How to be a "Faketoshi", better than any other "Faketoshi" !?!

[BitcoinFX]

"Great thread about the (possible) background and motivations of Craig Wright trying to be Satoshi Nakamoto & why he's hijacking the Bitcoin project. Sources will be added shortly. Thanks for thinking logic, @jimmy007forsure ! "
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1139069365545046016

...

" 1/ So where did #CraigWright aka #Faketoshi go wrong? Craig Wright was in debt for millions, Hotwire PE was going down the tubes. So in 2013 he decided to shop himself as Satoshi Nakamoto to lure in investors. He had some papers, patents in the making and other IP and himself!"
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1138687654449389568

Continued on twitter ^^

"The long con ... ?!?" ... - SWIM
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick

EDIT (additional):

SegWit and the bitcoin transaction fee conspiracy theory
- https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2019/06/12/1560351485000/SegWit-and-the-bitcoin-transaction-fee-conspiracy-theory/
... "Nonetheless, isn't that a fun conspiracy theory?" ...

No FT it's not a 'fun conspiracy theory'. Think about it for a moment. Probably best to redact 'live' links to (potential) scams?

[1713249803]

1713249803

[1713249803]

1713249803

[1713249803]

1713249803

[hv_]

Lol - hard ?

All done by  SOFTware - nothing else.

Trapped in the Internet - proven - hard for you

Cryptographic proof is hard evidence.

Learn how Bitcoin works.

So I steel your keys - my stuff then ?

If a real world person provs to trolls by moving coins - what does that do to trolls?

get real - and stop whining - cause someone killed your Satoshi beleivings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w39E_0Kh9M


Bitcoin does not Need such a smear from trolls that WANT things.

Bitcoin is about DO things

[BitcoinFX]

Lol - hard ?

All done by  SOFTware - nothing else.

Trapped in the Internet - proven - hard for you

Cryptographic proof is hard evidence.

Learn how Bitcoin works.

So I steel your keys - my stuff then ?

If a real world person provs to trolls by moving coins - what does that do to trolls?

get real - and stop whining - cause someone killed your Satoshi beleivings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w39E_0Kh9M


Bitcoin does not Need such a smear from trolls that WANT things.

Bitcoin is about DO things

1. No one stole my keys.

2. Possession is nine-tenths of the law ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_is_nine-tenths_of_the_law

What a pleasant fellow Dr. Wright appears to be.

Satoshi is/was not a god. Dr. Craig Wright is not a god either, nor is he the 'father' of Bitcoin. In fact, thus far he completely 'failed' the test.

"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."
- Albert Einstein


The 'signing' mentioned in the video you have linked was show to be fake / forged (years ago). Go here ...

- https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/

- https://rya.nc/sartre.html

and by Craig's own admission (which he later deleted) ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160505121146/http://drcraigwright.net/

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160502071722/http://www.drcraigwright.net/

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160502072011/http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

...

I'm not a troll. I'm not whining. I do build 'things'.

Not your keys, Not your coins!

[hv_]

Lol - hard ?

All done by  SOFTware - nothing else.

Trapped in the Internet - proven - hard for you

Cryptographic proof is hard evidence.

Learn how Bitcoin works.

So I steel your keys - my stuff then ?

If a real world person provs to trolls by moving coins - what does that do to trolls?

get real - and stop whining - cause someone killed your Satoshi beleivings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w39E_0Kh9M


Bitcoin does not Need such a smear from trolls that WANT things.

Bitcoin is about DO things

1. No one stole my keys.

2. Possession is nine-tenths of the law ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_is_nine-tenths_of_the_law

What a pleasant fellow Dr. Wright appears to be.

Satoshi is/was not a god. Dr. Craig Wright is not a god either, nor is he the 'father' of Bitcoin. In fact, thus far he completely 'failed' the test.

"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."
- Albert Einstein


The 'signing' mentioned in the video you have linked was show to be fake / forged (years ago). Go here ...

- https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/

- https://rya.nc/sartre.html

and by Craig's own admission (which he later deleted) ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160505121146/http://drcraigwright.net/

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160502071722/http://www.drcraigwright.net/

- https://web.archive.org/web/20160502072011/http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

...

I'm not a troll. I'm not whining. I do build 'things'.

Not your keys, Not your coins!

You just build / posted a bunch of shit / soft proofs - most are fabricated by trolls - but you are just to slow too dig you through

Have fun for a while

Why would anyone with hard brain in real world beleive this pile of proofs.

Wait - trolls ?

I ve no time for playgrounds  bye

[BitcoinFX]

You just build / posted a bunch of shit / soft proofs - most are fabricated by trolls - but you are just to slow too dig you through

Have fun for a while

Why would anyone with hard brain in real world beleive this pile of proofs.

Wait - trolls ?

Nope. Sorry.

I hate to inform you, but the information that fully debunked Craig's false signing is reproducible in the main part.

