Issue with neg trust rating - This must hit Lauda, i need help!

[ShooterXD]

Hello guys!

I dont know with here is the properly place to talk about this.

Lauda give me neg trust in the past due to think about my conection with scammers, but i dont.

This is the report:
"Accounts connected: jamalaezaz (uuid = 721115), SmartIphone (uuid = 374823), ShooterXD (uuid = 819403), BitFinnese (uuid = 860327).
User has been knowingly working for/with jamalaezaz, and SmartIphone. The user has kept quiet regarding the shady activities of the former (account trading, farming, and trust farming: see reference rating https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=721115), as well the latter who is involved in a scam accusation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2553092.0).
Therefore, they are essentially an accomplice who can't be trusted due to said activities."

I worked with Jamalezaz, only in UTRUST bounty campaign.

Lauda blocked me, and maybe someone can talk with her to solve this. Where are the proof about my connection in these scam accusation?
I need this account to back to work, cause this red trust just fucked me!

I really need a help from someone to solve this. PLEASE
Sorry for any inconvenienty.

Regards, Shooter

Special thanks to mprep who helped me with this thread!

[1715117470]

1715117470

[1715117470]

1715117470

[ShooterXD]

And Lauda, i need to say sorry for any rage coming from me.
Don't have excuses to the rage, but i take these trust without any action coming from me. I cannot be responsed by the act of others.
As i said, i only worked with Jamal in UTRUST campaign and i dont haved any problem there.



Take a look at my case, please!

[Steamtyme]

This feedback is fairly old. Any reason you are just bringing this up now?
Pretty sure Lauda has been on DT fairly consistently since the feedback was left so this would have prevented you from "working" all year.

Other than that you'll just have to continue your appeal here, I'm not sure how your accounts were connected maybe someone else will point it out or I'll find it as I go through the reference some more.

[ShooterXD]

This feedback is fairly old. Any reason you are just bringing this up now?
Pretty sure Lauda has been on DT fairly consistently since the feedback was left so this would have prevented you from "working" all year.

Other than that you'll just have to continue your appeal here, I'm not sure how your accounts were connected maybe someone else will point it out or I'll find it as I go through the reference some more.

Cause like a said, Lauda blocked me. And now i really need back to work here, cause i need a side job to complement my montly spends my friend. I live in Brazil, and probably you know, here the things are not good, and all my reserves are gone.

I dont have connection with Jamal, only worked with him in UTRUST, with many others managers.

I managed other campaigns alone, and never haved any problems.

[Quickseller]

Lauda runs bounty campaigns and this is one way that he prevents others from competing with him for work.

Lauda is not going to remove the rating or discuss it with you in good faith.

[ShooterXD]

This feedback is fairly old. Any reason you are just bringing this up now?
Pretty sure Lauda has been on DT fairly consistently since the feedback was left so this would have prevented you from "working" all year.

Other than that you'll just have to continue your appeal here, I'm not sure how your accounts were connected maybe someone else will point it out or I'll find it as I go through the reference some more.

Cause like a said, Lauda blocked me. And now i really need back to work here, cause i need a side job to complement my montly spends my friend. I live in Brazil, and probably you know, here the things are not good, and all my reserves are gone.

I dont have connection with Jamal, only worked with him in UTRUST, with many others managers.

I managed other campaigns alone, and never haved any problems.

About not working here for all year, i have a credit franchise here in Brazil, but like a said, the things its not good here, and i need a side job to keep my bills in day and give a good life to my familly.

[morvillz7z]

@ShooterXD, is there any chance PaymyBills is an alt account of yours?

You both used the same BTC address:

Code:

17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

I would like to enroll on this campaign.
User: Pay my Bills
Postion to Apply: newbie
Posts Start: 23
Address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

I see 1 slot free, im in?

Name: ShooterXD
Post count: 1230
Rank: full member
Bitcoin address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV
Profile UID: 819403

Oh, I almost forgot...PaymyBills account is banned, hasn't made a single post since March 2017 but for some odd reason has logged in a few hours ago. 

[ShooterXD]

@ShooterXD, is there any chance PaymyBills is an alt account of yours?

You both used the same BTC address:

Code:

17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

I would like to enroll on this campaign.
User: Pay my Bills
Postion to Apply: newbie
Posts Start: 23
Address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

I see 1 slot free, im in?

Name: ShooterXD
Post count: 1230
Rank: full member
Bitcoin address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV
Profile UID: 819403

Oh, I almost forgot...PaymyBills account is banned, hasn't made a single post since March 2017 but for some odd reason has logged in a few hours ago.  

This acc used fopr my wife, but ok.

I think this is a poloniex wallet and at this time unfortunately I did not have the knowledge about RULES relating to this type of terms.
It's all my fault, I know

And i logged in The acc today cause The acc is autologged in The notebook.
I dont have nothing to hide.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

This acc used fopr my wife, but ok

Yeah, right.  Heard that one a million times already.

Did Yobit actually let you into their campaign with the negs from Lauda?  You have one positive offsetting them, but I would think your feedback is tainted enough such that they wouldn't accept you.  They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278 who'd spot you immediately as a shitposter who is only marginally comprehensible. 

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

[coolcoinz]

The good old my wife, my bro, my gf, my roommate excuse. Does everyone around you use the same exact bitcoin address? If my wife was using bitcointalk she would at the very least have her own computer with her own wallet. If you guys are taking turns on the same computer with the same exact address, it's beyond suspicious.

