SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[BitcoinFX]

I just downloaded the latest CourtListener entry. Looks like Kleiman wants to nail Craig on purgery:

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
1. Admit Ira never told You he would release any claim against You in exchange for CoinExch shares.
2. Admit Ira never told You W&K Info Defense Research LLC would release any claim it had against You in exchange for Coin-Exch shares.
3. Admit the Estate of Dave Kleiman was not, in any capacity, a party in any proceeding You were involved in before the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
4. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
5. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
6. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v. W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
7. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
8. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).  
9. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Statement of Claims that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
10. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
11. Admit that You did not serve the Estate of Dave Kleiman with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
12. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
13. Admit that You did not serve Ira with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
14. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
15. Admit that You did not serve W&K Info Defense Research LLC with the Consent Orders that were filed in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
16. Admit that You were never appointed “Director / Authorized Agent” of Defendant W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
17. Admit that Jamie Wilson was not an “authorized officer” of W&K Info Defense Research LLC.
18. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/245661).
19. Admit that Jamie Wilson did not have authority from W&K Info Defense Research LLC to consent to judgment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales case Wright v W&K Info Defense Research LLC (2013/225983).
20. Admit that You cannot access the satoshin@gmx.com, satoshi@vistomail.com, and satoshi@anonymousspeech.com email accounts.
21. Admit that you mined bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
22. Admit that you mined at least 100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
23. Admit that you mined at least 200,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
24. Admit that you mined at least 300,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
25. Admit that you mined at least 400,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
26. Admit that you mined at least 500,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
27. Admit that you mined at least 600,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
28. Admit that you mined at least 700,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
29. Admit that you mined at least 800,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
30. Admit that you mined at least 821,050 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013
31. Admit that you mined at least 900,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
32. Admit that you mined at least 1,000,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.  
33. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,000 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
34. Admit that you mined at least 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
35. Admit you mined more than 1,100,111 bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
36. Admit that at least 821,050 bitcoins you mined before April 26, 2013 remain unspent.
37. Admit that at least 100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
38. Admit that at least 200,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
39. Admit that at least 300,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
40. Admit that at least 400,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
41. Admit that at least 500,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
42. Admit that at least 600,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.  
43. Admit that at least 700,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
44. Admit that at least 800,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.  
45. Admit that at least 900,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
46. Admit that at least 1,000,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
47. Admit that at least 1,100,000 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.
48. Admit that at least 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.  
49. Admit that more than 1,100,111 of the bitcoin you mined before April 26, 2013 remains unspent.  
50. Admit that bitcoin wallets are identifiable.  
51. Admit that bitcoin public addresses are identifiable.  
52. Admit that you developed intellectual property prior to April 26, 2013.
53. Admit that you developed intellectual property related to bitcoin prior to April 26, 2013.
54. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your partner.
55. Admit that you referred to Dave Kleiman as your best friend.
56. Admit Dave Kleiman trusted you.
57. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman the private keys to any bitcoin public keys.
58. Admit you never had an interest in any bitcoin belonging to Dave Kleiman.
59. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop intellectual property.
60. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop blockchain intellectual property.
61. Admit that Dave Kleiman worked with you to develop Bitcoin.
62. Admit you never had any interest in bitcoin Dave Kleiman mined.
63. Admit that Dave Kleiman never agreed to give you any of the bitcoin he mined.
64. Admit you never gave Dave Kleiman any private keys, in a format plainly accessible to him in their entirety, that correspond to any of the public keys in the coinbase transaction outputs from the blocks you mined.
 
 

More @MyLegacyKit's twitter feed ...

"Bummer, no bonded courier. Long document, few interesting parts added here.

Depositions (note the addition of Andreas Antonopoulos) and Request for Admission."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1212369647439417344

"And some more Admissions. Huge lol @ long list of numbers of Bitcoins Craig supposedly mined.

Zero, guys. Zero."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1212369663637753857

...

CSW 'moving the goal posts' ...

- https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/statement-of-dec-27-2019/

"... So what I will say now is the following.

