : 100000,
"testnet" : false
}


13:02:06

getstakinginfo


13:02:07

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1196,
"currentblocktx" : 1,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2,
"weight" : 49932455,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 94
}

[1713518920]

1713518920

[1713518920]

1713518920

[nohow82]

i think there's something wrong with this address SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX (new N.1)
How it's possible every stakes over 1000 sha?

[frank123m]

i think there's something wrong with this address SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX (new N.1)
How it's possible every stakes over 1000 sha?

the address: SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX is legit till now.
because after checking its balance before 2014.06.06, it had 12 mils SHA coins already.

Received   12,257,309.236315 SHA   in 13 transactions
Sent   140,141.055313 SHA   in 1 transactions
Staked   3,053,209.087199 SHA   in 1076 transactions

first year 25%, seems normal. but something wrong with it.

[frank123m]

more info:

last processed block: 46196 (april 26, 2014, 14:33 utc)
total coin in the system: 733 536 630.36497605 sha
top 100 richest
#   address   balance
1   Sg2NdZywasiNUADzm5dxt6G1WWKyKkj9Mc   397 874 484.35873902 sha
2   SSa2ejw4V6U4FLkqRherGtzMxFv5BJhGr5   33 123 808.92874100 sha
3   STX9LaJqGCshBvSxfUQjoDsup3eF4Huc5m   30 359 513.28987100 sha
4   SiRRA1exkSp1cf9ngNFmMRnK6qBcxNpMCT   25 000 000.00000000 sha
5   SiJN7eZpKUeemAKWkbF6fyWn9iqXLS4idf   14 934 372.68550400 sha
6   SQFH2nW1ox3mfHd8yy5ueFVmuh7A4eMtUX   12 249 486.14152900 sha
7   SdBXvP84JRxHLZkepQkhuGTYzc31Jr9WpB   10 791 666.05995800 sha
8   SjJk1ypVhY1Xp2VenHCiAEEcMHou9htQjy   8 000 111.00000000 sha
9   SXQJkvd6r5nNei23FSDAu9EULck3GGpafn   7 509 228.11506800 sha
10   SWfo3ptkFWTpMbqdcDZJp6HA6UjhXn49f2   7 286 416.73203700 sha

[nohow82]

So what is the problem ?

[frank123m]

So what is the problem ?

The problem is we now cannot go to next block and we don't know what caused this.
There seems to have a weakness in our network, then this happened by accident or attack.
too less nodes?

[nohow82]

Any idea?

[frank123m]

Any idea?

I am still waiting for CRF's reply. It is holiday, I don't know if they have the time or not.
or I will be doing some testing and try to find the way out.

[nohow82]

What happen if we have reached coin limit?

[frank123m]

What happen if we have reached coin limit?

PoS rate:
    - Year 1: 25%
    - Year 2: 15%
    - Year 3-9: 10%
    - Starting Year 10, it will have an annual PoS interest of 1%

should be ok, now we need to solve the problem and keep moving on.

[frank123m]

Coin Dead again. So, there will be a revival.

[nohow82]

And why?

[frank123m]

And why?

I have no idea.
we will see if we can pass the block 525599 in private network or new public network and try to find out why.
it feel like we just had a 51% attack.

[frank123m]

It is a very strange time.
Because doge blockchain is ready. btc blockchain is ready. but sha blockchain stopped.
so current we have this:


well, maybe someone need us doing something to SHA first, so here we go.

[frank123m]

and let me show you something.


17:43:41

getstakinginfo


17:43:41

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : false,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 0,
"weight" : 53134965,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : -1
}

[nohow82]

51% attack? How is it possible?
How could we pass block in private network?

[frank123m]

51% attack? How is it possible?
How could we pass block in private network?

actually, I don't know. and we forgot the coin's birthday celebration.
we just passed the coin's birthday and the coin gave us a smile.

[nohow82]

and let me show you something.


17:43:41

getstakinginfo


17:43:41

{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : false,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 0,
"weight" : 53134965,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : -1
}


{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1196,
"currentblocktx" : 1,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"difficulty" : 1.10854562,
"search-interval" : 2,
"weight" : 69010675,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 68
}

[frank123m]

"weight" : 69010675,
"netstakeweight" : 78937033,
"expectedtime" : 68
}

well, we just wait and see the weight > netstakeweight and see what happened.

because current setting:
Min stake age: 48 hours, no max age.

no max age, maybe a problem.

[nohow82]

I think that the problem is when n1 stacked a lot of coin. Addresses that haven't stacked for long time will cause this. I think