The ban was a mistake. I need admin’s attention

[tvplus006-2]

Hello everyone!

My account tvplus006
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tvplus006

I was banned on the 9th of May “probably due to spam or plagiarism”.
Today, when I finally managed to deal with my emotions, I have decided to ask, what was the actual reason for making the account permanently banned?

Edit: 13 June

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

In the message @theymos states that every plagiarism report is manually checked by the moderators:

All plagiarism bans are human-checked.

@hilariousandco , kindly clarify, if there are no processed reports, who checked my “plagiarism” and based on what my penalty is permanent ban?

I have been banned for over a month and, thus, cannot proceed with doing useful work for the forum, by revealing scams.

When making a final decision on my case, please take into consideration my attempts of fighting spam: 500 reports were sent to the moderator, only 9 of which were not accurate. And also my contribution to scams fight among ICO on our forum.
I am asking to unblock my account without any terms.

Edit: 16 July

OP should edit title with, "Ban by mistake" and mention admin. So other moderators and admin will check your account.

It is time to change the name of the thread.

#freetvplus006

[1713529795]

1713529795

[1713529795]

1713529795

[BitMaxz]

Most of the ban users recently they are banned because of plagiarism so I think this is the reason why you permanently banned.

Why don't you just continue this unban appeal here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143666.0 created by your friend? Someone already posted the reason why you've been banned.

[YOSHIE]

According to the rules the member bitcointalk forum is banned by 80% of errors (Plagiarism), 20% with other factors.
Most likely an account: ( tvplus006 ), Prohibited based on the results below: Topic: Ban evasion/bounty abuse I hope this can answer about your account being banned.

Common rule violations

These are the most common rule violations that newbies make. There are other rules than these.

Plagiarism: If you copy some text from somewhere, then you should have a good reason for it, and you must link to the source. Doing otherwise is plagiarism. Changing a few words around doesn't matter. If we find that you plagiarized, then you absolutely will be permanently banned, even if we find it years after you did it.
Multi-posting: Do not post twice in a row in a topic. Instead, edit your old post.
Low-content posts: Do not post low-content garbage like "agreed!", "nice project!", etc. You can be banned for this, and it's also pointless if you want to increase your rank, since you will never get merit for such posts.

TS: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5036308.0

[TryNinja]

Most of the ban users recently they are banned because of plagiarism so I think this is the reason why you permanently banned.

Why don't you just continue this unban appeal here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143666.0 created by your friend? Someone already posted the reason why you've been banned.

I’m pretty sure that would be considered “ban evading”; banned users can create ONE appeal thread and only post on that thread. Having a discussion somewhere else isn’t allowed.

He can read that thread, and continue as he wish here (on his own thread).

[r1s2g3]

Other unban appeal thread started by russian community exist below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143666.0

There is convincing answer in the thread why you get banned.

According to the rules the member bitcointalk forum is banned by 80% of errors (Plagiarism), 20% with other factors.
Most likely an account: ( tvplus006 ), Prohibited based on the results below: Topic: Ban evasion/bounty abuse I hope this can answer about your account being banned.

That topic did not concluded that tvplus is evading ban or abusing bounty.

[The Cryptovator]

I’m pretty sure that would be considered “ban evading”; banned users can create ONE appeal thread and only post on that thread. Having a discussion somewhere else isn’t allowed.

Nah, it would not. Another thread generated by community,  not by (OP) banned user. Forum allow you to create a thread by supporting a person if you think that any person deserve unban or temp ban.

If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.

That means you are allow to open a thread which will not consider ban evasion.

However, I am still curious to know the reason of ban. What was the exact post that OP got ban. Hope moderators will let us know.

Although OP were banned for valid reason, I think he deserve second chance by considering his contribution for forum. Signature & temp ban would be appropriate.

[TryNinja]

I’m pretty sure that would be considered “ban evading”; banned users can create ONE appeal thread and only post on that thread. Having a discussion somewhere else isn’t allowed.

Nah, it would not. Another thread generated by community,  not by banned user. Forum allow you to create a thread by supporting a person if you think that any person deserve unban or temp ban.

If you think that a ban should be ended, make your case in a new topic from a "good for the forum as a whole" perspective.

If the banned user (OP) posts in the other thread. That’s what I meant. Obviously it wouldn’t be ban evasion if someone else created an appeal for you. lol

[qwertyup23]

I have good faith that your ban will be considered and uplifted faster compared to most of the users who got affected on the recent ban wave. Due to your contribution and asset as someone who is dedicated to find fake ICOs and scams, your penalty might be relatively lenient. Wishing you the best of luck, tvplus and may you continue doing your work!

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Why don't you just continue this unban appeal here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143666.0 created by your friend? Someone already posted the reason why you've been banned.

I think it's better if he created his own appeal. This would show that he cares about his banned account and the community rather than let other people create for him an appeal.
With this thread, I am confident his appeal stands a higher chance of being looked into and I hope the Outcome is good as OP has really been good at bursting scam in the forum.

[The Cryptovator]

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

[YOSHIE]

In my opinion @ tvplus006, is prohibited because the Post 100% identical. Plagiarism
I'm sure the @ tvplus006 account was blocked based on this report:

Quote from: DarkStar_
The below post was originally posted by tvplus006, here. Posts are 100% identical.

