Time to change the "Negative Trust" description?

[TECSHARE]

Great. I am glad I took the time to make a thoughtful, logical, point by point reply just for you to run away because you feel like you have run out of arguments. Good show. Instead you opt for baseless claims that I want to let scammers freely scam. Who is the liar? Some one call chicken little, the sky is falling again. I have come up with an alternative, it is in the wall of text above.

You seemed to have missed everything I said. Re-read my previous posts, especially this part:

come up with an alternative to make things harder for them before they scam then we can't reach an agreement.
You can begin with these cases for example.

So you lie, avoid replying to main points, and accuse me of doing that?! Go away.

Funny, you completely ignore a giant detailed reply to each of your points then accuse me of avoiding replying to "main points". I didn't lie about anything, I explained myself using solid logic and replied to each of your points, point by point giving very specific alternatives. I am sorry if the hamster running the wheel in your brain has given up for the day and you have to resort to accusing me of lying and ignoring your arguments when I very clearly replied to each of them in an extremely detailed manner. Apparently your ego takes precedence over an intellectually honest discussion, but whats new?

P.S. learn how to use quotes.

[EcuaMobi]

Funny, you completely ignore a giant detailed reply to each of your points then accuse me of avoiding replying to "main points". I didn't lie about anything, I explained myself using solid logic and replied to each of your points, point by point giving very specific alternatives. I am sorry if the hamster running the wheel in your brain has given up for the day and you have to resort to accusing me of lying and ignoring your arguments when I very clearly replied to each of them in an extremely detailed manner. Apparently your ego takes precedence over an intellectually honest discussion, but whats new?

You go back to senseless insults as usual 
I've clearly made my point on my previous posts of this thread.

[TECSHARE]

Funny, you completely ignore a giant detailed reply to each of your points then accuse me of avoiding replying to "main points". I didn't lie about anything, I explained myself using solid logic and replied to each of your points, point by point giving very specific alternatives. I am sorry if the hamster running the wheel in your brain has given up for the day and you have to resort to accusing me of lying and ignoring your arguments when I very clearly replied to each of them in an extremely detailed manner. Apparently your ego takes precedence over an intellectually honest discussion, but whats new?

You go back to senseless insults as usual 
I've clearly made my point on my previous posts of this thread.

You mean like calling me a liar over an over when you run out of arguments? Good show old chap.

[EcuaMobi]

You mean like calling me a liar over an over when you run out of arguments? Good show old chap.

I'm sure you know what I mean. Your senses insults here and on most of your posts against me and others.
I'm not wasting more time with you. I should have stopped after your first lies.

[Vod]

So you lie, avoid replying to main points, and accuse me of doing that?! Go away.

He is doing this in a lot of places right now. 

There needs to be a simple form of due process here such as requiring a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating.

Which one did I do before you left a negative rating saying I am "mentally ill"?

[TECSHARE]

You mean like calling me a liar over an over when you run out of arguments? Good show old chap.

I'm sure you know what I mean. Your senses insults here and on most of your posts against me and others.
I'm not wasting more time with you. I should have stopped after your first lies.

Sure I know what you mean, and I don't agree, and I explained in detail why, point by point, but you refuse to respond. The word is senseless BTW.

How convenient you start with your hyperdeconstructivist attitude, I take the time to carefully reply in detail, then you just cry about it being a waste of time and you are suddenly above responding. BTW criticism of you, while you may find it insulting does not automatically make it an insult. Only you can control if you are insulted, and I am sorry your ego is to utterly fragile.

So you lie, avoid replying to main points, and accuse me of doing that?! Go away.

He is doing this in a lot of places right now. 

There needs to be a simple form of due process here such as requiring a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating.

Which one did I do before you left a negative rating saying I am "mentally ill"?

I see, so suddenly you want protection under my metric! Thanks for demonstrating its usefulness. Unfortunately we are not operating under my objective metric of a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws, we are operating under a subjective free for all, one you take full advantage of on a regular basis. Under the current standard we are operating under, even Theymos himself said leaving you a negative rating was completely valid, and after seeing you feign remorse and then move right back into unrepentant abuse just as you always do I decided to leave that rating for you because you more than earned it. As far as your mental illness, that is evident from your own continued unyielding escalation of unrepentant abusive behavior, but that is not why I left you the rating, I left it because you doxed and reported a user to the IRS as a form of retribution for their criticism of you. It is more than evident you have trouble controlling yourself.

[HCP]

What I've seen so far, tells me that my initial thoughts were somewhat correct... in that there are quite varied views on Trust, what it means (Positive vs. Negative), how it should be used and how it currently is being used.

Unfortunately, it looks like the pretty decent debate that we were having is starting to degenerate into off-topic/name calling etc. That being the case, I think I'll just stop it here before the thread gets any worse that it already is.

Thanks for all the responses, I appreciate it... it has certainly given me some food for thought.