Bitcoin Forum
July 20, 2019, 07:00:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 区块链十年过去了,面对POS,你是否觉得它还是一个骗局?  (Read 251 times)
GUOWENGUIdeSHEN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2019, 03:08:17 AM
 #1

凡是靠发利息,唆使用户不卖出的币都是骗局。这是不是大家对当前POS币的看法?
1563649230
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563649230

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563649230
Reply with quote  #2

1563649230
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
GUOWENGUIdeSHEN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2019, 03:10:02 AM
 #2

现在比特币的市值占据全部市值的百分之58,感觉这是它最后的回光返照。
deojhhu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2019, 01:36:25 AM
 #3

我认为POW开源无预挖的币种是可信的。
angelenaknepper
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 11, 2019, 12:00:57 PM
Merited by mo (1)
 #4

个人观点
1.目前有超过80条公链支持PoS,总市值1800亿美金。预计2019年有价值25亿美金的数字资产是基于PoS产生的,而比特币一年挖矿的产值也就在34亿美元左右。

2.项目本身一定要有用户,有价值。不然,无论你再怎么宣传推广、再怎么提高POS挖矿收益,都是空中楼阁。

3.Staking收益一定要有足够的吸引力。这是BTS、NXT、点点币等的前车之鉴。我甚至认为,学习EOS的模式,增加通胀率,加大节点奖励,这样才能吸引大资金和新玩家。

AutoBuy Cheap Amazon Web Services AWS Credit Code
----------------------------------------------------
https://onebay.selly.store , Telegram @Heyusd
GUOWENGUIdeSHEN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 11, 2019, 11:14:37 PM
 #5

个人观点


2.项目本身一定要有用户,有价值。不然,无论你再怎么宣传推广、再怎么提高POS挖矿收益,都是空中楼阁。

3.Staking收益一定要有足够的吸引力。这是BTS、NXT、点点币等的前车之鉴。我甚至认为,学习EOS的模式,增加通胀率,加大节点奖励,这样才能吸引大资金和新玩家。
EOS就目前而言,有什么价值呢?听说在上面可以运行程序,不知道现在有什么重量级的程序在上面运行。
ifc2020
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 03, 2019, 09:15:19 AM
 #6

我只认可pow币种
xcdmw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 05, 2019, 05:24:02 AM
 #7

pow的忠实粉丝,对其他的不感冒
nb22061987
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 05, 2019, 06:44:02 AM
 #8

比特币区块这么拥堵,为啥还要转比特币! Cool
kilja
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2019, 08:49:40 AM
 #9

比特币的话,还是推荐core钱包或者比太钱包,离线生成地址私钥
changcheng2019
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 10, 2019, 08:43:54 AM
 #10

真正去中心化的 只有 POW  其他的都是扯淡
kowsuper2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 10, 2019, 09:32:56 AM
 #11

pos比pow安全一些,pos的问题就是锁币就坑人了,有些币pos放在钱包就可以不用锁的。
yuchen91
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 11, 2019, 10:05:07 AM
 #12

从不相信靠持币人保证的安全
Alank_C
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 11, 2019, 02:57:00 PM
 #13

POS由于项目发起方掌握了大部分货币,对参于者不公平!而POW对于每一个人来说都是公平的!不管是创建者或者发明者,都要通过挖矿或都用金钱购买,不管哪种方式都需要付出,而不是像POS那样
WilliamXu1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2019, 01:35:00 AM
 #14

POS的设计就不合理,靠大家屯币锁币获取收益,这和买理财有什么本质区别吗?
yerim1021
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2019, 06:23:22 AM
 #15

BTC和ETH存在的话,POS绝对不能失去。还有ETH已经很多公司使用,渐渐增加使用的人,所以POS可以被别人更容易知道,现在可以看在中国其中最大的DigiFinex,几乎coin是由ERC20成做的。
Wang_daming95754
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 12, 2019, 08:42:30 AM
 #16

啥啊啊啊啊?????????????骗局?????
真的吗??不对啊!区块链有且只能有一种应用——那就是作为金融科技!
jiuchen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 15, 2019, 10:36:46 AM
 #17

POS的设计就不合理,靠大家屯币锁币获取收益,这和什么本质区别吗?
sos1311
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 17, 2019, 07:27:18 AM
 #18

不知道呢,POS感觉还是抓住了那种存钱有利息的心态吧,或许很过人喜欢,时间会说明一切
目前还是看好POW
Wnag_BtSRs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 17, 2019, 08:13:04 AM
 #19

通俗的说,POS 就是资本主义,按钱分配
ETHHODLER
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 19, 2019, 08:49:01 AM
 #20

区块链国际化道路探索很有意思么
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!