Do bounty participants enjoy longer or shorter campaigns?

[joshy23]

it's hard to say basing just on the length. Most campaigns pay only at the end of them so entering a long one (which I prefer, taking all other factors into account) gives you higher risk of not being paid or significant reduction of your payout, as with time long campaigns tend to get more and more participants. My ideal campaign would be a) run by a very reputable manager, b) with limited number of participants and c) 1-3 months in length.

Learned from what happened with those previous long term projects, most of them turned to a scam or not being listed from the exchange,
so if giving a chance it's much better to join in a short term campaigns so you can see the results right away and move to another after.

[Indamuck]

There have been a lot of successful "long" running funding rounds.  Even though I don't like EOS, they raised billions of dollars over a year.  That is very long compared to these other projects that are only running initial investment for a couple of months. 

[posi]

How long or short a bounty campaign is, is not what bounty participants enjoy, for what they enjoy is the team treating them like a human and co-worker. Besides, they like the team to keep their own side of the bargain in terms of making payment in time with keeping to the rules and regulation consider no KYC issue.

[r1s2g3]

Hello all,

Looking for some feedback on this particular topic. In general as a participant in bounty campaigns would you rather have one that:

1) is short in length but may provide limited opportunity to earn coins or tokens

Depend upon your time, if you are going to be busy in next month or so, you will like to take part in short campaign.

2) one that drags on for longer time periods (up to a year) but give you the opportunity to earn a larger share of the total bounty fund

Let me know your thoughts and why!

If you are paying weekly in some liquid coin and token then people will love to do long campaigns otherwise it is waste of year.

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

Bounty campaigns distributing their worthless token in name of bounty.

[Akonobea]

I am a bounty hunters but I enjoy short campaigns more than long ones. There are some campaigns that turn out to be scam or do not reach their soft cap. Imagine if you participated in a campaign like this, you have wasted a lot of time and resources.

[r1a2y3m4]

Bounty participants enjoy longer campaigns only if the bounty is big. But if the bounty is small then most probably bounty hunters wanted it as a short term campaign.

Although we have signature campaigns. For these signature campaigns, participants wanted it to lasts because it's a weekly payment and you know that these campaigns are paying.

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

I don't like bounty campaign combining their bounty thread with their announcement thread. Their announcements are being spammed by the social media participants.

[Avirunes]

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

I don't like bounty campaign combining their bounty thread with their announcement thread. Their announcements are being spammed by the social media participants.

Just report them to moderators if you happen to find something like that. There is a whole section dedicated for bounty threads to be posted and yet they are doing something like this in order to get some bumps.

[erikalui]

How long or short a bounty campaign is, is not what bounty participants enjoy, for what they enjoy is the team treating them like a human and co-worker. Besides, they like the team to keep their own side of the bargain in terms of making payment in time with keeping to the rules and regulation consider no KYC issue.

You spoke my mind. I hate the fact that the teams treat the participants as some beggars begging for money when infact we are working in their promotional campaign. They just ban users from their telegram groups who complain about a valid issue and don't even answer them via a personal message. Even if the team is working positively towards their project, such rudeness shows they can't be trusted for long.

[wumBowo]

Depends, i'm enjoying the shorter campaigns once especially if the payment type is the coin/token which belongs to their project. Otherwise, if the payment is an established coin such as BTC/ETH and we received it weekly like a signature campaings on sub-board services i prefer a long-term campaigns

What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

A campaigns which require a weekly report on their threads instead of using a handy report forms like google form

[chermtaty46]

I understand that short-term companies are preferable. But, the number of participants also significantly affects the amount of remuneration. Or does it depend on the type of payment?

[wumBowo]

I understand that short-term companies are preferable. But, the number of participants also significantly affects the amount of remuneration. Or does it depend on the type of payment?

if you're talking the campaigns which using 'percentage' instead of fixed rate, sure the number of participants will gives an affect of how much bounty participants will receive.
Type of payments also included on the factor since most of campaign that using BTC always give a fixed rate payments while the other is based on stakes which bounty participants earned during campaigns

[DdmrDdmr]

<...>

Most campaigns will pay based on stakes, which are a share of the total pool of allocated tokens for the campaign (/concept). At the end of the campaign, stakes are normally calculated by adding all the awarded stakes and calculating their token equivalent as a ratio to the campaign token pool. Therefore, the more people that participate, the less amount of tokens you will receive (many do not even put a limit to the amount of participants). Additionally, since the campaign pool tends to be a fixed amount, the longer the campaign, the less tokens you will get for your shares.

