SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[BitcoinFX]

Hahaha ...

Have transacted on both BTC and BSV chains, both work fine.
We are in uncharted territory, nobody knows what's going to happen in the next year/ 10 year.
It's always wise to spread risk.

What's going to happen is the BSV blockchain is going to be filled with pointless useless data and transactions will end up being slower than BTC.

BSV might be running OK now, but just watch what happens. Mark my words. At best it becomes centralized, at worst totally borked.

BSV is not the World Brain. It also cannot be the internet of everything.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Brain

...

*Satire*
Team America: World Police (10/10) Movie CLIP - Dicks, Pussies and Assholes (2004) HD
- https://youtu.be/32iCWzpDpKs *NSFW* *Not Suitable For Proof-of-Work* *Warning: Explicit Language*

[1714070975]

1714070975

[Phinnaeus Gage]

THEYMOS HELP!
CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC!

Apologies for not saying the next in a civil tone ...

Go fuck yourself, you fuckin moron. Hey, dude, would still believe in your preacher if he was caught fucking your son in his ass? If so, carry on, else, exit the gene pool.

As for if theymos opts to lock this thread, I'm ready to serve his dog the following ...

[Bitcoin SV]

Go fuck yourself, you fuckin moron. Hey, dude, would still believe in your preacher if he was caught fucking your son in his ass? If so, carry on, else, exit the gene pool.

As for if theymos opts to lock this thread, I'm ready to serve his dog the following ...

THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING

[RivAngE]

BSV Team - Are community of honesty peoples, supporters, volunteers, coders etc.

BSV is not only CSW & Ayre.

Don't touch BSV, trolls. Send all your claims to CSW

Theymos, sorry please if something offended you

BSV Team

Claiming that a fork (of a fork) of Bitcoin is 'BitCoin' is dishonest and fraudulous. Anyone actively supporting BSV is as dishonest as Faketoshi himself.

Come on, stop it, they are not dishonest! They are simply delusional.
Don't harsh people with mental illness man!

I really feel sorry for all the people who are just starting and trying to understand crypto though... so much shit and misinformation.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Go fuck yourself, you fuckin moron. Hey, dude, would still believe in your preacher if he was caught fucking your son in his ass? If so, carry on, else, exit the gene pool.

As for if theymos opts to lock this thread, I'm ready to serve his dog the following ...

THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING

"Teacher theymos, LOOK at that they're doing WHAT ARE THEY DOING!!!"

New contest: Name an item that you'd love to see stuck up Bitcoin SV's ass. Albeit he may like it, I'll start with ...

[TheNewAnon135246]

BSV Team - Are community of honesty peoples, supporters, volunteers, coders etc.

BSV is not only CSW & Ayre.

Don't touch BSV, trolls. Send all your claims to CSW

Theymos, sorry please if something offended you

BSV Team

Claiming that a fork (of a fork) of Bitcoin is 'BitCoin' is dishonest and fraudulous. Anyone actively supporting BSV is as dishonest as Faketoshi himself.

Come on, stop it, they are not dishonest! They are simply delusional.
Don't harsh people with mental illness man!

I really feel sorry for all the people who are just starting and trying to understand crypto though... so much shit and misinformation.

Yes, they are dishonest. They're actively promoting Craig as Satoshi and trying to convince people that their centralized altcoin is Bitcoin.

[nutildah]

...
As for if theymos opts to lock this thread, I'm ready to serve his dog the following ...

THEYMOS HELP! CLOSE THIS TROLL'S TOPIC! LOOK WHAT ARE THEY DOING

I fail to see the problem here.

[JohnBitCo]

Theymos! Please help! Close this troll's topic. Look what they have doing

And what are you doing here today. Supporting the Ponzi. Ahh

CSW is co-author of Bitcoin and BSV is Original Bitcoin.

BSV - is Original Bitcoin.

In this topic, complete freedom of speech and anarchy

That's why BSV is Original Bitcoin (Satoshi Vision)

[BitcoinFX]

"fake team member and plagiarized white paper" and more ...

