Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto - Evidence Here

[erikoy]

Noh, but a copy instead thats wants to be acknowledge as satoshi nakamoto. There is no way that guy who proclaim to be without the exposing real self to connect as satoshi will not determine to be a real satoshi unless he will prove it by providing evidences.

Imitating a legend is very common and this is how this guy done here.

[1715500431]

1715500431

[1715500431]

1715500431

[1715500431]

1715500431

[1715500431]

1715500431

[1715500431]

1715500431

[hatshepsut93]

it still surprises me that some people to this day still insist on accepting the lies of CW even though his fraud can not be any clearer than this!

all that aside, the funniest thing about all this is that the drama that CW started is biting him in the ass as BSV is dropping so hard these days and is also being removed from the big altcoin exchanges

Well, there's plenty of trolls, shills and morons in this world, so seeing idiotic opinions occasionally does not surprise me.

It is indeed good to see that community reacts to this bullshit, exchanges delisting CW's Bcash, people supporting those who are bullied by CW, like Hodlonaut.

[enhu]

While Satoshi and all other developers want anonymity, He wants out?

On the other hand, a sign message is all that he needs to prove, he doesn't have show evidences that can be faked and goes to any court just to prove it. What is is trying to achieve here? Getting BSV to be on major exchanges?

[Slow death]

How come the op believing the fake news.

just look at the OP post history:

Look guys, I know you like to revive dead lions, why not just read what Craig Wright posted 4 days ago and start buying BSV?

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5

3000 then 2700~2200, 1500 should really attract alot of buyer sentiments. Don't you think so?

Sounds like a good prediction. I see BTC at 1000$.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1014868;sa=showPosts;start=120

you may realize that he is more of a guy who does not like how bitcoin is going

We don't care who is Satoshi Nakamoto.

I would not be happy if the crazy guy was really satoshi

[Bagaji]

The acclaimed dude can proof to be Satoshi by replying to this thread with Satoshi main account here in this forum or better still, sign a message vai Satoshi wallet that is known to the public.

[MrFreeRoMan]

He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.

And also post using Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcointalk account so we can have another proof of being the man behind bitcoin

Not possible, account is blocked to avoid it being hacked.

The acclaimed dude can proof to be Satoshi by replying to this thread with Satoshi main account here in this forum or better still, sign a message vai Satoshi wallet that is known to the public.

[arielbit]

It is all bout having a coin using the name "Bitcoin" and selling it to investards, normies and plebs.

from forking to Bitcoin cash (BCH) to forking Bitcoin satoshi vision (BSV)?? BSV cements it, became too obvious he/they just want another shitcoin to sell.

because they don't have access to my keys and that is the way to sell shitcoins, by using THE "Bitcoin" name  

[HardFireMiner]

How come the op believing the fake news.

just look at the OP post history:

Look guys, I know you like to revive dead lions, why not just read what Craig Wright posted 4 days ago and start buying BSV?

https://medium.com/@craig_10243/evidence-and-law-f8f10001efa5

3000 then 2700~2200, 1500 should really attract alot of buyer sentiments. Don't you think so?

Sounds like a good prediction. I see BTC at 1000$.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1014868;sa=showPosts;start=120

you may realize that he is more of a guy who does not like how bitcoin is going

We don't care who is Satoshi Nakamoto.

I would not be happy if the crazy guy was really satoshi

As you can see from the provided by yourself screenshot, my post has 28 August 2018 date. On November 15 2018, Bitcoin Cash had a scheduled protocol upgrade, with 2 main implementation - 1 Bitcoin ABC with Wormhole upgrade to the Core, thus modifying Bitcoin to an unrecognizable state in my opinion, and 2 Bitcoin SV to 128MB for on-chain scaling and also re-enabled original “Satoshi” set of op_codes, particularly OP_MUL, OP_LSHIFT, OP_RSHIFT, and OP_INVERT.

Yes, I believe Btc (Bitcoin) has moved far away from the whitepaper during 1 August 2017 hard fork.
Yes, I also believe Bitcoin Cash ABC moved also away from Bitcoin whitepaper on 15 November 2018.

Is there any other thing I can clarify for you?

[HardFireMiner]

And since we are quoting Satoshi's posts in bitcointalk, check this one out:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234.msg1976#msg1976

BTW, I did come to my senses after that brief bout with 1.3, this release is still going to be 0.3 beta not 1.0.

I really appreciate the effort, but there are a lot of problems.

We don't want to lead with "anonymous".  (I've been meaning to edit the homepage)

"The developers expect that this will result in a stable-with-respect-to-energy currency outside the reach of any government." -- I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.

It's not stable-with-respect-to-energy.  There was a discussion on this.  It's not tied to the cost of energy.  NLS's estimate based on energy was a good estimated starting point, but market forces will increasingly dominate.

Sorry to be a wet blanket.  Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard.  There's nothing to relate it to.