As I’ve explained in court proceedings, I believe I will receive information in January 2020 that will enable us to identify coins I mined into my companies in 2009 and 2010, but cannot be certain that information will in fact arrive.  I have not said the private keys to those coins would become available, or if so, actually used, in January 2020. ... "

   

...

"#NewProfilePic #Triggered #CraigisSatoshi" #CraigisNotSatoshi #BSVisNotBitcoin



- https://twitter.com/CoinstorageGuru/status/1212842249685356544

"It's from this interview

https://youtu.be/8_SoIXUBIhw?t=3370 …"



- https://twitter.com/Proportionatty/status/1212872528827486208

...

Stiff Bickies !

In other news ...

"Craig Wright says he can’t move his satoshi coins until a bonded courier arrives in a few days.

My guess: He’s going to say the courier’s airship went down over the Mariana Trench and he just needs some extra time to organize a recovery expedition"

Bitcoin’s Purported Creator Says Fortune May Remain Locked
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-27/bitcoin-alleged-creator-says-his-fortune-may-remain-locked

- https://twitter.com/NeerajKA/status/1210639778854641664

...

"i hate this headline. I feel like my grandma will read it and actually think he’s the creator"
- https://twitter.com/_heyEthan/status/1210640686707617792

Shit How much time do I have left to dump before Craiggy boy destroys bitcoin?

Eternity.

Tru dat

   

...

DJ Shadow - Blood on the Motorway (HQ)
- https://youtu.be/H8JWKMZLmAU


"In honor of the new year I have decided to give away an only partially consumed jar of herring to the person who provides the wittiest rejoinder to this tweet."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1212844359529291776

"Are you painting?"
"No, I'm just doing my nails." - SWIM

 

...

"Also, is catsup with melted cheese on matzo technically pizza?"
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1212886139897552898

[1713890202]

1713890202

[1713890202]

1713890202

[1713890202]

1713890202

[1713890202]

1713890202

[1713890202]

1713890202

[Dabs]

CSW giving so many excuses, ... he just can't simply admit that he never had access to anything anyways. Anyone who mined anything back in 2009 would have kept copies or backups, particular those who had more forethought about the future.

[BitcoinFX]

CSW giving so many excuses, ... he just can't simply admit that he never had access to anything anyways. Anyone who mined anything back in 2009 would have kept copies or backups, particular those who had more forethought about the future.

Indeed. #Faketoshi CSW has given many excuses ... aside from the non-existent wallets are we supposed to believe that he also left the corresponding 'Satoshi' GPG key in his cow shed in Bagnoo, NSW ... ?

- https://bitcointalk.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

 

...

Whilst I might be considered frivolous with my own early bitcoins that I solo mined in 2010, I even managed to extract my empty wallets from old hard drives and easily import them into the latest Bitcoin Core release for signing ...

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

... if anyone believes actual Satoshi wouldn't of had forethought about the future, in regards to wallets with coins, they are likely very much mistaken, thus perhaps something very unfortunate did happen here ...

How the likes of Gavin Andresen fell for CSW's antics is beyond the pale, either that or he was already in on this whole charade / failed takeover bid.

 

WTF did just happen?
I possess a JJG star of valor, but this is beyond outrageous.

Your telling me!


Hilarious ... Remember when CSW made an attempt to copyright the Bitcoin whitepaper and actually put his own name on the top of the 1st page ...

- https://cointelegraph.com/news/staking-claim-on-bitcoin-does-craig-wrights-copyright-filing-hold-legal-merit

... well the version at hxxps://bitcoinsv.io/ e.g. hxxps://bitcoinsv.io/bitcoin.pdf is currently the original whitepaper and of course links back to ...

www.bitcoin.org

 

Furthermore, to quote hxxps://bitcoinsv.io/ ... apparently CoinGeek 'created' - BSV ... and not CSW or Satoshi ...

"... Satoshi Vision

Reflecting its mission to fulfil the vision of Bitcoin, the project name represents the “Satoshi Vision” or SV. Created at the request of leading BSV mining enterprise CoinGeek and other miners, Bitcoin SV is intended to provide a clear choice for miners and allow businesses to build applications and websites on it reliably. ..."

