Known Merit Abusers

[twiki]

Thanks for the clarification, the question is removed.

[1713564869]

1713564869

[1713564869]

1713564869

[FaucetKING]

Qwk is a merit source, Lafu is very close to hitting legendary rank, probably he wants to help him to rank up.

Lafu is a trusted member of the community and he helps as he can the forum.

I see nothing wrong here, the "job" for merit source is to help members who deserve the new rank to rank up. (ideally with banking 0 merits at the end of the month as theymos said)

Nope. It is all wrong!
The merit system is made to reward the greatest members here.. Not just to help the close users to rank up. That's a crystal-clear abuse to the system and that's not how Merits system should operate.
Instead of helping that member to rank up, there might be a newbie user putting a maximum efforts to help others.. IMHO, I think that newbies like this should be rewarded.. I am not against anything nor anybody here.. Everyone is free to do. Whatever he wants with his own merits.. But just try to be neutral and authentic.

[qwk]

Nope. It is all wrong!
The merit system is made to reward the greatest members here..

[TalkStar]

Current Merit system works specially for members encouragement where a good quality poster worthy of it. Lafu is one of them who's are really think about forum and Its users. Anyine can easily get their answer by seeing lafu's previous works that actually he deserve merits from one of our forum merit source to achieve near rank.

In my point of view its not looking unusual to me. We can put our attention to those issues where some users selling or abusing merits rather than rewarding someone for his/her quality works.

[coinlocket$]

Not just to help the close users to rank up. That's a crystal-clear abuse to the system and that's not how Merits system should operate.

So According to your thinking process, if users deserve to rank up (he is online often, he post constructive post, he helps the forum) and you merit him since he is useful to the community, you consider an abuse.
Instead, you want to give the merit to a newbie with few posts, that maybe posts 90% of his post on bounties and spam the forum.

Do not worry, good newbies will be merited too we have a lot of cases.

The question now is, how can you criticize a donator member with almost 1k merit earned while you are a shitposter with 0 merit earned?

BTW nice use of your merit, this post is even worth 50 merits not only 14.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301309.msg31417191#msg31417191
Archive: http://archive.fo/XQJPr



Clarly you can speak about merit.

Merit sent by FaucetKING from January 24, 2018 until April 19, 2019 (source)


Thu Mar  8 19:43:03 2018: 1 to tk808 (Trust list) (history) for Re: [ANN] [Airdrop] Nevra (XEV) - Equality, Freedom, Trust
Mon Mar  5 18:41:18 2018: 1 to tk808 (Trust list) (history) for Re: [ANN] [Airdrop] Nevra (XEV) - Equality, Freedom, Trust
Mon Mar  5 18:28:37 2018: 1 to tk808 (Trust list) (history) for Nevra (XEV) - Project is Terminated
Mon Mar  5 12:03:22 2018: 7 to Token_King (history) for Re: Do you like bitcoin, what's your reason?
Mon Mar  5 12:03:10 2018: 7 to Token_King (history) for Re: Do you like bitcoin, what's your reason?
Mon Mar  5 08:38:48 2018: 2 to Jodimaster (history) for [ANN][ICO][DTH] Dether - Buy & sell crypto for cash. Spend it at physical store
Mon Mar  5 08:37:09 2018: 3 to Token_King (history) for deleted post



Merit received by FaucetKING (Trust list) from January 24, 2018 until April 19, 2019 (source)

[ranman09]

Thanks for the clarification, the question is removed.

Though your accusations are wrong. I still would like to thank you for this post! Because of this I have known that there is a support group for people that are eager to excel here! Congrats @Lafu !