Plagiarism from Harris Pay : ( archive )

Quote from: Harris Pay on may . 04 2018. 09: 33: 58 AM

Harris Pay.
Dear, colleagues

I want to introduce you to a table with the new AirDrop and Bounty programs, which are on bitcointalk.
This is not the first table which is posted on a forum, but definitely not least. But I want to believe that it will find its admirers, which will help with finding new bounty.
It’s not a secret, that new Bounty programs need to be taken from thread:
Bitcoin Forum > Alternate cryptocurrencies > Marketplace (Altcoins) > Bounties (Altcoins)
Of course they are not posted in the same order in my table. Before getting something similar, you will have to filter through some rubbish and only then you will find the new program itself. The ones who have done it, will understand what I mean.
So, I have created this draft work, filtering through the rubbish. Everything that I have found, I have put in the table according to days of the week. The only thing that you will have to do is choose program, which suits you best.
In this table, not only programs which are led by famous managers are gathered, but also those who lead bounty for the first time. And if everyone understands about the first ones, I will talk about the second.
There are many campaigns, which do not hire local managers, but lead them by themselves. As a rule, they have the rank Cooper Member, and their name corresponds to the name of their bounty program. That is why I included them in the table.
The following ICO Bench rating in the table is set at the start of a bounty campaign. To get more accurate value, you should follow a link, which will get you to the page of a campaign in the rating, since the value is re-counted every couple of hours.
P.S. please, do not take the following table as a recommendation, but as a helping hand with choosing bounty.
I will be glad to receive your comments and critical remarks.

THE TABLE OF NEW BOUNTIES, which will make you happy.
*you can stimulate regular updating of the table with the help of +Merit or any kind wor

[hilariousandco]

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

[The Cryptovator]

In my opinion @ tvplus006, is prohibited because the Post is 100% identical. Plagiarism
I'm sure the @ tvplus006 account was blocked based on this report:

I am not getting why tvplus006 should be ban for this. Seems he is the original writer. Luckily someone replied with quote of full thread. So even post has been edited on November 03, 2018 the original quote of post made on April 21, 2018. But post made by "Harris Pay" on May 04, 2018. So the plagiarizer is Harris Pay. So this isn't reason why OP got ban.

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

So what is the solution? Only admin could determine why OP got ban? Or this ban happen by mistake? There should be record if ban for plagiarism like other users.

OP should edit title with, "Ban by mistake" and mention admin. So other moderators and admin will check your account.

[roosbit]

Well seems like other members have shown how exceptional tvplus006 has contributed towards the forum by finding plagiarised whitepapers and all, which is a commendable job!

OP should edit title with, "Ban by mistake" and mention admin. So other moderators and admin will check your account.

AFAIK Ban mistakes hardly happen on BCT!

Without any speculation best to wait for mods.

@Coolcryptovator nice work hope to see the "saved by the quote" if lady luck is TV's side

[The Cryptovator]

I am really disappointed about OP case. Its unexpected that we will not get answer why OP got ban for which post or any other reason. Lot of worst member of this forum got ban and getting their answere as well the reason of ban. But we still don't know the reason of ban for OP who is consider as a assets of forum.

I don't like to create any post really. But as a forum member I have right to ask why a good contributor got ban and its excusable or not.

I will be happy if any moderators or admin check the profile what is the exact reason of ban.

@OP, you have right to bump this thread. It will not consider ban evasion if you make reply on this thread.

Do not give up.

[Harlot]

I think the next step for your ban appeal is probably admitting that you did plagiarized a content and how sorry you are for that mistake. After that your ban appeal must contain how you have contributed in the forum when you were still an active member. The appeal really still depends on what theymos thinks about the case so you aren't really losing anything for trying.

[Joel_Jantsen]

If not for plagiarism, your account may be banned for low-quality posts as most of your old posts are just bounty-related stuff. You started finding scams and other detective work very recently for which you got most of the merits. I could be wrong though.

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

Moderators are not bound to reply to such threads, they do it out of their choice. If you're that curious, maybe you should open OP's profile and look for plagiarised posts?

[bones261]

If not for plagiarism, your account may be banned for low-quality posts as most of your old posts are just bounty-related stuff. You started finding scams and other detective work very recently for which you got most of the merits. I could be wrong though.

All the more reason for this user to be given a temporary posting ban and a signature ban for 2 years. Recently they have become a net positive for the forum and I don't think we should banish this user to the dog house forever.

Moderators replied on almost all of ban appeal thread and reply the reason of ban. But wondering why moderators are silent on "tvplus006" case. At least we could see the plagiarism post that OP got ban for. We can't judge before know the mistakes. So we want to know what was the post/mistake ?

Moderators are not bound to reply to such threads, they do it out of their choice. If you're that curious, maybe you should open OP's profile and look for plagiarised posts?

A moderator did reply to this thread, but had no info.

I don't know what it's for as there's no handled reports in the queue but I'm guessing it was probably for plagiarism.

 Since it appears that the results are inconclusive, I think tvplus006 should be granted a temp ban.

[suchmoon]

Since it appears that the results are inconclusive

Better now?

Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

[...]
Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

[bones261]

Since it appears that the results are inconclusive

Better now?

Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

[...]
Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

Meh, tvplus just was answering a noob's question and parroted what the OP had answered to another user. I think the intent was to be helpful rather than upping their post count for financial gain.