NSFW - Quickseller has some sort of mental issue

[marlboroza]

*Warning - this thread contains not safe for work (NSFW) material. Not recommended for users under 18 and with weak heart.*

QS completely went off topic in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5128907.0 which was about Rmcdermott927 getting into DT1 by fake votes or something and is trying to move thread into my dirrection starting from this post. I won't sit quietly and watch how this scambag is trying to discredit me. Don't you ever send me another message to remove negative feedback from your account pointing to theymos's words because that won't happen you pile of horse shit.

I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1, and was forced into making a public attempt of getting removed from DT2:

• Was actually blacklisted from DT1
• Appears to be pretending to want to get off DT2

I wasn't forced you moron.

A good first step to trying to get someone to remove you from their trust list would include sending a personal message asking to be removed from their trust list, and to follow up if they do not comply.

I have sent PM to one person I thought they will remove me from DT but that didn't happen. They know who they are and I won't share this information. So I don't think I will spam everyone's pm and harass people around forum because I don't do that, unlike you.

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1, he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted, he asked to be removed from DT publicly, however he has put very little effort into getting this done (very near to zero effort), and he still leaves trust sometimes.

marlboroza Trusts:

marlboroza Distrusts:

You retarded piece of goo. My trustlist was empty since then, I don't remember exact date when I removed everyone from my trust network, but it was in that period. Before, after? After.

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this.  

Well, I can't see scammer and not warn others. Blame my human nature for that. I know why you can't understand this, it is because you are one piece of scamming shit.

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1

marlboroza says

You piece of lying scamming shit



You mentally ill delusional paranoid piece of scamming shit

remove me on February 11, 2019, 11:21:46 PM

You crazy brain damaged narcissistic psycho maniac:

he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted.

I maybe talked or didn't talk to one person I trust and I won't share who is or isn't this person neither I will share what was or wasn't in that  conversation. Everything what has or hasn't been posted by other users is speculation. You have to respect my wish.


I would suggest you to have some sex, sperm has obviously come up to your head and it highly affects your brain cells in wrong way.


And no, nothing in this thread is emotional reaction, so if when you decide to use anything from this thread against me I will point you back to bold part.

[1713564107]

1713564107

[1713564107]

1713564107

[1713564107]

1713564107

[1713564107]

1713564107

[1713564107]

1713564107

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Don't you ever send me another message to remove negative feedback from your account pointing to theymos's words because that won't happen you pile of horse shit.

He recently sent me a similar PM, which I summarily ignored.  He's missing Theymos's point about burying hatchets and so forth, but my red trust on him is not based on anything personal; it's because of his escrow scam, which QS still doesn't seem to realize was wrong.

QS has a problem with you because he's essentially paranoid.  Your request to be removed from DT1 with no explanation as to why has somehow caused alarm bells to go off in his autistic little head--and you had every right to do what you did and you don't have to explain your actions to anyone. 

Just block his PMs if you don't want any more correspondence from him, although he doesn't seem to send out a lot of PMs to his detractors (at least in my experience).  I also wouldn't let him rent any space in your head, because it's not like his arguments are going to influence anybody to think any less of you.

[nutildah]

Thanks for clarifying -- something just didn't sit well when QS said you were "forced off DT1," as that never appeared to be the case. And bringing it up in that thread was particularly weird. Why he continues to post at all (under that account) is beyond me.

[suchmoon]

Now that QS is in a sig campaign he's making stuff up and shitposting Meta at an alarming rate.

Also the fucking newbie trolls... Mr Pharmacist could you make a public plea to ignore them, seemed to work to some extent with CH.

[Vod]

Now that QS is in a sig campaign he's making stuff up and shitposting Meta at an alarming rate.

What a sad ending to someone who used to brag they had 100+ BTC available to lend.  :/

Wonder if he invested everything in nastymining?   

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Mr Pharmacist could you make a public plea to ignore them, seemed to work to some extent with CH.

I'm not sure my thread was all that effective, as I kept seeing tons of replies to cryptohunter's trolly posts, and it did nothing to discourage him from typing them out as fast as his fingers could move.

It also might be too early to call for a boycott of these new jagoffs.  They just appeared out of nowhere within the last 24 hours, and I think we ought to wait and see what their sewage flow rate is.  Right now there aren't enough data points.

So did cryptohunter get a temp ban at least?  I've read conflicting statements about this.  If so, it might account for the sudden grand entrance of peabrains spouting the exact same argu-rants that CH has become famous for.

[Vod]

3- It is very unethical to highlight someone’s (alleged) mental illness, although I am unsure how much you care about ethics.

Like when you called me a pedophile?   

[suchmoon]

3- It is very unethical to highlight someone’s (alleged) mental illness, although I am unsure how much you care about ethics.

But what if the alleged narcissistic douche nozzle is a danger to the members of the forum? I consider marboroza's post a valuable PSA.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

3- It is very unethical to highlight someone’s (alleged) mental illness, although I am unsure how much you care about ethics.

Like when you called me a pedophile?   

Or like when Quickseller accused Lauda of having an unspecified pill addiction and provided no evidence for this?

[Vod]

If memory serves me correctly, the warning about vod was specified that it is something I believe to be true

So you believe I am a pedophile.
You know my name and where I live.

Why did you/do you not call the police?  780-423-4567

 

I sincerely believe Quickseller has a mental issue.  Either he is lying or he doesn't view sex with children as wrong.   :/

[suchmoon]

The pill addiction of lauda was based on credible information from a reputable person

I can't imagine a reputable person who would entrust credible information to you, let alone allow you to make it public.

Although I can imagine that you genuinely think that you're trustworthy and your word means something.

[Lauda]

The pill addiction of lauda was based on credible information from a reputable person and was meant to serve as a warning to others in regards to allowing lauda to handle their money.

If by reputable you mean inferior-ego-crazy neanderthal, then sure. You can't win with these slimey tactics.

I can't imagine a reputable person who would entrust credible information to you, let alone allow you to make it public.

Say one is a reputable person that has credible information about someone on the forum. Out of all of the forum member's who would they decide to disclose the information to? Surely Quickscammer.

[Vod]

Quickseller:  "My neighbor is drugging and raping the neighborhood children."
Other neighbor:  "Did you call the police?"
Quickseller:  "No,  I don't have children."

[Vod]

Quickseller:  "My neighbor is drugging and raping the neighborhood children."
Other neighbor:  "Did you call the police?"
Quickseller:  "No,  I don't have children."

Bump... If Quickseller PMs you to remove trust, remember his acceptance of pedophiles.

[marlboroza]

Bumping this with relevant post for this thread, as quacky decided to do his shit again (I obviously forgot to do it few days ago):

marlboroza is a liar who likes to twist facts for the benefit of those who he is allied with. I would not take him seriously.

He is intent on smearing and attacking anyone who is willing to speak out against any of his friends.

And, I just noticed one post which quacky posted after this thread was created, I will quote this part:

[...] What he posted is also not proof of anything, it does not show context, especially if there was communications before his alleged message he sent asking to be blacklisted from DT1.

...this post (redacted with links):

- Calling Lauda a pill addict
- Calling Vod a pedophile
- Accusing members of leaving fake trade feedback
- Calling Hhampuz a thief

There are plenty of other examples. QS has quite the track record of accusing people with zero evidence to back it up.

...and add this to collection:
Accusing random people of of condoning violence and asking people not to do business with them
Attacking suchmoon recently for plagiarism thingy

...to agree with this:

QS has a problem with you because he's essentially paranoid.  Your request to be removed from DT1 with no explanation as to why has somehow caused alarm bells to go off in his autistic little head