Did we actually really land on moon?

[TimeBits]

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

moon landing faked yes.
obama birth cert fake yes
entire usd money a scam yes
jfk killed by nixon and banker boys yes
mkultra yes
chemtrails yes
operation paperclip yes
flat earth no

A select few family's about to kill all of us, yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eenscggz-Pk         Weapon of mass destruction
Published on May 10, 2019 by me

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48383460           Facebook plans to launch 'GlobalCoin' currency in 2020
Published on May 24, 2019

[1713577191]

1713577191

[1713577191]

1713577191

[1713577191]

1713577191

[kotajikikox]

Isnt that astronomy gives us proof that theres some have been in the moon.
the astronomy landed in the moon.although theres no gravity in the moon so there are floating under the moon.
So amazing hopefuĺly someday they show as a more videos and proof that you can land and living for a while in the moon.

[Spendulus]

Isnt that astronomy gives us proof that theres some have been in the moon.
the astronomy landed in the moon.although theres no gravity in the moon so there are floating under the moon.
So amazing hopefuĺly someday they show as a more videos and proof that you can land and living for a while in the moon.

The entire Moon has been imaged and digitized at < 1/2 meter per pixel.

The database includes all the Apollo landing sites, and they show up quite clearly.

This was done starting in 2009 with the polar orbiting LIDAR.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/lunar_images/

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/exploration/moonVideo/index.shtml

A complete debunking of these idiotic Moon Conspiracy theories is as close as Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

[exemplaar]

+bonus: Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV | Movies & Television: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xE

So called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled.

[Spendulus]

*** garbage links deleted ****

So called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled.

What part?

Apollo launches through 8? 9? 10? 11?

Did the Saturn V exist?

Did the LEM exist?

What are the artifacts on the Moon at the exact locations of the Apollo landings?

[TimeBits]

.....

.....
this picture is pure gold.

No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

[BADecker]

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands? - Until you go and ask those who gave it, you will never know... and maybe even then you will never know.
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon? - Would you believe Buzz if he told you why?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon? - They didn't destroy it. They hid it, and certainly wouldn't tell YOU its location.
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector? - Why should it? It doesn't have anything to do with going to the moon.
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set? - Are you stupid? They aren't going to show us their actual top secret footage of what they really did. But, because it is a national thing, they want us to see what really went on. What better way than to make a movie of it?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage? - How in the world dense are some of you? The real footage was made in outer space in circumstances of extreme hot, cold, radiation, and who knows what else. So, they are trying to show you as accurately as possible what it really looked like, by placing images of whatever was really there, into the filming they made. Why? Because they want to be honest as they can without showing you the top secret stuff.
7) why is there strings? - Because string companies make string for us to use for lots of things around the house and yard. They even make bigger string called cord and rope.
8) why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage? - They placed the shadows there to satisfy some of you jokers who think that we never went to the moon. I mean, no matter what they did, you would still think that we never went - probably even if they had taken you along. So, to keep you happy, they threw in some multiple light-source shadows. Otherwise you wouldn't have anything to complain about.

Are you bald? If not, why don't you start to use your head for something more than a hair rack?

[Astargath]

+bonus: Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV | Movies & Television: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xE

So called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled.

''Simply put, the Apollo program that took us to the moon in the 1970’s was part of a technological ecosystem that has become antiquated over time, and would no longer be suitable for a lunar mission.''

Of course idiots like you would misinterpret anything when you need to, by using that quote you are directly saying that we DID land on the moon since he said we don't have the technology 'anymore' like we did in the past, you are a moron and you don't even realize it haha.

[Spendulus]

.....

.....
this picture is pure gold.

No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.

[TimeBits]

.....

.....
this picture is pure gold.

No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.

ok this your defense.

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

[Astargath]

.....

.....
this picture is pure gold.

No, your cartoons are not arguments.
Do you actually have any?

Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked.

1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands?
2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon?
3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon?
4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector?
5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set?
6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage?
7) why is there strings?
why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage?

All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords?

There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that?

The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman.

When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum.

So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?)

https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

You've believed a misquote from Buzz.

The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/

The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions.

Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right?

5,6,7 and 8 are garbage.

ok this your defense.

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

So a few youtube idiots found out NASA faked the moon landing but the whole russian intelligence and others didn't? Yeah sounds totally logical, do you realize they were competing against each other at that point, you think Russia would just let them lie and not see the ''strings'' you claim appear in the video LOL.

[Spendulus]

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!

[Astargath]

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!

I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH)

All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!!

[Spendulus]

1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock)
2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened.
3) you said they used up all the tech ( )
4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks)

5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.be

It was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images.

1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock.

2) You've been corrected, live with it.

3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right?

4) Now you're really not thinking.

123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down

The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging.

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/153

5,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid.

But if you really want to, go for it!

I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH)

All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!!

I've never even seen a logically consistent "didn't go moon" theory.

Like, okay. But did Apollo 8 go AROUND THE MOON? Did Grissom and the others die? Are there unmanned landers on the Moon? Where did our moon rocks come from if we didn't go there?

The rock issue is for me the big one, because one look at those rocks under a scope and if you have a slight understanding of geology, you know they didn't come from Earth. no way no how.

[sirazimuth]

~the usual drivel~

~load of bollocks~

~troll rubbish not worth quoting~

~same old same old....~

@Spendulus,

~childish memes... thinks he proves a point~

more of the same....

~ and of course this FE troll nutter chimes in wherever his buddy batty goes...~

Well then...
How did I guess that the FE batty and his twin nutjob sock xempy would  post their ridiculous garbage here ?
Small wonder, with a  thread title of "Did we actually really land on the moon" ...how could they not?

[notbatman]

The Moon is not a solid object, prove me wrong!

[TimeBits]

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther

[Astargath]

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther

''I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl'' So let me ask you this, you believe Buzz now, right? Did you believe the moon landing was real before hearing him saying that? Did you believe the moon landing was real when he said he went there for decades?

[MairaObergh]

Whether we land on the moon or not, it's one of those things where if we did, you're still going to have a bunch of people convinced that we didn't. Just because that's their personality.

[notbatman]

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Capricorn One starring OJ Simpson, a movie where NASA fakes a Mars landing. I think OJ was innocent, I'm going to recommend this movie.

The alleged wikileaks video shows fake moon landing footage, show me real footage if it's real! Oh that's right you can't because they erased the tapes. -- https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/13/1359562_us-moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-.html

The Eagle lander was a cardboard box wrapped in aluminum foil with roofing paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts. It's a structure a homeless methamphetamine addict builds to shelter himself from the elements.