Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 12:39:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone have a per unit cost estimate for mining bitcoins?  (Read 811 times)
Rockford99 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 12:41:23 PM
 #1

Granted, electricity prices are different in different areas, but has anyone done any rough math on the expectation of getting a block awarded?
1715387998
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715387998

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715387998
Reply with quote  #2

1715387998
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 12:57:46 PM
 #2

Granted, electricity prices are different in different areas, but has anyone done any rough math on the expectation of getting a block awarded?

Sounds like you are asking two different questions:

1. What is profitability of mining? -> Bitcoinx.com has charts how much you can make per day with 100Mh/s. -> http://bitcoinx.com/charts/

2. What is the likelyhood of finding a block? -> Here is a calculator to see statistics around how long it will take you to find a block -> http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/old_calculator.php
Rockford99 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
 #3

Is the probability of finding a block dependent on how many people are mining/searching for blocks?

I'm just trying to make sure that the validation system remains economically viable.  If some people get discouraged and drop out, I don't have a problem with that as long as enough people continue mining/validating to keep the authentication process reasonably fast.

Am I correct in assuming the significant mining occurred at much lower bitcoin prices (<$1 last year), so mining should persist even at much lower bitcoin prices.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 03:06:44 PM
 #4

No.  You can't look at just price.  Bitcoin compensated for difficulty.  More people mining = higher difficulty = harder to find a block for a given amount of hashing power.  Difficulty ensures that the average time for entire network to find a block is ~10 minutes.

Difficulty now is 1.2 million so it is 1.2 million times more difficult to find a block than the first block however it is roughly 50% easier than at the peak difficulty.

On average the number of hashes required to find a block is (difficulty)*(2^32).
So currently is ~5 quadrillion hashes (5154 trillion).

How much you can generate (gross revenue before cost) in fiat also varies with exchange rate.  The link above has a nice graph which takes into account both PRICE & DIFFICULTY to give you the expected daily revenue per 100MH/s.
Rockford99 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 09, 2011, 05:30:59 PM
 #5

Thanks.  So to paraphrase your response.  The payoff to mining is somewhat related to the number of people mining.

My contention is that one of prerequisites of bitcoin viability is a robust transaction validation system that clears transactions in a timely/low cost fashion.  It sounds as though this element won't be in jeopardy even at much lower bitcoin prices.  I'm not focusing on bitcoins from a trading profitability standpoint.  I just want the system to persist and to continue to clear in a viable manner.  As long as that continues, I maintain my confidence in bitcoins.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!