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

This ^

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

"Open BSV License
Copyright (c) 2019 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

1 - The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
2 - The Software, and any software that is derived from the Software or parts thereof,
can only be used on the Bitcoin SV blockchains. The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" and
the test blockchains that are supported by the un-modified Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.



Version 0.1.1 of the Bitcoin SV software, and prior versions of software upon which it was based,
were licensed under the MIT License, which is included below.

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
Copyright (c) 2009-2015 Bitcoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2009-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin ABC developers
Copyright (c) 2018 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE."

...

Which came first the chicken or the egg ?

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

It's time to BUILD, a solid legal case against BSV. - SWIM

...

- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/07/blockstream-commits-patent-nonaggression

...

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (5/8) Movie CLIP - Invincible Sword Goddess (2000) HD
- https://youtu.be/X5SaZ8EmSpw *Satire*

Ed Sheeran - You Need Me, I Don't Need You [Official Video]
- https://youtu.be/ZXvzzTICvJs *NSFW*

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

CSW is co-author of Bitcoin and BSV is Original Bitcoin.

Digest my post above. I just proved to you that BSV is not Bitcoin. It's a fork at block height #556767 .

 

[Bitcoin SV]

Theymos! Please help! Close this troll's topic.

Nutildah - is scam. Bitcoin SV - is not scam. Wake up

[TheNewAnon135246]

Theymos! Please help! Close this troll's topic.

Nutildah - is scam. Bitcoin SV - is not scam. Wake up

I fail to see how Nutildah is scam.

[Bitcoin SV]

Theymos! Please help! Close this topic, created by troll

[TheNewAnon135246]

Theymos! Please help! Close this topic, created by troll

Please stay on topic. This topic is filled with verifiable evidence that Bitcoin SV is a fraudulous project and that Craig Wright is the biggest fraud in the crypto space. Feel free to debunk any of them or stop crying.

[BitcoinFX]

More evidence that BSV supporters don't understand the world they are living in, let alone Bitcoin.

Miners are running the show, the backbone, the creation of blocks, the verification of everything

If they don't do all such, they might get orphaned and risk losing chunks of money or even entire long term investments.

It is redicules to believe some reconciliation with thick clients (slow nodes) on RasPI piss would do anything good

Watch this

https://mobile.twitter.com/ZeroNoncense/status/1188187298652930049?s=20

Too bad that almost all BSV transactions are being made by the same handful of addresses.

What? Are you saying they're... spamming to fake their transactions? Say it isn't so cause I need to believe!

Given all the spam that disappeared from bitcoin once the block size battle was resolved it doesn't surprise me they'd do something like that.

Define SPAM, especially on BitCoin where it costs fees to send txs.

I ll give u a hint

How about productive network capacity demonstration or real use.

Spam happens on free internet, metanet will fix all that

You've been here long enough to not be so clueless.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Spam_transactions

The network was being spammed to inflate the transactions in order to attempt to justify increasing the block size. And yes, it costs money and they were willing to do that. When they didn't get their way, miraculously they started bitcoin cash and the spam on bitcoin went away. Go figure.

No, not spam again. Rather expensive pointing out / voting for having enough exzess capacity that is needed for exponential growing social networks.

Yes, I m long enough here to get that

Learn, ppl only change things for the good after they got hurt - or better, by figuring out where is better incentives

"... "Information wants to be free" is an expression that means all people should be able to access information freely. ..."

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free

...

HINT: Freedom of speech and freedom of expression becomes unfree when/if it has to be paid for, as per. the entire BSV model.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

This thread utilizing self-moderation or twetch users having to effectively pay for content which is already freely available elsewhere, for example.

BSV doesn't solve any real world problems, it creates problems.

BSV is fascism.

...

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

While I am unsure on the matter, I think nChain has the largest portfolio of patents in the crypto currency and Blockchain space. Not knowing your definition of "patent troll" -- not exactly a dictionary term -- I really have no way to respond to your question.

