Invacio: Shady ICO project

[vision3001]

This is a longitudinal review (1+ yrs) on Invacio

First reviewed on 2 July 2018:

    18 Comments first, followed by 13 Questions for the INV team.

    [Section A] Comments:

    C1. Invacio is an interesting ICO project. On the surface from just reading its whitepaper, many may be bedazzled by its impressive technology for its wide variety of products. Those with AI practical and theoretical knowledge would smell snake oil after reading its whitepaper and numerous red flags would emerged as one proceed with an INV due diligence.

    C2. I wanted to believe and still want to.

    C3. This is my one-month long review of INV involving interactions with both core team members, former core team members and various stakeholders from INV 2nd official Telegram group, as well as INV unofficial Telegram group.
    T1: Official Original TG Group (during ICO): https://t.me/InvacioICO (before late May) ~ est. no. of users 10,000 at the point of shutdown
    T2: Replacement for the Official Original Group: https://t.me/invpricediscussion (late June) ~ est. no of users as at 12 June 2018 is about 1000+
    Invacio shutdown T1 claiming that it has served itӳ purposes for the ICO while banning users who asked uncomfortable questions. Thereafter, Invacio set up T2 and followed the same path of banning users who also asked uncomfortable questions - it is probably question of time when T2 would also disappear. Latest update as at 1 July 2018, T2 has gone private. Update as at Nov 2019: T2 was also deleted - sometime middle of 2019!

    C4. What is not AI:
    C4.1 Statistics is not AI
    C4.2 Massive accumulation of data is not AI
    C4.3 Data analytics is not AI
    C4.4 Web crawler (aka spider) is not intelligent agent and web crawlers (spiders) are not multi agents system.

    C5. Superlative, exaggerated and ad nauseam use of the term "Artificial Intelligence" (over 50 times) in the Invacio whitepaper.

    C6. The cover page of the whitepaper reads: "A Complex of Solutions Grounded in Multi-Agent System Artificial Intelligence", nonsensical title.

    C7. Page 6 of the whitepaper states "...multi-agent system AI for the ethical generation of wealth and the administration of disaster situations", another nonsensical statement that does not make sense.

    C8. Page 9 of the whitepaper regarding Jean, "... She is an intelligence so sensitive to the world and its changes she is able both to enact strategies by weighing these historical and live data, and to react to the world if the world fails to coincide with her expectations." More nonsense.

    C9. Page 18 of the whitepaper regarding Tamius. Zero evidence of Tamius despite claims that it was 70% completed in early 2018.

    C10. Page 25 of the whitepaper relates to Agnes. For all its description on what-is, there is a lack of how-to. performance metrics relating to the system is also missing.

    C11. Page 25 of the whitepaper relates to Alise and states that "Assisted by Jeanӳ spiders (bots which trawl the webs)". Definition of spiders is correct here and yes, spider is not an intelligent agent, and many spiders are not multi-agents.

    C12. Page 25 of the whitepaper states that "Alise... Through the noise and chatter of the internet Alise is able to make sense of the complex interactions which are having or will have an impact on a business, and Alise is where Invacioӳ great strength in sentiment analysis and real time natural language comprehension is seen at its most immediately effective". More snake oil here.

    C13. Page 38 of the whitepaper states that "... Invacioӳ Applied AI division looks to the performance of our multi-agent system Artificial Intelligence and associated technologies" - gibberish.

    C14. Page 41 of the whitepaper states that "DNS Reflection Attacks... System Development Executive, Ben Rengsomboon had this to say about our financial security precautions...", what is the LinkedIn or web profile for Ben Rengsomboon?

    C15. The lack of references in the whitepaper is very appalling to me ֠no excuse is required.

    C16. For all AI, Blockchain and data analytics capabilities, none of the core team member has any publication or prior works relating to AI, Blockchain or data analytics.

    C17. There was a very recent (29 June 2018) repeat of the using PS3 clusters to build a supercomputer, from the video titled "Invacio Update ? When Proof ?? Exit Scam? LIVE STREAM", Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djq-aejZjA8 The Invacio team has clearly never heard about Moore's Law. The claim of using PS3 clusters to build a supercomputer is an outright falsehood due to its constraints which many people already know (except Invacio).

    C18. For those who have brought INV tokens, I genuinely wish you well.

    [Section B] Questions:

    Q1. Page 19 of the whitepaper states "Tamius is able to offer a military grade...", to elaborate on what is military grade.

    Q2. Page 19 of the whitepaper states "WeNet... does not require the internet infrastructure, nor does it require a cellular network. Instead it uses ingenious methods to create a stable and portable internet gateway, in areas with zero internet connectivity.", pls elaborate on how you achieve connectivity with zero internet connectivity.

    Q3. Page 19 of the whitepaper states "Invacio Data ... Developed in consultation with experts from institutions including NASA and Facebook HHVM, as well as world-experts in IT... ". Pls state the name of the NASA expert(s), Facebook HHVM expert(s) and other IT experts.

    Q4. Page 27 of the whitepaper states "Aquila is a hedge fund led by experienced hedge fund managers, senior executives from Wall Street...". What are the names of these fund managers and senior executives?

    Q5. Page 27 of the whitepaper states "In late August 2017, Invacio Labs began a live test of certain elements of its financial technology." Show us the performance metrics of this test.

    Q6. Page 32 of the whitepaper is about Invacio Network. Is it an extension of the 2014's Invacio Network, see http://web.archive.org/web/20141117154133/http://invacio.wordpress.com:80/
    Mirror: https://archive.fo/ApgBf

    Q7. Page 37 of the whitepaper states that "Security... Led by a number of security specialists", pls state the names of these security specialists.

    Q8. Page 38 of the whitepaper states that "Labs... Led by William James Dalrymple West...", pls state the names of who else is in this Labs.

    Q9. Page 42 of the whitepaper states that "In November 2017 Invacio was extended an invitation to address the United Nations (ESCAP)." Would like the CEO of Invacio to clarify this false statement or perhaps the public should write to UN directly to enquire about this falsehood involving Invacio.

    Q10. Invacio original ICO team (14): https://i.imgur.com/RCx4mVH.gif
    Invacio team of "8" (as at 30 June 2018): https://i.imgur.com/JzdmMFm.jpg
    Invacio tech team (as at 3 July 2018): https://i.imgur.com/nCcZHAH.jpg
    Page 47 of the whitepaper indicates that Scott Soutter is a core team member, it was also stated in ICOBench and ICOMarks. Scott has since clarified that he was a *former Advisor* to Invacio and was never part of the Invacio tech team member. Two falsehoods here.
    (a) Who else among the 14 are (a) Advisors (b) part-time, refer to https://i.imgur.com/RCx4mVH.gif,
    (b) Invacio is expected to remove Scott from both ICOBench.com and Invacio.com websites; Invacio is also expected to issue a public apology to Scott for the false claims.

