@THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them

[Flying Hellfish]

A personal message is sent to a specific person to read. There is no expectation of privacy.

In another twist of irony if the sender of the PM wanted it posted in the fucking forum he probably would have posted it in the fucking forum instead of sending it privately to one person.

Funny how bill gator went ape shit over vod doxxing og but has no problem sharing something sent in private.  TBH bill gator has received my dox from my trying to support his btc business but now I am slightly concerned that he may share my PM when he feels it's to his advantage....

[1715499383]

1715499383

[1715499383]

1715499383

[1715499383]

1715499383

[bill gator]

if the sender of the PM wanted it posted in the fucking forum he probably would have posted it in the fucking forum instead of sending it privately to one person.

The reason they didn't want to post it publicly is the same reason it is so necessary to post it publicly.

Funny how bill gator went ape shit over vod doxxing og but has no problem sharing something sent in private.  

Is that funny? Or are those two entirely different things? You know showing an example of DT-intimidation is not the same as publicly posting your address, name and sister's hair-color.

I think pretending like what I did is comparable to releasing an address is disingenuous.

bill gator has received my dox ... I am slightly concerned that he may share my PM when he feels it's to his advantage....

Yes, because my contribution to the forum over the past few-years has primarily been releasing information when most convenient. If you'll take notice, I'm not acting out of self-preservation or what is going to make me come out the cleanest. You are way too desperate for attention if you have to stick your nose in here to say "bill plz no Dox". Please, FH, I've got respect for you - but your cognitive dissonance is showing.

[Quickseller]

A personal message is sent to a specific person to read. There is no expectation of privacy.

In another twist of irony if the sender of the PM wanted it posted in the fucking forum he probably would have posted it in the fucking forum instead of sending it privately to one person.

If something is posted that is intended to be read by one specific person and responded to by that person, it would get taken down by the moderators for doing exactly what you describe.

It is horribly ironic to be telling a moderator what types of threads shouldn’t be posted.

[SaltySpitoon]

You also don't keep the scam a secret. I think pretending like what I did is comparable to releasing an address is disingenuous.

Righto, so you say "Hey guys, Lauda is pressuring people like some mafia boss to ...." Obviously the PM was made to you because it wasn't something LFC was comfortable affixing their name to as a public post, but they wanted you to know. Who is going to blow a whistle if the one who obtains the information gives away their source? I'm just saying that I find your actions incredibly untrustworthy, far worse than buying an account and operating it for years without incident.


 

[Thule]

I claimed that Lauda was intimidating LFC,

It seems you are more concerned about Bill publishing a PM with evidence of Laudas abuse instead of Laudas intimidation ?

Why don't you hold Lauda responsible for that intimidation ?


Its funny to see how quickly someone who was supported by most DT members over a longer period of time gets so quickly a scammer stamp.

LFC provided the ultimate proof why this is happening

[suchmoon]

Seems that the new MO is to attack someone tangential to the whole shitslinging fight and averse to public drama

I thought the whole Vod situation was already over? Oh wait, no shit - you're actually projecting that hard right now!

This has nothing to do with Vod but for some reason you're so blinded by that conflict that you're attacking anyone in sight, even those who support(ed) and respect(ed) you. The 60 day ban would have been good for you.

If you witness a rape, and the victim doesn't want to speak to the police - do you just walk away?

Stupid analogy, but you certainly shouldn't do anything without victim's consent. You have your priorities seriously messed up.

[TheNewAnon135246]

A personal message is sent to a specific person to read. There is no expectation of privacy.

In another twist of irony if the sender of the PM wanted it posted in the fucking forum he probably would have posted it in the fucking forum instead of sending it privately to one person.

If something is posted that is intended to be read by one specific person and responded to by that person, it would get taken down by the moderators for doing exactly what you describe.

It is horribly ironic to be telling a moderator what types of threads shouldn’t be posted.

Why do you always twist words like that? Where did he say that it against the forum rules?

[bill gator]

It seems you are more concerned about Bill publishing a PM with evidence of Laudas abuse instead of Laudas intimidation ?

This has nothing to do with Vod

It's funny, putting those two quotes together, let's play a guessing game! Can anybody tell me why that's humorous?

The 60-day ban would've been good for burying a string of coincidences and abuses.

Righto, so you say "Hey guys, Lauda is pressuring people like some mafia boss to ...."

How well has that been working out for anyone that has been unable to produce a source/justification for their claims?
There's a handful of users sitting in here on Newbie accounts, because they're likely DT members afraid of similar consequence.

If we keep doing this circular "Lauda is a boogieman" act, where all we have are stories of old we are not going to get anywhere.
There are concrete examples of abuse, intimidation, coercion, etc. and refusing to pin down the details is one of the things that makes the situation slippery.

You're right, maybe producing the PM or at least attaching the username was a move in bad-taste.
I'm not here to make LFC look bad, they know that and I think they understand where I am coming from to a degree.

you certainly shouldn't do anything without victim's consent. You have your priorities seriously messed up.