Incidentally, the title of 'your dev' is a complete non-sequitur, seeing as 'dev' is pretty universally applied to 'the peeps who write the code'. An activity that CSW (am I safe in assuming it is him to which you refer?) pays others to do. And, of course, that whole 'your' thing.
 
Though whatever the outcome of that little sidebar, it sheds exactly zero light upon the questionable relevance of the quoted tirade by BitcoinFX.

Try again? Or let BitcoinFX speak for him/herself?

"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something. Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent. So trying to get a patent on something somebody else invented and implemented in code would be futile. ..."

No shit. Relevance?

Did you somehow forget your dev is crypto's biggest patent troll?

Apparently being a fraud and a conman wasn't low enough for him.

This ^

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

"Open BSV License
Copyright (c) 2019 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

1 - The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
2 - The Software, and any software that is derived from the Software or parts thereof,
can only be used on the Bitcoin SV blockchains. The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" and
the test blockchains that are supported by the un-modified Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE.



Version 0.1.1 of the Bitcoin SV software, and prior versions of software upon which it was based,
were licensed under the MIT License, which is included below.

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
Copyright (c) 2009-2015 Bitcoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2009-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin ABC developers
Copyright (c) 2018 Bitcoin Association

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
THE SOFTWARE."

...

Which came first the chicken or the egg ?

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

It's time to BUILD, a solid legal case against BSV. - SWIM

...

- https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/07/blockstream-commits-patent-nonaggression

...

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (5/8) Movie CLIP - Invincible Sword Goddess (2000) HD
- https://youtu.be/X5SaZ8EmSpw *Satire*

You fail to establish any relevancy for your spouting. You also seem to have a rather flawed understanding of IP law. Lesson one: patents and copyrights are two completely different things.

Exactly what point do you think you are making by quoting the Open BSV License?

Patent Troll ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll
- https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/patent_troll



Do you honestly think I don't know the difference (or similarities) between a patent and copyright.

Completely moronic.

BSV is a copy of a copy of original Bitcoin (BTC) which was forked at BCH block height #556767. It's in the BSV 'source code' repo.

Totally moronic.

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

"You ain't even lord of your yard." - SWIM

...

STORMZY - SHUT UP
- https://youtu.be/RqQGUJK7Na4 *Satire* *NSFW*

...

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong ! Still waiting.

What in heaven's name are you talking about?

Where is a proof that CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin?

Prove me wrong or piss off from BSV, trolls! Still waiting.

There is no 100% proof  - never will.

just watch his latest interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xap67QIrBNc

I do not like a villain either.

Currently looking at CSW's claims in regards to leaving Bitcoin because of Silk Road etc.,

Here is a recent post of mine that was deleted from the moderated BSV thread in the alt. boards of this forum ...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Reasons why Satoshi left

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=175.0

... Sirius, Theymos and others didn t.

 

TBH that thread is one of the reasons I initially left this forum and Bitcoin (returning in 2013).

I don't know if that thread is a reason the real Satoshi left. However, forums are places for open (and private) discussions concerning many subject topics, hence the reason why forums (or threads) should not be used to help spread 'false' narratives and/or mis-information!

Note that I did not post anything in that thread and neither did the 'Satoshi' forum account either.

The thread originator is this guy ...
- https://www.askgamblers.com/forum/topic/3057-dragons-tale-an-introduction/
- https://bensonsamuel.com/tag/andrew-tepper/

~ Who potentially owes people (including myself) a lot of money (bitcoin) for running a then unlicensed?!? and untested ('live' in-development / play-testing), gambling environment with highly questionable (unprovable!?!) odds, whilst clearly presenting a more dubious sense of morality here ... etc., ?!?

I cannot speak for Sirius, Theymos and others posting in that thread (Gavin Andresen included!).

Moreover though, two wrongs don't make a right!

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.0
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.msg49823597#msg49823597

P.S. I only do truth, I have nothing to hide!

P.P.S. If CSW ever 'proves' he is/was one of Satoshi he/they (and/or) his companies are also going to potentially be owing myself (and many others) a lot of money (bitcoin).