    Q11. Page 59 of the whitepaper mentioned about "VADGAMA BLOCKCHAIN". Pls elaborate on this new blockchain. Vadgama's Youtube interview with ICOGenius is most uninspiring and he talked gibberish at times, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tGZKhTbRAI

    Q12. Did Invacio receive an equity investment? Core team member Corey said "Yes" while Core team member Roger said "No". Who is correct?
    Corey (29 Mar 2018): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n1Eism1c_U
    Roger (29 Jun 2018): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djq-aejZjA8

    Q13. What is the company that conducted the ICO? Is it 'INVACIO HOLDINGS (UK) LIMITED' https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08928794/filing-history or the UK company is only for the Class C shares?

    For your reply, pls use this notation, Ans1 for Q1, Ans2 for Q2, ..., Ans16 for Q16; if you are replying to my comments, you may use this notation, Re1 for C1, Re2 for C2, ..., Re18 for C18; so that I can tell if you are responding to a comment (C) or a question (Q).

    I may revise my ratings after receiving answers to the above 13 questions.


Add-on comment on 26 July 2018:

    C19. Callous violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by Roger (a team member of Invacio): https://i.imgur.com/sIVODBg.png
    Source: https://twitter.com/cryptomarmite/status/1022124166076620800


Updated review on 29 July 2018:

    C20. When the Invacio project was further exposed by Keith Wareing (a Youtube ICO reviewer/interviewer) for falsehoods, Invacio also maliciously created a domain with vindictive remarks, refer to http://keithwareingcrypto.com (created by the Invacio's team)
    This is a whois record for this domain name (noticed that this domain was created a couple of days ago): https://i.imgur.com/Af0iRwD.gif

    C21. The first unethical and unprofessional KYC abuse case (with malicious intent) by Invacio:
    Evidence: https://i.imgur.com/CZDbah7.png

    C22. Latest tweet from VC crypto fund that invested in Invacio: "BlueNodeCapital: @MktsInsider Heads-up team on your article featuring Invacio. You are obviously not aware but Invacio is a full blown professionally done ICO scam that seen millions of dollars wiped out for hundreds of investors. If you need further info on what has occurred let me know.
    1:37 PM - 29 Jul 2018"
    Blue Node Capital: https://bluenodecapital.vc/team
    Source: https://twitter.com/bluenodecapital/status/1023668901115252736?s=21
    Cache: https://i.imgur.com/6eS3j16.png

    C23. Token buyers who felt that they have been scammed by Invacio may check out this Support Group relating to actions that they can take:
    Website: https://invacioclassaction.com
    Telegram: https://t.me/InvacioActionFraudUK

    These rogue Invacio cowboys are seemingly unstoppable.


Reply from Invacio CEO "William James Dalrymple West" on 25 Nov 2018:

    Re1) Can't argue with this opening statement. The authors, John Marshall and Daniel Brace respectively over stated some technical components of the whitepaper without fully understanding the technology. Unfortunately, it had not been subject to a further vetting process by William to ensure it properly reflected and conveyed the content as tasked. In hindsight, the draft whitepaper would have been culled dramatically prior to final release as he stated publicly within our telegram after finally obtaining time to read it in June-18. The technology described was accurate, however the words used were at times over exaggerated in nature.
    https://imgur.com/a/f019k5l screenshots from the file, more than welcome to share, deleted user represents the closing and removal of Johnӳ email and Daniels email accounts at Invacio.

    Re2) Really? We find that hard to believe given the negative sentiment found in posted discussions both public and private that weӶe witnessed in social media.

    Re3) This action was carried out with appropriate warning and notification informing the community that the telegram account had to be shutdown based on a risk assessment and exercising responsible governance. The decision was based on a number of factors that included the non-transferable nature of the account (given the loss of the sim-card), and more importantly it was owned by an ex-employee (Mr Christoph Huber) which had been removed due to his questionable conduct and unprofessional business actions. Never the less messages have been left in this older group informing the community that the account that is under Invacioӳ control (Roger Baker).
    Further at the end of the ICO Invacio culled all bounty members or airdrop individuals, those that left and joined the Telegram under Invacioӳ control made up 1000+ users from the ICO.

    Re3.1) TG#2 is still a vibrant community and a source of intelligent conversation (all things blockchain and AI) and publicly viewable. In order to maintain confidence through effective management within the community it was decided that it would be made private for a few weeks while we cleansed it of people that were unable to offer qualified and/or constructive criticism/discussion, or were constantly sharing the baseless claims posted by Mr. Yeap from all over the internet. http://t.me://invacioofficial

    Re4) AI is a very broad concept and in my opinion one that is overused from a terminology standpoint. I personally despise this element of the sector, like all sectors there is a buzz word and it is used heavily to raise cap, or interest.
    Overall we meander between various types of AI, however i personally see AI as achievable by anyone in its various states regardless of experience level. Furthermore I have absolutely no interest in being the best but prefer to work to a criteria and have each stage of the process in the flow pick-up the shortcomings, as to how that works and even a description, that is my IP, the core reason is to see if it scales, itӳ also the element that perked up Scottӳ interest, the rest we both know is achievable as stated above.

    If still unsure what AI is I suggest visiting the URL below as it's not my place to teach people how to suck eggs.
    https://searchenterpriseai.techtarget.com/definition/AI-Artificial-Intelligence

    Re4.1) In response to your previously cited papers (and weak effort to support your argument), here is one from another source countering that it is indeed part of a process. https://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2015/11/18/artifical-intelligence-and-bayes-rule/
    Re4.2) We have common ground in that accumulation of data may not be AI, but the systems that either collate, analyse and derive may be ANI which is AI. This is what some of our data solutions offer, and in part are used in a continuously processing on demand data relevant to subject decisions at the time.
    Re4.3) Agreed itӳ a buzz word, but in essence for data analytics to work data needs to be captured, processed (analysed), with derived indicators/elements that are then are usable.
    Re4.4) Interesting statement, no theyӲe not multi-agents and Iӭ not entirely sure if you fully comprehend the technology. Spiders are not AI in any of itӳ accepted forms, they are however more commonly understood as process elements that incorporated derive intelligence (data) from the BigData being processed into the system. Such intelligent actions such as for example classification, context and understanding where that information is of use, specifically addressed in our process of hunting and gathering additional information to factor into a current process.
    https://www.invnews.blog/applied-vs-generalized-ai-where-do-we-fit-and-what-is-the-difference
    So in a nutshell these ճpidersԠare merely bots that fetch information for the AI to use in its tasks. Further we never stated spiders were the agents although the term dgentԠdoes mean someone, or something that acts on behalf of someone, or something else! So, a part of the spider process fetching data for an AI module would technically be an agent of the AI.

