DT Members with Sig bans.

[Quickseller]

In my mind it is up to these banned/sig banned DT members to explain themselves (sooner than later) and provide some context with the reason why they were sig banned and appeal to DT directly. The mods/staff/this insane new bot have done their job and now it's up to DT to act aswell.

Do we now have different rules for DT members and non DT members as it concerns plagiarism? This is an offence as far as I agree with your post though. The forum has its standard for such misconduct .

The rules regarding pretty much anything are different for seniors and non seniors. It's all about that intent.

More and more "rules for thee but not for me"

[1714728840]

1714728840

[1714728840]

1714728840

[1714728840]

1714728840

[1714728840]

1714728840

[1714728840]

1714728840

[Lauda]

In my mind it is up to these banned/sig banned DT members to explain themselves (sooner than later) and provide some context with the reason why they were sig banned and appeal to DT directly. The mods/staff/this insane new bot have done their job and now it's up to DT to act aswell.

Do we now have different rules for DT members and non DT members as it concerns plagiarism? This is an offence as far as I agree with your post though. The forum has its standard for such misconduct .

The rules regarding pretty much anything are different for seniors and non seniors. It's all about that intent.

More and more "rules for thee but not for me"

Correct. It is because I am this

The Queen of Cats

and you are this:

filthy degenerate

[The Cryptovator]

Well one of the accounts I was talking about is bill gator, turns out he is an account buying pajeet.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145840.0

Everyone should remove him from DT just for that

That case is about bought account, it's not just plagiarism case. Plagiarism ban with bought account couldn't be treated same as normal plagiarism case. An account seller/buyers can't be in my trust list (although I had not added him previously).

[Quickseller]

In my mind it is up to these banned/sig banned DT members to explain themselves (sooner than later) and provide some context with the reason why they were sig banned and appeal to DT directly. The mods/staff/this insane new bot have done their job and now it's up to DT to act aswell.

Do we now have different rules for DT members and non DT members as it concerns plagiarism? This is an offence as far as I agree with your post though. The forum has its standard for such misconduct .

The rules regarding pretty much anything are different for seniors and non seniors. It's all about that intent.

More and more "rules for thee but not for me"

Correct. It is because I am this

The Queen of Cats

and you are this:

filthy degenerate

This is good to know. I will be sure to keep this for future reference.

[Lauda]

This is good to know. I will be sure to keep this for future reference.

I'm glad that you agree that you're a filthy degenerate peasant. Now, back to work.