 

Also, https://github.com/bitcoin-sv-specs/protocol/blob/master/updates/genesis-spec.md

"Maximum Transaction Size

The size of a transaction is the size in bytes of the serialized form of the transaction[^2].

The maximum size of a transaction is 1GB (1,000,000,000 bytes). This limitation is expected to be lifted in the future."

ROFL ...

BSV folks clearly don't understand that the fees go up when the tx volume goes up with 'utility' / increased usage ...

Unlike BTC (in the main part) this will also include reams and reams of pointless / useless data being uploaded into the blocks as an intended 'feature' of the software ...

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52369283#msg52369283

In short, may all BSV blocks be 1GB+ and then best of luck syncing / downloading the BSV blockchain - let alone reliably accessing the onchain data.

BSV will likely bork itself. Hell, some crazy fool might even try to upload say the entire VX heavens .torrent contents file by file, block by block, or something - god forbid !

 


*Meme*

"Calvin, Craig & others are meeting next week to come up with a plan to pour more fuel on the BSV dumpster fire 😂"



- https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1213384772338245632

...

*Satire*

Fire It Up
- https://youtu.be/kBhYTERzDVE *NSFW* *Do Not Try This At Home*

*More Satire*

The Crow | 'Warning Explosives Ahead' (HD) | Brandon Lee | 1994
- https://youtu.be/PouAPBQ5qnc *NSFW*

[gmaxwell]

I just downloaded the latest CourtListener entry. Looks like Kleiman wants to nail Craig on purgery:

unfortunately the court ruled he doesn't have to respond to that because they filed it too close to the close of discovery. Kind of a dumb decision, considering that the delays are craig's fault...

[BitcoinFX]

I just downloaded the latest CourtListener entry. Looks like Kleiman wants to nail Craig on purgery:

unfortunately the court ruled he doesn't have to respond to that because they filed it too close to the close of discovery. Kind of a dumb decision, considering that the delays are craig's fault...

Surely most of those Request for Admission are par for the course anyway - rather impossible for either side (or the court / judge) to get down to the nitty-gritty without establishing the above.

[Dabs]

Bitcoin SV is intended to provide a clear choice for miners

Maybe the clear choice is to avoid BSV. Or go with the original BTC. I mean Bitcoin. The one that has some value today, at least more than 20 times more than BSV or BCH.

[BitcoinFX]

Self-moderated thread posts get deleted ... so reposting here ...

After segwit BTC is not Bitcoin anymore! This is not Original Bitcoin!

Irony, You sign message Bitcoin segwit address.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
BSV - is Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
3KDJhw9LewyXdfvZ4JQktkTDLfutPbyTxv
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

And wrong format, don't have signature, Read here before sign message: Sign message format

most of payments are carried out in this currency

Nothing

This is how one actually signs and verifies a message in original Bitcoin (BTC) ...

Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft

Craig Wright is an identity thief who has taken the name Satoshi Nakamoto - prove me wrong!

My Old Wallet Address: 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp created 15/02/2010 15:20

Why can't Craig Wright do this? 

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin.

Don't trust, verify.

Signed by BitcoinFX - bitcointalk.org - January 6th, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
G7/SRVNoiHQp0/hWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H+jQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=Project%20Anastasia%3A%20Bitcoiners%20Against%20Identity%20Theft%0A%0ACraig%20Wright%20is%20an%20identity%20thief%20who%20has%20taken%20the%20name%20Satoshi%20Nakamoto%20-%20prove%20me%20wrong!%0A%0AMy%20Old%20Wallet%20Address%3A%201JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp%20created%2015%2F02%2F2010%2015%3A20%0A%0AWhy%20can't%20Craig%20Wright%20do%20this%3F%20%0A%0AVerifying%20my%20(old)%20zero%20balance%20wallet%20address%20for%20blockchain%20research%20etc.%2C%0A%0A-%20https%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D4630066.0%0A%0ANot%20Your%20Private%20Keys%2C%20Not%20Your%20Bitcoin.%0A%0ADon't%20trust%2C%20verify.%0A%0ASigned%20by%20BitcoinFX%20-%20bitcointalk.org%20-%20January%206th%2C%202020&vrSig=G7%2FSRVNoiHQp0%2FhWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H%2BjQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI%3D

- https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp

...

