Yobit spam on the forum

[asche]

too late to delete, because it was quoted.

No it is not. You just hope this will lead to extra post counted, while it actually only increases the probability you well get banned from the campaign for the trash you are posting here.

[1713249587]

1713249587

[Zz]

too late to delete, because it was quoted.

No it is not. You just hope this will lead to extra post counted, while it actually only increases the probability you well get banned from the campaign for the trash you are posting here.

That's not my intention.
I erased my own message. however, the quoted message remained. see : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5133809.msg50702998#msg50702998

also,
I'm coming out of this campaign.

[AztecGoldHero]

seems just a jelous topıc, opened by a new bıe, probably hsı maın accunt also not sr member, and yobıt opened thıs campaıng just for sr and hıgh mermbers,

crypto and forum need these kınd of campaıngs, also it has limits wıth 20 post a day, there was tons of campaıng that allows 50 post a day,

[hulla]

Meanwhile, I will advice them to set atleast 30 minutes post gap.

There we go - pretty decent idea. Yobit (or any campaign for that matter perhaps?) should count a maximum of 1 payable post per 30 minutes or maybe 3 per hour (1 every 20 minutes).

That would be a great idea.

I massively doubt they're going to allocate the amount of time needed to check that. Considering the number of people who've piled in they'd need to tie up an employee not too far off full time. I'd be very interested to know what resources they have chucked at it. They may only rely on complaints or just keep going without looking at anything until it reaches a critical mass of annoyance.

You might be right because if their previous campaign but the total 20 daily posts per day will lead to some campaign participants greediness and I think it will be better if they can reduce the daily paid posts to 15.

[Astargath]

Funny this thread is filled with people wearing sigs pretending to care about the spam  

[markiz73]

I have long thought that the maximum number of paid posts in the Signature Campaign should be governed by the rules of the forum. 50-60 posts a week is a good limit.
If the user writes more, it should not be paid.

[TheNewAnon135246]

seems just a jelous topıc, opened by a new bıe, probably hsı maın accunt also not sr member, and yobıt opened thıs campaıng just for sr and hıgh mermbers,

crypto and forum need these kınd of campaıngs, also it has limits wıth 20 post a day, there was tons of campaıng that allows 50 post a day,

20 posts per day is way too much. The amount of (extremely) low quality posts prove that. 20-25 posts a week is more than enough for a signature campaign imo.

[severaldetails]

Meanwhile, I will advice them to set atleast 30 minutes post gap.

There we go - pretty decent idea. Yobit (or any campaign for that matter perhaps?) should count a maximum of 1 payable post per 30 minutes or maybe 3 per hour (1 every 20 minutes).

That would be a great idea.

I massively doubt they're going to allocate the amount of time needed to check that. Considering the number of people who've piled in they'd need to tie up an employee not too far off full time. I'd be very interested to know what resources they have chucked at it. They may only rely on complaints or just keep going without looking at anything until it reaches a critical mass of annoyance.

I am still a member of the old campaign, and there the counting was done by a bot. I think that it can't be too difficult to add some code that measures the time between posts. This way a 30 minutes gap for paid posts would be easy to controle. I find this a good idea!

[Malsetid]

seems just a jelous topıc, opened by a new bıe, probably hsı maın accunt also not sr member, and yobıt opened thıs campaıng just for sr and hıgh mermbers,

crypto and forum need these kınd of campaıngs, also it has limits wıth 20 post a day, there was tons of campaıng that allows 50 post a day,

20 posts per day is way too much. The amount of (extremely) low quality posts prove that. 20-25 posts a week is more than enough for a signature campaign imo.

I don't think they're required to meet that 20 posts a day though. And for somone who have pretty much the whole day to spend in the forums, 20 quality posts i think is easily attainable. I've read quite a lot of yobit campaigners' posts recently and many of them aren't shit posts and are relevant to the topic or the post they're replying on. It would just be better i think if there's an actual mod for the campaign itself to track their posters for spam and irrelevant content.

[Mulann2]

Funny this thread is filled with people wearing sigs pretending to care about the spam  

Trying to correct one wrong with another wrong (By Mulann2)
Actually i don't see yobit campaign as a wrong, what is wrong is the attacks like this has never been seen before
But hey! Yobitooss must be enjoying the spotlight, any kind of publicity is still a.......? (fill it)
Lol! this forum is full of D........s

[markiz73]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1006631.msg50705126#msg50705126
I've already seen a few reviews in local boards that Yobit  doesn't pay. Soon as possible willing spam will be less.

[2girls]

https://twitter.com/YobitExchange/status/1119228178743083009
YoBit Signature Campaign (BitcoinTalk): https://yobit.net/en/signature/  ★ Sr Member: 0.00012 BTC per constructive post (20 max per day). ★ Hero Member: 0.00016 BTC per constructive post (20 max per day). ★ Legendary Member: 0.00020 BTC per constructive post (20 max per day).

YoBit exchange organized a Signature Campaign at our forum. They pay 20 posts per day. Forum will be filled with spam. Here is an example.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310031;sa=showPosts

legendary users start writing idiotic posts.
if you do not take action, spam will be even more

I am not sure why everyone specially the DT members are angry on the Yobit new Signature Campaign . If the Campaign follows the Rule , whats the Issue with the DT members ?
However, Forum Spamming should not be allowed.