    Re5). Refer to the earlier response in C3., Mr. John Marshall and Mr. Daniel Brace co-authored the whitepaper, and it is acknowledged it should have been further vetted and culled respectively. Hindsight is always 20/20.

    Re6) Let us address the simple description in its context. A complex of solutions by its very meaning refers to number of products and/or projects. Now if we extend this to the Multi-Agent system it simple refers to many AI modules coupled together and automatically searching for required information with little human intervention.

    Re7) Again, letӳ address the simple description in its context. Ethical Generation of wealth simple means at fundamental level guidance on ethical trading via prediction/projection systems.
    In relation to ddministration of disaster situationsԬ that is something Michael had discussed at the UNESCAP, and further Invacio are discussing with a UN party. More specifically, this is in the form of monitoring and guiding disaster response units, or coordinating disaster relief scenarios (taking feeds from multiple live and historical data sources to calculate the best way to deal with any particular).

    Re8) This description has been acknowledged earlier and further the source identified. For clarification, our AI ԊeanԠdoes in deed work autonomously once instructed. Multiple data feeds essentially refers to the system being able to recognise patterns across a broad spectrum of inputs. Also, self-correcting if errors are recognised during any task (spiders/bots sent to source new data)

    Re9) Tamius Wallets have been released on both Apple iOs and Android, however, Tamius has been canned as the crypto markets are in a state of decline (the same as our still locked ETH from the ICO).

    Re10) Agnes has altered since the whitepaper to bring in line with regulations. There are also multiple new modules being rolled into Agnes to offer a broader range of projections.
    https://www.invnews.blog/invacio-agnes-is-the-edge-to-your-sword-not-the-sword-itself

    Re11) I refer you to your comment and our response to C4.

    Re12) Pattern spotting across multiple data feeds and ability to calculate best course of action and give real-time brand awareness.

    Re13) This has been clearly taken out of context and deserves no further comment.

    Re14) What is the point that youӲe attempting to convey in this comment? In response IӤ simply say you will find a very qualified businessman that runs a rather successful logistics company, he is also a wizard with computer hardware. - Note no longer involved in the project.

    Re15) It has never been stated or presented as a fully peer reviewed publication in an academic context so therefore no references are required. This had been raised by William upon drafting the document and was later discounted by John (Cambridge educated) as not required.

    Re16) This statement is a rather insular and unqualified statement and that has not been substantiated. The proof of our AI is fast approaching an official release and there is little that such commentary will change its course or realisation.

    Re17) LIVE STREAM", Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djq-aejZjA8 The Invacio team has clearly never heard about Moore's Law. The claim of using PS3 clusters to build a supercomputer is an outright falsehood due to its constraints which many people already know (except Invacio).
    The PS3ӳ by design were only ever meant for large scale image processing (something well documented by AFRL and DARPA). Their collective horsepower was purposed to carry out the pure grunt work it takes for processing our satellite feeds. Furthermore, the term for the PS3 construction was supercluster, not supercomputer. A full-blown supercomputer is however, being constructed. Here is an article about an additional HPC server being built to replace the PS3 cluster as there are issues with the newly introduced Electronics Import law in Thailand (https://www.invnews.blog/430850-tflop-rig) and two more talking about the other hardware we are using to construct our systems. https://www.invnews.blog/geforce-rtx-2080-ti-powering-invacio https://www.invnews.blog/titan-v-the-worlds-most-powerful-voltabased-graphics-card

    Re18) This is completely false and directly contradicts everything you have discussed and posted throughout social media and chat forums both public and private. Your actions thus far have demonstrated a disregard and a lack of understanding of the technology in effort to destabilize the project and thereby the utility token.

    Re19. Not covered by GDPR, non European subjects and open transparency.

    Re20. To clarify your confusion, Whois actually provides no information related to Invacio Analytica

    Re21. Not covered by GDPR, non European subjects and open transparency.

    Re22. Since pulled back as they were about to be called to court.

    Ans1. This statement is quite clear and has no ambiguity. It offers the same minimum level of security expected from that the military establishment. For further consumption and consideration I refer you to C&A 9.

    Ans2. Clearly whether deliberately or not youӶe completely ignored the concept of Intellectual Property in this context. This is tantamount to giving the game away or revealing the ingredients behind the secret sauce. I believe itӳ important to put WeNet into context in that the technology wasnӴ part of the token sale. It was mentioned as a component (that already exists) which was to become part of Vadgama Blockchain.

    Ans3. Evidently you have deliberately blinded yourself to events of the past when we had released a personӳ name of significance in relation to this project. This is obviously ruse and a vain attempt to serve your agenda to engage in external harassment (something well documented) and we will certainly not be releasing.

    Ans4. This information is not publicly available and further held in confidence due to such nefarious and targeted harassment that both you and select parties have engaged. For further clarification Aquila was mentioned as a group project which was not an INV related utility Anyway, here is an article which explains a lot about our current standing: https://www.invnews.blog/what-happened-to-aquila-and-our-other-fintech-projects

    Ans5. We would, only Mr. Andres Pedraza ran off with the money and related measurement data. Feel free to find out more here: www.http://andrespedrazatrading.com/

    Ans6. Invacio.com has developed (as with any technical complex) over the last 12 months. It goes without saying that progress can sometimes be painful much like with any organisation and there will always be some issues with contractors not performing as they should and making noise if they arenӴ paid.

    Ans7. Clearly this is another example of an attempt to identify professionals of interest to engage in external harassment. Please refer to our response found in Q3.

    Ans8. Once again another example of an attempt to identify professionals of interest to engage in external harassment. Please refer to our response found in Q3.

    Ans9. Invacio are still attending UN conferences even without Michael. https://www.invnews.blog/invacio-research-analytica-group-to-attend-the-un-for-aiblockchain
    https://www.invnews.blog/invacio-thank-you-geneva

    Ans10. Your attempt to paint yourself as a crypto project forensic investigator is pointless as your demands are also irrelevant. I will turn this around back onto you that is will be both you and your fellow posse that reside behind the anonymity of private and public chat groups (i.e ICOChecker) who be will be expected to give full unreserved public apologies to both Scott and Invacio Analytica when your version of the truth is disproven.

    Ans11. IӬl make it perfectly clear (which evidently you are confused) it was only ever in the appendix and still sits as a future project, no details shall be given beyond the description you can see above.
    Though Reaper has since replaced for external chain (read our blog).