Whilst the identity theft of princess Anastasia is an excellent analogy, I have long thought that the 'Tichborne case' also provides a very fitting example to describe the actions of CSW ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tichborne_case  a.k.a "The Tichborne Claimant"

"... the man who lost himself still walks in history, with no other name than that which the common voice of his day accorded him: the Claimant ..."

...

...snip...

Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

Look at all this comprehensive research into his lies ...

The #faketoshi fraud timeline ...
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

Satoshi ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0

Furthermore, BSV is NOT Original Bitcoin. It is a fork of a fork (a copy of a copy) as described in the BSV license here:

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

Quote: "... The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" ..."

Comprende ?

Until someone can provide some sort of cryptographic evidence (sign from an early address, moving coins, PGP, etc.), then what they say can be rightly ridiculed. If they can provide such evidence, then that doesn't automatically make them Satoshi, but it does warrant further discussion and examination. Signing a message proves ownership; it does not prove identity.

In fact, there's technically nothing that could ever prove Satoshi's identity. Signing from early addresses or Satoshi's PGP key would only muddy the waters. Private keys can be compromised due to security mistakes or even encryption vulnerabilities.

I believe that anybody claiming to be Satoshi ought to be ridiculed and ostracized from the community without question. It's an unprovable claim; believing it requires faith. That's the antithesis of everything Satoshi ever imparted to us, including the Bitcoin software. I'm not going to believe something I cant verify.

Signing is better than not signing. Verifying is better than not verifying.

Multiple Bitcoin address signing (and verification) of early blocks, coupled with account logins (on sourceforge.net , bitcointalk.org , email etc.,) and GPG Key signing, as well as being able to discuss topics on early Bitcoin development and the Bitcoin code with original members of this community would be a good start.

- https://bitcointalk.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Instead we get continually deflecting responses like this from CSW ...

GQ interview with Craig Wright "F##K OFF!"
- https://youtu.be/7YUTq7_vO3A *NSFW*

 



Image Source: @lopp on twitter

"/Shuz" - *Satire* - SWIM
- https://youtu.be/LPBTaVfsfrQ *NSFW*

@nutildah - Oh Gawd ... looks like were going to need another SCAM thread for BCH ...

"I first bought Bitcoin Cash in January of 2011."



- https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/1214231453711527936

...

"Liar. Charlatan. Scammer.

Bitcoin Cash didn't even exist in January of 2011. Bitcoin Cash is a dying fork, one of 70+ Bitcoin knock offs that didn't make it, since August 1, 2017. https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/1214231453711527936 … "



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1214462064527368193

[Hueristic]

3 posts deleted from new scam thread.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

W0w, a new scam thread filled with newbie sockpuppet bumps, great job!

We've never seen that move before.

Here's the real BSV scamcoin thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0

[Iamtutut]

2 posts deleted in the Bitcoin Shit Version thread:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Big Blog Train 2020

It's rolling on stable tracks


Welcome BitCoin getting 11

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-genesis-block-constructed-11-years-ago-today/

did the bonded courier arrive ?

No, only the whip.

AND

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Oh wait, Craig is using another forged document trying (the one he has shown to Modern Concensus) to support his claim...

https://twitter.com/gardling/status/1208054855589355522

Another day, another fail.

[Iamtutut]

During a forum fight against Nullc (Greg Maxwell) on hacker news, Craiggy faketoshi Wright proved again HIMSELF he isn't Satoshi.
How ? He called TWICE Merkle trees "Merkel Tree"...



...Which prompted this on twitter:

https://twitter.com/jronkain/status/1214620961510744071
BEHOLD THE CRAIG WRIGHT MERKEL TREE

[Duncan.Idaho]

Me2 Movement
 

I sense BitcoinFX was deleted since he is quoted in replies but OP is MIA.

3 posts deleted from new scam thread.

"Moderated" thread yet claims to be the true BTC.