Not all campaigns function by the above criteria. BTC based campaigns for example tend to pay a fixed amount per post, establishing an upper limit to the amount of posts that are considered in the payment procedure. These campaigns tend to delimit the number (and quality) of participants according to budget and other factors.

[nakamura12]

I think it differs from person to person as some people want shorter campaigns but the reward given is almost the same as the longer campaigns which shorter campaigns may/might happen to give much higher or the same reward as the longer campaign or not as the reward you'll get from campaigns whether short or long is based on the campaign itself on how successful the campaign is.

[okala]

I think it differs from person to person as some people want shorter campaigns but the reward given is almost the same as the longer campaigns which shorter campaigns may/might happen to give much higher or the same reward as the longer campaign or not as the reward you'll get from campaigns whether short or long is based on the campaign itself on how successful the campaign is.

You are absolutely right it depends on individuals while some participants want I short term campaign others preferred the long term one it depends on users preference but for me personally if I like the project I don't mind promoting them for a long time as far as the payment is OK I don't mind.

[Ipwich]

Shorter campaigns. i dislike long term or too late payment.
I have experienced such campaigns... it is stressful for me being waited long term.

However, after all, it depends on quality of project.
if its quality waste, i dont want to join bounty.

It's a problem now because we don't know if the project is quality or not after it's listed in an exchange.
If the price will dump, people will think it's not a quality project, sad to say but people judge the project easily based on it's early performance.

[Mike Mayor]

Long bounties are bs and they take advantage. Hell some go on for a year. If you do not get paid after a year of work you going to be fuming and probably want to punch your screen in. Its unacceptable.
Bounties must split their campaign into 2 months long at the most and pay within 2 months afterwards and try get listed on the exchange. Many times you wait months to be paid or get paid and then wait months for the token/coin to be listed on the exchange.

[playboy654]

Hello all,

Looking for some feedback on this particular topic. In general as a participant in bounty campaigns would you rather have one that:

1) is short in length but may provide limited opportunity to earn coins or tokens

or

2) one that drags on for longer time periods (up to a year) but give you the opportunity to earn a larger share of the total bounty fund

Let me know your thoughts and why!

Bonus: What's your most disliked type of bounty campaign?

If you are talking about bounties which is paying their own coins for the participation then longer format of the campaign increase the rick for the participants because they will get profits only of that project's coin or token get some value or else they just wasted all their time on that project.But bitcoin paying signature campaign means you have to choose long form even if the reward is less for now because later those small rewards will turn into big amount.

[tetrisdancyo]

Shorter campaigns. i dislike long term or too late payment.
I have experienced such campaigns... it is stressful for me being waited long term.

However, after all, it depends on quality of project.
if its quality waste, i dont want to join bounty.

It's a problem now because we don't know if the project is quality or not after it's listed in an exchange.
If the price will dump, people will think it's not a quality project, sad to say but people judge the project easily based on it's early performance.

Whenever I join a bounty, I look into there background, such as members, business partners, and investors.

So, even if the price of tokens falls in the short term, or the distribution of tokens is significantly delayed,
I can be convinced to some extent,then I may make use of this experiment next time.

Still, i often make a mistake in choosing bounty project...

[jademaxsuy]

Lower ranks do enjoy long terms this because the earlier they get into the campaign then the better rewards.a.user will get. But still it will depend on the rank because the higher the rank that a user will be joining in the signature bounty campaign then tue higher stakes allocated for them. This is why many are asking to get awarded by merits in order for. them to.earn in signature bounty campaign after getting some.merits and then ranking up later on.

[playboy654]

Lower ranks do enjoy long terms this because the earlier they get into the campaign then the better rewards.a.user will get. But still it will depend on the rank because the higher the rank that a user will be joining in the signature bounty campaign then tue higher stakes allocated for them. This is why many are asking to get awarded by merits in order for. them to.earn in signature bounty campaign after getting some.merits and then ranking up later on.

Actually I never seen any bounties asking for merit requirement to join on their bounties.They are just concentrate on the quantity of their participants not that quality posts which are useful for the community.But as a memebr of this forum we have to avoid spams and start helping the other people as much as can in the way we are.