[o_e_l_e_o]

I don't think they're required to meet that 20 posts a day though.

No, but providing an incentive for 20 posts a day means many of them will post any old spam in an effort to reach 20 posts a day to maximize their earnings.

And for somone who have pretty much the whole day to spend in the forums, 20 quality posts i think is easily attainable.

Sure, there are some members who could make 20 on-topic, constructive, and high quality posts in a day. But there are many more members who struggle to even make a single constructive or high quality post. Incentivizing them to post 20 times a day simply results in 20 spam posts.

If the Campaign follows the Rule , whats the Issue with the DT members ?

The campaign promotes and pays for low-value, pointless, and off-topic posts, all of which are against the rules.

[Findingnemo]

The spam invaders looks much more than I expected in less than 72 hours.On every thread's last page you only can see 90% signature as yobit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1006631.msg50705126#msg50705126
I've already seen a few reviews in local boards that Yobit  doesn't pay. Soon as possible willing spam will be less.

As far as I know they were only paying to english posts.

[DdmrDdmr]

I’ve taken a look at Yobit signature bearers to see what info I can gather so far. Now my focus here is only on meriter/merited people, since those are a subset I regularly download (therefore providing a partial view).
General context: There are a total of 35k meriter/meriters, and over 155K people who have at least logged-in over the last three months (bpip).

This morning I downloaded all meriter/merited profiles, and going over their signatures, I make it 321 meriter/merited forum members that are bearing a Yobit signature (searching for the terms ‘Yobit’, ‘fast exchange’ and ‘over 1450’ in the signature – discarding old stale signatures in the process). As far as I’m aware, the campaign started on the 19/04/2019, so it’s running into its fourth day now.

The rank distribution is as follows:

Code:

rank         nUsers
Legendary 55
Hero Member 99
Sr. Member     134
Full Member 17
Member         15
Jr. Member 1

There are 33 profiles bearing the signature that do not have the minimum Sr. Member rank. 54 of the profiles also have negative trust (DT depth 2 view).

Link to merited/meriter profiles: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S9mvmHtjqO0CUz6jO25DVdDzHx9Pgde62O_3FYhzzoM/edit?usp=sharing

Now the above is just after 4 days. Seeing the signature is not an issue at all. Some are bound to be decent posters, and the signature will (at least to me) be pretty transparent. It’s when you see a bunch of one-liners , thrusts of 20 posts in just a few minutes, or last post by the same profile in a wide range of posts, that it gets a bit one your nerves. If that is the case, then report to moderator is the procedure to follow.

[tranthidung]

Some are bound to be decent posters, and the signature will (at least to me) be pretty transparent. It’s when you see a bunch of one-liners , thrusts of 20 posts in just a few minutes, or last post by the same profile in a wide range of posts, that it gets a bit one your nerves. If that is the case, then report to moderator is the procedure to follow.

It is obviously that not all Yobit supporters are shit posters, but most of them are. We should have deeply respect on someone who kept posting decent ones as Yobit supporters, because they somehow bring benefits back to Yobit, rather than shitposters, that likely only cheated money out of Yobit.
Nevertheles, you likely said something incorrect, the spam from Yobit looks not really a serious spam, because forum members now have become more actively report spam posts. Consequently, most of spam posts deleted within first hours after published by shitposters.

[2girls]

Some are bound to be decent posters, and the signature will (at least to me) be pretty transparent. It’s when you see a bunch of one-liners , thrusts of 20 posts in just a few minutes, or last post by the same profile in a wide range of posts, that it gets a bit one your nerves. If that is the case, then report to moderator is the procedure to follow.

It is obviously that not all Yobit supporters are shit posters, but most of them are. We should have deeply respect on someone who kept posting decent ones as Yobit supporters, because they somehow bring benefits back to Yobit, rather than shitposters, that likely only cheated money out of Yobit.
Nevertheles, you likely said something incorrect, the spam from Yobit looks not really a serious spam, because forum members now have become more actively report spam posts. Consequently, most of spam posts deleted within first hours after published by shitposters.

So you mean to say that those wearing the signature of Yobit are all spam posters and as soon as we see a Yobit wear account post on the forum, it should be deleted immediately .   Common Get a life 

[asche]

So you mean to say that those wearing the signature of Yobit are all spam posters and as soon as we see a Yobit wear account post on the forum, it should be deleted immediately .   Common Get a life 

I mean most people wearing said signature went from 1-2 posts/day to 20.

How come they suddenly have that much to say? Including yourself. Who are you kidding?

Also I thought you couldn't participate in YoBit signature with red trust

[theymos]

129 users who were wearing a yobit signature and had at least 1 good report against them in the last 14 days are banned for 14 days. All yobit signatures are wiped. Signatures containing "yobit.net" are banned for 60 days.

Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.

[asche]

129 users who were wearing a yobit signature and had at least 1 good report against them in the last 14 days are banned for 14 days. All yobit signatures are wiped. Signatures containing "yobit.net" are banned for 60 days.

Some people were talking about neg-trusting spammers for spamming. This is not appropriate; report the posts, and if that doesn't seem to be working well, come to Meta with specific examples and suggestions.

That was swift and fair.

Thanks