Can't handle any critics.  Hmmm ... sounds like a sincere engagement.

BSV exists, it will likely persist, but walling yourself into a garden, on /bitcointalk.org suggest fishy business.

[BitcoinFX]

...snip...

I sense BitcoinFX was deleted since he is quoted in replies but OP is MIA.

3 posts deleted from new scam thread.

"Moderated" thread yet claims to be the true BTC.

Can't handle any critics.  Hmmm ... sounds like a sincere engagement.

BSV exists, it will likely persist, but walling yourself into a garden, on /bitcointalk.org suggest fishy business.

Can confirm 3 more on-topic and informative posts deleted from the self-moderated BSV scammers thread.

As one cannot appeal the self-moderation it is fairly pointless posting. However, most folks do seem to be getting the message regarding BSV on this forum now.

Time to take an alternative action elsewhere!

[gentlemand]

Time to take an alternative action elsewhere!

Someone should start a thread that matches that one in the same section and fans should keep posting so it's always one post above it.

Perhaps - [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision IS A CROCK OF SHIT

[Hueristic]

Time to take an alternative action elsewhere!

Someone should start a thread that matches that one in the same section and fans should keep posting so it's always one post above it.

Perhaps - [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision IS A CROCK OF SHIT

Or

[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision IS A SCAM and here are the deleted posts

And we can post all moderated posts there so that it will always bump when one gets deleted.

A script to do that would be optimal.

[Duncan.Idaho]

A script to do that would be optimal.

 

_{(also may latest POST @bsv which was just a link >> deleted)}

[BitcoinFX]

Reposting here ...

HAPPY BIRTHDAY  BITCOIN

https://coingeek.com/happy-birthday-bitcoin-11-years-since-first-software-release/

Bitcoin is BTC.

Oh good info.
Thank you very much for telling me what news website I should avoid using at all cost.
They use tactics to mix truth with a lie, and maybe some people will catch a bait...

Indeed. As an example of these untruth's, today on Bitcoin's (BTC) network launch day ... CoinGeek has posted the following article ... so, let's debunk it (again!) ...

- https://coingeek.com/happy-birthday-bitcoin-11-years-since-first-software-release/

Quote:

"... As Dr. Craig Wright detailed in his fireside chats at the CoinGeek conferences in Toronto and Seoul in 2019, he worked on the Bitcoin code in his spare time while working at auditing firm BDO. In January 2009 he was finishing up that job, and running a network of 69 computers at separate locations, including his farm in New South Wales... "

...

"Proof-of-Fibre           Craig's cow ranch Bagnoo 2009
1/2

Previously I looked at Craig's claim of having 60+ computers running Bitcoin during Jan 2009. In this part I'll explore his other claim of running those computers from his weekend cow ranch at Bagnoo NSW, Australia"
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1143461228141924353

"Proof-of-Fibre            Craig's cow ranch Bagnoo 2009
2/2 Conclusion

-No record of a fibre-to-the-home link
-Neighbours have poor internet service
-Evidence that at Craig's ranch there was marginal ADSL, satellite and 3G wireless internet available

Conclusion: No fibre"
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1143461241316188160

...

When I started running Bitcoin and joined the network <2010 with fully port forwarded nodes I saw (on average) less than <20 (always on) connections. CSW's alleged number of computers running has also been demonstrated to not match with the mining difficulty on the network or actual number of machines on the network. [citation needed].

Re: Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg42180805#msg42180805

...

"Talking about 69 computers that Craig #Faketoshi Wright claims to have used for Bitcoin in the beginning... total bollocks too of course. @jimmy007forsure did a beautiful thread about that."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1213746750986629120

"Half of those 69 Bitcoin related computers were in his cow ranch in Bagnoo, Craig has claimed.

"I spent money to have fibre laid and opened up a rural town to fast Internet."

Which didn't happen either, of course."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1213947602372366336

...