    Ans12. Once again as you appear to be confused, the video made by William and released by Invacio was vetted, and was clear, it was in regards to WeNet which was external to Invacio.

    Ans13. As per the contract signed during sale. If you were not part of the sale, then you wonӴ have seen it which just shows that there is no interest from you beyond attempting to paint everything in a bad light. Invacio AAP Holdings Ltd (Seychelles)


Follow-on DD on Invacio on 28 Nov 2018 by Dr. Yeap:

    Reply to Re3.1) While the current official Invacio Telegram is run by a group of rogue cowboys who banned people for asking uncomfortable and difficult questions, those who are banned and those who are interested to know more about this shady ICO can find the various discussion between Invacio stakeholders from both sides to be revealing - this time round, uncomfortable and difficult questions cannot be deleted by the Invacio cowboys as none of them are admins of this group. Check out https://t.me/iconinjas

    Reply to Re4) Spotted emperor's new clothes.

    Reply to Re4.4) Read your own whitepaper to identify the contradition. If what you said in Re4.4 is true, then what you stated in your whitepaper is false.

    Reply to Re5) Interesting blame game from the CEO.

    Reply to Re6) Credits to you or your co-authors of the whitepaper?

    Reply to Re7) Mixed of facts and nonsense = nonsense.

    Reply to Re8) More emperor's new clothes.

    Reply to Re9) Good excuse there.

    Reply to Re10) Emperor's new clothes++

    Reply to Re12) Emperor's new clothes++

    Reply to Re15) Fail. [...] .

    Reply to Re16) CEO forgotten that their team members information are available all over internet, including what they have provided in their person LinkedIn profile - refer to Internet archive/cache, next best to the immutable blockchain.

    Reply to Re17) Emperor's new clothes++

    Reply to Re18) For those who have brought INV tokens, I still wish you all well.

    Reply to Re19) Fail.

    Reply to Re20) Fail.

    Reply to Re21) Failure to understand the meaning of unethical and unprofessional.

    Reply to Ans1. Failure to provide an explanation, with zero reference.

    Reply to Ans2. Failure to understand the meaning of IP and instead use IP as an excuse to hide.

    Reply to Ans3. Fail.

    Reply to Ans4. Fail.

    Reply to Ans5. Fail - might as well claim that he has ran away with Agnes and that you are now naked. This reply from the CEO is a good proof that Agnes is fake - yes, it is non-obvious.

    Reply to Ans6. Failure to provide an explanation.

    Reply to Ans7. Fail.

    Reply to Ans8. Fail.

    Reply to Ans9. Failure to provide a direct explanation.

    Reply to Ans10. Failure to provide a direct explanation and failed attempt to change the topic.

    Reply to Ans11. Thank-you for confirming that it's Emperor's new clothes - powered by Vadgama Blockchain.

    Reply to Ans12. Failure to provide a direct explanation and failed attempt to change the topic.

    Reply to Ans13. Screen snapshot of the 'INVACIO HOLDINGS (UK) LIMITED' and the gifts from both Invacio's Token Sales T&C and it's Whitepaper v1.1: https://i.imgur.com/RE4QbIg.jpg
    Q14. Has any INV token holder receive the class C shares from INVACIO HOLDINGS (UK) LIMITED?

    C24. One additional finding since my last review, I have personally caught Invacio stealing the IP of another coder. I am more than pleased to provide this forensic evidence (among other dishonest claims and falsehoods from the Invacio project) as an expert witness - if necessary.

    If and when ICOBench implements a negative rating, Invacio will be the 1st to earn a negative rating from me. For now, it remains 1 1 1.


Updated Review on 10 July 2019:

    C25. Fake AI meets Faketoshi: https://www.invnews.blog/faketoshi-is-not-so-fake-satoshi

    C26. Invacio continues release meaningless and fake AI products.

    C27. As at 10 July 2019, there are 65 class members in the ICO Class Action against Invacio: https://ico-class-action.org/class-actions/invacio-ai. The related Telegram group (with over 400 members) can be found here: https://t.me/InvancioAIRecovery

    C28. In addition, numerous evidence of false Invacio claims can be found: https://invacioclassaction.com. The related Telegram group (with over 80 members) can be found here: https://t.me/WilliamWestInvacioScam

    C29. Invacio token has been delisted from numerous crypto exchanges and the last one standing is now Mercatox: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/invacio with a marketcap of $623,452 (as of 10 July 2019).

    C30. These cowboys continue to be unstoppable.

[1713912815]

1713912815

[1713912815]

1713912815

[1713912815]

1713912815

[vision3001]

Is Invacio a scam?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ico/comments/8sexk1/is_invacio_a_scam

[marty40]

Pretty sure they have released over a dozen products.

Oh, yep, some of them just from their website.

https://relevancy.invacio.com/
https://agnes.invacio.com/
https://invmail.io/
https://tamius.invacio.com/
https://lucid.invacio.com/
https://lincoln.invacio.com/
https://madoff.invacio.com/

Favorite has to be Lucid, uncovered a Ponzi recently and information supplied to the FBI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32sFhB2k6v8

Also, work with Universities.
https://imgur.com/8mL6jmX

[vision3001]

[ ]

[vision3001]

Invacio Ai Fraud 🚨The $500 Million Dollar Lie (parody)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmfQh3rLNsY

Youtube Speech to Text Transcription of the above video:

Code:

