Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 10:12:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Raspberry Pi cluster vs Graphic Card  (Read 265 times)
mitsos2017 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2019, 05:35:20 AM
 #1

I would like to know (if possible) if a Raspberry Pi Cluster could compeed a Graphic Card in a vanity address search (as a cheaper alternative).
I'll make an example:
You can buy a 1060 with $250 usd and make a cluster of 5 RPi3 with the same amount.
If the card "finds" a vanity address in 1 hour, would be possible for the cluster to find it earlier?
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ABCbits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 7403


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
May 09, 2019, 06:43:24 PM
Merited by dbshck (4)
 #2

Performance of a RPi3 very low, it's only as fast as Pentium III or IV (according to few benchmark i've seen as fast), there's no way it could beat GTX 1060.

But as a side note, NVIDIA release NVIDIA Jeston Nano which have powerful GPU (for barebone PC) with price $99, i don't know cluster of Jetson Nano could beat GTX 1060 for vanity address task, but it definitely far faster than RPi3.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
charlie137
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 220


(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ


View Profile WWW
May 10, 2019, 09:29:50 PM
 #3

did you consider AWS instead?

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

/__      ___ (  /    
\\--`-'-|`---\\ |      AXErunners
 |' _/   ` __/ / 
 '._  W    ,--'     
    |_:_._/
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 3208



View Profile
May 12, 2019, 07:00:16 AM
 #4

I haven't been keeping up with hash rates, but I wouldn't be surprised if a GPU is 50 - 100 times faster than a CPU. Given that an RPi is pretty wimpy, my guess is that it would take 100 - 200 Rpis to match a GPU.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
koch44
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 11


View Profile
May 13, 2019, 08:06:56 AM
 #5

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

BTC Python developer of various tools. Contact me for programming help (python/cuda)
keychainX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 374
Merit: 53

Telegram @keychainX


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2019, 11:41:01 AM
 #6

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX

koch44
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 11


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 11:29:49 AM
 #7

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX


thanks for the info! appreciate it

BTC Python developer of various tools. Contact me for programming help (python/cuda)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!