Wondering if anyone knows of any links (even tenuous) between this fellow, CSW and/or Calvin Ayre ?

Basically, it seems quite remarkable to myself that DT was available so soon after Bitcoin's release.

So, CSW's own affirmative defense in his self proclaimed creation of Bitcoin and others usage for 'bad' things is ...

Ignorantia juris non excusat
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

Diminished responsibility
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminished_responsibility

...

Affirmative defense
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_defense
The insanity plea ? or Burden of proof ?



...

Hello everyone! I have some interesting thoughts to put forward about Hal Finney being Satoshi. (I don't know if they are new or not)

I would say that Craig Wright is a liar and maybe Hal Finney is the creator of Bitcoin because:

* Hal Finney died because of complications with ALS in 2014. (Bitcoin was created in 2009)
* Only a dying person has no interest in fame or money and that is why he hid is name and worked for a greater cause, to revolutionise and discourage centralised banking systems.
* Why would someone like Craig Wright try to be 100% private and then all of a sudden become public? He also only became public AFTER Hal Finney's death.

"Craig Wright - Lying about Hal Finney once more. 🤦‍♂️

Craig recently claimed in public that "cypherpunk-affiliated developers like Hal Finney held patents".

Nope. It's a lie, Craig. A few of Hal's emails are referenced in 8 patents, that's all. But he had no patents himself."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1187762788430684166

...

"Craig Wright - Do. Not. F*ck. With. Hal. Finney.

After putting his shit on the Bitcoin legacy of OGs like @marttimalmi, he's now going after Hal Finney.

Don't do that, Craig. You're making a #Faketoshi fool of yourself again."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1173953365342117893

...

The  #faketoshi  fraud  TIMELINE
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/ponsdeserres.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

...

R.I.P. Hal.

...

They're Dead Dave - Red Dwarf - BBC
- https://youtu.be/6Hrwut2dV0k

...

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148607.msg51291248#msg51291248

My life is quite hard sometimes, because I've remained an honest broker (seemingly unlike TraderCobb) and most certainly CSW.

I'm a 'last man standing' and I intend to firmly remain a Cypherpunk 'Nightmare' ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

I do care. Prove me wrong ! Still waiting. Still just getting started.  

...

Daft Punk - Harder Better Faster (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/gAjR4_CbPpQ

[PYREXCOIN]

there is only one Bitcoin as BTC and we all Satoshi

[BitcoinFX]

Regurgitating the same misinformation over and over ... It's already been fully debunked and redacted ...

"no sh*te sherlock"
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1188886282388361223

Gavin Andersen has confirmed that CSW has private keys from first block.

You must to understand, that CSW is co-author of Bitcoin.

These hackers (anonymous part of Satoshi Nakamoto's team) will never reveal themselves. Until then, we will consider CSW a founder of Bitcoin (Original Bitcoin now, Satoshi Vision)

...snip...

Wrong ! and he redacted it later on ...

Gavin Andresen: It Was a Mistake to Blog Claiming Craig Wright Is Satoshi
- https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/

and ...

(Failed) verification of the signature posted by Craig Wright on May 2, 2016

- https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification

and ...

Prove to the world you are Satoshi Nakamoto*
*not really

- https://albacore.io/faketoshi

...

Let's forget personalities and agendas for a moment, humor us ...


Imagine being the originator (or not) of a project released to the world as free and open source software.

Imagine returning to the project years later and being unable to provide any publicly verifiable proof whatsoever of being said originator.

Imagine creating a copy of a copy of said project and then claiming it to be the original project.

Imagine trying to copyright and patent said software without proving that your the originator.

Imagine instead providing a plethora of proven false information and forged documents to the contrary and in a court of law.

Imagine being part of a community that would think any of the above was OK either now or in the future.

Imagine trying to solve a transaction volume scaling issue by instead storing unlimited amounts of data on chain.

Imagine thinking its OK to endorse other software developers to effectively build on quick sand.

Imagine being a crypto exchange that thinks its OK to list and allow trade of the forked chain against itself.