[Music]
Brought to my attention this morning something that clover crypto clever boy 
his bloody name is said on a broadcast this morning and voseo scam was the 
biggest scam of 2018 the ICO scam when you start looking into a lot of that 
stuff I'm 500 million from about 10,000 over 10,000 you know different investors 
a team of a CEO and down a ICO of 500 million dollars gee that's a lot of 
money okay you will be to move my just to point out and fax it okay Jim the 
fund is now being made available to of Asia are very significant around about 
half a billion dollars certainly wasn't 500 million dollars it's talking 
billions of dollars investment coming into of Asia and the ICO was originally 
to create a user base utility user base for our systems you I have 500 
million dollars I bought this yacht I owned this island and you have fun in 
the crypto sphere so he also states this video these they have actually more than 
1 billion dollars in investment and they actually have access to know all rim so 
disputed clovers playing about a 500 million dollar around about half a 
billion dollars it would be amazed or unsafe oh so that's half a 
billion dollars your statement about a 500 minutes to four billion dollars 500 
million stories it would be nice I better buy an island and you know find a 
five hundred million dollars I've got a  yacht you know who you I've 
got a yacht five hundred million dollars 
 you but the news that William has just released in summary they have 
enough money already 100 million dollars I in the 
the organization weird country dude putting you and you out clover 
cutting you and Joe just you remember that a nice always talking about how 
people are going to jail that you're going to jail your mom's going to jail 
your dog's going to jail your grandma's going to jail this is the way it's going 
down it's so stupid [Music] 
[Music] clover came out get sebacio I'm 
so-and-so for you just give me a defamation was just seven year prison 
term into it now you're looking at 20 years roughly give or take ten years 
depending on the country corporate defamation at least I reckon around 
about sixty people go to jail for this project only gonna serve ten years in 
jail you can see what you like about me I don't care I won't go to jail 
other than the pistol I set up while I fight a fight you're this level William 
you can be anything from five to twenty years they don't want to be looking at 
these these prison towns they're going to jail I'll get a reduced force 
thankfulness okay you're only gonna serve ten years in jail he's going to 
jail you are gonna get five years for each count but I'm gonna reduce that to 
two and a half years with time so he's going to jail I'm gonna serve 10 years 
this precedes they will be extradited to the US 60 people go to jail for this 
project I won't go to Jack you've got clover I think he's realized this 
up I think he realized this games yeah certainly wasn't five hundred million 
dollars but he get a fine possible prison term and unlikely a slap on the 
wrist this games yeah to clover and he's broke apparently but this guy scammed 
from a lot of investors he was based in the UK and we fled the country and left 
to Thailand and has been in voiding lawsuits the entire time and has been 
looking at different ways to attract investors into his project which is a 
complete lie he's gonna do this video he's gonna like do all of his little 
After Effects the the entire project was that was a gigantic money grab people 
that were investing based on on his lies he's continuously trying to slander 
people to bring attention to to his project and I'm not gonna allow it and 
I'm gonna make sure that people understand the truth coming from his own 
words but the feds do not like being fooled 
this video was recently posted on the website in this video we'll have where 
says that in discussions with five countries seven companies and two major 
agencies for half the billion dollars so can easily you know you imagine it you 
take in five hundred million dollars and then taken out any out a system all our 
fault and the world was told it makes every 
receive a significant investment and didn't need that much more than only 
less than been open so how much did they see me right in terms of invasive 
nothing it was never classed as an invasive 
investment its background investment in the we net technology which William owns 
privately there was no attempts to mislead there 
was no attempts to mislead and there's a lot of money been waived in the general 
direction of debate we have the various funds driven by artificial intelligence 
which have made tremendous profit in real life we take money from the front 
from the coin sale we put that into the AI funds how much they're doing 
basically raise nothing this is not professional behavior it's making people 
really really I'm getting puppy death threat for mentioning base in the first 
place I'm guessing them why the am I getting desperate and now I'm doing an 
interview with a man and to four hats and it's not giving a straight 
you put the tinfoil hat on and it's longer fortune was created just hot 
new cuts my company working you right I spent money based on the forthcoming 
value of it makes no I hired youtubers I paid start to do marketing I spent an 
absolute fortune I am at or not I am personally as a lot for twelve thousand 
dollars because a state of point and fraud was thrust upon me and I've 
got some scruffy cousins in for half tried to defend the loss 95 percent loss 
of the values your token I've got  government agencies asking me 
about fraud I've got people folding me up in the middle of the night saying 
these guys are in bad finding all of the you've 
done and you're telling me that this is logical this is just Plus this is 
bollocks mate you are in the forefront you sir in the forefront of duel the 
ones gonna get nicked he's had jurisdiction he's in a different country 
these companies in the be behind your the UK mate you are gonna get absolute 
cucumber boil this can't be seen this how much you paint to lie on Williams 
behalf he's insight from that Keith 
wearing video Roger Baker now comes out and says at invasion haven't in fact 
received a single penny and that the investment was in fact four we met which 
was privately owned by William to be unfair on my token holders have got 
really already you okay nice all the money coming in and all the 
money going out the entire project was a gigantic money grab the scanner I don't 
 yard you know who you so it's kind of like you I have 
five hundred million dollars I bought this yacht I own this island 
[Music] motivation my one solution is destroying 
day onlys in my corner right there when now all these other tilting bottom and 
even your God and they say do you you think I'm free that will make you 
feel like eating I think that I found myself a 
cheerleader she is always right there I think that I found myself a 
cheerleader is always right there [Music] 
you live in Vietnam against okay now what's the legal outcome it comes under 
criminal code okay is a criminal code okay and it's got a serious crimes that 
can range anything else twenty years so on so forth I'll be speaking to the 
count pardon legal directors for the tire divisions for them free to approach 
the Vietnamese counterparts for establishing a loss statement okay okay 
invasive did not complete [Music] 
hisses scam he deserves the huge technology scam people there when he 
comes the trove of my friend is simply just Brittany job I don't care because 
John died I don't care if he died right guys 
Jimmy happens in Asia you go to jail and it died and go to jail in the die let it 
come out she team go back home give some sort of disease you know give some sort 
disease I don't care who died I don't care who died it ones it functions on 
safety chug away I'm not chugging away he's put 
you in jail clover communed yeah did you remember 
that I don't care he died never weird country 
dude in voseo was a daxing harassing a lot of people threatening people gone 
out of their way to make death threats like this William West I don't 
understand a guy if he has as much confidence in his program and his fake 
AI and his harassing a dog sing software why is he on telegram trolling 18 hours 
a day it's so stupid the guy is like just this 
young kid going around thanks to thinking he's above the law a lot of 
people got scammed in in his project so once I started kind of learning a little 
bit more about I was never involved like I've never even talked to the guy he did 
half his channel was videos of mine he was taking videos of mine uploading them 
to YouTube plugging them into his no after effects software and trying to 
insinuate that I'm being deceptive if you listen to his videos he says so on 
and so forth all the damn time and he's always talking about how people are 
going to jail this is so stupid he says the same thing over and over again so 
when he lies when he says he's a pathological liar 
he just says so on and so forth over and over and over and over and over and over 
again it's just a weird weird country dude but you know yeah you're welcome to 
do your own videos you can upload your opinions to YouTube but just don't 
upload my videos and put them on your channel the entire thing and and then 
put ads to them are like trying to monetize like my content or this is 
gonna happen to your accounts gonna get terminated.

[Cosbycoin]

Thank you for the review of this project,  this is what we really need in the space and not people coming to the forum to shill a project that they own in order to scam investors of their earnings, we wish to see more of this, and I am very sure you would see a lot of members of this community ready to donate to you in order to make this research better, because I believe everybody should be paid for their time spent.

[shinratensei_]

Is this an ico which has already claimed raised half of billions dollars? I just heard about the rumor of this shitty ico but it looks like that's a true story. Look at those domains and they are fake. This is a ponzi and i was seeing from its twitter says it has surpassed nasdag and what a joke.