Quote CoinGeek article:

"... Speaking of that 69 computer network, something (Dr. Wright has referred to as a Microsoft update) caused the machines to restart at some point between the Genesis Block and Block 1, putting nodes in the network out of sync. Wright frantically ran (and drove) between the distant locations over the next few days, buying expensive Microsoft licenses, installing a domain and workgroup and creating a forest and WUS server—a process that “took most of that whole week”. Dr. Wright gives this as the reason for the six-day break between Block 0 and the first mined block.

Hal Finney helped with the code to get it all running again, along with advice from Dave Kleiman. Of Kleiman, Wright said “I wouldn’t be sane or whatever else without him...”

"... Note about the “Microsoft Patch Tuesday” incident:

A few people have pointed out that there wasn’t a Microsoft Patch Tuesday between the 3rd and 9th of January. The first Microsoft Security Bulletin for 2009 was actually released on January 13th, though the company sent out an advance notification on January 8th (the notification wouldn’t have caused any restarts though)..."

...

"A Coingeek #Faketoshi story in 3 images. 🤦‍♂️

"and Dave Kleiman" 😂😂😂😂😂

Source:
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-genesis-block-constructed-11-years-ago-today/ …"



...



...



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1213700471527034880

...

"And Hal Finney only started bug fixing with Satoshi Nakamoto on Jan 10, 2009 which was AFTER the release. No delays there either.

Craig has been lying about these things quite a few times. The real Satoshi would have had these facts straight, of course."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1213728461686218752


"... "There are people who helped when I asked." - #Faketoshi

Meanwhile, the real Satoshi didn't ask, he happily received Hal Finney's first email offering help with "Crash in bitcoin 0.1.0"

That's what you get when #Faketoshi is on a backdating spree. Numerous mistakes. 🤦‍♂️ ..."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1213730851667763200

...

Furthermore ...

Whois Satoshi? Known Satoshi IP addresses? ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155191.0

Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi. BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

EDIT:

Looks like CoinGeek edited the article(s), ... thus proving they indeed publish 'fake news' ...

"😂 hilarious!

Note that Coingeek deleted the disclaimer (screenshot attached) and the article has been rewritten without mentioning the "update"."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1215342366560833543

...

"The first article 6 days ago still says "Also, January 6, 2009, was a Microsoft “Patch Tuesday” which updated and restarted Dr. Wright’s network of 69 machines, throwing them out of sync." though.

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-genesis-block-constructed-11-years-ago-today/ …

Rewrite coming in 1, 2, 3..."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1215343145937928192

Now go here ...

- http://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/

...snip...

"New to Bitcoin? Please, don't be confused.

It's pretty simple. Everything not bearing the ticker BTC is not Bitcoin. So always demand the real thing (which can be bought & used in little pieces called sats!), and at all times, avoid scams & copycats.

Now you're good to go. 👊"

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1201835155725455361

...snip...

[Dabs]

If there is an unmoderated thread version of the BSV thread, post it here. Then we can start posting on the moderated thread, wait until our post gets deleted, then post it in the unmoderated version.

[BitcoinFX]

If there is an unmoderated thread version of the BSV thread, post it here. Then we can start posting on the moderated thread, wait until our post gets deleted, then post it in the unmoderated version.

Done!

[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Satoshi Vision - Unmoderated Thread ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5216304.0

[BitcoinFX]

"District Judge Bloom smacks down Craig's appeal, agrees with the Magistrate Judge that he lacks credibility, says the plaintiffs were prejudiced by "[Craig's] antics", & calls the bonded courier a "mysterious figure...from the shadows". I'm in tears😂

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.373.0.pdf … "


 

 

 
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1215964839861985280

...

The back and forth in that twitter thread between @fluffypony and @CalvinAyre = priceless vs the inconceivable !

 

Portishead - Mysterons
- https://youtu.be/GxWgRnnWfcc

Building Steam With A Grain Of Salt
- https://youtu.be/2KMyeLrNfX0

[Iamtutut]

This is how the BSV scammers are pretending that their chain is used.

ONE SINGLE adress has received 4.3 million Txs which ALL seem of the exact same amount: 0.00000772 BSV
https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/1217003661919801345

On the blockchain explorer: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv/address/1JGyfFYEweyKKKyDMgkZnPijEnU3EvVN7o