Bitcoin was never supposed to be anonymous, it was designed to be private.

[mrdeposit]

He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.

And also post using Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcointalk account so we can have another proof of being the man behind bitcoin

Not possible, account is blocked to avoid it being hacked.

I didn't know this fact until reading your post. It looks like forum admin and moderators decided to block the account for preventing the possible hacks. Craig Wright needs to re-think his strategy as a real Satoshi and some questions should be answered before accepting the verification of real Satoshi.

[Spider A4]

Any single incredible evidence he able to represent? So logically "Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto" it's absolutely false and now BSV will be delist from some big exchange like binance and kraken.
https://www.coindesk.com/kraken-exchange-joins-binance-shapeshift-in-delisting-bitcoin-sv

[lobat999]

The acclaimed dude can proof to be Satoshi by replying to this thread with Satoshi main account here in this forum or better still, sign a message vai Satoshi wallet that is known to the public.

Records of credit card purchases don't directly point that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto when that bank and tax records has a name of Craig Wright? Right? And that is insufficient proof that is very unacceptable to most of the cryptocommunity. The burden of proof lies on Dr. Wright himself and he ought to show us more convincing proofs than those already shown because the community won't buy it.

[carlfebz2]

He’s an embarrassment to be honest, a cringeworthy weasel. I can’t wait until we see his demise. The only way he can prove he is Satoshi is if he signs a message from a well known Satoshi early address & he won’t because he can’t.

And also post using Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcointalk account so we can have another proof of being the man behind bitcoin

Not possible, account is blocked to avoid it being hacked.

Where you do get such information? If satoshis account can be hacked then they can probably hack this entire forum as well. What you think?

[miropp]

It's very strange that he was silent for so long and suddenly decided to show up. It is obvious that the evidence that he is Satoshi no. So it's a waste of time.

[tunapa]

It’s becoming too much to read and hear this claims of being Satoshi or not. It wouldn’t take much for him to prove to the entire world that he is the real Satoshi. All these multiple claims simply means he is the real Satoshi. With or without satoshi , crypto is good to go . He has left a great legacy to follow up

[Cuk0ng_bitc0in]

yes. a lot of crypto enthusiasm that rejected Craig's statement. even wikileaks criticized him because he made false evidence. one of the easiest ways that craig could do to prove himself as Satoshi Nakamoto was to move a number of Bitcoin results from Genesis Blok. Without this method, it's hard to believe that Craig is really Satoshi Nakamoto.

[mohammedmattar]

These lies of CW have no strong evidence on them 
I think he is trying to support his position
and bad BSV position after delisted from Binance.

[HardFireMiner]

Where is your God now?

Notably, when reviewing Wright’s copyright applications, the U.S. copyright examiner was aware that the Bitcoin white paper and code were each a “famous work” and there have been questions about who is associated with the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. After receiving confirmation from Wright that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the Copyright Office granted the following registrations:

• U.S. copyright registration no. TXu 2-136-996, effective date April 11, 2019, for the paper entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, with year of completion 2008. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

• U.S. copyright registration no. TX-8-708-058, effective date April 13, 2019, for computer program entitled Bitcoin, with year of completion 2009 and date of first publication January 3, 2009. The registration recognizes the author as Craig Steven Wright, using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright wrote most of version 0.1 of the Bitcoin client software, and the registration covers the portions he authored.

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-creator-craig-s-wright-satoshi-nakamoto-granted-us-copyright-registrations-for-bitcoin-white-paper-and-code/


Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.


Bitcoin

[o_e_l_e_o]

Where is your God now?

I'll just quote myself from the other topic below. Anyone can file a copyright claim for anything and it would be registered. This means absolutely nothing in terms of proving he is Satoshi.  Actually, that's incorrect. This is yet more evidence that he is decidedly not Satoshi. To think Satoshi would start filing copyright claims on bitcoin is utterly laughable. CSW continues to be a fraud, liar, and scammer.

He has registered a copyright claim. Anyone can register a copyright claim for anything. Registering a claim says nothing about the claim being investigated, verified, supported by evidence, legally binding, etc. Everyone who has posted in this thread could right now register a copyright claim for bitcoin's whitepaper, and they would all be accepted.

If it wasn't hilarious enough that someone claiming to be Satoshi (who has apparently abandoned everything Satoshi stood for) was shouting his identity from every platform he can find and suing people for not believing him, let's all take a moment to appreciate just how hilarious someone claiming to be Satoshi filing a copyright claim is. Let's also appreciate the hilarity of the BSV shills pumping BSV on the back of this fraudulent announcement.

[Apes]

all evidence points to Craig Wright. For some reason there seems to be something strange, it seems that this evidence can be traced from the past why it is now being published.
Is he just looking for popularity from Satoshi Nakamoto figure. he tried to influence that he was a figure who had been making people curious. there must be strong evidence if he or any wanna to prove it.