[vision3001]

Is this an ico which has already claimed raised half of billions dollars? I just heard about the rumor of this shitty ico but it looks like that's a true story. Look at those domains and they are fake. This is a ponzi and i was seeing from its twitter says it has surpassed nasdag and what a joke.

The fake $500 million investment was busted in this youtube video (among other busts): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmfQh3rLNsY

[zgrdyg]

Is this an ico which has already claimed raised half of billions dollars? I just heard about the rumor of this shitty ico but it looks like that's a true story. Look at those domains and they are fake. This is a ponzi and i was seeing from its twitter says it has surpassed nasdag and what a joke.

I hope you wrote billions instead of millions.

I mean this is obviously ponzi and even there are lots of greedy people, it is impossible for them to raise half of billions dollars.

[vision3001]

Invacio Class Action
https://invacioclassaction.com

[Invacio Analytica]

Yes we are a scam, fuck all you idiots who were so easy to fool and steal from.

I am gonna buy a jakt and an island, so fuck you all

Off to the Bahamas

Cheers

William West

[vision3001]

Telegram History in "INV Analytica Community [@invacioofficial]

---------------------------------- start

.....25.05.2018 22:00:01, R1 R1 [@R1R1B]: >>upgraded the group to a supergroup<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:48, Hopsplat [@Hopsplat]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:52, Colin Ferrell [@ColinFerrell]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:07, James Beal [@Mrbates1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:13, Youcanbecome: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:25:39, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: 🚀 Please don’t kick and punch, just discuss and have fun. Remember we are all on the same team.

We are now trading on the following exchanges: 💰
www.idex.market
www.mercatox.com
www.bancor.network
.....25.05.2018 22:25:43, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: >>unsupported service message type: messageActionPinMessage<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:47, Kim [@kbyber]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:53, Tonyladz [@Tonyladz1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:59, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:27:11, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: INV 1 CENT CONFIRMED
:
:
:
24.04.2019 20:44:02, Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94]: As to the remark about this "being my community" and the tone taken.

This tone was taken as we have already been attacked in the past as a result of poorly worded / understood announcments.

Saying we "had confirmation for Binance/Bittrex would be a complete missrepresentation, for one we made it abundantly clear during that period we had 0 intention of listing on Binance due to privacy constraints this was only resolved when we moved ops for Invmail from outside the EU zone, as such we applied and we are waiting, we've never stated we had been accepted (in public) though have had discussions with Binance related people, also scammers pretending to be Binance people which has only ever been discussed in private groups.

The same for Bittrex, we've never said we'd agreed listing, in fact i do not believe we even stated we'd applied, though i could be wrong on the second part (applied).

I say "we" in the past tense as this brings me on to the next part.

I have made it abundantly clear i am no longer actively involved with Invacio and its day to day operations, truth be told, i have visited its site(s) 3 times in this month, 6 times last month.

I am the Founder (Group) though again non-active, and reluctantly the person who appears to be the face due to the depths i am in debt with the project whilst all others have dissappeared with their riches or onto pastures green.

I stepped away, and made it abundantly clear that 'i' refuse to allocate any more intellectual ideas to Invacio Group, or any of its subsidaries.

You have been given technologies as promised, there will not be anymore from me, these were delivered, you have two more technology offerings coming in Veritas and API, that is it from me, more importantly my commitments have been honoured, and Invacio Group honours its contractual agreements to Invacio AAP Holdings for technology provisions, even if the unlikely event the company is sold or broken apart for its IP, these contractual commitments to Invacio AAP Holdings will be honoured and will continue to serve those products as outlined and committed to.

As to the future of the INV project, i will speak frankly, if INV can not gain grassroots movement from its token-holders then it will never survive, you have more products than any other project out there hitting multiple market segments, you also have one of the lowest cap tokens in the market for such an array of offerings and yet there is just a few active people talking about the project.

As to my position - I hang around here as i am still accumulating INV, I believe it has a place and stand from the side(s) supporting it, i also do own 2xxk INV from my team tokens, which i'd burn if i would see any benefit, but i also believe i earned those tokens, and its the little i have recieved for all my commitments that have been honoured.

Invacio AAP Holdings? - What next, Invacio AAP Holdings has a contractual agreement to provide utility and products from Invacio's technologies, it has done this, and these remain active, and will continue to do so with the last two products releasing shortly.

Marketing as mentioned many times, Invacio AAP Holdings committed to 14% of realised, it records show it spent well over 1m USD in crypto during the coinsale which amounts to more than four times the unrealised crypto funds that are currently sat tethered, if those funds rise on the markets then i am sure that is to be re-addressed but it won't be anytime soon.

I truly hope (for my sake financially and others) that INV is able to rise, and that people talk about the merrits of the project, but i am not leading that charge but encouraging it, i am not running Invacio AAP Holdings, it has governing rules to follow and has followed it, delivering on its promises.

---------------------------------- end

Note: Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94] is yet another Telegram account of William James Dalrymple West (ex-CEO of Invacio)

[vision3001]

William James Dalrymple West (ex-CEO of Invacio) latest fake AI product:https://shotsling.com/

Cache 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20180801000000*/http://shotsling.com/
Cache 2: https://archive.fo/yxZEA

[vision3001]

Invacio Equity & Payments through U.K. company (Evidence)
https://invacioclassaction.com/expose/f/equity-payments-through-uk-company?blogcategory=Fraud

Actions for Victims

ActionFraud UK
https://www.actionfraud.police.uk

What do I do if I think I’ve been scammed? (in UK)
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/scams-fraud/investment-scams

[vision3001]

Long list of fraud committed by William James Dalrymple West (Founder of Invacio)
https://invacioclassaction.com/crimes

[Invacio Analytica]

My new scam is called shotsling.com, i will steal all your api keys, passwords, so i can access your email accounts and drain your exchanges.

https://imgur.com/ZUrvPN9

https://imgur.com/1KGHFyZ

I am really enjoying all those millions i scammed from all you idiots who are braindead morons.

Will enjoy my life now with my lovers Roger Baker and Dan Revolution in the caribbean.

[vision3001]

Letter from a token holder "How I was scammed by William West"
7 May 2019 | Investment Scams, Misrepresentation, Fraud

I wanted to write to you to tell my story on how I was scammed by William West. I would appreciate it if you kept my identity anonymous as William West has my GDPR data. He has very vindictively used the private data of ex token holders to doxx, harass, slander and threaten them. I don't want to be another victim!

