You may not like CSW...

[RawDog]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

[1713540059]

1713540059

[1713540059]

1713540059

[1713540059]

1713540059

[1713540059]

1713540059

[1713540059]

1713540059

[1713540059]

1713540059

[Nadziratel]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea.

[pushups44]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

But you're not a lawyer, and lawyers have openly said anyone could have registered to copyright the bitcoin whitepaper. The government even gave a press release stating they do not do in-depth investigations with such applications.

[stfN2128]

And we all know that the US government is doing only good things to the world   Just having patents doesn't mean that i'm the founder of something.
I still think that satoshi is a group of people who still wanna stay anonymous. maybe craig was involved in any way and he is the one who's looking for attention.

[Nadziratel]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

But you're not a lawyer, and lawyers have openly said anyone could have registered to copyright the bitcoin whitepaper. The government even gave a press release stating they do not do in-depth investigations with such applications.

Yeah, I'm not a lawyer. And registering whitepaper does not make him Satoshi.

In addition, by law, the person who put forward a claim is obliged to prove it! The gentleman claims to be Satoshi in every environment. Just claim! There's no evidence!

So, if I register the whitepaper on me, will I be Satoshi? Let's be serious, that's enough comedy!

[Kakmakr]

Ah, the forum Troll is back. 

Ok so the guy has some money to file a Copyright claim on the Bitcoin White paper, obviously something that can be done by the average Joe on the street with some money to burn.

As far as my knowledge about Copyright is concerned, it can be challenged with a little bit of money too.  It is also a criminal offense if you file a claim for something and you cannot show that you have a legitimate ownership of the thing you are claiming ownership of.

As far as I know, CW has not signed a single Bitcoin address that is known to have been used by Satoshi Nakamoto and he even gave false information on owning a early Bitcoin address and the real owner came forward by signing that address...  

[CryptoBry]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea.

The main test is if he can move the big hoard of Bitcoin that Satoshi Nakamoto has under his control but so far he is not taking the challenge and have chosen to instead cloud the issue with so many of his shenanigans. But I am not wondering why Craig Wright is doing what he is doing. Because he is good in seeking publicity and he knows how to use the media mainstream or not into his favor. Craig Wright has all the right in the world to believe that he is the real Satoshi but he can never impose that the industry will believe and install his name as the real one.

[Herbert2020]

the US government is awarding copyrights to him

if you want to be brain dead and gullible that is your choice and Craig's chance to empty your pocket. 

[vycl87]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

Why should I like CSW? I can't understand why are you thinking he is Satoshi. Having too many patents doesn't make him Satoshi or any awards. I think you missed a point. There is nothing to make us cry here. It is so simple if he wants to prove that who Satoshi is. Satoshi has a big amount of BTC as we all know. I am waiting collect all of them in a wallet... Just an idea.

The main test is if he can move the big hoard of Bitcoin that Satoshi Nakamoto has under his control but so far he is not taking the challenge and have chosen to instead cloud the issue with so many of his shenanigans. But I am not wondering why Craig Wright is doing what he is doing. Because he is good in seeking publicity and he knows how to use the media mainstream or not into his favor. Craig Wright has all the right in the world to believe that he is the real Satoshi but he can never impose that the industry will believe and install his name as the real one.

Well, since he claims to be Satoshi. Why did he initially want to remain anonymous? I think CSW should explain this before! This event is the biggest proof that CSW is not Satoshi.

[Rufsilf]

So what of he has patents, or if the US government is awarding him copyrights it doesn't prove anything about him being Satoshi who invented Bitcoin. Also, it's also possible that he is not the real Satoshi and that the patent was only awarded to him, and maybe he just wanted to get all the credit knowing that the real Satoshi wanted to stay anonymous.

[freedomgo]

It doesn't matter, what matters here is the belief of the people, if they believe that would give a positive market sentiment in the space and would result to an increase of BSV and might be the most successful coin this year.

However, after this Massive Surge After Craig Wright Claims The Official Rights Over Satoshi Papers, which is clearly a hype, then this happens, https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/,  price started to tank.

[talkbitcoin]

not liking him is not a personal opinion, it is about the fact that he is a scammer and nobody likes scammers specially those who steal other people's identity and abuse it for their own personal gains by fooling people like OP...
these people and all those who support them should be behind bars because they are robbing people in broad daylight.

[bitbollo]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144781.0
Early Adopter Proves Ownership of Bitcoin Address Claimed by Wright

If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi

[antisocial77]

getting patents is nothing if the tech is new. ibm and alibaba gets tons of patents because there are so many things to discover or create.csw is a trash thats all.

[pushups44]

Ah, the forum Troll is back. 

Ok so the guy has some money to file a Copyright claim on the Bitcoin White paper, obviously something that can be done by the average Joe on the street with some money to burn.

As far as my knowledge about Copyright is concerned, it can be challenged with a little bit of money too.  It is also a criminal offense if you file a claim for something and you cannot show that you have a legitimate ownership of the thing you are claiming ownership of.

As far as I know, CW has not signed a single Bitcoin address that is known to have been used by Satoshi Nakamoto and he even gave false information on owning a early Bitcoin address and the real owner came forward by signing that address...  

If you read the OP's previous messages, he makes it clear that he believes CSW is actually Satoshi. He has also bashed bitcoin as an investment since 2013 I believe - meaning he may have missed out on the massive bull run of 2017.

He's entitled to believe CSW is Satoshi. And I will remain a skeptic of that claim, until CSW moves funds or signs messages from the first blocks.

[gentlemand]

If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi

Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him.

Ultimately the only power Satoshi has left is his however many coins so it would be relevant. Beyond that he's been left far behind and that's what he wanted all along.

[traderethereum]

Bitcoin doesn't need to be patent, and the original inventor doesn't need to prove himself as the inventor of bitcoin.
The real Satoshi Nakamoto still prefers to remain in the dark and don't tell anyone that he is the real inventor of bitcoin.
I only smile to see many people tried to prove that they are the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but they cannot sign in into the wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto itself.
That is strange, why the owner of the wallet cannot sign into his own wallet and it doesn't make sense hahaha
I don't care who will be the real Satoshi Nakamoto because I think he will not reveal himself to public easily and he likes to stay in the grey side as ordinary people which other people don't know who is he.

[Jating]

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin.  After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author.  It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

Hey, where have you been? 

But what you are stating is not a fact. CSW is not Satoshi and no matter how many patents/copyrights he file we all know that is not the originator of bitcoin and the whitepaper. 

[Indamuck]

He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator.  Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.

[pushups44]

He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator.  Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.

The problem with this theory is that he'd have to be an unmitigated masochist to deal with the constant humiliations of being mocked and called Faketoshi without even so much as moving the first bitcoins. Ockam's Razor suggests he does not have the private keys he claims to have.