Imagine being a regulator, law maker or law enforcer that allows the above to persist.

Imagine thinking the above is a vision of sound money, a store of value or digital cash.

Imagine patenting a free and open source software protocol (effectively copyleft) and thinking you might try to enforce them.

Imagine following, supporting or investing in any of the above.

Imagine thinking that big business is not going to see straight through all of this and is going to use and embrace it wholeheartedly.


CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Prove me wrong !

Gavin is a three letter agency mole, who should kindly return the 500 BTC I sent to his faucet.

...

I dont like eos or other illegal ICOs
But Brock Pierce has some good points here

https://youtu.be/ym3gk05iAQQ


Finally BitCoin can do all what we need

Sufficient decentralized and full compliant


Sigh - haters gonna hate - cannot fix that

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Pierce



Kasabian - eez-eh
- https://youtu.be/ST6nEvIEY4s

...

"Original #Bitcoin protocol was launched in Jan 2009 and has had its ticker stolen twice by others forking away from Bitcoin.  Now Bitcoin is only #BSV.  the last fork when the soupers left got ride of the last of those blocking Bitcoins abilities so independance day."
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1188675794408804352

...

Erm ... NO !

DERP: "Is Time Linear, or Can the Future Influence the Past?" ...

...

"CoinGeek Conference - World’s first Bitcoin BCH BComm Merchant adoption...

#Bitcoin
#BitcoinCash
#BCH
#VirtualCurrency
#Cryptocurrency
#BTC"
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/997324084630491138

...

The founder of CoinGeek called bitcoin altcoin and spoke in support of Bitcoin.com
- https://medium.com/@lioneltunisiano_4262/the-founder-of-coingeek-called-bitcoin-altcoin-and-spoke-in-support-of-bitcoin-com-ce50da65f9f

...

"Great news on the expansion! @CalvinAyre is stepping up and charging forward with his contribution to #BCH growth:
* Top BCH miner
* Squire mining devices
* Ayre Media
* Coingeek News @RealCoinGeek
* bComm Coingeek Conferences, etc.

Calvin Ayre is going full 'MOGUL MODE.' ..."
- https://twitter.com/TweetyBirdbrain/status/1043552795339706373

...

"hahaha...not the brightest:"
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/990914094340431878

...

"Aaaand... we got another death threat from the BSV camp towards BTC (and BCH).

Is it a flaw? Is it a Genesis block file system? Is it a prunable tree merger?

Meet the Bitcoin Operating System, re-securing the flawed chains! Be very, very afraid... well, maybe not."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1188503263437565953

...

Some folks here seem to have very short memories indeed.

Gorillaz - DARE (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/uAOR6ib95kQ

[ChiBitCTy]

If this has been presented/talked about here already, forgive me.

One of my favorite posts here (or topic in this case) is Satoshi’s “Escrow” thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750.msg8140#msg8140

I see Smart Contracts as one of the most promising technologies in this space so I was pretty excited when I came across this thread.  While Satoshi does not mention “smart contracts” by name, it seems pretty clear that’s exactly what he’s referring to.  I’m no Mr Robot so I asked the person who would know better than anyone-  Nick Szabo (creator of Smart Contracts, bit-gold ..and maybe much more .. wink) . I sent him the link to satoshis post and he confirmed “while a bit vague, yes I believe that’s what Satoshi is referring to”.

I decided to ask Craig Wright a few months later if smart contracts were implemented in to bitcoin and its blockchain. He responded to me saying “yes, I built smart contracts in to bitcoin from day 1”.

In the first paragraph of the Escrow thread Satoshi states -

Here's an outline of the kind of escrow transaction that's possible in software.  This is not implemented and I probably won't have time to implement it soon, but just to let you know what's possible.

I guess there’s a possibility Satoshi wasn’t referring to smart contracts, but it’s seems more likely than not that’s exactly what he was referring to.

So pointing out the obvious..Craig told me he built these contracts in on day one, directly conflicting with Satoshis own words, stating he had not had time to implement the tech yet nor will be able to anytime soon. Just seems like another small but obvious gaff in Craig’s web of lies.