In April 2018 I decided to dig into my savings and purchased a number of Invacio tokens during their ICO.   Tamius and Aquilla were the main two reasons why I purchased the Invacio tokens. Tamius was Invacio’s flagship product/service. It was the first listed in their WP and was heavily marketed during the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) token sale. It was very exciting since Tamius was advertised as a complete banking service powered by the blockchain, merging both crypto and fiat currency. The underlying technology behind crypto currency is the blockchain. The Tamius product was the only Invacio product directly linked to blockchain technology. I was particularly interested in supporting companies that made use of this technology and wanted to be part of it. Taking this into account, Tamius was the main reason why I purchased the tokens. To add to this, its full release was only a matter of weeks away which further influenced my decision to purchase tokens. Invacio claimed that Tamius was 70% completed and due for full roll out in Q2 –Q3 2018.

After the ICO had ended, the main Invacio telegram group was shut down without warning by Invacio. At this point i was invited to join a new telegram group run by some Invacio token holders. It was here I made contact two ex team members of Invacio. These gentlemen helped with the marketing literature for Invacio and they both independently told the group that Tamius was nothing more than an idea in the head of Williams West (CEO). Both claimed nothing had been done in the development of Tamius. When I asked them why it had been advertised as 70% complete, they explained it was because William West had insisted it to be advertised as such. They claimed that Tamius was no more than an idea in Williams head. They told me that it had become abundantly clear that William West was a con man and they didn't want to be associated with a scam company, hence their reason for leaving.

A few months after the ICO, Invacio informed the public that the Tamius project had been shelved for good. As far as I can tell not a single thing was ever done to develop the banking solution that was supposedly 70% complete in January 2018. Invacio did produce a wallet in which you could store your Invacio tokens. It should be noted that this can be produced by a competent coder in a matter of days. You can also buy wallets off the shelf which I suspect is what Invacio did. Many crypto currencies produce wallets for their token holders and they are all free to use. The Invacio wallet (also free to download) has since been shelved because it was simply a terrible wallet. The fact the entire Tamius project has been ditched is not at all surprising to me and it proves my fears were warranted. I would also argue it strongly suggests the testimony of multiple ex Invacio team members to be truthful. This is one of many examples where in my opinion Invacio have grossly misrepresented themselves in order to entice investment for the financial gain of William West and his company.

The second product/service that sold Invacio to me was their hedge fund named Aquilla. The White Paper claimed that Aquilla was 100% competed and due for full roll out in Q2-Q3. Invacio described Aquilla as being “a hedge fund governed by human equity management” that employed “the full power of Invacios multi-agent AI, Invacio Data and fintech divisons”. The reason I was so interested in Aquilla was because Invacio had promised those that bought a certain minimum of tokens would receive actual share equity in the company Invacio Holding (UK) Ltd in return. This was a major draw to me since hedge funds can be extremely lucrative and I wanted to own a piece of it. Also, it’s not every day you are presented with the opportunity to invest in a hedge fund. This really excited me and the fact the WP advertised the hedge fund as being 100% completed led me to believe it was all set up and ready to go. How wrong I was.

I soon found out that Invacio had completely misled me. There was no hedge fund at all. The truth is, a few Invacio staff and friends had entrusted an associate with a few thousand dollars to invest in the forex market for them. However, the whole thing went pear shaped. The rumor goes that he either lost all their money in the market or ran off with it prior to the ICO. Either way the whole thing was an epic failure. Despite this terrible experience, Invacio decided that they now had a working hedge fund - Aquilla

William West and Invacio knowingly misrepresented Aquilla in order to gain investment form unsuspecting individuals like myself. Had I know the truth there is no chance I would have invested. As I have already stated, Aquilla was very attractive to me since I would essentially own a small piece of its success by way of the C Class shares I was to receive. As it turns out I was never given the equity in the form of C class shares in Invacio Holdings (UK) Ltd as set out in part 2 of the contract agreement. In fact nobody has received any equity in this company as it was dissolved in November 2018.

Another major reason why I invested into the Invacio project, was on the back of the news that they had received a massive investment from an unnamed outside party to the tune of 500 million dollars. This was big news to me and was a huge driver and confidence boost that Invacio really had something special. If someone was willing to invest such vast sums of money my thinking process was that they must have carried out an inordinate amount of due diligence before committing to such a large investment. This gave me the confidence to actually pull the trigger and make my purchase. Not only this but on the back of this huge investment Invacio had slashed their hard cap which stood at $100 million by over two thirds, making the token economics of the project very attractive to me.

It turns out that this was another massive lie by Invacio. The hype factor Invacio employed by concocting this falsehood worked and I was suckered in as I'm sure many others were. I thought I was investing into a well established legitimate  company who was on the verge of signing massive government contracts. I really believed that an outside party had actually invested $500 million into the company. I feel like such a fool now for believing them.

As is the case with all those investors who paid $1 per INV token as i did, we lost nearly all our money. William West didn't care a damn. I applaud Crypto Clover for exposing him. How William West has the nerve to point fingers at other projects such as ARB is beyond a joke.   

Thank you for taking the time to read this. I wish you well in your fight against William West

Source: https://invacioclassaction.com/expose/f/letter-from-a-token-holder-how-i-was-scammed-by-william-west

[vision3001]

A letter to William from another one of his victims
11 May 2019 | Information, Intimidation, Lies, Misrepresentation, ICO Scams

On 11th May 2019 an Invacio token holder wrote the following message/letter to William in his Invacio Telegram group (see below) As with anyone who questions William the author was instantly banned from the group and the message was deleted.  If anyone else would like to speak out against William West, please contact us and we will share your story.

William:

You say it is the token holders responsibility to create awareness. No it is not. It is your responsibility. You created this company. You started this ICO. You made promises and you received the funds. And I don’t understand what is so difficult about giving your products and your (sic) groundbreaking AI to independent researchers, to journalists, to real influencers? Surely, if they are anywhere near is good as you claim they would be delighted to look into them and give them raving reviews. Unless, of course they aren’t what was promised.

Well now, all of that is too late anyway as you left the company, which according to you was never led by you? How is that even possible? Of course, you argue that Invacio was never lead by you, that Invacio AAP was without staff and CEO the entire time. Well, whatever you think, you can’t just hide behind your made up legal structure of companies pointing fingers at AAPs, Ltds and holdings. No one put money into a Seychelles AAP without a leader. They put it into you and Invacio. They put it into promises you made. What they got has very little to do with what you promised during the ICO. Now that everything has gone down the drain you have left the building. A far cry from the self portrayed image of an independently wealthy philanthropist who builds a company and creates an ICO so the masses can participate.

Well done! I hope you are proud of yourself. Btw do you remember what you said when Julian Hosp left TenX? You called him leaving his company an exit scam. What do you call your own actions?

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134006.new#new

[vision3001]

An interview with Invacio CEO back in March 18th 2018 - full of lies on hindsight.