Also, don't post outside the meta if your account is banned or you'll get another one. Especially now that you've confirmed it.

And Lauda, i need to say sorry for any rage coming from me.

Your chances of getting Lauda to change that rating were slim before you raged. Now, I'd say they are below 1%.

[ShooterXD]

The good old my wife, my bro, my gf, my roommate excuse. Does everyone around you use the same exact bitcoin address? If my wife was using bitcointalk she would at the very least have her own computer with her own wallet. If you guys are taking turns on the same computer with the same exact address, it's beyond suspicious.

Also, don't post outside the meta if your account is banned or you'll get another one. Especially now that you've confirmed it.

And Lauda, i need to say sorry for any rage coming from me.

Your chances of getting Lauda to change that rating were slim before you raged. Now, I'd say they are below 1%.

This is my rage:
https://archive.fo/PQ5z2

About the same address I know it's my fault, but for me, everything that is mine belongs to my wife and vice versa.

[Quickseller]

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

[morvillz7z]

Actually, I was waiting to hear what excuse he'd come up with, I have to admit that it's not very original.

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills. 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed.  I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda.  I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda).  Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

[Quickseller]

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed.  I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda.  I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda).  Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

[coolcoinz]

This is my rage:
https://archive.fo/PQ5z2

About the same address I know it's my fault, but for me, everything that is mine belongs to my wife and vice versa.

Making another address in a wallet takes less than a second. Do you also share phone number, email and social media profiles with your wife? Do you see how ridiculous it sounds?
I'll remind you again that you are evading a ban posting here to argue about red trust when your other account is banned. You should first resolve that matter and then worry about your trust.

Actually, I was waiting to hear what excuse he'd come up with, I have to admit that it's not very original.

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills.  

https://i.ibb.co/gdv4bqL/trust3.jpg

He claims to be broke and he share everything with his wife, but he paid her back with interest.

[Vod]

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills.  

That is good enough evidence for me.  

(Sorry, sent 2 sMerit the wrong post.)

[Vod]

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

[HCP]

So... in summary:

Alt account == "Wife's Account" == Trust farming with "loans" + probable ban evasion?

Is that about right or did I miss something?

[TheNewAnon135246]

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed.  I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda.  I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda).  Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

This sounds like you are hearing what you want to hear (as usual).

[r1s2g3]

So... in summary:

Alt account == "Wife's Account" == Trust farming with "loans" + probable ban evasion?

Is that about right or did I miss something?

Not probable, It is confirmed banned evasion.

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda.  Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed.  I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda.  I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda).  Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

It also means that TP has full trust in Lauda . (I guess that is the purpose of trust that you do not need to individually scrutinize everything, so have faith on other judgement.)

[The-One-Above-All]

r1s2g3 is missing the point, as usual for low brow ass kissing members.


The pharmacist is a confirmed supporter of lauda. He is also a sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spamming sock puppet hugeblackwoman. He openly admits he does not have the capacity to understand if lauda is a scammer, but will support him regardless because he is an ass kisser.

So his own opinion on this is cast in doubt also. There is not point relying on the opinions of those that are observably untrustworthy or their supporters who by their support are untrustworthy as well.

Their observable double standards and trust abuse will come to an end, or it will just mean the entire board will turn into a war zone.

[Thule]

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.


Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

[bones261]

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.


Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

Yobit has already stated that they will be booting participants with red trust. Also, the process of joining the yobit signature campaign is done on yobit's webpage. From what I can tell, the main function of the campaign manager will be to audit participant's posts and make recommendations for any removals if the content is poor. If they don't hire someone from outside of the organization, someone from their staff will have to do it. After all, I'm sure Yobit doesn't want to pay posters who post garbage that are more likely to give them a worse reputation than they already have, rather than getting new customers to click on the link.

[Thule]

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.


Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

Yobit has already stated that they will be booting participants with red trust. Also, the process of joining the yobit signature campaign is done on yobit's webpage. From what I can tell, the main function of the campaign manager will be to audit participant's posts and make recommendations for any removals if the content is poor. If they don't hire someone from outside of the organization, someone from their staff will have to do it. After all, I'm sure Yobit doesn't want to pay posters who post garbage that are more likely to give them a worse reputation than they already have, rather than getting new customers to click on the link.

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

[bones261]

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

Well, that would mean that Yobit is lying.

https://yobit.net/en/signature/details/

★☆★ Rules ★☆★

Poor quality and unconstructive posts will not be tolerated on this campaign. You don't need to write an essay with each post but one word replies in spammy off topic threads or streams of constant half-assed one liners will immediately get you removed. Please just put some effort in to your posts and you'll be fine.

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.

Any user who hasn't made a post in over a month will also be removed.

[Thule]

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

Well, that would mean that Yobit is lying.

https://yobit.net/en/signature/details/

★☆★ Rules ★☆★

Poor quality and unconstructive posts will not be tolerated on this campaign. You don't need to write an essay with each post but one word replies in spammy off topic threads or streams of constant half-assed one liners will immediately get you removed. Please just put some effort in to your posts and you'll be fine.

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.

Any user who hasn't made a post in over a month will also be removed.

Yes

Anyway they got banned by theymos for 60 days.Let's see how quickly they will come back with a known campaign manager