Out of curiosity, how would one get the consent to investigate a murder?

[SaltySpitoon]

I claimed that Lauda was intimidating LFC,

It seems you are more concerned about Bill publishing a PM with evidence of Laudas abuse instead of Laudas intimidation ?

Why don't you hold Lauda responsible for that intimidation ?


Its funny to see how quickly someone who was supported by most DT members over a longer period of time gets so quickly a scammer stamp.

LFC provided the ultimate proof why this is happening

Yeah, I don't care about Lauda in the slightest, because assuming everything everyone is claiming is true, it absolutely doesn't matter in the slightest. Whether you guys still can physically see ratings by Default trust or not, not a single one of the people that has responded here uses it. Thule, when you see negative feedback left by Lauda for someone, do you disregard it? I'm assuming your answer is yes, in which case that means you don't use default trust. Relying on default trust means blindly relying on the feedback left by those users because you don't know any better. Everyone involved here knows better, so they know who's feedback to disregard or value. Everyone is just complaining about a DT mafia because conflict is fun. Like I said, the power of DT is literally the same as a PTA, maybe a little annoying but they don't have any real authority to do anything. When was the last time any of the involved did a trade here? (looks mainly at the collectibles section users) Ok, does Lauda or anyone else's feedback mean anything to you if you've been trading within this community for years and know who to trust? And if you aren't certain, or are trading with a new user do you just use Minerjones as escrow? Cool, problem solved.

Just to clarify, all of this DT red trust and such is about your feelings being hurt, not that it'll affect your account in any way. Thats fine, but everyone can tell what it is, this massive conflict is because of hurt feelings, not for the greater good and justice.

[Lauda]

LFC provided the ultimate proof why this is happening

Yawn. Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it. You are a scamming monkey for which about 1% of my brain is needed to beat. All the PMs that were sent out were suggestions and any of them can be published. I didn't put more than 15-20 seconds of writing into most of them, quite the intimidation.

[Flying Hellfish]

You are way too desperate for attention if you have to stick your nose in here to say "bill plz no Dox".

As I said I am only slightly concerned because at the end of the day I'm not all that scared of being dox'd, I've openly stated a number of personally Identifiable things here on this forum.


Feel free to stick the FH wants attention conspiracy theory up your ass where it belongs, I get all the attention thanks though!

[bill gator]

Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it.

Who talks like that?

I'm not all that scared of being dox'd

I get all the attention thanks though!

It's truly saddening to me that your lack of fear towards being DOX'd is stronger than your faith that I would never release such information.
Don't let all that attention go to your head, buddy.

[Flying Hellfish]

A personal message is sent to a specific person to read. There is no expectation of privacy.

In another twist of irony if the sender of the PM wanted it posted in the fucking forum he probably would have posted it in the fucking forum instead of sending it privately to one person.

If something is posted that is intended to be read by one specific person and responded to by that person, it would get taken down by the moderators for doing exactly what you describe.

It is horribly ironic to be telling a moderator what types of threads shouldn’t be posted.

Why do you always twist words like that? Where did he say that it against the forum rules?

I didn't, he know's it, QS doesn't like me  

[TheNewAnon135246]

Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it.

Who talks like that?

Lauda.

[SaltySpitoon]

Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it.

Who talks like that?

OJ Simpson

[Lauda]

Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it.

Who talks like that?

I do ever since Quickscammer tried to attack my reputation 3 years ago with pathetic conspiracy theories. That worked out nicely for him. The stupid likes to project. Do you truly believe in your intimidation claims mr. liar?

[Flying Hellfish]

It's truly saddening to me that your lack of fear towards being DOX'd is stronger than your faith that I would never release such information.
Don't let all that attention go to your head, buddy.

Until you decided to release a PM that was CLEARLY sent in the spirit of being kept confidential, I wasn't worried about either.

[Thule]

You are a scamming monkey for which about 1% of my brain is needed to beat.

Seems like your brain is broken being unable to provide proof of scam for over 2 years now.

LFC provided the ultimate proof of your abuse and why your bitches are abusing the feedback system with you in the control position.

You must be very pissed about the PM when looking all the hate Bill is getting for it from your monkeys.


Remember such punks like you would be instantly get eaten by me but you are no men enough to reveal your identity you PUSSY

[bill gator]

Which part of what we're going through right now is a conspiracy?
Other than bozo's claim that I have half a dozen alts, by their count.

By conspiracy, do you mean you have a different way to explain your lazy DT manipulation? Or are we talking about something else?
You speak so ambiguously, I wish you had it in you to say what's really on your mind.

a PM that was CLEARLY sent in the spirit of being kept confidential

It's amazing to me that you don't see a problem with why they wanted it kept confidential. They are a legendary member, on DT1, that has been respected for years and they are afraid of what Lauda will do to them if they don't bend the knee. I don't keep your information recorded anywhere and that goes for everyone I've ever done a deal with.

[Lauda]

Do you truly believe in your intimidation claims mr. liar?

Point.