______________________

Posted on March 10, 2018 by Tech Company News Editorial   
Below is our recent interview with William West, the Founder and CEO of Invacio: William West

Q: Could you provide our readers with a brief introduction to Invacio?

A: My name is William J.D. West, and I’m the Founder of Invacio.

Invacio is a cutting-edge technology company that has created a level-3 (Self-learning) artificial intelligence and is ready to bring it to the global market.

Invacio’s “Jean” is a state-of-the-art, multi-faceted A.I. system that can work as a stand-alone “market specific” module, or as a bigger network of more than 30 individual modules, working together to create one of the most sophisticated Artificial Intelligence platforms on Earth.

Invacio brings together the world’s largest repository of organized data with the most advanced A.I. technology known to man… and is working to make it accessible to EVERYONE on the planet.

Invacio is committed to a socially conscious approach, realizing that this new technology not only comes with immense benefits, but also with potential hazards. Accordingly, we are focused on ethics and optics, as well as a technically sound offering.

With this in mind we are inviting the public to be part of our early growth and to participate in our success.

It was only recently that we determined to pursue an ICO, having originally intended to pursue a more conventional course. Yet as we came to understand how completely an ICO accords with the values that lay at the heart of the company — with our concern for privacy, security, innovation, and inclusiveness — it quickly became obvious that an ICO was by far the most appropriate route for the company to take. The ethics and desire for transparency made it virtually impossible to go with a traditional capital raise.
I can’t say it’s been perfect…(we hit a little speed-bump when the market dropped in early February) but overall we are very pleased.

Q: Could you tell us something more about your ICO?

A: Gladly! We are very excited by the response we’ve had so far.

We came out of the gate strong, but with little previous ICO experience, we made a few mistakes. Not enough marketing budget spent in the right places, combined with one of our major marketing and advertising resources (Facebook) blocking ICOs only one day after we launched the Pre-sale! We took the market downturn as an opportunity to hit the pause button and reset our strategy.

So far, it looks like it was the right move, we’ve picked up our previous momentum and are adding new accounts, and people to our Telegram group faster than any time until today!

The coins are $1.00 and we have a bonus scale starting at 50% that slides to 10% over time as the Pre-sale goes on. That is, you can buy 100 coins for $100 (our minimum purchase) and you would receive 50 bonus coins- as it sits today. The number of bonus coins will decrease the longer the sale goes on, as demand increases and we get closer to a public release on the exchanges.

Q: Can you give us more insights into your technology?

A: We have access to or control more than 2.5 billion separate data-sets.
Some are from NASA.

Some are from accounting firms, and some are bowling scores from the 1970’s…but all combined, they are the largest repository of data in existence. And all of them are accessed by Jean as she crunches data in endless ways to teach herself about the world.

Invacio’s technology has already shown outstanding performance in live tests that have run the whole range of our products and services, from our ‘Zero-Knowledge’ end-to-end encrypted communications, groundbreaking data repository and financial offerings, to TAMIUS, the revolutionary decentralized Blockchain banking system that underlies our crypto currency.

Watchful for any potential regulatory changes, and sensitive to the potential global ramifications of the recent adoption of crypto currency by certain countries and banks, we are developing our own Blockchain — built for speed, privacy, stability, and security — to suit our future plans.

To this end we have teams in place looking at the applications of Blockchain to distributed-AI, and also at work testing ways that we can establish a Blockchain able to work off-grid. Just as our current fintech tests have been, all research after a certain point in development will be conducted with the greatest possible (and practical) transparency.

In consequence of the research done by the Applied Tech division at Invacio Labs, Tamius is able to offer a military grade, secure and free-to-operate, online communications framework that will allow transactions to be conducted even in the remotest and densest of environments.

WeNet does not require the internet infrastructure, nor does it require a cellular network. Instead it uses ingenious methods to create a stable and portable internet gateway, in areas with zero internet connectivity. WeNet offers completely secure, stable, independent end-to-end encrypted communications systems for voice, video, financial and data communications in areas where this would be otherwise impossible.

Q: What makes Invacio unique and what is the company’s long term potential?

A: The ability to scale to the required size and deploy a specific module to serve the required network or segment is unique in the technology world, and garnered us an opportunity to unveil our system to the United Nations ESCAP when our Government Liaison, Michael J. Aumock was invited to speak at the FDI meeting in Nov, 2017. It was a rousing success, and helped set in motion the events that brings us here today.

Invacio presented the UN the many potential uses of our multi-agent system A.I. including the ethical generation of wealth and the management of disaster relief situations. This honor has allowed Invacio to begin forging ties with several national governments, and has opened the door for discussions regarding putting our technologies to work in the international arena.

Invacio therefore comes to this ICO in the unusual position of having already aroused international governmental interest, and, with fully conceived plans for the further development of several of our divisions (including the incorporation of Blockchain technologies into our distributed AI and transactional services, and the refinement of the ways our core-AI.

This existing international interest from both private and public sectors, combined with a well-funded roll-out plan and a clear, ethical mandate for the road ahead make Invacio a safe bet for the future. We acknowledge that our goals are a bit lofty, but what is A.I. if not the loftiest goal of all.

Q: What are your plans for next six months?

A: The next 6 months (and the 12 months or so after that) will see us launching several new products. We have already given our ICO participants access to INVmail, our zero-knowledge, encrypted communications system with burn capability.

Post ICO you will see us focusing on two areas for the next two quarters. First there is DATA, which is used to support fintech (Agnes, Archimedes and Aquila, our hedge fund) and disaster relief, as well as being basically the core of the A.I.

Second, is the Madhav Blockchain. This will include rolling out Tamius and wrapping that technology around the WeNet mechanics to begin to address the “Unbanked billions” around the globe and finally allow them to be part of the global economy. This amazing technology, which basically allows the internet to travel, completely encrypted, over radio waves similar to a walkie-talkie, will give even the most remote villages and peoples a way to connect with the rest of mankind, bringing education, knowledge and the ability to learn, to the people who for no other reason than being born someplace remote, have never had access to it before. Invacio’s future is bright, because we can brighten the future of these people, around the world.

Source: http://techcompanynews.com/invacio-delivers-cutting-edge-level-3-self-learning-artificial-intelligence-technology/
Archive: https://archive.fo/sT8uL

Coinmarketcap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/invacio
Archive: https://archive.fo/U3ZNu

[sharpshot]

Craig Wright is anti alt coins and ICO's but it looks Invacio are claiming their "AI" indicates that he's telling the truth in all his videos. Calvin Ayre has tweeted about this and is using it to make Craig Wright seem more legitimate. Having read and seen lots about Invacio, I have zero confidence in them and I think people should warn others about this https://www.invnews.blog/faketoshi-is-not-so-fake-satoshi?utm_content=91785767&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-2800495464