SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[Phinnaeus Gage]

And now Jimmy is roasting Craig with a metadata analysis:

https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1164347761799471105

"Dear all. Could I please encourage you all to *download* Craig Wrights version of the Bitcoin White paper to your thumb or hard drive. I will explain later. I have archived it so you can choose to download from either source.
https://t.co/GbvincPd0B?amp=1
https://t.co/rcO3dp94wU?amp=1 "

Then do the same with the real WP on bitcoin.org

Tool used to extract metadata: https://t.co/wtBgxCeE0N?amp=1

Creation date of the original WP:


Then you've got the "Craig's touch"


Whitepaper Created in 2009 but modified in...........................................2008

You can read the whole thread, it's short and fun.

Proof by Metadata is Proof of Troll

What is your anno trust Level again ?

 

Proof by Craig is a forgery.


What is your anno trust Level again ?

"I just farted my anus trust level. It smells like Nirvana Crypto Spirit."

[1714062578]

1714062578

[Iamtutut]

Can't face your cult is based on fraud, poor you.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Can't face your cult is based on fraud, poor you.

[Iamtutut]

And now Jimmy is roasting Craig with a metadata analysis:

https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1164347761799471105

"Dear all. Could I please encourage you all to *download* Craig Wrights version of the Bitcoin White paper to your thumb or hard drive. I will explain later. I have archived it so you can choose to download from either source.
https://t.co/GbvincPd0B?amp=1
https://t.co/rcO3dp94wU?amp=1 "

Then do the same with the real WP on bitcoin.org

Tool used to extract metadata: https://t.co/wtBgxCeE0N?amp=1

Creation date of the original WP:


Then you've got the "Craig's touch"


Whitepaper Created in 2009 but modified in...........................................2008

You can read the whole thread, it's short and fun.

Proof by Metadata is Proof of Troll

What is your anno trust Level again ?

 

Proof by Craig is a forgery.


What is your anno trust Level again ?

"I just farted my anus trust level. It smells like Nirvana Crypto Spirit."

Smells like a shitcoin......Oh well, it's a shitcoin !

[hv_]

And now Jimmy is roasting Craig with a metadata analysis:

https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1164347761799471105

"Dear all. Could I please encourage you all to *download* Craig Wrights version of the Bitcoin White paper to your thumb or hard drive. I will explain later. I have archived it so you can choose to download from either source.
https://t.co/GbvincPd0B?amp=1
https://t.co/rcO3dp94wU?amp=1 "

Then do the same with the real WP on bitcoin.org

Tool used to extract metadata: https://t.co/wtBgxCeE0N?amp=1

Creation date of the original WP:


Then you've got the "Craig's touch"


Whitepaper Created in 2009 but modified in...........................................2008

You can read the whole thread, it's short and fun.

Proof by Metadata is Proof of Troll

What is your anno trust Level again ?

 

Proof by Craig is a forgery.


What is your anno trust Level again ?

"I just farted my anus trust level. It smells like Nirvana Crypto Spirit."

Smells like a shitcoin......Oh well, it's a shitcoin !

Nope. If u wanna piss on BSV, u piss on Satoshi.

Altering to Segshit is the shitcoin

[TheNewAnon135246]

Posted on Twitter:

Newest court records show the extent of Wright's BitMessage forgery. Previously the only public images obscured all but one address. Now we see that all messages purportedly from Dave were sent by a v4 addr, a format that did not exist until >1y later. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/270/4/kleiman-v-wright/ (source)

[RivAngE]

What is entertaining is how the BSV believers will find any kind of unthinkable basis to deny the provided proof, no matter how unreasonable their basis for denial is!

They are no believers or supporters at this point, they are a cult!
At least they are not dangerous!

[TheNewAnon135246]

I'd love to hear Craig's opinion on the latest court ruling (denying the dismissal of the Wright vs Kleiman case).

[TheBeardedBaby]

When all this saga ends, Craig should face some jail-time just because he must be held accountable for attempting to lie to the court under oath and impersonating Satoshi for personal gain. Pure conman damaging the Bitcoin image and dividing the bitcoin society (not really but there are still some fools thinking he is satoshi).
 