[BitcoinFX]

If this has been presented/talked about here already, forgive me.

One of my favorite posts here (or topic in this case) is Satoshi’s “Escrow” thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750.msg8140#msg8140

I see Smart Contracts as one of the most promising technologies in this space so I was pretty excited when I came across this thread.  While Satoshi does not mention “smart contracts” by name, it seems pretty clear that’s exactly what he’s referring to.  I’m no Mr Robot so I asked the person who would know better than anyone-  Nick Szabo (creator of Smart Contracts, bit-gold ..and maybe much more .. wink) . I sent him the link to satoshis posts and he confirmed “while a bit vague, yes I believe that’s what Satoshi is referring to”.

I decided to ask Craig Wright a few months later if smart contracts were implemented in to bitcoin and its blockchain. He responded to me saying “yes, I built smart contracts in to bitcoin from day 1”.

In the first paragraph of the Escrow thread Satoshi states -

Here's an outline of the kind of escrow transaction that's possible in software.  This is not implemented and I probably won't have time to implement it soon, but just to let you know what's possible.

I guess there’s a possibility Satoshi wasn’t referring to smart contracts, but it’s seems more likely than not that’s exactly what he was referring to.

So pointing out the obvious..Craig told me he built these contracts in on day one, directly conflicting with Satoshis own words, stating he had not had time to implement the tech yet nor will be able to anytime soon. Just seems like another small but obvious gaff in Craig’s web of lies.

Good one !

Please feel free to submit any additional information here:

- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/contact.html

...

Arthur and the team will gladly take care of it for you ...

*Satire*

[BitcoinFX]

More #Gigamegs lolz ...

Coincodecap lists BSV as dead project -- Last commit 6 months ago, no roadmap

https://www.reddit.com/r/bsv/comments/docgd7/coincodecap_lists_bsv_as_dead_project_last_commit/



 

Oh NO! An anonymous troll says a secretive upgrade has been made in secret!! Whatever will we do??!

The reason why they are not publishing updates to GitHub is because they don't want anyone pointing out how silly they are. 'Just say "no" to open source peer review.' - BSV motto

I don't know about you but I would rather use software that has been scoured for imperfections hundreds of times over rather than a black box protocol pushed by a con artist.

Exactly. Complete and utter FUDsters ...



...



As this fellow tweeted in response below, imagine believing that the Genesis block is executable code ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable

"LuLZ. So the world's best software engineers and hackers (both white and black hat) have been using this open-source code for a decade and they missed a filesystem in the genesis block?  Also, do these nutjobs even realise the genesis block is not executable code?"
- https://twitter.com/crypto_skillz/status/1188527007568519168

...

"Gonna go out on a limb and say no.

Occam's Razor is usually right."
- https://twitter.com/Bitcoin_Beyond/status/1188604590914244609

They actually had to ask each other about this! ROFL.



...

"Then I assume BSV'ers are running nodes from a binary with unknown code now? I am sure that will not result in loss of funds ... 🤣"
- https://twitter.com/Lec29560622/status/1188857727424090115

"Centralized mining - in progress, check
Centralized development - check
Centralized usage - Calvin invests in most apps, check
Following the whitepaper - pumping shitloads of data in the blockchain, uncheck

So Bitcoin. So Satoshi Vision. 🤦‍♂️"
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1188861183182417921

...

Yep, so probably best to continue mining BTC instead ...

"since I mine BTC to support original #Bitcoin #BSV with the revenues, BTC going up in price is actually still good for BSV.  However it is still shocking how undervalued the worlds only true utility platform tokens still are in comparison to zero utility BTC."
- https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1189050522243928064

[TheNewAnon135246]

BSV Twitter is a sad echo chamber. Everyone repeats the same thing over and over again but nobody can answer simple questions like:

- Where did Satoshi ever mention turning a p2p cash system into a storage system for weather data?
- How do you expect new mining pools to sync a full node when using 1TB blocks?
- What do you think about all of the expert witnesses in the Wright vs Kleiman case?