Anyone who knows what they are doing can actually reproduce Craig's forgeries for themselves as in ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducible_builds

...

Quite clearly you don't know what your talking about.

So, now your trolling me and my thread with mis-information.

and for the record, hv_ is clearly a proponent of BSV (which is not orignal Bitcoin).
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg48841605#msg48841605



EDIT (additional):

All messages of these competitor-paid trolls has been deleted
nutildah
imtutut
Cryptotourist
BitcoinFX
Last of the V8s
mosprognoz
Hueristic
bitcoinPsycho
Piston Honda
gembitz

Hi muppet, tell me who's supposed to pay me, I'm gonna claim my money.

Most certainly I'm not a 'troll'.

Re: Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

You folks are denying historical facts. The very fact you have done this demonstrates your attitude towards the bitcointalk community here, members of which (myself included), who actually helped build Bitcoin (BTC) from the ground up, both technically and economically.

Someone somewhere is going to end up owing me a lot of money btw? By money, I mean Bitcoin (BTC).

For the record, nor am I 'paid'.

[BitcoinFX]

Dr. Craig Wright - Rekt - Admits he is not Satoshi Nakamoto
- https://youtu.be/KoM1jl4Hldk

Bitcoin (BTC) would not exist without the work of Hal Finney.

Gavin Andresen (not his real name btw) is 99% the reason Satoshi left - how does that make you feel now Gavin?

Gavin is also the reason Craig arrived.

Gavin Andresen about Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto
- https://youtu.be/pNZyRMG2CjA

Gavin vs Vitalik, "Craig wright is probably not Satoshi" Mic drop moment
- https://youtu.be/2qLI3VIHuKU

Proof-of-beats
Signal - To - Noise Ratio -- Vitalik Mic Drop
- https://soundcloud.com/proofofbeats/signal-to-noise-ratio-vitalik-mic-drop

To think I once donated 500 BTC to this guys faucet.  

More 'high place liars' ...

I will find out exactly what happened here - 100%

...

RATM - Hadda Be Playin' on the Jukebox - A Poem by Alan Ginsberg.
- https://youtu.be/deuBDhpQ4VM

Now, what if I told you all that no one has ever asked me anything about any of this, ever!

Re: Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

I mean, come on!

Oh, and I'm also aware I'm being 'monitored', damn! these people are pathetic.

[Adriano2010]

Even if more people will claim they are Satoshi, and create a fork coin people will still use bitcoin and consider bitcoin always bitcoin, but anyway great tutorial.

[BitcoinFX]

"A story in 3 acts (or, Mr. Wright's very bad days). We'll cover this in today's Crypto Caselaw Minute but the tldr is that things aren't going well for Wright in federal court in Florida. As we noted previously about this case, federal judges see through smoke screens fast."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139138903665979392

"This week's Crypto Caselaw Minute from @stephendpalley and me is out, and it's got CSW, the word Ownum about thirteen hundred times, and an alleged equity grant issue."
- https://twitter.com/NelsonMRosario/status/1139227365136109568

...

Law of Cryptocurrency
Crypto Caselaw Minute #40–6/13/19
- https://medium.com/crypto-caselaw-minute/crypto-caselaw-minute-40-6-13-19-df5125ca059f

... scroll down ...

" Kleiman v. Wright, 9:18-cv-80176-BB, S.D.Fl., Order on Motion to Dismiss, 6/11/2019 [SDP]

Hearing transcript: https://www.scribd.com/document/413268354/Kleiman-v-Wright-Hearing-Transcript

Motion to Compel: https://www.scribd.com/document/413268455/Kleiman-v-Wright-Motion-to-Compel

Response to Motion to Compel: https://www.scribd.com/document/413268741/Kleiman-v-Wright-Response-in-Opp

Mediation Order: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/208/kleiman-v-wright/ "

...

"Pay peanuts, hire monkeys" ? *Joking* - Just been a bit busy! - SWIM 

... shorter version ...

Court orders Craig Wright to provide a list of trustees and comply with discovery (via @stephendpalley & @NelsonMRosario)
- https://twitter.com/TheBlock__/status/1139173060219719688
- https://www.theblockcrypto.com/2019/06/13/court-orders-craig-wright-to-provide-a-list-of-trustees-and-comply-with-discovery/

...

EDIT (additional):

"Ferdinand Gimbel LeFroix III invented Bitcoin in 1972 in a VW bus in Sonoma while high on psilocybin laced nutmeg and deep in conversation with his girlfriend Darlene Zingborer, who everyone called Mitzi."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139282615968706560

"Arguably, it was probably Mitzi's idea and that is where the real litigation will be."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139282845879472160

"If you read the Kleiman v Wright pleadings carefully you will see the truth -- Mitzi is Satoshi."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139283163086295041

 

...