[Iamtutut]

And now Jimmy is roasting Craig with a metadata analysis:

https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1164347761799471105

"Dear all. Could I please encourage you all to *download* Craig Wrights version of the Bitcoin White paper to your thumb or hard drive. I will explain later. I have archived it so you can choose to download from either source.
https://t.co/GbvincPd0B?amp=1
https://t.co/rcO3dp94wU?amp=1 "

Then do the same with the real WP on bitcoin.org

Tool used to extract metadata: https://t.co/wtBgxCeE0N?amp=1

Creation date of the original WP:


Then you've got the "Craig's touch"


Whitepaper Created in 2009 but modified in...........................................2008

You can read the whole thread, it's short and fun.

Proof by Metadata is Proof of Troll

What is your anno trust Level again ?

 

Proof by Craig is a forgery.


What is your anno trust Level again ?

"I just farted my anus trust level. It smells like Nirvana Crypto Spirit."

Smells like a shitcoin......Oh well, it's a shitcoin !

Nope. If u wanna piss on BSV, u piss on Satoshi.

Altering to Segshit is the shitcoin

I piss on faketoshi, the guy in the picture.

[Iamtutut]

Craig forgetoshi (I have to copyright this) was, in 2012, caught with.......................................................................Plag iarism. I know, it's on a daily basis.

http://attrition.org/errata/plagiarism/it_regulatory_standards_compliance_handbook.html

Found on twitter, courtesy of @PonsDeSerres

[Iamtutut]

You like backdating ? Here you are dear Ladies and Sirs:

https://twitter.com/verretor/status/1164826165535633413

"Faketoshi uploaded 3 new documents. Date posted removed.
Date Written: April 17, 2007

Producer / Creator: Microsoft® Word for Office 365 (Released June 28, 2011)
Created: Thu 22 Aug 2019 05:52:22 PM EDT
Modified: Thu 22 Aug 2019 05:52:22 PM EDT

abstract_id = 3441212, 3441239, 3441263

30 Jun 2017 = 2993791
25 Jul 2017 = 3004026
2 Apr 2018 = 3151940
4 Nov 2018 = 3265146
7 Jan 2019 = 3305528
Hidden = 3438946"

[cryptodevil]

Craig: "I am Satoshi!"

Us: "Ok, can you sign a message with a key Satoshi would have had?"

Craig: *writes rambling diatribe about how keys are not proof of ownership*

Us: "Well, sure, being in possession of a private key does not necessarily prove you are the owner of either the key or the property the key grants access to, but the burden of proof is yours to support your claim to be Satoshi and your signing of a message with a key we know Satoshi originally owned at some point would then transfer the onus on to us to prove you are not the original owner of said key, surely?"

Craig: "You're all supporters of terrorists and paedophiles!"

[hv_]

Winds of change for a Central Core News

https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-bitcoin-white-paper-ssrn-says-i-am-satoshi-nakamoto/

Dont piss against the wind...

[Iamtutut]

Winds of change for a Central Core News

https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-bitcoin-white-paper-ssrn-says-i-am-satoshi-nakamoto/

Dont piss against the wind...

Usual BSV shill bullshit.

https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-again-claims-authorship-of-bitcoin-white-paper
The SSRN (formerly the Social Science Research Network), is a repository and international journal for the sharing of scholarly research. The service is owned by major publishing house Elsevier, and allows paper authors (or those claiming to be) to upload pdfs of their work.

The hosting site does not peer-review papers that are uploaded, according to its website. Uploads are reviewed by SSRN staff “to ensure that the paper is a part of the scholarly discourse in its subject area.” It also asks authors to self-certify that the information submitted is correct.

https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/ssrn-faq/#include_paper
2. Is my paper eligible for inclusion and public display in SSRN's eLibrary?   
"SSRN does not provide peer review for papers in the eLibrary."

[TheNewAnon135246]

Winds of change for a Central Core News

https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-bitcoin-white-paper-ssrn-says-i-am-satoshi-nakamoto/

Dont piss against the wind...

The author of the article on Twitter: "Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright claims he did. But there are inconsistencies in his account." (source)

Craig fucked up the metadata......again.

[tmfp]

[arewethereyet?]

Look at me, look at me.

Desperate twat.

[Iamtutut]

Even in law this guy is a joke.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Exactly how Satoshi envisioned Bitcoin will be according to ALL his early pennings.

Now if you'll excuse me, back to improving my invention I call The CSW Device^®™