STO vs ICO - security

[Lexurdania]

Hi,

I've compared a few ICOs and STOs.

In my opinion, they are nothing different when it comes to security.

What do you think?

Security more preferrend as long term investment. For raising funds, i think there is no different between ICO or STO in crypto but right now many STO offered on IEO. If i should to choose to invest, i think i will invest in STO because it should be regulated by financial authority

[Dr.Osh]

My side is on IEO, coins are going for this crowdfunding, but if I have to pick between the two I'll definitely go for STO because they are more regulated than ICO, there's a lot of scams in ICO and it keeps growing every day, and they keep scamming people

well, now ICO is the last choice after IEO and STO. STO is also the newest form of ICO, and people now also prefer STO to ICO. well, for now, only a very good project will make ICO successful.

[HELLOFF]

So far, only in the information space we hear about the advantages of ico over IEO companies.  As soon as we get real results, then it will be possible to say with accuracy which concept of promoting new projects is not only profitable, but also safe.

[indrakusumaindra]

Hi,

I've compared a few ICOs and STOs.

In my opinion, they are nothing different when it comes to security.

What do you think?

Well i do think STO is more like stock and also they do need legal from their country. I do think STO will come out pretty much in 2019 which i think ICO are already dead and if institutions want to enter crypto world STO is the best to fund money and the best way offer to investors. I do hear that coin from STO is only act as stock and cant be act as token.

[republicrypto]

Hi,

I've compared a few ICOs and STOs.

In my opinion, they are nothing different when it comes to security.

What do you think?

security for what ? if we talk about return i think an ICO or STO even for IEO project, will not ggive us a guarantee for return mate
because after hit the market, the price will always depends on supply and demands from the project itself,
so, we must know all things about the project before investing, always DYOR buddy
regards

[vanjava]

for me STO security is more guaranteed than ICO. because STO itself is a security token offering that shows that security is more important for the convenience of users.

[Genkotsu]

i think that is have a long distance bitween ICO and STO.
if you mean is initial coin yeah that is same, but for security i think that is so much different.
ICO is not have security system they just make a smart contract with based other blockchain like erc20 and they can play ICO, so simple.
STO is have more and more security system to lauch they own STO.

[Elsop]

I see no difference to it STO and ICO seem the same.

[ub27]

STO offer security tokens which represent a share of company holdings while ICO do not offer such. STO is regulated to an extent with legal backings and this is not the case for ICO. In terms of investor security, STO is better than ICO.  Both gear towards token sale anyway. 

[Bananington]

STO and ICO are very different, so saying they are same isn't true. ICO is just a crowdfunding means to raise funds for a crypto startup with no legal backings most times. STO on the other hand represent a means to issue security tokens which represent company shares and has legal backings.  Also, not all exchanges can list security tokens.

[sukoyomi]

STO offer security tokens which represent a share of company holdings while ICO do not offer such. STO is regulated to an extent with legal backings and this is not the case for ICO. In terms of investor security, STO is better than ICO.  Both gear towards token sale anyway. 

We have seen it clearly, now a new project mostly use STO. Even for low budget project, they do STO except for scamming project with low life will still use ICO, because the goal is indeed to scam investor.

[Batalo]

Ok, thanks.

So, we have:
1. ICO
2. STO
3. IEO

What else?

WI want to knoq IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

[fukajiyus.sa]

I think  STO is a secure and good option for investors compare to any ICO that usually became scam later.

[Butern Butler]

Hi,

I've compared a few ICOs and STOs.

In my opinion, they are nothing different when it comes to security.

What do you think?

Yes.I agreed with you but what is the different between in system?

[Uikjuysd]

Advantages of ICO:
::Decentralization,
::Low state regulation (advantage for small independent investors),
::Ease of investment (there is no minimum investment value).

Advantages of STO:
::Rights over company profits as well as dividends,
::Increased security,
::Regulated by the SEC (advantage only for large investors in the traditional market).

So in my opinion STO is more secure then ICO.

[omnik]

STO offer security tokens which represent a share of company holdings while ICO do not offer such. STO is regulated to an extent with legal backings and this is not the case for ICO. In terms of investor security, STO is better than ICO.  Both gear towards token sale anyway. 

We have seen it clearly, now a new project mostly use STO. Even for low budget project, they do STO except for scamming project with low life will still use ICO, because the goal is indeed to scam investor.

Where i can see most of the project use STo rather than IEO, are you saying bullshit about that? STO dead and you can see now some STO didn't even raise the funds. Crypto investors are still interested in IEO that listed instantly after the crowdsale rather than STO without a lot of guarantees.

[lebev.hus]

I haven't invested into IEOs or STOs yet, as I see them as just another rebranding of ICOs.I think all are same like ICO.

[Elsop]

STO is actually a new, improved version of the ICO. It has been made due to the large number of ICO scams in recent times.That;s why

[Menawi12]

STO offer security tokens which represent a share of company holdings while ICO do not offer such. STO is regulated to an extent with legal backings and this is not the case for ICO. In terms of investor security, STO is better than ICO.  Both gear towards token sale anyway. 

We have seen it clearly, now a new project mostly use STO. Even for low budget project, they do STO except for scamming project with low life will still use ICO, because the goal is indeed to scam investor.

Where i can see most of the project use STo rather than IEO, are you saying bullshit about that? STO dead and you can see now some STO didn't even raise the funds. Crypto investors are still interested in IEO that listed instantly after the crowdsale rather than STO without a lot of guarantees.

I think STO is still running. There are several STOs that can reach up to millions of dollars in sales. For many investors, the IEO is profitable for the short term and some investors choose long-term investments by buying STO because of STO is like bonds or company shares

[Ablaba Huston]

STO offer security tokens which represent a share of company holdings while ICO do not offer such. STO is regulated to an extent with legal backings and this is not the case for ICO. In terms of investor security, STO is better than ICO.  Both gear towards token sale anyway. 

We have seen it clearly, now a new project mostly use STO. Even for low budget project, they do STO except for scamming project with low life will still use ICO, because the goal is indeed to scam investor.

Where i can see most of the project use STo rather than IEO, are you saying bullshit about that? STO dead and you can see now some STO didn't even raise the funds. Crypto investors are still interested in IEO that listed instantly after the crowdsale rather than STO without a lot of guarantees.

I think STO is still running. There are several STOs that can reach up to millions of dollars in sales. For many investors, the IEO is profitable for the short term and some investors choose long-term investments by buying STO because of STO is like bonds or company shares

Thank you for your reply.