Now, who remembers the part where I told you Bitcoin was (probably) built by some folks drinking cider in tent ?!? ... - SWIM



Whois Satoshi? Known Satoshi IP addresses? ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155191.0



The Parallel History of Bitcoin.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155188.0




hahaha! ...

Who coined the word "cryptocurrency" ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155348.0

- https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1095309111263223808



Oops.

[hv_]

hahaha! ...

Who coined the word "cryptocurrency" ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155348.0

- https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1095309111263223808



Oops.

Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ?

Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ?  You ?


 

[BitcoinFX]

hahaha! ...

Who coined the word "cryptocurrency" ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155348.0

- https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1095309111263223808



Oops.

Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ?

Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ?  You ?


 

Wrong. CSW posted the edited version of this on his own twitter feed: Dr Craig S Wright (@ProfFaustus) - then seemingly subsequently deleted his entire twitter feed presumable to cover up evidence.

This is not the only example of this.

You seemingly have a real problem with trying to twist hard facts and the truth.

[Kakmakr]

Well the guide would have been useful to future wannebe Faketoshi's if they can actually do the stuff that are suggested. <Like signing those early addresses>    In any way, who really wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto? The real Satoshi will get a ton of media attention and it will be a absolute freak show with all the crazy people hunting for the 1 000 000 coins. 

Satoshi will also spend a lot of time in court and he/she or they will be sued by everyone that wants to get their hands on those coins. <Remember Bitcoin is a combination of several different ideas that was out there before Bitcoin was developed. 

[hv_]

hahaha! ...

Who coined the word "cryptocurrency" ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155348.0

- https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1095309111263223808



Oops.

Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ?

Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ?  You ?


 

Wrong. CSW posted the edited version of this on his own twitter feed: Dr Craig S Wright (@ProfFaustus) - then seemingly subsequently deleted his entire twitter feed presumable to cover up evidence.

This is not the only example of this.

You seemingly have a real problem with trying to twist hard facts and the truth.

Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?

Was he closing his Twitter or was it closed by Twitter ?

Still - you wanna be blind or wanna create bias

[nutildah]

Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?

He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW:

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

[hv_]

Well the guide would have been useful to future wannebe Faketoshi's if they can actually do the stuff that are suggested. <Like signing those early addresses>    In any way, who really wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto? The real Satoshi will get a ton of media attention and it will be a absolute freak show with all the crazy people hunting for the 1 000 000 coins. 

Satoshi will also spend a lot of time in court and he/she or they will be sued by everyone that wants to get their hands on those coins. <Remember Bitcoin is a combination of several different ideas that was out there before Bitcoin was developed. 

reads like a deja vu

[hv_]

Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?

He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW:

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance  /s

You see - it does not lead to any good.

There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet.

Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever.

 


> Better beleive nothing and just watch

[nutildah]

Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance  /s

You see - it does not lead to any good.

There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet.

Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever.

What especially potent brand of dumbfuck juice are you chugging that you did not see the link to Reddit I posted where CSW admits he changed his blog??

[hv_]

Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?

He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW:

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance  /s

You see - it does not lead to any good.

There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet.

Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever.

 

What especially potent brand of dumbfuck juice are you chugging that you not see the link to Reddit I posted where CSW admits he changed his blog??

Nice - now you show reason & context.

Getting better (why u need ad hominenm?). Does that proof anything ?

[nutildah]

Getting better (why u need ad hominenm?). Does that proof anything ?

I asked you a serious question: what compels you to ignore evidence that isn't in the favor of your narrative?

It proves CSW changed his blog. You were adamantly denying such even after I provided a link for you that he did. So I ask you again the same question in a 3rd framing: what compels you to be so dishonest?

[BitcoinFX]

"Proof-of-Nonsense - Craig Wright Jan 2009 Craig has claimed he had 60+ computers running Bitcoin from Jan 2009.. lets explore that:"
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1142782633740390400

"Hold on a second... Craig Wright claims Microsoft patch Tuesday ruined the forming of the Genesis block between Jan 3 - Jan 9 2009. But Craig... in January 2009, Microsoft patch Tuesday was on the 13th, as usual on the second Tuesday of every month, remember? ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1142793211938783232

   



...

What's the question? - SWIM
- https://youtu.be/DKbQFMOEFTs

...

"Excellent opinion piece regarding Kleiman v Wright by @danielkelman who is: "a lawyer licensed in New York, a solicitor licensed in Hong Kong, and a foreign-registered lawyer in Taiwan." ... " *NSFW*
- https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1142778840210714624

Opinion on Current Issues in Kleiman v. Wright - SWIM *NSFW*
- https://medium.com/@danielkelman/opinion-on-current-issues-in-kleiman-v-wright-4240e4fcfd5

[seoincorporation]

Great thread! 

Is awesome to see how we can easily become a faketoshi with the necessary proof just by some hacking and forking. Y will try to do it by my self just to understand in the process how this work, but the logic behind it is clear, thanks again for this information.