(E)t)h)e)x).bet Signature Campaign 0,024 BTC / month [CLOSED]

[erikalui]

Name: Erikalui
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=141005
Post count: 11870
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin address: 339zienYz2r2yyRiS6cxgrJEMNU8Hwny2R

Will change my signature once accepted

[1713406866]

1713406866

[1713406866]

1713406866

[1713406866]

1713406866

[daarul50]

Name: daarul50
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=672808
Post count: 3886
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin address: 1PinP9c88MKHeyjVb3x8F26Ebt8hRfyMeD

Please correct the signature code because I cannot use the code

[2double0]

Name: 2double0
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153776
Post count: 2005
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin address: bc1ql4gn6r75sydqwe99qz6nc44mvkzcfc4hqwqn3y

I will change everything once accepted.

[robelneo]

Withdrawing my application will delete after 24 hours have passed

[wolwoo]

Name: wolwoo
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1003533
Post count: 1918
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin address: 1G7HCyiRbQSZgXCmt61FUD4X6qhDwSQnbo

avatar will change soon...

[asu]

To be deleted

[talkbitcoin]

Name: talkbitcoin
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=458191;sa=summary
Post count: 4181
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin address: bc1q0eduf0jdtzv0z6uqntq9wepzr2dfses2umt8rl
(if bech32 address is not accepted here i can change it to a legacy one)

[janggernaut]

Name : janggernaut
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=478204
post count : 2218
Rank : legendary
Bitcoin Address : 1CD8jBHh8xQ4uikpTaX8DbebnwRbYBrioz
For @OP,  your signature code for Legendary rank is exceeded 4000 characters which i can't wear them atm.

[EthexBet]

Sorry if my arrival was unexpected, I just came to help fix a signature that exceeded character and fix it quickly.

I only removed a few characters and that was good enough, there was no link that I changed.

Hi unyil, and thank you for your help. It is highly appreciated!

[EthexBet]

Payment for the Week #4 has been submitted!

You can find tx ids in the spreadsheet. Kindly confirm the receipt and have a good week!

[DarkDays]

.

[EthexBet]

Name: Sithara007
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=305398
Posts (including this one): 10,877
BTC Address: 39c5PZYzTn5KDkDx9e3yPAYQ6jtS2bK8c8
Rank: Legendary

Will change signature signature and avatar once accepted

You are accepted starting from the next week. Kindly, update your avatar and signature.

[MadeinCoin]

Name: MadeinCoin
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=441443
Post count: 3061
Rank: Legendary Member
Bitcoin address: 3EVRZmkt5McztCxRs2hkDnHPgG5p8suAer

Sorry, the campaign is full. Next time.

OK, but if there is an empty slot again, please accept my application.  thank you

[Dontme]

Payment for the Week #4 has been submitted!

You can find tx ids in the spreadsheet. Kindly confirm the receipt and have a good week!

Thank you already received 

[Sellman]

I think that the EthexBet should reply to all applications with @everyone tag, then reply all users whom applied when the campaign is full in a single post, rather than reply to each applicant. It will save more time and also save more space for the bounty topic. I am not sure that your current replying approach will be considered as bumping or not, if yes it is forum rule's violation, so just remind that you should be careful.

[stadus]

~snip~

Nice suggestion, multi quote in just one post.
Just like this one - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2189942.msg21998295#msg21998295

[erikalui]

You has been accepted from the next week. Kindly, update your avatar and signature.

Thanks for accepting me. I've changed my signature and avatar

[legendster]

I think that the EthexBet should reply to all applications with @everyone tag, then reply all users whom applied when the campaign is full in a single post, rather than reply to each applicant. It will save more time and also save more space for the bounty topic. I am not sure that your current replying approach will be considered as bumping or not, if yes it is forum rule's violation, so just remind that you should be careful.

I think the OP chooses to do otherwise willingly. Having multiple posts in the same thread makes for a more bumped thread. And with a campaign budget that low he needs all the bumps he can get.

[diazepam666]

Thanks EthexBet, got the payment. Long live... 

[EthexBet]

~snip~

Nice suggestion, multi quote in just one post.
Just like this one - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2189942.msg21998295#msg21998295

I think that the EthexBet should reply to all applications with @everyone tag, then reply all users whom applied when the campaign is full in a single post, rather than reply to each applicant. It will save more time and also save more space for the bounty topic. I am not sure that your current replying approach will be considered as bumping or not, if yes it is forum rule's violation, so just remind that you should be careful.

I think the OP chooses to do otherwise willingly. Having multiple posts in the same thread makes for a more bumped thread. And with a campaign budget that low he needs all the bumps he can get.

I think that the EthexBet should reply to all applications with @everyone tag, then reply all users whom applied when the campaign is full in a single post, rather than reply to each applicant. It will save more time and also save more space for the bounty topic. I am not sure that your current replying approach will be considered as bumping or not, if yes it is forum rule's violation, so just remind that you should be careful.

I think the OP chooses to do otherwise willingly. Having multiple posts in the same thread makes for a more bumped thread. And with a campaign budget that low he needs all the bumps he can get.

Nothing like this. I just got criticized that I have missed someone when i picked some members i liked more then others and then said that campaign is full to others. After that, I decided to answer everyone.

If it looks like the rules violation, ill think how to improve this - but making the post with multi-answer to more than 2-3 posts is a mess both for writer and readers.