Interesting, even if barely legible, and ultimately just nonsense.
That is a very unscientific expression. Emotional talk you have to do at a pub. Not to express blunt statements without proof.
I spent a bit reading through the
guy's tweets and his English isn't as good as Satoshi's. He makes basic grammatical mistakes whereas Satoshi's English was near flawless, indicative of a native speaker.
If is never stated I am a native speaker of the English language. My wjhite paper was reviewed by Hal himself. Surprised.
As the person who did write the first prototype did use my shared account.
Do you really thing all talent is born in regions they do speak English or we all speak perfect English. Well visit India and talk to IT engineers.
One of the reasons I did use @gmx in Germany was the fact I am from Belgium, besides the point I do not trust Google or Microsoft.
But I understand Your mistakes. You assume all, the one who did code, before Gavin Andreesen, is the same guy as me.
You are really sure ?
And then you have these reply tweets from a couple prominent bitcoin developers, regarding the PGP key offered up by Debo:
@orionwlFWIW, there are no known messages signed by that key, but it was distributed along with early bitcoin, so it could be satoshi's real key
mind the uncertainty: my signing it was a mistake about how gpg web of trust is supposed to work at the time, and I revoked it later
If You doubt pgp key PGP key: 0x18C09E865EC948A1 is the valid key of Satoshi Nakamoto, then You need to read again bitcoin.it
and You should study the history of bitcoin. I think You lack basic knowledge of the history of bitcoin. It was trust signed not only by
all core developers but also by Hal Finney himself, as the Bitcoin Foundation was informed of this key. It was more then 10 years on the net.
That is a fact. So please, legendary here to spend your time, but you spread nonsense.
@peterktoddI signed it based on circumstantial evidence that I still believe; PGP WoT isn't a strict protocol; use your common sense in interpreting it.
Pete Todd is not God. I did speak a few times with him only, mainly about, hm, ethics, values and points of view. Not that much technical things.
Oh yes, and his bitstamp stuff or something. And he was one of those who did warn me about the interview Gavin had with the authorities, I think.
But he was not that close to me like Hal Finney. I did talk only a few times, with Gavin as well, directly.
That said, I have no reason to think that the Twitter account @realSatoshiN is really Satoshi Nakamoto.
He said nothing wrong here. I did not yet provide conclusive proof, but nobody else but me did write the court in Florida to counter the statements of Craig Wright.
I saw nobody else do the same to counter his perjury.
And I said since 2014, the final proof is to digitally sign.
If You did read my tweets, all my tweets since 2014, You would also have seen since that day,
I did insist any claimant would digitally sign with the Genesis block, the PGP key and I tell You even more.
You all look to the first transaction to Hal Finney. But everyone is very silent about the full content of the hardcoded hash.
Beside the fact I did register the white paper before publishing it on the internet at a Belgian notary, I also did encoded personal data.
So in worse case scenario, I only need to replicate the process to generate the hash, step by step, and You will all read my personal data.
And I assure You all, this is not the name Craig Wright You will read.
I say this to those big mouth, some 'legendary' here, some of them became famous because I did talk to them here on my old account.
Be really carefull what You state. Because when I digitally sign, for sure You will look like a fool.
If You are smart, You consider everything possible, until it is proven wrong or right.
But to talk like in a pub, that is not a mature and proper scientific attitude.
I remember, when I did spread my idea, I had mockery from the p2p community, coders, hackers.
That attitude is not constructive. Those who did mock those days, they can be ashamed now, because bitcoin, blockchain became
a great project, wordwide success. It is a hive project, the queen is as important as every bee. It is a blueprint for cooperation and
a model to show the world, people can work together. Not in competition but by cooperation.
But those who always start to criticize, to mock, the spread emotional statements (without proof), like pub talk,
You are the guys who kill very often beautiful idea's. The worse parts in this story is, You claim yourself 'experts'.
Well put Your real name here, when I digitally sign, people will have some reference to Your ' expertise', so You can join the group,
You did mock, did try to poison my invention in the early days.
All the Best,
Satoshi Nakamoto
@realsatoshin
